

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Michael Mariotte, NIRS 301-270-6477
200 environmental, peace,
consumer, religious organizations and small
businesses today joined together to blast the Kerry-Lieberman
"climate" proposal as a taxpayer bailout of the nuclear power
industry and other dirty energy interests that would be ineffective at
addressing the climate crisis.
The groups pledged to oppose the
Kerry- Lieberman bill unless
substantial changes are made, including removing all support for nuclear
power.
"This bill is just
business-as-usual: taxpayer giveaways to giant
nuclear and other energy corporations wrapped in the guise of doing
something
about our climate crisis. To call this a climate bill is greenwashing in
the
extreme. We need to direct our resources to the fastest, cheapest,
cleanest and
safest means of reducing carbon emissions-this bill does just the
opposite," said Michael Mariotte,
executive director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a
national
organization based in Takoma Park, MD, which coordinated this statement.
"The climate crisis won't be
solved by increasing reliance
on the dirty energy technologies of the past." said Michael Keegan of
the
Michigan-based Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Great Lakes, "What we need
is
an all-out effort to implement the clean technologies that already exist
and
are improving daily: solar and wind power, distributed energy systems,
smart
grids, increased energy efficiency-these are the energy technologies of
the 21st century."
Among other provisions, the bill
is expected to:
*provide $54 billion in taxpayer
"loan guarantees" for
construction of new nuclear reactors. These "loan guarantees" would
actually be direct taxpayer loans from the government's Federal
Financing
Bank. It would also provide a 10% tax break to wealthy utilities for
nuclear
construction costs.
*create a "Clean Energy
Deployment Administration" (CEDA)
with the authority to provide unlimited taxpayer loans for new
reactor
construction without Congressional oversight.
*support dirty and dangerous
reprocessing technologies, authorize
billions of dollars in nuclear research and development, and
legislatively
attempt to speed the nuclear reactor licensing process despite a recent
report
from the Bipartisan Policy Center that found the industry is primarily
to blame
for the slow pace of licensing.
*continue to support offshore
oil drilling near much of the U.S. coastline
despite the calamitous BP oil spill.
*provide $10 billion for
wasteful and impossible "clean
coal" development.
*target a reduction in carbon
emissions of only 17% from 2005 levels by
2020-far lower than most scientists believe is necessary.
Groups in New England were particularly
upset at their
Senators' actions. "Senator John Kerry's blatant support of the
nuclear industry has left thousands of his Massachusetts
constituents questioning his judgment," said Sandra Gavutis, executive
director of C-10, a grassroots group in eastern Massachusetts.
"Senator
Joe Lieberman is the
nuclear power industries' best friend in the U.S. Senate. His support
for
a major federal loan guarantee for the nuclear power industry comes as
no
surprise. However, he does not represent the interests of the people of
Connecticut, who demand
investment instead in safe, clean, renewable energy," added Nancy Burton
of the Connecticut Coalition Against
Millstone.
In an affront to
environmentalists across the world, Senators Kerry and
Lieberman originally chose April 26-the 24th anniversary of
the Chernobyl
nuclear catastrophe-to unveil their "climate bill" that would
provide vast new government support for construction of new nuclear
reactors
and make future Chernobyl-like disasters even more likely. Only the
sudden
withdrawal of support for the bill by South Carolina Senator Lindsay
Graham
changed the bill's release date.
"Everyone needs to face the
tragic truth about the very real
consequences of nuclear catastrophe," says Glenn Carroll, coordinator of
Nuclear Watch South. "The Chernobyl
accident is still
happening as
wildlife intrudes the ruined reactor and spreads radiation around the
countryside. The massive concrete sarcophagus is 24 years old and
threatens to
collapse, initiating another deadly plume of radiation to the
environment. Sun
and wind promise us complete freedom from the untenable threat of
irreversible
nuclear contamination and our leaders must be pressed upon to heed
Chernobyl's warning
against investing in more nuclear reactors." Nuclear Watch South is
based
in Georgia where the giant
Southern Company is slated to receive the first government nuclear
payouts for
two new reactors at the Vogtle site near Augusta.
"In the past month we've
commemorated Chernobyl--the
worst man-made disaster in history--and seen two new disasters: a
massive oil
spill on our Gulf
Coast and a coal mine
explosion," said Mariotte. "Nuclear power, oil and coal are not
solutions to climate change, they are enormous environmental problems.
These
Senators should know better. The widespread opposition to this bill
indicated
by these 200 organizations indicates the American people want real
solutions to
the climate crisis, not more expensive bailouts for dirty energy
interests."
Signers listed by State
Patricia
Birnie
GE
Stockholders Alliance
Tucson, AZ
Jack
& Felice Cohen-Joppa
The
Nuclear Resister
Tucson, AZ
Russell
Lowes, Research Director
www.SafeEnergyAnalyst.org
Tucson, AZ
Stephen
M. Brittle
Don't Waste Arizona
Phoenix, AZ
Dave
Ewoldt
Executive
Director
Natural
Systems Solutions
Tucson, AZ
Bill
Cunningham
Southwest
Solar
Tucson, AZ
Julia
Rouvier
Flagstaff Nuclear
Awareness Project
Flagstaff, AZ
Christopher
Worcester
Solar
Wind Works
Truckee, CA
Elaine Holder, President
Mothers for Peace Action Committee
San Luis Obispo, CA
Robin
Bayer, President
Magic
Palo Alto, CA
Linda
Seeley
Terra Foundation
San Luis Obispo,
CA
Mary
Beth Brangan
EON, The Ecological Options Network
Bolinas, CA
Philip
Tymon, Administrative Director
Occidental Arts and Ecology
Center
Occidental, CA
Lillian
Light, President
The Environmental Priorities Network
Palos Verdes, CA
Leslie Sheridan, President
The Added Edge, Inc.
Vineburg, CA
Steven Gorelick
International Society for Ecology and
Culture
Berkeley, CA
Enid
Schreibman
Center
for Safe Energy
Berkeley, CA
Monroe Jeffrey
International Tribal Association
Perris, CA
Carol
Wiebe
Westhaven Center for the
Arts
Trinidad, CA
Joyce
McLean
Santa Cruz WILPF
Santa
Cruz, CA
Marylia Kelley
Tri-Valley CAREs
Communities Against a Radioactive Environment
Livermore, CA
Sheldon Plotkin
Southern California Federation of Scientists
Los Angeles, CA
Bernice Fischer
Peninsula
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Palo Alto, CA
Guenn
Johnsen-Gentry
Director
of Education and Outreach
North Valley Food Co-op
Redding, CA
Albert G Cohen
Southern
California
Ecumenical
Council
Pasadena,
CA
Todd
Steiner, Executive Director
Turtle Island Restoration
Network
Forest
Knolls, CA
Patricia Krommer C.S.J.
Sisters of St. Joseph
Los Angeles, CA
Wendy
Oser
Nuclear
Guardianship Project
Berkeley, CA
Dorothy Holland, Co-Chair
Santa Barbara Branch
Women's International League for Peace
& Freedom
Santa Barbara, CA
Ananda
Lee Tan
North American Program Coordinator
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
Berkeley, CA
Free
Soil Party of the U.S.
Los Angeles, CA
Mark
Moulton
Fund For Peace Initiatives
Menlo Park, CA
Evan
Ravitz, Founder
Vote.org
Boulder, CO
Lezley Suleiman
President, Tallahassee Area Community
Canon City, CO
Judi Friedman,
Chair
PACE (Peoples
Action for Clean Energy, Inc.)
Canton, CT
Nancy Burton
Connecticut Coalition
Against Millstone
Redding Ridge, CT
Paula Panzarella
Fight the Hike
New Haven, CT
Alan Muller,
Executive Director
Green Delaware
Port
Penn, DE
Jim
Riccio
Jay Marx, Campaign Coordinator
Proposition One Committee for Nuclear
Disarmament and Economic Conversion
Washington, DC
Donald Keesing
Coordinator
Voices Opposed To Environmental Racism
Washington, DC
Jim
Walker
No
Nukes Now
Tallassahee, FL
Marilyn
Blackwell
Help Save the
Apalachicola River Group
Wewahitchka, FL
Cara
Campbell, Chair
Ecology
Party of Florida,
Ft.
Lauderdale, FL
Nancy O'Byrne
Pax Christi Northeast
Florida
St. Augustine, FL
John Hedrick
Panhandle
Citizens
Coalition
Tallahassee, FL
Dick
Glick
Corporation for Future Resources
Tallahassee, FL
Rev. Dr.
Kathleen A.
Bishop
Rabbi Barry Silver
Social Justice League of Palm Beach County
Lake Worth, FL
Joyce
Tarnow, President
Floridians
for a Sustainable Population
Cross
City, FL
Sue Michalson, chair
The Village Greens Environmental
Club
The Villages, FL
Michael Canney
Alachua County Green
Party
Gainesville, FL
Glenn Carroll
Nuclear Watch
South
Atlanta, GA
Tom Ferguson
Foundation
for Global
Community
Atlanta, GA
Bob Darby
Food Not
Bombs
Atlanta, GA
Bobbie Paul, Executive Director
Georgia WAND
Atlanta, GA
Adele
Kushner, Executive
Director
Action for a Clean Environment
Alto, GA
Roy H. Taylor III
Choosing Green
Canton, GA
Andrea
Shipley, Executive Director
Snake
River Alliance
Boise, ID
Dave
Kraft
Nuclear
Energy Information Service
Chicago, IL
Carolyn
Treadway
No New
Nukes
Normal, IL
Carol Stark,
Director
Citizens
Against Ruining the Environment-C.A.R.E.
Lockport IL
Maureen Headington
Stand Up/Save Lives Campaign
Burr Ridge, IL
Cheryl Becker
Body Wisdom Incorporated
Lake Bluff, IL
John E. Surette, SJ
Spiritearth
La Grange Pk, IL
John Blair, president
Valley
Watch, Inc.
Evansville, IN
Ann Suellentrop
Physicians for Social Responsibility Kansas City Chapter
Kansas City, KS
Nancy Givens, CoChair
BGGreen Partnership for a Sustainable
Community
Bowling Green, KY
Corinne
Whitehead, President
Coalition
for Health Concern, Inc.
Benton, KY
W. H. Herke, Ph.D.
Citizens for a Clean Environment
Baton Rouge, LA
Deb Katz
Citizens Awareness Network
Shelburne Falls, MA
Sandra
Gavutis, Executive Director
C-10
Foundation
Newburyport, MA
Nancy Munger and Laura Roskos,
Co-Presidents
WILPF, U.S. Section
Boston, MA
Hugh Harwell, MRP
Ecological Planner, Designer &
Builder
Sirius Ecovillage
Shutesbury, MA
Margaret Sheehan, President
Biomass Accountability Project, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Andree Collier & Ken Ward
Jamaica Plain Green
House
Jamaica Plain, MA
Jonathan Mark,
Publisher, Flyby News
Wendell Depot, MA
D.O.,
Glen & Jean
The
Enviro Show
WXOJ-LP
& WMCB
Florence, MA
Virginia Pratt
Boston Branch,
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Boston, MA
David
Starr, Director
GREEN Northampton
Northampton, MA
Brent
Baeslack, Co-chair
Haverhill Environmental League
Haverhill MA
William S. Linnell
Cheaper, Safer Power
Portland, ME
Bradshaw
Cummings
Peace Action Maine
Portland, ME
Michael Mariotte, Executive Director
Nuclear
Information and Resource Service
Takoma Park, MD
Max Obuszewski
Baltimore Nonviolence
Center
Baltimore, MD
Ken Bossong,
Executive Director
SUN DAY Campaign
Takoma Park, MD
Kevin Kamps
Beyond Nuclear
Takoma Park, MD
Angela Flynn, Coordinator
Teach Environmental
Awareness for Community Health
Bethesda, MD
Gwen Dubois
Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility
Baltimore, MD
Dagmar Fabian
Crabshell
Alliance
Baltimore, MD
Keith Gunter
Citizens'
Resistance at Fermi Two
Monroe, MI
Alice Hirt
Don't Waste
Michigan
Holland, MI
Michael J.
Keegan
Coalition for
a Nuclear-Free Great Lakes
Monroe, MI
Joel Welty, Executive Director
Michigan Alliance of Cooperatives
Blanchard, MI
Eugenia
Bajorek
SJF
& PCUUC Peace and Justice
Oakland, MI
Derek Grigsby
The Detroit Peoples Water
Board
Detroit, MI
Vic
Macks
Michigan Stop the
Nuclear Bombs Campaign
Detroit, MI
Amber Garlan
Green Party of St. Paul
St. Paul, MN
Judi
Poulson, Chair
Fairmont
MN Peace Group
Fairmont, MN
Danene Provencher
West Metro Global Warming Action Group
Mound, MN
Susu Jeffrey, Founder
Friends of Coldwater
Twin Cities, MN
Jean Chovan, Joy Johnson
Co-chairs
Southeastern Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers
Rochester, MN
Mark
Haim
Missourians
for Safe Energy
Columbia, MO
Chris Daum
Oasis Montana Inc.
Renewable Energy Supply & Design
Stevensville, MT
Buffalo Bruce
Western Nebraska Resources Council
Chadron, NE
Steve
Larrick, President
South Salt Creek Community Organization
Lincoln, NE
Peggy Maze Johnson
Citizen
Alert
Las Vegas, NV
Doug
Bogen
Executive Director
Seacoast Anti-Pollution League
Portsmouth, NH
Paula Gotsch
GRAMMES
Normandy Beach, NJ
Lori Gold
Genesis Farm
Blairstown, NJ
Janet
Greenwald
Citizens
for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping
Albuquerque, NM
Joni Arends, Executive Director
Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety
Santa Fe, NM
Lesley Weinstock, Coordinator
Aguq es Vida Action Team (AVAT)
Albuquerque, NM
Marian Naranjo, Director
Honor Our Pueblo Existence (H.O.P.E.)
Espanola, NM
Penelope
McMullen, SL
Loretto
Community
Santa
Fe, NM
John Boomer
MASE (Multicultural Alliance For A Safe Environment)
Albuquerque, NM
Pam Gilchrist
Network
of Spiritual Progressives
Santa Fe, NM
Greg Mello
Los Alamos Study Group
Albuquerque, NM
Alice Slater
Nuclear Age
Peace Foundation, NY
New York, NY
Barbara Warren
Executive Director
Citizens' Environmental Coalition
Albany, NY
Arnold Gore
Consumers Health Freedom Coalition
New York, NY
Stanley Romaine, Chair
Great
Neck SANE/Peace Action
Great
Neck, NY
Gerald R.
Lotierzo, Co-Chair
Peace Action
of Central
New York
JK Canepa, Co-Founder
New York Climate Action Group
New York, NY
Aresh Javadi, Executive Director
The More Gardens!
Fund
New York, NY
Ann
Eagan
Green
Party NYC
New York, NY
James Rauch, Secretary
F.A.C.T.S. (For A Clean Tonawanda Site)
Alden, NY
Conrad Miller M.D.
Founder
Physicians
For Life
Watermill, NY
Elaine
Donovan, co-founder
Concerned Citizens for Peace
Honeoye, NY
Jim Warren,
Executive Director
NC WARN
Raleigh, NC
Lewis E. Patrie, MD, Chair
Western N. C. Physicians for Social
Responsibility
Asheville, NC
E.M.T. O'Nan, Director
Protect All Children's Environment
Marion, NC
Robert Eidus
Eagle Feather Organic Farm
Marshall, NC
Wells
Eddleman, Staff
Scientist
NC Citizens Research Group
Durham NC
Ed King
Triangle
Greens
Pittsboro, NC
Roberta Dees
Carolina
Green Sense
Charlotte, NC
Connie Kline
Ohio Citizens
Against a Radioactive Environment
CARE
Willoughby Hills, OH
Chris Borello, President
Concerned
Citizens of Lake Twp./Uniontown IEL Superfund Site, OH
Terry J. Lodge, Convenor
Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy
Toledo, OH
Karen Hansen,
State Director
Ohio
Conference on Fair Trade
Columbus, OH
Marilyn
McCullough
The Carrie
Dickerson Foundation
Tulsa, OK
B.A. Geary
Citizens Action for Safe Energy
Tulsa, OK
Nina Bell,
J.D.,
Executive Director
Northwest
Environmental
Advocates
Portland, OR
Betsy
Toll
Living
Earth Gatherings
Portland, OR
Dona
Hippert J.D., President
Oregon Toxics
Alliance
Eugene, OR
Paige
Knight, President
Hanford Watch
Portland, OR
Chuck
Johnson
Center
for Energy Research
Portland, OR
Lloyd Marbet, Executive Director
Oregon Conservancy Foundation
Boring, OR
Peter
Bergel
Oregon PeaceWorks
Salem, OR
Lynn Sims
Don't Waste Oregon
Portland, OR
David
Hughes
Citizen
Power
Pittsburgh, PA
Dr. Lewis
Cuthbert
Alliance For A Clean Environment
Pottstown, PA
Ernest Fuller
Concerned
Citizens for SNEC Safety
Six
Mile Run, PA
Mike
Ewall
Energy
Justice Network
Philadelphia, PA
Zoey
Alderman-Tuttle
Student
Green Team of Mercyhurst
College
Erie, PA
Eric Epstein
Three Mile Island Alert
Harrisburg, PA
Katharine Dodge, President
Northeast PA Audubon Society
Honesdale, PA
Uke Jackson
Uke Jackson Productions, Inc.
Delaware Water Gap,
PA
Mary Elizabeth Clark
SSJ Earth
Center
Philadelphia, PA
Terri MacKenzie SHCJ
The EcoSpirituality Group, American Province Sisters of the Holy
Child
Rosemont, PA
Nancy Tate
LEPOCO Peace
Center
Bethlehem, PA
I.K.
Samways Chair
Green
Party of Pennsylvania
Harrisburg, PA
Sandy Hazley, Chair
Green Party of Allegheny County
Pittsburgh, PA
Bill Belitskus, Board President
Allegheny Defense Project (ADP)
Kane, PA
Joe
Martin
McKean County Citizens Against Nuclear Waste
Bradford, PA
Patricia Hval, Chair
Westerly Peak Oil Task Force
Westerly, RI
William Smith, III
USA Nica Windpower, Inc.
Jamestown, RI
Finian Taylor
Hilton
Head for Peace
Hilton
Head, SC
Louise
Gorenflo, moderator
Know Nuclear
Crossville TN
Kathleen
Ferris, Co-Founder
Citizens to
End Nuclear Dumping in TN
Murfreesboro, TN
Irucka
Embry
EcoC2S
(EcoCsquaredS)
Murfreesboro/Nashville,
TN
Eric
Lewis, Administrator
Cumberland Green Bioregional Council
Nashville, TN
Cynthia Weehler
Energia
Mia
San Antonio, TX
Jerry Stein, President
Peace Farm
Amarillo, TX
Mary
Schneider
The Holographic Repatterning Institute At Austin
Austin, TX
Marisol Cortez, Climate Justice Organizer
Southwest Workers' Union
San Antonio, TX
Peggy
and Melodye Pryor
No
Bonds for Billioniares
Andrews,
TX
Joseph L. Goldman, Ph.D, CCM
Technical Director
International Center for the
Solution of Environmental Problems
Alpine, TX
Gary Stuard
Founder/Executive Director
Interfaith Environmental
Alliance (IEA)
Dallas, TX
Elena Day
Peoples'
Alliance for
Clean Energy
Charlottesville, VA
Jason Von Kundra, President
GMU Environmental
Action Group
Fairfax, VA
Joe
Cook
Council Coordinator
Hampton Roads
MoveOn.org
Norfolk, VA
Brian
Tokar
Institute
for Social Ecology
Plainfield, VT
Beth
Champagne
North Country
Coalition for Justice and Peace
St. Johnsbury, VT
Crystal
Zevon
Farm
Fresh Market and Cafe
Barre, VT
Randy
Kehler, Co-Coordinator
Safe
& Green Campaign
Brattleboro, VT
Debra
Stoleroff
Vermont Yankee
Decommissioning Alliance
Montpelier, VT
Ariel
Zevon
Local
Agricultural Community Exchange
Barre, VT
Rachel
Smolker
Climate
SOS
VT
Gerry
Pollet, JD;
Executive Director,
Heart of America
Northwest
Seattle, WA
Chris
Herman
Winter
Sun Design
Edmonds, WA
Marianne
Edain
Whidbey
Environmental Action Network
Langley, WA
John
LaForge
Nukewatch
Luck,
WI
Judy Miner, Executive Director
Wisconsin Network for
Peace and Justice
Madison WI
Guy Wolf
Coulee
Region Progressives
Stoddard, WI
Gail
Vaugh
DownRiver
Alliance
Ferryville, WI
Irene Mehlos
Merrill Peace Study
Merrill, WI
Christopher
LaForge
Great Northern Solar
Port Wing, WI
Northern Futures Foundation
Port Wing, WI
Kickapoo Peace Circle
Viroqua, WI
Al Gedicks
Wisconsin Resources
Protection Council
La Crosse, WI
Nuclear Information and Resource Service is the information and networking center for people and organizations concerned about nuclear power, radioactive waste, radiation, and sustainable energy issues.
“The United States and Russia already have enough deployed nuclear weapons to kill tens of millions of people in an hour and devastate the world," said one expert, warning a lapse will "only make the world less safe."
If New START expires on Thursday, it will be the first time in decades that the United States and Russia don't have a nuclear arms control treaty, and experts have been sounding the alarm about the arms race that likely lies ahead.
“The expiration of New START would be massively destabilizing and potentially very costly both in terms of economics and security," said Jennifer Knox, a research and policy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists' (UCS) Global Security Program, in a Tuesday statement.
"The United States and Russia already have enough deployed nuclear weapons to kill tens of millions of people in an hour and devastate the world," Knox pointed out. "Letting New START lapse would erase decades of hard-won progress and only make the world less safe."
New START was signed in April 2010, under the Obama administration, and entered into force the following February. A decade later, just days into the Biden administration, it was renewed for five years. In 2022, Russia invaded neighboring Ukraine—an ongoing conflict—and the next year, Russian President Vladimir Putin suspended his country's participation in the treaty, though he has not withdrawn.
"The global security environment facing the United States is very different from when New START was first negotiated, but it remains true that bounding an open-ended, costly arms race will still require some form of agreement between Washington and Moscow," said Ankit Panda, the Stanton senior fellow in the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's Nuclear Policy Program, in a statement.
"The public and lawmakers alike must recognize that we are on the cusp of a fundamentally new nuclear age—one that is more unpredictable, complex, and dangerous than anything we've witnessed post-Cold War," warned Panda, one of the experts participating in a Wednesday briefing about the treaty. "A big risk is that without any quantitative limits or hands-on verification, we'll end up with compounding worst-case-scenario thinking in both capitals, as during the Cold War."
While Putin has halted US inspections of Russian nuclear facilities, he has still proposed extending the treaty for a year. Tara Drozdenko, director of the UCS Global Security Program, said that "abiding by New START for another year would be a win-win-win for the United States, Russia, and the rest of the world... The Trump administration should take swift action to publicly acknowledge that the United States will continue to abide by New START in the interim."
However, US President Donald Trump—who fancies himself as a deal-maker—hasn't expressed an interest in fighting for the pact, telling the New York Times last month that "if it expires, it expires," and "I'd rather do a new agreement that's much better."
Trump has called for China—which has the most nuclear weapons after Russia and the United States, and is building up its arsenal—to be part of a new deal, but Beijing hasn't signaled it will do so. Putin has proposed participation from France and the United Kingdom. The other nuclear-armed nations are India, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan.
Noting Trump's comments to the Times and aspiration for the Chinese government to join, Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at the think tank Defense Priorities, declared that "this is wishful thinking–if the administration thinks getting a new 'better' treaty after this one lapses will be easy, they are mistaken."
"New START's end brings few benefits and lots of risks to the United States, especially as Washington tries to stabilize relations with rivals like Russia and China," she said, suggesting that Trump "would be better off hanging on to the agreement he has a little longer before trying to get a better one."
Dmitry Medvedev, a Putin ally who signed the treaty while serving as president and is now deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, said in a Monday interview with Reuters, TASS, and the WarGonzo project that "our proposal remains on the table, the treaty has not yet expired, and if the Americans want to extend it, that can be done."
"For almost 60 years, we haven't had a situation where strategic nuclear potentials weren't limited in some way. Now such a situation is possible," he noted. "I spent almost my entire life, starting from 1972, under the umbrella of the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty."
"In some ways, even with all the costs, it is still an element of trust," Medvedev said. "When such a treaty exists, there is trust. When it doesn't, that trust is exhausted. The fact that we are now in this situation is clear evidence of a crisis in international relations. This is absolutely obvious."
Considering New START's potential expiration this week, the Russian leader said that "I don't want to say that this immediately means a catastrophe and a nuclear war, but it should still alert everyone. The clock that is ticking will, in this case, undoubtedly accelerate again."
According to Reuters, he was referencing the Doomsday Clock. Last week, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' Science and Security Board set the symbolic clock at 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to global catastrophe, citing various developments, including a failure to extend the treaty, Russian weapons tests, and China's growing arsenal.
"In 2025, it was almost impossible to identify a nuclear issue that got better," Jon B. Wolfsthal, a board member and director of global risk at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), said last week. "More states are relying more intently on nuclear weapons, multiple states are openly talking about using nuclear weapons for not only deterrence but for coercion. Hundreds of billions are being spent to modernize and expand nuclear arsenals all over the world, and more and more non-nuclear states are considering whether they should acquire their own nuclear weapons or are hedging their nuclear bets."
"Instead of stoking the fires of the nuclear arms competition, nuclear states are reducing their own security and putting the entire planet at risk. Leaders of all states must relearn the lessons of the Cold War—no one wins a nuclear arms race, and the only way to reduce nuclear dangers is through binding agreement to limit the size and shape of their nuclear arsenals," he argued. "Nuclear states and their partners need to invest now in proven crisis communication and risk reduction tools, recommit to preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, refrain from nuclear threats, and pursue a more predictable and stable global security system."
Regarding New START specifically, FAS Nuclear Information Project associate director Matt Korda stressed this week that "we are about to enter an era of unconstrained nuclear competition without any guardrails. Not only will there no longer be anything stopping the nuclear superpowers from nearly doubling their deployed nuclear arsenals, but they would now be doing so in an environment of mutual distrust, opacity, and worst-case thinking."
"While New START was a bilateral agreement between Russia and the United States, its expiration will have far-reaching consequences for the world," he said. "There are no benefits from a costly arms buildup that brings us right back to where we started, but there would be real advantages in pursuing transparency and predictability in an otherwise unpredictable world."
“I have lost my faith in the integrity of how we do our work and our commitment to principled reporting on the facts and application of the law,” said resigning staffer Omar Shakir.
Two Human Rights Watch employees—the group's entire Israel-Palestine team—resigned after senior staffers blocked a report calling Israel's denial of Palestinian refugees' right of return to their homeland a crime against humanity.
Jewish Currents' Alex Kane reported Tuesday that HRW Israel-Palestine team lead Omar Shakir and assistant researcher Milena Ansari are stepping down over leadership's decision to nix the report, which was scheduled for release on December 4. Shakir wrote in his resignation email that one senior HRW leader informed him that calling Israel's denial of Palestinian right of return would be seen as a call to “demographically extinguish the Jewishness of the Israeli state.”
“I have lost my faith in the integrity of how we do our work and our commitment to principled reporting on the facts and application of the law,” Shakir—who is also member of Jewish Currents' advisory board—wrote in his resignation letter. “As such, I am no longer able to represent or work for Human Rights Watch.”
In an interview published Tuesday by Drop Site News, Shakir—who was deported from Israel in 2019 over his advocacy of Palestinian rights—said: “I’ve given every bit of myself to the work for a decade. I’ve defended the work in very, very difficult circumstances... The refugees I interviewed deserve to know why their stories aren’t being told."
Ansari said that "whatever justification" HRW leadership "had for pausing the report is not based on the law or facts."
The resignations underscored tensions among HRW staffers over how to navigate a potential political minefield while conducting legal analysis and reporting of Israeli policies and practices in the illegally occupied Palestinian territories.
As Kane reported:
The resignations have roiled one of the most prominent human rights groups in the world just as HRW’s new executive director, Philippe Bolopion, begins his tenure. In a statement, HRW said that the report “raised complex and consequential issues. In our review process, we concluded that aspects of the research and the factual basis for our legal conclusions needed to be strengthened to meet Human Rights Watch’s high standards.” They said that “the publication of the report was paused pending further analysis and research,” and that the process was “ongoing.”
Kenneth Roth, a longtime former HRW executive director, defended the group's decision to block the report, asserting on social media that Bolopion "was right to suspend a report using a novel and unsupported legal theory to contend that denying the right to return to a locale is a crime against humanity."
However, Shakir countered that HRW "found in 2023 denial of a return to amount to a crime against humanity in Chagos."
"This is based on [International Criminal Court] precedent," he added. "Other reports echoed the analysis. Are you calling on HRW to retract a report for its first time ever, or it just different rules for Palestine?"
Polis Project founder Suchitra Vijayan said on X Tuesday that "the decision by Human Rights Watch’s leadership to pull a report on the right of return for Palestinian refugees, after it had cleared internal review, legal sign-off, and publication preparation, demands public reckoning."
"This was not a draft in dispute and the explanation offered so far evades the central issue of 'institutional independence' in the face of political pressure," added Vijayan, who is also a professor at Columbia and New York universities. "Why was the report stopped, and what does this decision signals for the future of its work and credibility on Palestine?"
Offering "solidarity to Omar and Milena" on social media, Medical Aid for Palestinians director of advocacy and campaigns Rohan Talbot said that "Palestinian rights are yet again exceptionalized, their suffering trivialized, and their pursuit of justice forestalled by people who care more about reputation and expediency than law and justice."
Sarah Leah Whitson, HRW's former Middle East and North Africa director and currently executive director at Democracy for the Arab World Now, told Drop Site News on Tuesday that “We have once again run into Human Rights Watch’s systemic ‘Israel Exception,’ with work critical of Israel subjected to exceptional review and arbitrary processes that no other country work faces."
The modern state of Israel was established in 1948 largely through a more than decadelong campaign of terrorism against both the British occupiers of Palestine and Palestinian Arabs and the ethnic cleansing of the latter. More than 750,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled from their homeland, sometimes via massacres or the threat thereof, in what Arabs call the Nakba, or catastrophe.
More than 400 Palestinian villages were destroyed or abandoned, and their denizens—some of whom still hold the keys to their stolen homes—have yet to return. Today, they and their descendants number more than 7 million, all of whom have been denied the right of return affirmed in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194.
Many Palestinians and experts around the world argue that the Nakba never ended—a position that has gained attention over the past 28 months, as Israel has faced mounting allegations of genocide for a war that's left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing in the coastal strip and around 2 million people forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened.
Bolopion told Kane Tuesday that the controversy over the blocked report is “a genuine and good-faith disagreement among colleagues on complex legal and advocacy questions."
“HRW remains committed to the right of return for all Palestinians, as has been our policy for many years," he added.
As some Democrats suggest compromising in order to reform the agency, Rep. Rashida Tlaib said that “ICE was built on violence and is terrorizing neighborhoods. It will not change.”
President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed a bill to end a brief government shutdown after the US House of Representatives narrowly passed the $1.2 trillion funding package.
While the bill keeps most of the federal government funded until the end of September, lawmakers sidestepped the question of funding for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which Democrats have vowed to block absent reforms to rein in its lawless behavior after the shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis and a rash of other attacks on civil rights.
The bill, which passed on Tuesday by a vote of 217-214, extends funding for ICE's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), for just two weeks, setting up a battle in the coming weeks on which the party remains split.
While most Democrats voted against Tuesday's measure, 21 joined the bulk of Republicans to drag it just over the line, despite calls from progressive activists and groups, such as MoveOn, which Axios said peppered lawmakers with letters urging them to use every bit of "leverage" they can to force drastic changes at the agency.
House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who voted for the bill, acknowledged that it was "a leverage tool that people are giving up," but said funding for the rest of the government took precedence.
The real fight is expected to take place over the next 10 days, with DHS funding set to run out on February 14.
ICE will be funded regardless of whether a new round of DHS funding passes, since Republicans already passed $170 billion in DHS funding in last year's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Democrats in both the House and Senate have laid out lists of reforms they say Republicans must acquiesce to if they want any additional funding for ICE, including requirements that agents nationwide wear body cameras, get judicial warrants for arrests, and adhere to a code of conduct similar to those for state and local law enforcement.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair emerita of the Congressional Progressive Caucus who voted against Tuesday's bill reiterated that in order to pass longterm DHS funding, "there must be due process, a requirement for judicial warrants and bond hearings; every agent must not only have a bodycam but also be required to use it, take off their masks, and, in cases of misconduct, undergo immediate, independent investigations."
Some critics have pointed out that ICE agents already routinely violate court orders and constitutional requirements, raising questions about whether new laws would even be enforceable.
A memo issued last week, telling agents they do not need to obtain judicial warrants to enter homes, has been described as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Despite this, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said on Tuesday that Republicans will not even consider negotiating the warrant requirement, calling it "unworkable."
"We cannot trust this DHS, which has already received an unprecedented funding spike for ICE, to operate within the bounds of our Constitution or our laws," Jayapal said. "And for that reason, we cannot continue to fund them without significant and enforceable guardrails."
According to recent polls, the vast majority of Democratic voters want to go beyond reforms and push to abolish ICE outright. In the wake of ICE's reign of terror in Minneapolis, it's a position that nearly half the country now holds, with more people saying they want the agency to be done away with than saying they want it preserved.
"The American people are begging us to stop sending their tax dollars to execute people in the streets, abduct 5-year-olds, and separate families," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who gathered with other progressive lawmakers in the cold outside DHS headquarters on Tuesday. "ICE was built on violence and is terrorizing neighborhoods. It will not change... No one should vote to send another cent to DHS."
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who comes from the Minnesota Somali community targeted by Trump's operation there, agreed: "This rogue agency should not receive a single penny. It should be abolished and prosecuted."