For Immediate Release
Kirsten Stade (202) 265-7337
EPA Employees Blow the Whistle on Flawed Climate Bills
Agency Specialists Say Greenhouse Gas Offsets Unenforceable and Demand Probe
WASHINGTON - The major bills before Congress to regulate greenhouse gases to
combat global climate change suffer from "multiple unfixable flaws" that
undermine their effectiveness, according to a detailed congressional
disclosure by two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) employees,
posted today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility
(PEER). These agency experts' unofficial protest is also testing new
agency guidelines on employee free speech rights following EPA's order
last fall that the two employees remove a YouTube video they had
produced on the frailties of cap-and-trade.
The two EPA
employees, Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel, are enforcement attorneys
speaking as private citizens. They contend that the integrity failings
of greenhouse gas offsets, the lynchpin for major climate bills before
Congress, ensure that such legislation will be an ineffective - and
deceptive - waste of funds. Specifically, they argue that:
- The complexity and subjectivity of offsets renders them impossible to certify, regulate or enforce;
is no reliable way to distinguish offset projects which will occur
because of the offset incentive from those which would have happened
- In some cases, such as in the context of forestry
projects, the offsets will fail to appreciably mitigate demand and the
polluting activity (such as logging) will simply shift elsewhere; and
- The offsets will create perverse incentives to keep polluting activities legal so they can keep being sold as offsets.
Williams and Zabel assert that these offsets, in essence, are a new
"creative financial instrument" which carries the same deceptive
potential to bankrupt markets as did the creative instruments peddled on
Wall Street. The two ask for a congressional probe into the
reliability of any offset program before enactment.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The media landscape is changing fast
Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.
Change is coming. And we've got it covered.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
out as private citizens, Williams and Zabel are contradicting positions
endorsed by their own agency, the EPA, which attempted to silence them
last fall by demanding under threat of "disciplinary action" that they
remove a YouTube video that was critical of the offsets. EPA was
embarrassed by the public furor that ensued. Earlier this month, the
Office of Government Ethics posted a government-wide clarification of
its free speech policy (curiously dated March 19, 2010) that fails to
lay out clear guidance for when and under what circumstances its
employees may voice personal opinions.
In response, Williams and
Zabel noted that, "We are extremely grateful to our attorney, Tom
Devine of the Government Accountability Project, our EPA ethics
officials, and the White House ethics counsel for providing a
clarification that has allowed us to go forward with our dissent. While
we appreciate the recent resolution of our First Amendment dispute with
EPA, we are still troubled that federal employees have not received
greater clarity about their ability to discuss non-confidential
on-the-job experiences when engaged in personal non-commercial speech
regarding important issues of public concern." Added PEER Executive
Director Jeff Ruch, "Despite its rhetoric about openness, today's EPA
often suppresses open debate, both inside and outside its hallways, on
matters of vital public interest. Laurie and Allan work inside EPA but
they actually work for the public and, as public servants, seek to
better serve their true employers."
We want a more open and sharing world.
That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.
All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.
Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.
Please select a donation method:
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.