June, 17 2010, 12:19pm EDT
On Thursday, the Israel cabinet announced that the blockade would be
eased, allowing more of what it terms "civilian goods" into the
impoverished territory where 4 out of 5 people are dependent on
international aid.
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7413 5566,After hours: +44 7778 472 126,Email:,press@amnesty.org
Israel Gaza Blockade Must Be Completely Lifted
Amnesty International today urged Israel
to completely lift without delay its blockade on Gaza, which imposes a
collective punishment on 1.4 million Palestinians in clear violation of
international law.
LONDON
Amnesty International today urged Israel
to completely lift without delay its blockade on Gaza, which imposes a
collective punishment on 1.4 million Palestinians in clear violation of
international law.
On Thursday, the Israel cabinet announced that the blockade would be
eased, allowing more of what it terms "civilian goods" into the
impoverished territory where 4 out of 5 people are dependent on
international aid.
"This announcement makes it clear that Israel is not intending to
end its collective punishment of Gaza's civilian population, but only
ease it. This is not enough," said Malcolm Smart, Amnesty
International's director for the Middle East and North Africa.
"Any step that will help reduce the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza
is to be welcomed, but Israel must now comply with its obligations as
the occupying power under international law and immediately lift the
blockade."
"Just as important as allowing goods into Gaza is allowing exports
to leave Gaza, yet there is no mention of this in today's announcement.
Banning the vast majority of exports, raw materials and the movement of
people has destroyed the economy of Gaza, and pushed its population
into unemployment, poverty and dependency on aid agencies for
survival. These problems will not be solved while the blockade
continues."
According to media reports, Israel is to move from allowing only
listed products into Gaza, to using a list of products that will be
specifically prohibited.
It is not yet clear which products will remain prohibited and there
is also no mention of allowing the free movement of people, also a
human right under international law.
The current Israeli restrictions prevent the movement of
Palestinians through the crossing points from Gaza into Israel in all
but a handful of cases, generally in exceptional humanitarian cases.
This closure makes it extremely difficult for Palestinians in Gaza
to exit even to receive necessary medical treatment and virtually
impossible to leave for reasons such as visiting close family members
or taking up university places and jobs.
The Israeli authorities have previously put forward a range of
justifications for the blockade - saying that it is a response to
attacks from Palestinian armed groups, a reaction to the continued
holding of the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, and a means to
pressure the Hamas de facto administration.
Amnesty International has strongly condemned the firing of
indiscriminate weapons by Palestinian armed groups into southern Israel
as a violation of international law, but measures limiting civilian
goods, the movement of people and virtually banning export, target the
civilian population as a whole not the armed groups in particular.
"Any restrictions imposed on the movement of people and goods into
or out of Gaza must be proportionate and non-discriminatory", said
Malcolm Smart.
"Israel may need to carry out monitoring of entry points to Gaza for
security purposes, but that monitoring must be targeted at those
suspected of posing a security threat - not to the whole population"
Background
The Gaza Strip, along with East Jerusalem and the rest of the West
Bank, was occupied by Israel in 1967. Israel has imposed increasingly
severe restrictions on Palestinian movement into and out of Gaza since
the early 1990s, including on their movement to other parts of the
Occupied Palestinian Territories. This contradicts the principle,
accepted by international community, that the West Bank, including East
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip comprise one territorial unit and
violates the occupying power's duty to ensure the welfare of the
occupied population, as stipulated under Articles 27 and 47 of the
Fourth Geneva Convention.
Despite the withdrawal of Israeli settlers living illegally in Gaza
in 2005 (the process referred to by Israel as "disengagement") the
Israeli authorities have retained control of Gaza's airspace, its land
border with Israel and its territorial waters - as shown by its recent
military action against the humanitarian flotilla bound for Gaza in
which nine international activists were killed.
After Hamas took control in Gaza in June 2007, the existing Israeli
policy of closure was tightened to a blockade restricting the entry of
food, fuel, and other basic goods. Movement of medical cases in and out
of the area became restricted and delayed. Gazan families are not
allowed to visit relatives in Israeli jails. This situation was made
worse by the general closure of the Rafah crossing (Gaza's single
crossing point with Egypt) to daily use by the Egyptian authorities.
After 2007 Rafah was opened only intermittently to allow some
occasional movement.
Following Israel's military action on 31 May 2010 against the aid
flotilla in international waters outside Gaza, the Egyptian authorities
announced they were opening the Rafah crossing point 'indefinitely'.
However, Egypt has yet to permit fully free passage of Palestinians
into its territory, allowing entry only to Palestinians with specially
obtained permits.
As the occupying power, Israel bears the foremost responsibility for ensuring the welfare of the inhabitants of Gaza.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
LATEST NEWS
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular