May, 12 2010, 11:24am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Michael Mariotte, NIRS 301-270-6477
Grassroots Clean Energy/Environmental Groups: Kerry-Lieberman Dirty Energy Bill Is No Solution to Climate Crisis
TAKOMA PARK, Md.
200 environmental, peace,
consumer, religious organizations and small
businesses today joined together to blast the Kerry-Lieberman
"climate" proposal as a taxpayer bailout of the nuclear power
industry and other dirty energy interests that would be ineffective at
addressing the climate crisis.
The groups pledged to oppose the
Kerry- Lieberman bill unless
substantial changes are made, including removing all support for nuclear
power.
"This bill is just
business-as-usual: taxpayer giveaways to giant
nuclear and other energy corporations wrapped in the guise of doing
something
about our climate crisis. To call this a climate bill is greenwashing in
the
extreme. We need to direct our resources to the fastest, cheapest,
cleanest and
safest means of reducing carbon emissions-this bill does just the
opposite," said Michael Mariotte,
executive director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a
national
organization based in Takoma Park, MD, which coordinated this statement.
"The climate crisis won't be
solved by increasing reliance
on the dirty energy technologies of the past." said Michael Keegan of
the
Michigan-based Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Great Lakes, "What we need
is
an all-out effort to implement the clean technologies that already exist
and
are improving daily: solar and wind power, distributed energy systems,
smart
grids, increased energy efficiency-these are the energy technologies of
the 21st century."
Among other provisions, the bill
is expected to:
*provide $54 billion in taxpayer
"loan guarantees" for
construction of new nuclear reactors. These "loan guarantees" would
actually be direct taxpayer loans from the government's Federal
Financing
Bank. It would also provide a 10% tax break to wealthy utilities for
nuclear
construction costs.
*create a "Clean Energy
Deployment Administration" (CEDA)
with the authority to provide unlimited taxpayer loans for new
reactor
construction without Congressional oversight.
*support dirty and dangerous
reprocessing technologies, authorize
billions of dollars in nuclear research and development, and
legislatively
attempt to speed the nuclear reactor licensing process despite a recent
report
from the Bipartisan Policy Center that found the industry is primarily
to blame
for the slow pace of licensing.
*continue to support offshore
oil drilling near much of the U.S. coastline
despite the calamitous BP oil spill.
*provide $10 billion for
wasteful and impossible "clean
coal" development.
*target a reduction in carbon
emissions of only 17% from 2005 levels by
2020-far lower than most scientists believe is necessary.
Groups in New England were particularly
upset at their
Senators' actions. "Senator John Kerry's blatant support of the
nuclear industry has left thousands of his Massachusetts
constituents questioning his judgment," said Sandra Gavutis, executive
director of C-10, a grassroots group in eastern Massachusetts.
"Senator
Joe Lieberman is the
nuclear power industries' best friend in the U.S. Senate. His support
for
a major federal loan guarantee for the nuclear power industry comes as
no
surprise. However, he does not represent the interests of the people of
Connecticut, who demand
investment instead in safe, clean, renewable energy," added Nancy Burton
of the Connecticut Coalition Against
Millstone.
In an affront to
environmentalists across the world, Senators Kerry and
Lieberman originally chose April 26-the 24th anniversary of
the Chernobyl
nuclear catastrophe-to unveil their "climate bill" that would
provide vast new government support for construction of new nuclear
reactors
and make future Chernobyl-like disasters even more likely. Only the
sudden
withdrawal of support for the bill by South Carolina Senator Lindsay
Graham
changed the bill's release date.
"Everyone needs to face the
tragic truth about the very real
consequences of nuclear catastrophe," says Glenn Carroll, coordinator of
Nuclear Watch South. "The Chernobyl
accident is still
happening as
wildlife intrudes the ruined reactor and spreads radiation around the
countryside. The massive concrete sarcophagus is 24 years old and
threatens to
collapse, initiating another deadly plume of radiation to the
environment. Sun
and wind promise us complete freedom from the untenable threat of
irreversible
nuclear contamination and our leaders must be pressed upon to heed
Chernobyl's warning
against investing in more nuclear reactors." Nuclear Watch South is
based
in Georgia where the giant
Southern Company is slated to receive the first government nuclear
payouts for
two new reactors at the Vogtle site near Augusta.
"In the past month we've
commemorated Chernobyl--the
worst man-made disaster in history--and seen two new disasters: a
massive oil
spill on our Gulf
Coast and a coal mine
explosion," said Mariotte. "Nuclear power, oil and coal are not
solutions to climate change, they are enormous environmental problems.
These
Senators should know better. The widespread opposition to this bill
indicated
by these 200 organizations indicates the American people want real
solutions to
the climate crisis, not more expensive bailouts for dirty energy
interests."
Signers listed by State
Patricia
Birnie
GE
Stockholders Alliance
Tucson, AZ
Jack
& Felice Cohen-Joppa
The
Nuclear Resister
Tucson, AZ
Russell
Lowes, Research Director
www.SafeEnergyAnalyst.org
Tucson, AZ
Stephen
M. Brittle
Don't Waste Arizona
Phoenix, AZ
Dave
Ewoldt
Executive
Director
Natural
Systems Solutions
Tucson, AZ
Bill
Cunningham
Southwest
Solar
Tucson, AZ
Julia
Rouvier
Flagstaff Nuclear
Awareness Project
Flagstaff, AZ
Christopher
Worcester
Solar
Wind Works
Truckee, CA
Elaine Holder, President
Mothers for Peace Action Committee
San Luis Obispo, CA
Robin
Bayer, President
Magic
Palo Alto, CA
Linda
Seeley
Terra Foundation
San Luis Obispo,
CA
Mary
Beth Brangan
EON, The Ecological Options Network
Bolinas, CA
Philip
Tymon, Administrative Director
Occidental Arts and Ecology
Center
Occidental, CA
Lillian
Light, President
The Environmental Priorities Network
Palos Verdes, CA
Leslie Sheridan, President
The Added Edge, Inc.
Vineburg, CA
Steven Gorelick
International Society for Ecology and
Culture
Berkeley, CA
Enid
Schreibman
Center
for Safe Energy
Berkeley, CA
Monroe Jeffrey
International Tribal Association
Perris, CA
Carol
Wiebe
Westhaven Center for the
Arts
Trinidad, CA
Joyce
McLean
Santa Cruz WILPF
Santa
Cruz, CA
Marylia Kelley
Tri-Valley CAREs
Communities Against a Radioactive Environment
Livermore, CA
Sheldon Plotkin
Southern California Federation of Scientists
Los Angeles, CA
Bernice Fischer
Peninsula
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Palo Alto, CA
Guenn
Johnsen-Gentry
Director
of Education and Outreach
North Valley Food Co-op
Redding, CA
Albert G Cohen
Southern
California
Ecumenical
Council
Pasadena,
CA
Todd
Steiner, Executive Director
Turtle Island Restoration
Network
Forest
Knolls, CA
Patricia Krommer C.S.J.
Sisters of St. Joseph
Los Angeles, CA
Wendy
Oser
Nuclear
Guardianship Project
Berkeley, CA
Dorothy Holland, Co-Chair
Santa Barbara Branch
Women's International League for Peace
& Freedom
Santa Barbara, CA
Ananda
Lee Tan
North American Program Coordinator
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
Berkeley, CA
Free
Soil Party of the U.S.
Los Angeles, CA
Mark
Moulton
Fund For Peace Initiatives
Menlo Park, CA
Evan
Ravitz, Founder
Vote.org
Boulder, CO
Lezley Suleiman
President, Tallahassee Area Community
Canon City, CO
Judi Friedman,
Chair
PACE (Peoples
Action for Clean Energy, Inc.)
Canton, CT
Nancy Burton
Connecticut Coalition
Against Millstone
Redding Ridge, CT
Paula Panzarella
Fight the Hike
New Haven, CT
Alan Muller,
Executive Director
Green Delaware
Port
Penn, DE
Jim
Riccio
Greenpeace
Washington DC
Jay Marx, Campaign Coordinator
Proposition One Committee for Nuclear
Disarmament and Economic Conversion
Washington, DC
Donald Keesing
Coordinator
Voices Opposed To Environmental Racism
Washington, DC
Jim
Walker
No
Nukes Now
Tallassahee, FL
Marilyn
Blackwell
Help Save the
Apalachicola River Group
Wewahitchka, FL
Cara
Campbell, Chair
Ecology
Party of Florida,
Ft.
Lauderdale, FL
Nancy O'Byrne
Pax Christi Northeast
Florida
St. Augustine, FL
John Hedrick
Panhandle
Citizens
Coalition
Tallahassee, FL
Dick
Glick
Corporation for Future Resources
Tallahassee, FL
Rev. Dr.
Kathleen A.
Bishop
Rabbi Barry Silver
Social Justice League of Palm Beach County
Lake Worth, FL
Joyce
Tarnow, President
Floridians
for a Sustainable Population
Cross
City, FL
Sue Michalson, chair
The Village Greens Environmental
Club
The Villages, FL
Michael Canney
Alachua County Green
Party
Gainesville, FL
Glenn Carroll
Nuclear Watch
South
Atlanta, GA
Tom Ferguson
Foundation
for Global
Community
Atlanta, GA
Bob Darby
Food Not
Bombs
Atlanta, GA
Bobbie Paul, Executive Director
Georgia WAND
Atlanta, GA
Adele
Kushner, Executive
Director
Action for a Clean Environment
Alto, GA
Roy H. Taylor III
Choosing Green
Canton, GA
Andrea
Shipley, Executive Director
Snake
River Alliance
Boise, ID
Dave
Kraft
Nuclear
Energy Information Service
Chicago, IL
Carolyn
Treadway
No New
Nukes
Normal, IL
Carol Stark,
Director
Citizens
Against Ruining the Environment-C.A.R.E.
Lockport IL
Maureen Headington
Stand Up/Save Lives Campaign
Burr Ridge, IL
Cheryl Becker
Body Wisdom Incorporated
Lake Bluff, IL
John E. Surette, SJ
Spiritearth
La Grange Pk, IL
John Blair, president
Valley
Watch, Inc.
Evansville, IN
Ann Suellentrop
Physicians for Social Responsibility Kansas City Chapter
Kansas City, KS
Nancy Givens, CoChair
BGGreen Partnership for a Sustainable
Community
Bowling Green, KY
Corinne
Whitehead, President
Coalition
for Health Concern, Inc.
Benton, KY
W. H. Herke, Ph.D.
Citizens for a Clean Environment
Baton Rouge, LA
Deb Katz
Citizens Awareness Network
Shelburne Falls, MA
Sandra
Gavutis, Executive Director
C-10
Foundation
Newburyport, MA
Nancy Munger and Laura Roskos,
Co-Presidents
WILPF, U.S. Section
Boston, MA
Hugh Harwell, MRP
Ecological Planner, Designer &
Builder
Sirius Ecovillage
Shutesbury, MA
Margaret Sheehan, President
Biomass Accountability Project, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Andree Collier & Ken Ward
Jamaica Plain Green
House
Jamaica Plain, MA
Jonathan Mark,
Publisher, Flyby News
Wendell Depot, MA
D.O.,
Glen & Jean
The
Enviro Show
WXOJ-LP
& WMCB
Florence, MA
Virginia Pratt
Boston Branch,
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Boston, MA
David
Starr, Director
GREEN Northampton
Northampton, MA
Brent
Baeslack, Co-chair
Haverhill Environmental League
Haverhill MA
William S. Linnell
Cheaper, Safer Power
Portland, ME
Bradshaw
Cummings
Peace Action Maine
Portland, ME
Michael Mariotte, Executive Director
Nuclear
Information and Resource Service
Takoma Park, MD
Max Obuszewski
Baltimore Nonviolence
Center
Baltimore, MD
Ken Bossong,
Executive Director
SUN DAY Campaign
Takoma Park, MD
Kevin Kamps
Beyond Nuclear
Takoma Park, MD
Angela Flynn, Coordinator
Teach Environmental
Awareness for Community Health
Bethesda, MD
Gwen Dubois
Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility
Baltimore, MD
Dagmar Fabian
Crabshell
Alliance
Baltimore, MD
Keith Gunter
Citizens'
Resistance at Fermi Two
Monroe, MI
Alice Hirt
Don't Waste
Michigan
Holland, MI
Michael J.
Keegan
Coalition for
a Nuclear-Free Great Lakes
Monroe, MI
Joel Welty, Executive Director
Michigan Alliance of Cooperatives
Blanchard, MI
Eugenia
Bajorek
SJF
& PCUUC Peace and Justice
Oakland, MI
Derek Grigsby
The Detroit Peoples Water
Board
Detroit, MI
Vic
Macks
Michigan Stop the
Nuclear Bombs Campaign
Detroit, MI
Amber Garlan
Green Party of St. Paul
St. Paul, MN
Judi
Poulson, Chair
Fairmont
MN Peace Group
Fairmont, MN
Danene Provencher
West Metro Global Warming Action Group
Mound, MN
Susu Jeffrey, Founder
Friends of Coldwater
Twin Cities, MN
Jean Chovan, Joy Johnson
Co-chairs
Southeastern Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers
Rochester, MN
Mark
Haim
Missourians
for Safe Energy
Columbia, MO
Chris Daum
Oasis Montana Inc.
Renewable Energy Supply & Design
Stevensville, MT
Buffalo Bruce
Western Nebraska Resources Council
Chadron, NE
Steve
Larrick, President
South Salt Creek Community Organization
Lincoln, NE
Peggy Maze Johnson
Citizen
Alert
Las Vegas, NV
Doug
Bogen
Executive Director
Seacoast Anti-Pollution League
Portsmouth, NH
Paula Gotsch
GRAMMES
Normandy Beach, NJ
Lori Gold
Genesis Farm
Blairstown, NJ
Janet
Greenwald
Citizens
for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping
Albuquerque, NM
Joni Arends, Executive Director
Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety
Santa Fe, NM
Lesley Weinstock, Coordinator
Aguq es Vida Action Team (AVAT)
Albuquerque, NM
Marian Naranjo, Director
Honor Our Pueblo Existence (H.O.P.E.)
Espanola, NM
Penelope
McMullen, SL
Loretto
Community
Santa
Fe, NM
John Boomer
MASE (Multicultural Alliance For A Safe Environment)
Albuquerque, NM
Pam Gilchrist
Network
of Spiritual Progressives
Santa Fe, NM
Greg Mello
Los Alamos Study Group
Albuquerque, NM
Alice Slater
Nuclear Age
Peace Foundation, NY
New York, NY
Barbara Warren
Executive Director
Citizens' Environmental Coalition
Albany, NY
Arnold Gore
Consumers Health Freedom Coalition
New York, NY
Stanley Romaine, Chair
Great
Neck SANE/Peace Action
Great
Neck, NY
Gerald R.
Lotierzo, Co-Chair
Peace Action
of Central
New York
JK Canepa, Co-Founder
New York Climate Action Group
New York, NY
Aresh Javadi, Executive Director
The More Gardens!
Fund
New York, NY
Ann
Eagan
Green
Party NYC
New York, NY
James Rauch, Secretary
F.A.C.T.S. (For A Clean Tonawanda Site)
Alden, NY
Conrad Miller M.D.
Founder
Physicians
For Life
Watermill, NY
Elaine
Donovan, co-founder
Concerned Citizens for Peace
Honeoye, NY
Jim Warren,
Executive Director
NC WARN
Raleigh, NC
Lewis E. Patrie, MD, Chair
Western N. C. Physicians for Social
Responsibility
Asheville, NC
E.M.T. O'Nan, Director
Protect All Children's Environment
Marion, NC
Robert Eidus
Eagle Feather Organic Farm
Marshall, NC
Wells
Eddleman, Staff
Scientist
NC Citizens Research Group
Durham NC
Ed King
Triangle
Greens
Pittsboro, NC
Roberta Dees
Charlotte, NC
Connie Kline
Ohio Citizens
Against a Radioactive Environment
CARE
Willoughby Hills, OH
Chris Borello, President
Concerned
Citizens of Lake Twp./Uniontown IEL Superfund Site, OH
Terry J. Lodge, Convenor
Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy
Toledo, OH
Karen Hansen,
State Director
Ohio
Conference on Fair Trade
Columbus, OH
Marilyn
McCullough
The Carrie
Dickerson Foundation
Tulsa, OK
B.A. Geary
Citizens Action for Safe Energy
Tulsa, OK
Nina Bell,
J.D.,
Executive Director
Northwest
Environmental
Advocates
Portland, OR
Betsy
Toll
Living
Earth Gatherings
Portland, OR
Dona
Hippert J.D., President
Oregon Toxics
Alliance
Eugene, OR
Paige
Knight, President
Hanford Watch
Portland, OR
Chuck
Johnson
Center
for Energy Research
Portland, OR
Lloyd Marbet, Executive Director
Oregon Conservancy Foundation
Boring, OR
Peter
Bergel
Oregon PeaceWorks
Salem, OR
Lynn Sims
Don't Waste Oregon
Portland, OR
David
Hughes
Citizen
Power
Pittsburgh, PA
Dr. Lewis
Cuthbert
Alliance For A Clean Environment
Pottstown, PA
Ernest Fuller
Concerned
Citizens for SNEC Safety
Six
Mile Run, PA
Mike
Ewall
Energy
Justice Network
Philadelphia, PA
Zoey
Alderman-Tuttle
Student
Green Team of Mercyhurst
College
Erie, PA
Eric Epstein
Three Mile Island Alert
Harrisburg, PA
Katharine Dodge, President
Northeast PA Audubon Society
Honesdale, PA
Uke Jackson
Uke Jackson Productions, Inc.
Delaware Water Gap,
PA
Mary Elizabeth Clark
SSJ Earth
Center
Philadelphia, PA
Terri MacKenzie SHCJ
The EcoSpirituality Group, American Province Sisters of the Holy
Child
Rosemont, PA
Nancy Tate
LEPOCO Peace
Center
Bethlehem, PA
I.K.
Samways Chair
Green
Party of Pennsylvania
Harrisburg, PA
Sandy Hazley, Chair
Green Party of Allegheny County
Pittsburgh, PA
Bill Belitskus, Board President
Allegheny Defense Project (ADP)
Kane, PA
Joe
Martin
McKean County Citizens Against Nuclear Waste
Bradford, PA
Patricia Hval, Chair
Westerly Peak Oil Task Force
Westerly, RI
William Smith, III
USA Nica Windpower, Inc.
Jamestown, RI
Finian Taylor
Hilton
Head for Peace
Hilton
Head, SC
Louise
Gorenflo, moderator
Know Nuclear
Crossville TN
Kathleen
Ferris, Co-Founder
Citizens to
End Nuclear Dumping in TN
Murfreesboro, TN
Irucka
Embry
EcoC2S
(EcoCsquaredS)
Murfreesboro/Nashville,
TN
Eric
Lewis, Administrator
Cumberland Green Bioregional Council
Nashville, TN
Cynthia Weehler
Energia
Mia
San Antonio, TX
Jerry Stein, President
Peace Farm
Amarillo, TX
Mary
Schneider
The Holographic Repatterning Institute At Austin
Austin, TX
Marisol Cortez, Climate Justice Organizer
Southwest Workers' Union
San Antonio, TX
Peggy
and Melodye Pryor
No
Bonds for Billioniares
Andrews,
TX
Joseph L. Goldman, Ph.D, CCM
Technical Director
International Center for the
Solution of Environmental Problems
Alpine, TX
Gary Stuard
Founder/Executive Director
Interfaith Environmental
Alliance (IEA)
Dallas, TX
Elena Day
Peoples'
Alliance for
Clean Energy
Charlottesville, VA
Jason Von Kundra, President
GMU Environmental
Action Group
Fairfax, VA
Joe
Cook
Council Coordinator
Hampton Roads
MoveOn.org
Norfolk, VA
Brian
Tokar
Institute
for Social Ecology
Plainfield, VT
Beth
Champagne
North Country
Coalition for Justice and Peace
St. Johnsbury, VT
Crystal
Zevon
Farm
Fresh Market and Cafe
Barre, VT
Randy
Kehler, Co-Coordinator
Safe
& Green Campaign
Brattleboro, VT
Debra
Stoleroff
Vermont Yankee
Decommissioning Alliance
Montpelier, VT
Ariel
Zevon
Local
Agricultural Community Exchange
Barre, VT
Rachel
Smolker
Climate
SOS
VT
Gerry
Pollet, JD;
Executive Director,
Heart of America
Northwest
Seattle, WA
Chris
Herman
Winter
Sun Design
Edmonds, WA
Marianne
Edain
Whidbey
Environmental Action Network
Langley, WA
John
LaForge
Nukewatch
Luck,
WI
Judy Miner, Executive Director
Wisconsin Network for
Peace and Justice
Madison WI
Guy Wolf
Coulee
Region Progressives
Stoddard, WI
Gail
Vaugh
DownRiver
Alliance
Ferryville, WI
Irene Mehlos
Merrill Peace Study
Merrill, WI
Christopher
LaForge
Great Northern Solar
Port Wing, WI
Northern Futures Foundation
Port Wing, WI
Kickapoo Peace Circle
Viroqua, WI
Al Gedicks
Wisconsin Resources
Protection Council
La Crosse, WI
Nuclear Information and Resource Service is the information and networking center for people and organizations concerned about nuclear power, radioactive waste, radiation, and sustainable energy issues.
LATEST NEWS
Abortion Defenders Decry 'Baseless' Attack on Mifepristone as SCOTUS Hears Case
"The overturn of Roe was just the first step in the far right's relentless campaign to restrict women's reproductive freedom," said one advocate. "We always knew they would come for medication abortion, too."
Mar 26, 2024
As the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in a case brought by right-wing activists seeking to sharply limit access to a commonly used abortion pill, reproductive rights advocates renewed warnings that Republicans' endgame isn't just making abortion a states' rights issue, but rather forcing a nationwide ban on all forms of the medical procedure.
Thehigh court justices—including six conservatives, half of them appointed by former President Donald Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—are hearing oral arguments in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a case brought by the right-wing Alliance Defending Freedom on behalf of anti-abortion doctors. The case involves the abortion pill known by the generic name mifepristone, which was first approved by the FDA in 2000 as part of a two-drug protocol to terminate early-stage pregnancies.
"If the Supreme Court refuses to follow the evidence and imposes medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone, it will be just another stepping stone in the anti-abortion movement's end goal of a nationwide ban on abortion."
"Mifepristone has been used by millions of women over the last 20 years, and its safety and effectiveness have been well-documented," said Jamila Taylor, president and CEO of the Institute for Women's Policy Research. "The drug has taken on even greater importance for women's health since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, and the far right has moved to block women's access to healthcare at every turn."
In a dubious practice known as "judge shopping," the plaintiffs filed their complaint in Amarillo, Texas, where Matthew Kacsmaryk, the sole federal district judge and a Trump appointee, ruled last April that the FDA's approval of mifepristone was illegal. Shortly after Kacsmaryk's ruling, a federal judge in Washington state issued a contradictory decision that blocked the FDA from removing mifepristone from the market. The U.S. Department of Justice subsequently appealed Kacsmaryk's ruling.
Later in April 2023, the Supreme Court issued a temporary order that allowed mifepristone to remain widely available while legal challenges continued. A three-judge panel of the right-wing 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last August that the FDA's 2016 move to allow mifepristone to be taken later in pregnancy, mailed directly to patients, and prescribed by healthcare professionals other than doctors, was likely illegal. However, the court also allowed the pill to remain on the market pending the outcome of litigation.
In an analysis of the case published Tuesday, jurist Amy Howe explained:
There are three separate questions before the justices on Tuesday. The first one is whether the challengers have a legal right to sue, known as standing, at all. The FDA maintains that they do not, because the individual doctors do not prescribe mifepristone and are not obligated to do anything as a result of the FDA's decision to allow other doctors to prescribe the drug.
The court of appeals held that the medical groups have standing because of the prospect that one of the groups' members might have to treat women who had been prescribed mifepristone and then suffered complications—which, the FDA stresses, are "exceedingly rare"—requiring emergency care. But the correct test, the FDA and [mifepristone maker] Danco maintain, is not whether the groups' members will suffer a possible injury, but an imminent injury.
Destiny Lopez, acting co-CEO of the Guttmacher Institute, called the plaintiffs' claims "baseless."
"If the Supreme Court refuses to follow the evidence and imposes medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone, it will be just another stepping stone in the anti-abortion movement's end goal of a nationwide ban on abortion," she said on Tuesday. "As the court weighs its decision, let's be clear that the only outcome that respects facts and science is maintaining full access to mifepristone."
As more than 20 states have banned or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court's June 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling overturnedRoe v. Wade and voided half a century of federal abortion rights, people have increasingly turned to medication abortion to terminate unwanted pregnancies. And while Republicans have often claimed that overturning Roe was not meant to ban all abortions but merely to leave the issue up to the states, GOP-authored forced pregnancy bills and statements by Republican lawmakers and candidates including Trump—who last week endorsed a 15-week national ban—belie conservatives' goal of nationwide prohibition.
Project 2025, a coalition of more than 100 right-wing groups including Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America and other anti-abortion organizations, wants to require the FDA to ban drugs used for medication abortions, protect employers who refuse to include contraceptive coverage in insurance plans, and increase surveillance of abortion and maternal mortality reporting. The coalition is reportedly drafting executive orders through which Trump, if reelected, could roll back Biden administration policies aimed at protecting and expanding abortion access.
"The overturn of Roe was just the first step in the far right's relentless campaign to restrict women's reproductive freedom. We always knew they would come for medication abortion, too," Taylor said. "But conservatives seeking to block access to mifepristone are not concerned about women's safety; they want to block all abortion options for women and prevent them from making their own reproductive decisions, even in their own homes."
Right-wing groups including the Heritage Foundation have been pressing Trump to invoke the Comstock laws, a series of anti-obscenity statutes passed in 1873 during the Ulysses S. Grant administration. One of the laws outlawed using the U.S. Postal Service to send contraceptives and punished offenders with up to five years' hard labor. Named after Victorian-era anti-vice crusader and U.S. postal inspector Anthony Comstock, the laws were condemned by progressives of the day, with one syndicated newspaper editorial accusing Comstock of striking "a dastard's blow at liberty and law in the United States."
Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern said Tuesday that far-right Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito—who wrote the majority opinion in Dobbs—"are clearly eager to revive the Comstock Act as a nationwide ban on medication abortion, and maybe procedural abortion, too."
"That would subject abortion providers in all 50 states to prosecution and imprisonment," he added. "No congressional action needed."
Progressive U.S. lawmakers joined reproductive rights advocates in rallying outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
"Mifepristone is safe and effective and has been used in our country for decades," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). "These far-right justices need to stop legislating from the bench."
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) asserted that "medication abortion is safe, effective, and routine healthcare."
"Over half of U.S. abortions are done this way and we have decades of scientific evidence to back up its safety," she added. "SCOTUS must protect access to mifepristone and we must affirm abortion care as the human right that it is."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Experts Warn of Toxins in GM Corn Amid US-Mexico Trade Dispute
"The Mexican government is both wise and on solid ground in refusing to allow its people to participate in the experiment that the U.S. government is seeking to impose."
Mar 26, 2024
Friends of the Earth U.S. on Monday released a brief backing Mexico's ban on genetically modified corn for human consumption, which the green group recently submitted to a dispute settlement panel charged with considering the U.S. government's challenge to the policy.
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced plans to phase out the herbicide glyphosate as well as genetically modified (GM) or genetically engineered (GE) corn in 2020. Last year he issued an updated decree making clear the ban does not apply to corn imports for livestock feed and industrial use. Still, the Biden administration objected and, after fruitless formal negotiations, requested the panel under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
"The U.S. government has not presented an 'appropriate' risk assessment to the tribunal as called for in the USMCA dispute because such an assessment has never been done in the U.S. or anywhere in the world," said agricultural economist Charles Benbrook, who wrote the brief with Kendra Klein, director of science at Friends of the Earth U.S.
"The U.S. is, in effect, asking Mexico to trust the completeness and accuracy of the initial GE corn safety assessments carried out 15 to 30 years ago by the companies working to bring GE corn events to market."
The group's 13-page brief lays out health concerns related to GM corn and glyphosate, and the shortcomings of U.S. analyses and policies. It also stresses the stakes of the panel's decision, highlighting that "corn is the caloric backbone of the Mexican food supply, accounting, on average, for 50% of the calories and protein in the Mexican diet."
Blasting the Biden administration's case statement to the panel as "seriously deficient," Klein said Monday that "it lacks basic information about the toxins expressed in contemporary GMO corn varieties and their levels. The U.S. submission also ignores dozens of studies linking the insecticidal toxins and glyphosate residues found in GMO corn to adverse impacts on public health."
The brief explains that "since the commercial introduction of GE corn in 1996 and event-specific approvals in the 1990s and 2000s, dramatic changes have occurred in corn production systems. There has been an approximate four-fold increase in the number of toxins and pesticides applied on the average hectare of contemporary GE industrial corn compared to the early 1990s. Unfortunately, this upward trend is bound to continue, and may accelerate."
The U.S. statement's assurances about risks from Bacillus thuringiensis or vegetative insecticidal protein (Bt/VIP) residues "are not based on data and science," the brief warns.
"The U.S. is, in effect, asking Mexico to trust the completeness and accuracy of the initial GE corn safety assessments carried out 15 to 30 years ago by the companies working to bring GE corn events to market," the document says. "The Mexican government is both wise and on solid ground in refusing to allow its people to participate in the experiment that the U.S. government is seeking to impose on Mexico."
"The absence of any systematic monitoring of human exposure levels to Bt/VIP toxins and herbicides from consumption of corn-based foods is regrettable," the brief adds. "It is also unfortunate that the U.S. government rejected the Mexican proposal to jointly design and carry out a modern battery of studies able to overcome gaps in knowledge regarding GE corn impacts."
"The U.S. government's case against Mexico has no more scientific merit than its sham GMO regulatory regime, and should be rejected by the USMCA dispute resolution panel."
Friends of the Earth isn't the only U.S.-based group formally supporting the Mexican government in the USMCA process. The Center for Food Safety sent a 10-page submission by science director Bill Freese, an expert on biotech regulation, to the panel on March 15. His analysis addresses U.S. regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) along with the risks of GM corn and glyphosate.
"GMO regulation in the U.S. was crafted by Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, and is a critical part of our government's promotion of the biotechnology industry," Freese said last week, referring to the company known for the glyphosate-based weedkiller Roundup. "The aim is to quell concerns and promote acceptance of GMOs, domestically and abroad, rather than critically evaluate potential toxicity or allergenicity."
His submission notes that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration "does not require a GE plant developer to do anything prior to marketing its GE crop or food derived from it. Instead, FDA operates what it calls a voluntary consultation program that is designed to enhance consumer confidence and speed GE crops to market."
"When governmental review is optional; and even when it's conducted, starts and ends with the regulated company's safety assurance—what's the point?" Freese asked. "Clearly, it's the PR value of a governmental rubber stamp."
"The Mexican government's prohibition of GM corn for tortillas and other masa corn products is fully justified," he asserted. "The U.S. government's case against Mexico has no more scientific merit than its sham GMO regulatory regime, and should be rejected by the USMCA dispute resolution panel."
In a Common Dreams opinion piece last week, Ernesto Hernández-López, a law professor at Chapman University in California, pointed out that Mexico's recent submission to the panel also "offers scientific proof and lots of it," including "over 150 scientific studies, referred to in peer-review journals, systemic research reviews, and more."
"Mexico incorporates perspectives from toxicology, pediatrics, plant biology, hematology, epidemiology, public health, and data mining, to name a few," he wrote. "This clearly and loudly responds to American persistence. The practical result: American leaders cannot claim there is no science supporting the decree. They may disagree with or dislike the findings, but there is proof."
The Biden administration's effort to quash the Mexican policy notably comes despite the lack of impact on trade. While implementing its ban last year, "Mexico also made its largest corn purchase from the U.S., 15.3 million metric tons," National Geographicreported last month.
Kenneth Smith Ramos, former Mexican chief negotiator for the USMCA, told the outlet that "right now, it may not have a big economic impact because what Mexico is using to produce flour, cornmeal, and tortillas is a very small percentage of their overall imports; but that does not mean the U.S. is not concerned with this being the tip of the iceberg."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Out-of-Touch Billionaire' Larry Fink Blasted for Calling 65 a 'Crazy' Retirement Age
"I love how rich people are treated as sources of great wisdom when they obviously don't know their ass from their elbow," said one economist.
Mar 26, 2024
Larry Fink, the billionaire CEO of the world's largest asset management firm, wrote in his annual letter to investors on Tuesday that it is "a bit crazy" that 65 is viewed as a sensible retirement age in the United States, drawing swift backlash from Social Security defenders and policy analysts.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, replied that the CEO of BlackRock apparently doesn't know the U.S. already raised the full retirement age for Social Security to 67 under a law passed during the Reagan administration—a change that inflicted benefit cuts across the board.
"I love how rich people are treated as sources of great wisdom when they obviously don't know their ass from their elbow," Baker wrote on social media.
While Fink, who is 71, wrote that "no one should have to work longer than they want to," he argued that "our conception of retirement" must change, pointing specifically to the Netherlands' decision to gradually raise its retirement age and tie it to life expectancy. (Fink does not mention that life expectancy in the U.S. has been trending downward in recent years.)
"When people are regularly living past 90, what should the average retirement age be?" Fink wrote. "How do we encourage more people who wish to work longer, with carrots rather than sticks?"
Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams in response to the BlackRock CEO's letter that "Larry Fink is the definition of an out-of-touch billionaire."
"He is welcome to work as long as he wants to, but that doesn't mean that everyone else—including people who do demanding physical labor—should work until they die," said Lawson.
"Half of Americans age 65 and older are living on less than $30,000 per year. This is absurd. Congress must expand Social Security."
Roughly half of older Americans have no retirement savings, a fact that Fink acknowledged in his letter.
While progressive lawmakers such as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have called on policymakers to expand Social Security benefits by forcing rich people like Fink to contribute more to the program, the BlackRock CEO argued that the private sector and federal government should team up to "ensure that future generations can live out their final years with dignity."
"What should that national effort do? I don't have all the answers," Fink added. "But what I do have is some data and the beginnings of a few ideas from BlackRock’s work. Because our core business is retirement."
Fink's letter comes days after the Republican Study Committee—a panel comprised of around 80% of the House GOP caucus—released a budget proposal calling for "modest adjustments to the retirement age for future retirees to account for increases in life expectancy" in a purported bid to "secure Social Security solvency for decades to come."
But progressives argue that rather than slashing benefits for new retirees to shore up the program, Congress should lift the payroll tax cap that allows the ultra-rich to pay the same amount into Social Security as someone who makes $168,600 a year.
Fink, for example, has a base salary of around $1.5 million. With the current payroll tax cap in place, Fink stopped paying into Social Security less than a month and a half into 2024.
"In the U.S. today, 12 million seniors are dealing with food insecurity," Sanders wrote on social media Tuesday. "Half of Americans age 65 and older are living on less than $30,000 per year. This is absurd. Congress must expand Social Security."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular