

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jess Levin (202) 772-8162
jlevin@mediamatters.org
Today, Media Matters for America's Ari Rabin-Havt sent a
letter to News Corp. chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch noting Fox News'
role in regularly promoting the Tea Party movement. When Rabin-Havt
asked Murdoch about that topic at the National Press Club on Tuesday
night, Murdoch said he didn't think Fox News "should be supporting the
Tea Party" but would like to "investigate" "before condemning anyone."
The letter reads:
Dear Mr. Murdoch:
I wanted to thank you for taking my question Tuesday night at the
National Press Club. As a reminder, I asked you
whether it was "appropriate for a news network to engage in that much
politics" in regards to Fox News' role in regularly promoting the Tea
Party movement.You
replied: "No. I don't think we should be supporting the Tea Party or
any other party. But I'd like to investigate what you are saying before
condemning anyone."We appreciate your willingness to look into this matter. To aid in
your investigation, Media Matters has
compiled over 15 examples of your network's "support" of the Tea Party
movement. And, contrary to a Fox News spokesperson's suggestion
that only the "opinion commentators" are actively encouraging
participation in the protests, it is a problem that stretches across
the entire network.Tuesday
night, I was pleased to learn that you don't believe that Fox News
should be "supporting the Tea Party or any other party" and that you
were open to "condemning" anyone who had done so. For the past year, Media
Matters has
been vocal in criticizing the network's tea party coverage. I hope the
attached evidence is enough to convince you to take action. We look
forward to hearing the results of your investigation.Please don't hesitate to contact me if you would like any additional
information.Kind regards,
Ari Rabin-Havt
Vice President of Research & Communications
Media Matters for America
With the letter, Rabin-Havt included the following attachment:
"Join Your Local Tea Party": Fox News' history of promoting
the tea party movement
Anchor: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea parties.
Here we go!" During the April 13, 2009, edition of Your
World, Fox Business anchor and "business journalist" Stuart Varney plugged
Fox News' presence at the April 15, 2009, tea parties, saying: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea
parties. Here we go!"
Fox News aired more than 100 commercial promotions for tea
party protests in less than two weeks. From April
6 to April 15, Fox News aired at least 107 commercial promotions
for their coverage of the April 15, 2009, tea party protests.
Beck encouraged viewers to "please go" to "FNC Tax Day Tea
Parties." Fox News aired graphics on repeated occasions in
which they dubbed the April 15, 2009, Tax Day Tea Parties, "FNC Tax Day
Tea Parties." Host Glenn Beck told viewers
they could "[c]elebrate with Fox News" at any of four Fox
News-described "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties," saying: "If you can't make
the one in San Antonio" -- which Beck himself attended -- "please go to
the one with Neil or with Sean in Atlanta, that's supposed to be great,
Greta is in Washington, D.C. Just get out and let your face be seen."
"Can't get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea
party." On the April 11, 2009, edition of Fox News Watch,
Fox News host Bill Hemmer said:
HEMMER: While the mainstream media's ignored
the tea party movement, here at the Fox News Channel, we're gearing up
to bring you special coverage of the events all across the country.
Sean Hannity is in Atlanta; Glenn Beck's at the Alamo -- where else
would he be? -- San Antonio; Neil Cavuto is live in Sacramento; and
Greta is in Washington, D.C.Can't
get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea party. You can check
it out on the site for the location of a tea party in your area. Again,
that is Wednesday, the 15th of April.
On April 15, 2009, news anchor Megyn Kelly said,
"you can join the tea party action from your home if you go to the
FoxNation.com ... a virtual tax day tea party." On April 16, 2009, Fox
& Friends co-host Gretchen Carlson told viewers that
they "can still have a virtual tea party" at Fox Nation
Fox News host: "[H]opefully millions of people" will
participate. While reporting live at a protest on April 15,
2009, former Big Story host John Gibson, a Fox News Radio host,
remarked that
"hopefully millions of people" will participate in the protests.
Anchor to viewers: You "need to go" to tea party merchandise
site. On April 15, 2009, Fox Business anchor David Asman told viewers they
"need to go" to a tea party merchandise site "no matter what side of the
issue you're on."
News anchor on list of nationwide tea party events: "Check it
out online right now." On March 24, 2009, Hemmer noted
protests in Florida and Ohio and directed
viewers to the program's website to learn more about the protests:
HEMMER:
It's called the tea party. And check out the scene in Orlando, Florida.
More than 4,000 turned out over the weekend protesting government
spending and a big thumbs-down to the policies currently in Washington.
Radio host Bud Hedinger hosted that event. Protesters, well, they waved
flags and signs and with slogans like "Repeal the Pork" and "Our Bacon
is Cooked." I say, our bacon is cooked.They're
popping up literally all across the country now. They had about 5,000
in Cincinnati last weekend. If you go to our website, you will find a
growing list of these events, hundreds of photos, and a new tea-party
anthem that you will hear from the man who wrote it and recorded it
next hour. And there's a list of the nationwide Tax Day tea party
events coming up on the 15th of April, which will be a huge deal for
those organizations. So check it out online right now.
News anchor: To find "one happening near you, head to our
website." On April 6, 2009, Hemmer again directed
viewers to Fox News' website to find a tea party "happening near you"
HEMMER:
If you want to know more about the tea-party movement, if there is one
happening near you, head to our website FoxNews.com/americasnewsroom.
We have an entire section devoted to the growing tea-party movement.
That's our America's Newsroom website online. All the
information you need to know. Check it out right now.
Hannity: "We hope you'll join us." On April 3, 2009,
Fox News host Sean Hannity said:
"And also log on to our Web site to get all the details about our
special 'Tax Day Tea Party.' We're going to be live in Atlanta, April
15th. Governor [and Fox News host Mike] Huckabee, by the way, will be
on that show." Hannity also said during the program: "And then it's
April 15, it's our tea party tax day show. And I'll be hosting the show
from Atlanta, where one of dozens of tea party protests are going to be
going on that evening. So we hope you'll join us."
Reporter: "We want to let folks know" tea party schedule so
"they can be a part" of events. The August 23, 2009, edition of Fox
News' America's News HQ
hosted Tea Party Express organizer Mark Williams to promote the tour.
During the segment, anchor and reporter Shannon Bream said of the
tour's schedule:
BREAM: You do have a bit of a cohesive, at least organized schedule.
We want to let folks know you're going to be making --WILLIAMS: Yes.
BREAM:
-- 34, 35 stops, I believe it is, all across the country, so if they
want to come out and take part, they certainly can be a part of what
you're doing. And, you know, this has definitely struck a chord with
people.
Reporter: "[H]opefully Washington will listen to their
concerns." During the August 28, 2009, edition of Fox &
Friends, William La Jeunesse reported
live from Sacramento on the kickoff of the Tea Party Express. At the
conclusion of his report, La Jeunesse said of the tour's concerns:
"[T]hey believe, collectively, that they at least have a voice, and
hopefully Washington will listen to their concerns."
Host: "How you can join, next." On its August 19,
2009, broadcast, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade told
viewers "how you can join" the Tea Party Express:
KILMEADE:
Straight ahead, citizens take their concerns about health care on the
road to -- on the road. The organizer of a cross-country tea party
tour, and how you can join, next.[...]
KILMEADE:
The Tea Party Express will make 35 stops across the country, giving
Americans a constructive outlet in which to share their concerns on
health care, and I imagine more.
During
the segment, Fox News helped viewers find out "how you can join" the
Tea Party Express by displaying the dates and locations of 22 stops.
"To sign up for Tea Party 2.0 Go to ..." On May 13,
2009, On the Record host Greta Van Susteren did
a segment
on the "Tea Party 2.0," saying: "If you wanted to go to a tea party on
April 15 but could not make it or there was none in your hometown,
tomorrow's your big chance." She later asked Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC),
"What do they do, do they log on a particular place? And will they be
able to interact with you? I mean, how's this gonna work?" and later,
"[W]hen is this tea party? When does it begin? Is there a Web address
or a phone number?"
Cavuto on protestors: "God bless these folks."
On March 27, while showing footage of tea party protestors gathering
for a tea party rally "four and a half hours from now," Fox Business
senior vice president Neil Cavuto commented,
"I don't do that [gather to protest] for anything. ... God bless these
folks."
Reporter endorsed tea partier's call to "get these liberal
communists out of our government." While covering
a tea party protest for FoxNews.com on September 4, 2009, reporter
Griff Jenkins interviewed a tea partier who said he wanted to "get
these liberal communists out of our government." Jenkins replied: "How
about that. I couldn't have said anything better than that." On the
September 12, 2009, edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Dave
Briggs said of Tea Party Express-embedded Jenkins: "You might call him a
tea party groupie."
Fox News employee: Some members of Fox "cheerlead for rallies
and tea parties." Fox News contributor Bernard Goldberg stated
on September 29, 2009: "There are some programs on Fox that are not
only not 'Fair and Balanced' -- they're commentary shows, they don't
have to be -- but they brag about how 'Fair and Balanced' they are.
They don't cover rallies and tea parties; they cheerlead for rallies and
tea parties. And as a journalist, I am totally against that."
Tea party participants credited Fox promotions for bringing
them to the April 15, 2009, protests. For instance:
Tea party organizers used Fox News to increase attendance.
For instance:
Appendix: Fox News Tea Party promotional graphics
The following are examples of images that appeared on Fox News
properties, which promoted various Tea Party protests:
(Click here.)
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
"Big Tech is building a mountain of speculative infrastructure," warned one critic. "Now it wants the US government to prop up the bubble before it bursts."
Tech giant OpenAI generated significant backlash this week after one of its top executives floated potential loan guarantees from the US government to help fund its massive infrastructure buildout.
In a Wednesday interview with The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI chief financial officer Sarah Friar suggested that the federal government could get involved in infrastructure development for artificial intelligence by offering a "guarantee," which she said could "drop the cost of the financing" and increase the amount of debt her firm could take on.
When asked if she was specifically talking about a "federal backstop for chip investment," she replied, "Exactly."
Hours after the interview, Friar walked back her remarks and insisted that "OpenAI is not seeking a government backstop for our infrastructure commitments," while adding that she was "making the point that American strength in technology will come from building real industrial capacity, which requires the private sector and government playing their part."
Despite Friar's walk-back, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said during a podcast interview with economist Tyler Cowen that released on Thursday that he believed the government ultimately could be a backstop to the artificial intelligence industry.
"When something gets sufficiently huge... the federal government is kind of the insurer of last resort, as we've seen in various financial crises," he said. "Given the magnitude of what I expect AI's economic impact to look like, I do think the government ends up as the insurer of last resort."
Friar and Altman's remarks about government backstops for OpenAI loans drew the immediate ire of Robert Weissman, co-president of consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, who expressed concerns that the tech industry may have already opened up talks about loan guarantees with President Donald Trump's administration.
"Given the Trump regime’s eagerness to shower taxpayer subsidies and benefits on favored corporations, it is entirely possible that OpenAI and the White House are concocting a scheme to siphon taxpayer money into OpenAI’s coffers, perhaps with some tribute paid to Trump and his family." Weissman said. "Perhaps not so coincidentally, OpenAI President Greg Brockman was among the attendees at a dinner for donors to Trump’s White House ballroom, though neither he nor OpenAI have been reported to be actual donors."
JB Branch, Public Citizen’s Big Tech accountability advocate, said even suggesting government backstops for OpenAI showed that the company and its executives were "completely out of touch with reality," and he argued it was no coincidence that Friar floated the possibility of federal loan guarantees at a time when many analysts have been questioning whether the AI industry is an unsustainable financial bubble.
"The truth is simple: the AI bubble is swelling, and OpenAI knows it," he said. "Big Tech is building a mountain of speculative infrastructure without real-world demands or proven productivity-enhancing use cases to justify it. Now it wants the US government to prop up the bubble before it bursts. This is an escape plan for an industry that has overpromised and underdelivered."
An MIT Media Lab report found in September that while AI use has doubled in workplaces since 2023, 95% of organizations that have invested in the technology have seen "no measurable return on their investment."
Concerns about an AI bubble intensified earlier this week when investor Michael Burry, who famously made a fortune by short-selling the US housing market ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, revealed that his firm was making bets against Nvidia and Palantir, two of the biggest players in the AI industry.
This has led to some AI industry players to complain that markets and governments are undervaluing their products.
During her Wednesday WSJ interview, for instance, Friar complained that "I don’t think there’s enough exuberance about AI, when I think about the actual practical implications and what it can do for individual."
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, meanwhile, told the Financial Times that China was going to beat the US in the race to develop high-powered artificial intelligence because the Chinese government offers more energy subsidies to AI and doesn't put as much regulation on AI development.
Huang also complained that "we need more optimism" about the AI industry in the US.
Investment researcher Ross Hendricks, however, dismissed Huang's warning about China winning the AI battle, and he accused the Nvidia CEO of seeking special government favors.
"This is nothing more than Jensen Huang foaming the runway for a federal AI bailout in coordination with OpenAI's latest plea in the WSJ," he commented in a post on X. "These grifters simply can't be happy making billions from one of the greatest investment manias of all time. They'll do everything possible to loot taxpayers to prevent it from popping."
"Congress needs to assert its constitutional power to prohibit use of military force," stressed one of the war powers resolution's co-sponsors.
As the Trump administration argues that it can continue its extrajudicial assassination spree of alleged drug runners on the high seas without congressional approval, the US Senate is set to vote Thursday afternoon on a bipartisan war powers resolution that would block military action against Venezuela absent lawmakers' assent—as required by law.
Last month, Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced a resolution to block US military "hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress," citing the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and Congress' sole ability to declare war under the Constitution.
Posting on X ahead of Thursday's vote, Schiff said that the measure's co-sponsors "are forcing a bipartisan vote to block the administration from dragging this country into war in South America."
"Congress needs to assert its constitutional power to prohibit use of military force," he added.
Trump has PUBLICLY threatened land strikes in Venezuela—after already killing at least 66 unknown people on boats in the Caribbean—unnecessarily putting the U.S. at risk of war. Here’s what @schiff.senate.gov, Senator Paul, and I are doing about it:youtube.com/shorts/TQKsF...
[image or embed]
— Senator Tim Kaine (@kaine.senate.gov) November 6, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy, a Washington, DC-based think tank, said Thursday that President Donald Trump "talks about himself as a historic peacemaker while continuing to order reckless military strikes and threatening to invade countries around the world."
"His actions violate both the Constitution and his own promises to be an anti-war president," he added.
This is the second time Kaine and Schiff have tried to introduce a Venezuela war powers resolution. Last month, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman joined his GOP colleagues in voting down a similar measure. Paul joined Democrats and Independent Sens. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) and Angus King (Maine) in voting for the legislation.
Since September 2, Trump has overseen 16 reported attacks on vessels allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean off the coast of South America, killing at least 67 people. Venezuelan and Colombian officials, as well as relatives of some of the slain men, assert that some victims were fishers and condemned the attacks as war crimes.
Trump—who deployed an armada of warships and thousands of troops off the coast of Venezuela—has also approved covert CIA action and, along with senior administration officials, threatened to attack targets on land inside the oil-rich country, which has long been subjected to US meddling, regime change, and deadly sanctions. Late last month, the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro said that his country’s security forces captured a group of CIA-aligned mercenaries engaged in a "false-flag attack" against the nation.
The War Powers Resolution of 1973—also known as the War Powers Act—was enacted during the Nixon administration at the tail end of the US war on Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos to empower Congress to check the president’s war-making authority. The law requires the president to report any military action to Congress within 48 hours and mandates that lawmakers must approve troop deployments after 60 days.
That 60-day door closed on Monday. However, according to The Washington Post, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel T. Elliott Gaiser told lawmakers this week that Trump is not bound by the War Powers Resolution, as the administration does not believe that the boat strikes legally meet the definition of "hostilities" because the victims of the attacks aren't fighting back.
The dubious argument that acts of US military aggression aren't hostilities isn't new—the Obama administration asserted similar immunity from the War Powers Resolution when it decided to attack Libya in 2011, leading to the ouster of longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi and over a decade of enduring conflict and division.
As Brian Finucane, a former State Department legal adviser who is now a senior official at the International Crisis Group, wrote for Just Security this week:
There are many flaws with the Trump administration’s reported interpretation of hostilities. As indicated in the legislative history, Congress understood the term “hostilities” to apply broadly, more broadly than “armed conflict.” The Obama administration’s prior attempt to restrictively interpret the term garnered strong bipartisan congressional opposition...
That the Trump administration would resort to creative lawyering to circumvent the limits of the War Powers Resolution is hardly a surprise... It nonetheless is yet another legal abuse and arrogation of power by the executive. And it is a power grab in the service of killing people outside the law based solely on the president’s own say-so.
"Congress needs to push back against this attempt by the White House to further encroach upon its constitutional prerogatives on the use of military force," Finucane added. "The legislative branch should reject the executive’s strained legal interpretation of the War Powers Resolution, including possibly in legislation. Congress should also continue efforts to halt these killings at sea and block an unlawful attack on Venezuela."
Pelosi's progressive challenger called it the start of a "generational shift" in the Democratic Party.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is calling it quits after nearly four decades in Congress. On Thursday, the longtime Democratic leader announced that her 20th term in Congress will be her last and that she will not run for reelection in 2026.
"For decades, I've cherished the privilege of representing our magnificent city in the United States Congress," Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a video tribute to her constituents in San Francisco. "That is why I want you, my fellow San Franciscans, to be the first to know I will not be seeking reelection to Congress. With a grateful heart, I look forward to my final year of service as your proud representative."
The departure of the 85-year-old Pelosi, the first and only woman to ever hold the speaker's gavel, comes at a critical crossroads for the Democratic Party, when the brand of corporate-friendly centrism she came to embody faces a crisis of credibility after failing to withstand the return of President Donald Trump, and an increasingly muscular progressive flank seeks to reshape the party in its image.
"Starting out as a progressive, Pelosi has steadily drifted to the center over the decades, coinciding with her rise up the party ranks, the gradual rise of her net worth, and even San Francisco’s transformation into an unaffordable playground for the rich," wrote Branko Marcetic in Jacobin when she stepped down from the role as the Democratic leader in 2022.
Once a proponent of universal healthcare, Pelosi will likely be remembered as one of the foremost obstacles to achieving Medicare for All, which she fought tooth and nail to block, with the support of the health insurance industry, during her final four years as speaker.
As the climate crisis grows more urgent and increasingly destructive, Pelosi will be remembered as the person who derided the nascent "Green New Deal" effort to transition America's economy toward renewables as "the green dream or whatever they call it."
As the Democratic Party's base reckons with its near-total shift against Israel following more than two years of genocide in Gaza, Pelosi—who previously backed funding for the Iraq War against the grassroots of her party—will be remembered as the person who, suggested that Democrats protesting for a ceasefire were spreading “[Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s message” and should be investigated by the FBI.
As Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rampages through American cities—including her beloved San Francisco—tormenting immigrants and citizens alike, Pelosi will be remembered for her role bending to Republican demands during the last government shutdown in 2019, to hand the agency more funding as part of a power play against the progressive "Squad" members who wanted to see the agency abolished or defunded.
And at a time when Americans struggle with a surging cost of living, Pelosi will be remembered as one of the people who profited most from her position at the heights of power. In 2024, she and her husband raked in more than $38 million from stock trading, more than any other member of Congress in either party, and remained a persistent defender of the humble elected representative's right to use their immense wealth of insider knowledge for personal gain.
Pelosi's retirement announcement comes at a moment when the Democratic establishment, particularly its congressional leaders—Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Pelosi's successor, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)—face historic unpopularity with their own voters.
A survey published by Pew Research at the beginning of October found that 59% of self-identified Democrats disapprove of the job their leaders are doing. A previous poll from Reuters/Ipsos found that Democrats believe there was a large gulf between their governing priorities, like universal healthcare, affordable childcare, and higher taxes on the rich, and those of the party.
Pelosi's announcement comes just two days after the most significant triumph in decades for the progressive movement she tried to crush, with the democratic socialist state assemblyman Zohran Mamdani being comfortably elected as New York City's next mayor despite Pelosi's refusal to endorse.
"This is an appropriate response to Mamdani’s win," New Republic writer Indigo Oliver said of Pelosi's retirement on social media. "Chuck Schumer should follow Pelosi’s lead."
Even prior to her retirement becoming official, momentum was building behind a more progressive candidate to take Pelosi's seat as well: Saikat Chakrabarti, the former chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who some have described as a "clone" of Mamdani, though he too has been met with criticism for his coziness with San Francisco's powerful tech sector.
"Pelosi’s retirement marks the end of an era in San Francisco politics and the beginning of a long-overdue generational shift," said an email from the Chakrabarti campaign.