May, 06 2010, 03:58pm EDT
A Decade Later, Million Mom March Endures As a Force to Save Lives
WASHINGTON
Ten years ago, on Mother's Day 2000, some three-quarters of a million
people gathered on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. for the largest
demonstration in history supporting stricter gun laws.
Painstakingly
constructed through word of mouth, basement phone banks and Kinko's
copies by a ragtag band of volunteers with almost no organizing
experience, the crowd stunningly exceeded expectations. The event
revitalized the national push for common-sense gun laws to protect
America's children and gave birth to a broad national network of
activists. Satellite events in 73 cities added nearly a quarter of a
million more activists to the day's remarkable place in the history of
the fight against gun violence.
As the Million Mom March celebrates its 10th anniversary,
the event has left in its historical wake a web of activists who remain
committed to the struggle against gun violence despite the difficulty of
passing federal legislation during the tenure of the Bush
Administration. Its leaders have built strong Chapters and local
coalitions that have helped to pass strong gun laws on the local and
state levels.
The urgency for national action continues: since
that day of bright skies and warm air, an estimated 872,247 Americans
have been killed or injured with firearms. .
The Million Mom
March - whose volunteers joined forces with the Brady Campaign to
Prevent Gun Violence in 2001 - has Chapters
nationwide, and volunteers have played an instrumental role in
passing both local and state laws across the country. The Chapters are
continuing their local activities and are currently working to persuade
their U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators to support pending
legislation in Congress to close the gun show loophole.
"We're
making progress all the time. I am proud to say that here in my home
state of California, elected officials know who we are and they know
that there's a cost to crossing us," says Mary Leigh Blek, who served as
the President of the Million Mom March organization after the event on
the Mall. "We have made progress in our communities, but now we need to
turn our energy to passing federal legislation."
On May 14,
2000, with buses of activists pulling into Washington D.C. from
virtually every state in the nation, the Washington Post and ABC News
reported the results of a poll of 1,068 adults showing that about one in
10 reported having been shot at and nearly one in four had experienced a
gun pointed at them. A 400-pound bell made of melted firearms was
rung. A "Wall of Death" carried the names of 4,001 gun violence
victims. Women's movement leaders like Rosie O'Donnell, Susan Sarandon
and Melissa Etheridge were joined by elected officials including
Congresswomen Connie Morella of Maryland and Carolyn McCarthy of New
York, and many others. The crowd included thousands of children.
Few
might have believed back then that the activists would stay committed,
but they have. In fact, two days after the 2000 March, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote,
"in this cynical, media-saturated time, it's hard for anyone to conceive
of something so old-fashioned as a political movement with members who
sustain their commitment over time and do unglamorous organizing work
when cameras aren't around."
It certainly has been unglamorous
most of the time, says Joan Peterson, a Brady Campaign board member and
the President of the Minnesota Million Mom Chapters.
"There's
nothing glamorous about manning a table outside a grocery store on a
cold Duluth winter day, or pulling weeds in a memorial garden, or phone
banking members of the state legislature, but that's how we get things
done here in Minnesota," Peterson said. "And I know my fellow Moms all
around the country do the same basics, so we can make a difference and
reduce gun violence."
Million Mom March founder Donna
Dees-Thomases, who once said her band of organizers had "never organized
anything more complicated than a car pool," authored a compelling book
about the March called Looking for a Few Good Moms. "From the
beginning, the idea of the Million Mom March was to affect change on gun
policy at the local level, in their own communities. More than 800,000
have died or been injured since the March, but there's no telling how
many lives have been saved through the education and advocacy of these
volunteers. While we have had many accomplishments over the last 10
years, there is still more to do," said Dees-Thomases. "Now is the time
to exercise the strength of our local Chapters to apply political
pressure on local representatives - many of whom they helped elect - to
pass strong and effective federal legislation."
The Million Mom
March Chapters successes can be found at the local, state and
national levels. At the local level, Chapters across the country have
given gun violence victims a voice calling for stronger gun laws,
holding candlelight vigils, rallies, and lobbying their elected
officials.
At the state level, Chapters have led many successful
fights to pass new gun laws:
- In 2001, the New
Jersey Million Mom March Chapters helped pass groundbreaking
legislation to require all new handguns to have childproof safety
features, and last year worked with state partners to pass a new law to
stop large volume purchases of handguns that will help combat illegal
gun trafficking. - In 2005, the Illinois
Million Mom March Chapters helped to pass legislation to close the
gun show loophole in that state; - In the wake of the
shootings at Virginia Tech by a mentally ill person in 2007, Chapter
leaders in Minnesota, Texas,
New
York, Washington, Illinois,
Pennsylvania,
Virginia
and North
Carolina successfully pushed for new laws to ensure that
disqualifying mental health records be uploaded to the National Instant
Check System for firearm purchases. - In California,
Chapters have helped to pass new gun laws including a ban on .50
caliber sniper rifles, requiring all new semi-automatic handguns to have
"microstamping" technology that will help law enforcement solve gun
crimes, and just last year helped pass legislation to require handgun
ammunition vendors to keep purchaser records to aid police in tracking
down armed criminals;
Chapters have also helped to fend off
attempts by the gun lobby to pass legislation forcing colleges and universities to allow
virtually anyone to carry loaded hidden guns into classrooms and
dormitories. The gun lobby has failed 35 times in 22 states to pass
such a law.
At the national level, Million Mom March Chapters
showcased their power in 2002 when the H&R Block company backed down
in the face of a well-publicized, coordinated nationwide protest over
H&R Block's scheme to donate money to the NRA for each NRA member
tax preparation.
Blek said at the time "H&R Block's
sweetheart deal with the NRA flies in the face of corporate and social
responsibility. Consumers and investors need to know that H&R
Block's contributions are funding a powerful political lobby that fights
reasonable gun violence prevention measures at every turn."
After
a barrage of phone calls, e-mails and letters and the threat of
nationwide protests by Million Mom March Chapters and state-based gun
violence prevention organizations, H&R Block was forced to quickly
change its policy.
Currently, Chapters around the country are
protesting Starbucks' decision to allow loaded guns on their
premises. Chapters have already participated in protests at coffee
shops in Denver; Seattle; Alexandria, Virginia and throughout
California to urge Starbucks to adopt a "no guns" policy in their
establishments nationwide. More protests are being planned.
Chapter
leaders are also getting elected to office. In Missouri, former St.
Louis Chapter leaders, Stacey Newman and Jeanne Kirkton won their races
for State Representative. And recently, Eileen Filler-Corn was elected
in Virginia as a House Delegate. Million Mom March Chapters
are now setting their sights on passing strong federal legislation to
close the gun show loophole. Momentum has been building for
the pending legislation sponsored by Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) and Rep.
McCarthy (D-NY) in the House and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) in the
Senate. Chapter leaders across the country have been a driving force in
securing more than 100 House co-sponsors on the bill that has led to a
pledge to hold hearings on the legislation.
The anniversary
will receive special recognition at a May 18 Brady Center event at the
National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington DC, where journalist
Helen Thomas will also be honored. A number of other events are taking
place around the country between Sunday and May 14 to mark the tenth
anniversary. (See details, www.bradycampaign.org/chapters/chapteractivities.)
In addition, scores of activists have shared their personal thoughts
about the anniversary and the issue at a website called MothersDayProject2010.org.
Not every battle over the last 10 years has had a winning
outcome, but the display of conviction and energy produced by these
activists has nevertheless been remarkable even when they suffer
setbacks. For example, in 2004 Million Mom March activists secured the
donation of a 26-foot recreational vehicle, had it painted bright pink
(the official Million Mom March color scheme) and drove it more than
8,500 miles around the country, stopping in scores of cities and towns
to urge Congress to reauthorize the federal assault weapons ban. The
ban, unfortunately, expired in September 2004.
As Dees-Thomases
wrote at the conclusion of her book on the March, "at the end of the
day, May 14, 2000, 12 mothers would end their Mother's Day by learning
that their child had died at the end of a gun barrel. One of the
children who died that day was B.J. Stupak, the teenage son of
Congressman Bart Stupak. He committed suicide with a gun."
"The
Million Mom March activists have learned that with efforts to reduce
gun violence patience is more than a virtue, it's a necessity," said
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign. "People like Joan
Peterson know, though, that even the hardest Minnesota winter gives way
to spring. Progress, while slow, will come, and these efforts will be
rewarded."
As Dionne wrote in the Post in 2000, "these mothers
have a broader opportunity if they want to take it. A century ago,
organized women's groups, concerned about the effects of
industrialization on families and children, let loose a reform spirit
that dominated public policy for 50 years...
"The moms can win
this one. But a march is only a start."
The resolve remains,
activists promise. "What the gun lobby doesn't seem to get is that we
are in this fight to stay," said Dana Sanchez Quist, who helped organize
the 2000 March and currently serves as President of the Florida
Million Mom March Chapters. "We're not going anywhere. We'll
never stop fighting for sensible laws to protect our kids."
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
How Amazon Exemplifies a Right-Wing Tax Code Rigged for Oligarchs Like Jeff Bezos
A new report makes clear "what's at stake by detailing the numerous ways Trump's tax code is designed to favor Amazon and its executives."
Apr 25, 2025
Few if any corporations in the United States better exemplify the rigged nature of the nation's tax code than the e-commerce behemoth Amazon, which throughout its history has made use of cavernous loopholes to avoid taxation and build massive wealth for its top executives—including founder Jeff Bezos.
In a new report titled "Amazon and Our Rigged Tax System," a coalition of advocacy organizations details how "corporate tax advantages have been essential to the company's rapid growth and increasing market dominance"—and examines how Republican plans for another round of tax cuts could further benefit the corporation and Bezos.
The report from the Institute for Policy Studies, Athena Coalition, and PowerSwitch Action notes that Amazon—described as a "perfect case study in what is wrong with our tax code"—has "used credits and loopholes to avoid paying even the sharply reduced" 21% statutory corporate tax rate established in 2017 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which President Donald Trump signed into law early in his first term.
If Amazon had paid the 21% statutory corporate tax rate between 2018 and 2021, the company's federal tax bill during that period would have been $12.5 billion higher, the groups estimated.
But in 2018, the first year the TCJA was in effect, Amazon received more in federal tax credits than it paid in taxes, giving the company a negative federal tax rate.
Bezos, who stepped down as Amazon's CEO in 2021 but still serves as executive chairman, has also benefited substantially from the skewed U.S. tax code. The report estimates that Bezos, one of the wealthiest people in the world, "pocketed $6.2 billion as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's failure to address the disparity in tax rates on income from wealth versus income from work."
"On his $36.7 billion in Amazon stock sales since that tax reform, Bezos owed only a 20% capital gains tax, far less than the 37% top marginal rate on ordinary income," the new report notes.
Andy Jassy, the company's current CEO, has "pocketed at least $6.6 million in savings over the past seven years thanks to the TCJA's reduction in the top marginal income tax rate," according to the new report.
"To stop autocracy, we need to challenge the corporations and billionaires behind and benefiting from oligarchy, not give them more tax breaks."
The report was published as Republicans in the U.S. Congress, with full support from President Donald Trump, work on tax legislation that's expected to renew individual provisions of the TCJA that would otherwise expire at the end of the year.
If the Republican-controlled Congress extends the soon-to-expire estate tax provisions of the TCJA—which doubled the federal estate tax exemption—"Bezos and Jassy's heirs would enjoy savings of $5.6 million," the new report estimates.
The advocacy groups said they produced the report out of "shared concern that a rising oligarchy is building an economy that bankrolls billionaires while leaving workers and small businesses behind."
"Right now, working families are bracing for drastic cuts to life-saving programs like Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare and harmful slashing of pro-consumer regulations," the groups said. "Meanwhile, big corporations like Amazon and their executives stand to get even richer and more powerful through the huge tax breaks proposed by the administration and Congress. This fight has profound implications not only for Amazon and its executives, but for the balance of power in our economy."
Lauren Jacobs, executive director of PowerSwitch Action, said in a statement that "Amazon and Jeff Bezos have made billions squeezing every drop of profit they can out of our communities by breaking workers' bodies, poisoning our air, and sucking up public subsidies, and now they're selling out our fundamental freedoms."
"To stop autocracy," said Jacobs, "we need to challenge the corporations and billionaires behind and benefiting from oligarchy, not give them more tax breaks."
The report proposes a number of potential legislative solutions that it describes collectively as a "pro-worker and small business fair tax agenda."
Among the proposals are raising rather than cutting the statutory corporate tax rate and closing loopholes, imposing tax penalties on companies with massive CEO-to-worker-pay gaps, raising taxes on stock buybacks, and lifting the Social Security payroll tax cap to ensure the wealthy "pay their fair share into the system."
"This report highlights what's at stake by detailing the numerous ways Trump's tax code is designed to favor Amazon and its executives over the very workers and independent small businesses that have been hurt by Amazon," said Ryan Gerety, director of the Athena Coalition. "Over the next several months, we must stand together to protect public programs and oppose tax handouts to corporate billionaires like Andy Jassy and Jeff Bezos."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Win for Government Ethics' as George Santos Sentenced to 7 Years for Fraud
"Now more than ever, a commitment to transparency and accountability is key to ensuring that candidates and elected officials serve the public, not their own interests," said one campaign finance reform advocate.
Apr 25, 2025
Government ethics watchdogs on Friday said the sentencing of former Republican congressman George Santos to more than seven years in prison for fraud was a victory for "the many voters and donors who were deceived" by the disgraced lawmaker.
"Santos' brazen fraud and misconduct, which included serious violations of federal campaign finance laws, was an affront to his constituents, his donors, and the integrity of our democracy," said Saurav Ghosh, director of campaign finance reform at the Campaign Legal Center. "The fact that he was held accountable should speak loudly to anyone contemplating similar actions aimed at exploiting the democratic process for personal gain."
Santos received his 87-month sentence from U.S. District Judge Joanna Seybert in the Eastern District of New York eight months after he pleaded guilty to two felony counts and admitted to using his campaign fundraising operation for personal gain.
The former New York congressman, who flipped a blue seat in a Long Island district in 2022 and was charged by prosecutors just months later, admitted to submitting false reports to the Federal Election Commission, stealing financial and personal information from elderly and cognitively impaired donors to fraudulently charge their credit cards, and using campaign contributions for luxury shopping and a hotel room in Las Vegas.
"The robust enforcement of campaign finance and ethics laws is critical to ensuring that our democracy works for everyday Americans, not politicians' personal interests."
Seybert said during the sentencing that Santos had committed "flagrant thievery" during his brief political career.
He is required to report to prison by July 25 and was also ordered to pay more than $373,000 in restitution.
"This accountability for his pattern of unethical and illegal conduct is a win for government ethics," said Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
Ghosh praised "the diligent enforcement efforts of the Office of Congressional Ethics, which helped bring about this result."
"Now more than ever, a commitment to transparency and accountability is key to ensuring that candidates and elected officials serve the public, not their own interests," said Ghosh. "The robust enforcement of campaign finance and ethics laws is critical to ensuring that our democracy works for everyday Americans, not politicians' personal interests."
Keep ReadingShow Less
After Uproar, Trump Reverses on Mass Suspension of Student Visas
While the backtracking by the administration was welcome, one immigration expert warned people to "stay tuned for a round 2.0 of this."
Apr 25, 2025
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A U.S. Department of Justice attorney told a federal court on Friday that the Trump administration will restore the visa status of thousands of foreign students after removing their information from a nationwide database, which led some universities to inform students that they must immediately self-deport and sparked numerous legal battles.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) terminated over 4,700 international students' records on the Student Exchange and Visitor Information System (SEVIS), which "sparked more than 100 lawsuits, with judges in more than 50 of the cases—spanning at least 23 states—ordering the administration to temporarily undo the actions," according toPolitco. "Dozens more judges seemed prepared to follow suit before Friday's reversal."
In a statement read aloud during a federal court hearing on Friday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Carilli explained that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) "is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations."
"Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain active or shall be reactivated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination," Carilli added, referring to the National Crime Information Center.
According toWUSA9's Jordan Fisher, Carilli also said the Department of Justice intends to file a similar statement in the other cases, but ICE reserves the right to terminate SEVIS records in the future based on student behavior.
The journalist added on social media that "I spoke with an attorney last night who said he's already talked to foreign students who left the U.S.—fearing they would be deported otherwise. This decision does not restore any canceled visas, and now they may face real difficulties returning."
Responding to the news on social media, American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick said that "this is massive," but added this is "not the end" of the issue.
"ICE says it is going to develop a new policy to terminate SEVIS records legally in a way that aligns with their plans," he stressed. "So stay tuned for a round 2.0 of this—which would presumably be less chaotic, at the minimum."
Despite the development in the Washington, D.C. court, and the Justice Department's supposed plan to share its update with other courts across the country, some cases seem to be proceeding, at least for now.
Boston Globe reporter Steven Porter said on social media that he asked the ACLU of New Hampshire about the Friday statement, "(since they represent multiple plaintiffs whose SEVIS records were terminated), and legal director Gilles Bissonnette said they still don't know the nature or extent of these reversals."
"Bissonnette said the government hasn't given any indication that it intends to restore Dartmouth doctoral student Xiaotian Liu's student status absent an order from the court," so Liu still has 'an urgent and critical need' for immediate relief," Porter reported. "A federal judge in New Hampshire is likely to rule today on whether to grant a preliminary injunction in Liu's case. There is currently a temporary restraining order in place."
In addition to the SEVIS terminations, the Trump administration is targeting universities' federal funding as well as trying to deport several immigrants involved in campus protests against the U.S.-backed Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip, widely condemned as a genocide against Palestinians.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular