May, 06 2010, 03:58pm EDT
A Decade Later, Million Mom March Endures As a Force to Save Lives
WASHINGTON
Ten years ago, on Mother's Day 2000, some three-quarters of a million
people gathered on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. for the largest
demonstration in history supporting stricter gun laws.
Painstakingly
constructed through word of mouth, basement phone banks and Kinko's
copies by a ragtag band of volunteers with almost no organizing
experience, the crowd stunningly exceeded expectations. The event
revitalized the national push for common-sense gun laws to protect
America's children and gave birth to a broad national network of
activists. Satellite events in 73 cities added nearly a quarter of a
million more activists to the day's remarkable place in the history of
the fight against gun violence.
As the Million Mom March celebrates its 10th anniversary,
the event has left in its historical wake a web of activists who remain
committed to the struggle against gun violence despite the difficulty of
passing federal legislation during the tenure of the Bush
Administration. Its leaders have built strong Chapters and local
coalitions that have helped to pass strong gun laws on the local and
state levels.
The urgency for national action continues: since
that day of bright skies and warm air, an estimated 872,247 Americans
have been killed or injured with firearms. .
The Million Mom
March - whose volunteers joined forces with the Brady Campaign to
Prevent Gun Violence in 2001 - has Chapters
nationwide, and volunteers have played an instrumental role in
passing both local and state laws across the country. The Chapters are
continuing their local activities and are currently working to persuade
their U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators to support pending
legislation in Congress to close the gun show loophole.
"We're
making progress all the time. I am proud to say that here in my home
state of California, elected officials know who we are and they know
that there's a cost to crossing us," says Mary Leigh Blek, who served as
the President of the Million Mom March organization after the event on
the Mall. "We have made progress in our communities, but now we need to
turn our energy to passing federal legislation."
On May 14,
2000, with buses of activists pulling into Washington D.C. from
virtually every state in the nation, the Washington Post and ABC News
reported the results of a poll of 1,068 adults showing that about one in
10 reported having been shot at and nearly one in four had experienced a
gun pointed at them. A 400-pound bell made of melted firearms was
rung. A "Wall of Death" carried the names of 4,001 gun violence
victims. Women's movement leaders like Rosie O'Donnell, Susan Sarandon
and Melissa Etheridge were joined by elected officials including
Congresswomen Connie Morella of Maryland and Carolyn McCarthy of New
York, and many others. The crowd included thousands of children.
Few
might have believed back then that the activists would stay committed,
but they have. In fact, two days after the 2000 March, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote,
"in this cynical, media-saturated time, it's hard for anyone to conceive
of something so old-fashioned as a political movement with members who
sustain their commitment over time and do unglamorous organizing work
when cameras aren't around."
It certainly has been unglamorous
most of the time, says Joan Peterson, a Brady Campaign board member and
the President of the Minnesota Million Mom Chapters.
"There's
nothing glamorous about manning a table outside a grocery store on a
cold Duluth winter day, or pulling weeds in a memorial garden, or phone
banking members of the state legislature, but that's how we get things
done here in Minnesota," Peterson said. "And I know my fellow Moms all
around the country do the same basics, so we can make a difference and
reduce gun violence."
Million Mom March founder Donna
Dees-Thomases, who once said her band of organizers had "never organized
anything more complicated than a car pool," authored a compelling book
about the March called Looking for a Few Good Moms. "From the
beginning, the idea of the Million Mom March was to affect change on gun
policy at the local level, in their own communities. More than 800,000
have died or been injured since the March, but there's no telling how
many lives have been saved through the education and advocacy of these
volunteers. While we have had many accomplishments over the last 10
years, there is still more to do," said Dees-Thomases. "Now is the time
to exercise the strength of our local Chapters to apply political
pressure on local representatives - many of whom they helped elect - to
pass strong and effective federal legislation."
The Million Mom
March Chapters successes can be found at the local, state and
national levels. At the local level, Chapters across the country have
given gun violence victims a voice calling for stronger gun laws,
holding candlelight vigils, rallies, and lobbying their elected
officials.
At the state level, Chapters have led many successful
fights to pass new gun laws:
- In 2001, the New
Jersey Million Mom March Chapters helped pass groundbreaking
legislation to require all new handguns to have childproof safety
features, and last year worked with state partners to pass a new law to
stop large volume purchases of handguns that will help combat illegal
gun trafficking. - In 2005, the Illinois
Million Mom March Chapters helped to pass legislation to close the
gun show loophole in that state; - In the wake of the
shootings at Virginia Tech by a mentally ill person in 2007, Chapter
leaders in Minnesota, Texas,
New
York, Washington, Illinois,
Pennsylvania,
Virginia
and North
Carolina successfully pushed for new laws to ensure that
disqualifying mental health records be uploaded to the National Instant
Check System for firearm purchases. - In California,
Chapters have helped to pass new gun laws including a ban on .50
caliber sniper rifles, requiring all new semi-automatic handguns to have
"microstamping" technology that will help law enforcement solve gun
crimes, and just last year helped pass legislation to require handgun
ammunition vendors to keep purchaser records to aid police in tracking
down armed criminals;
Chapters have also helped to fend off
attempts by the gun lobby to pass legislation forcing colleges and universities to allow
virtually anyone to carry loaded hidden guns into classrooms and
dormitories. The gun lobby has failed 35 times in 22 states to pass
such a law.
At the national level, Million Mom March Chapters
showcased their power in 2002 when the H&R Block company backed down
in the face of a well-publicized, coordinated nationwide protest over
H&R Block's scheme to donate money to the NRA for each NRA member
tax preparation.
Blek said at the time "H&R Block's
sweetheart deal with the NRA flies in the face of corporate and social
responsibility. Consumers and investors need to know that H&R
Block's contributions are funding a powerful political lobby that fights
reasonable gun violence prevention measures at every turn."
After
a barrage of phone calls, e-mails and letters and the threat of
nationwide protests by Million Mom March Chapters and state-based gun
violence prevention organizations, H&R Block was forced to quickly
change its policy.
Currently, Chapters around the country are
protesting Starbucks' decision to allow loaded guns on their
premises. Chapters have already participated in protests at coffee
shops in Denver; Seattle; Alexandria, Virginia and throughout
California to urge Starbucks to adopt a "no guns" policy in their
establishments nationwide. More protests are being planned.
Chapter
leaders are also getting elected to office. In Missouri, former St.
Louis Chapter leaders, Stacey Newman and Jeanne Kirkton won their races
for State Representative. And recently, Eileen Filler-Corn was elected
in Virginia as a House Delegate. Million Mom March Chapters
are now setting their sights on passing strong federal legislation to
close the gun show loophole. Momentum has been building for
the pending legislation sponsored by Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) and Rep.
McCarthy (D-NY) in the House and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) in the
Senate. Chapter leaders across the country have been a driving force in
securing more than 100 House co-sponsors on the bill that has led to a
pledge to hold hearings on the legislation.
The anniversary
will receive special recognition at a May 18 Brady Center event at the
National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington DC, where journalist
Helen Thomas will also be honored. A number of other events are taking
place around the country between Sunday and May 14 to mark the tenth
anniversary. (See details, www.bradycampaign.org/chapters/chapteractivities.)
In addition, scores of activists have shared their personal thoughts
about the anniversary and the issue at a website called MothersDayProject2010.org.
Not every battle over the last 10 years has had a winning
outcome, but the display of conviction and energy produced by these
activists has nevertheless been remarkable even when they suffer
setbacks. For example, in 2004 Million Mom March activists secured the
donation of a 26-foot recreational vehicle, had it painted bright pink
(the official Million Mom March color scheme) and drove it more than
8,500 miles around the country, stopping in scores of cities and towns
to urge Congress to reauthorize the federal assault weapons ban. The
ban, unfortunately, expired in September 2004.
As Dees-Thomases
wrote at the conclusion of her book on the March, "at the end of the
day, May 14, 2000, 12 mothers would end their Mother's Day by learning
that their child had died at the end of a gun barrel. One of the
children who died that day was B.J. Stupak, the teenage son of
Congressman Bart Stupak. He committed suicide with a gun."
"The
Million Mom March activists have learned that with efforts to reduce
gun violence patience is more than a virtue, it's a necessity," said
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign. "People like Joan
Peterson know, though, that even the hardest Minnesota winter gives way
to spring. Progress, while slow, will come, and these efforts will be
rewarded."
As Dionne wrote in the Post in 2000, "these mothers
have a broader opportunity if they want to take it. A century ago,
organized women's groups, concerned about the effects of
industrialization on families and children, let loose a reform spirit
that dominated public policy for 50 years...
"The moms can win
this one. But a march is only a start."
The resolve remains,
activists promise. "What the gun lobby doesn't seem to get is that we
are in this fight to stay," said Dana Sanchez Quist, who helped organize
the 2000 March and currently serves as President of the Florida
Million Mom March Chapters. "We're not going anywhere. We'll
never stop fighting for sensible laws to protect our kids."
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular