

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jess Levin (202) 772-8162
jlevin@mediamatters.org
Today, Media Matters for America's Ari Rabin-Havt sent a
letter to News Corp. chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch noting Fox News'
role in regularly promoting the Tea Party movement. When Rabin-Havt
asked Murdoch about that topic at the National Press Club on Tuesday
night, Murdoch said he didn't think Fox News "should be supporting the
Tea Party" but would like to "investigate" "before condemning anyone."
The letter reads:
Dear Mr. Murdoch:
I wanted to thank you for taking my question Tuesday night at the
National Press Club. As a reminder, I asked you
whether it was "appropriate for a news network to engage in that much
politics" in regards to Fox News' role in regularly promoting the Tea
Party movement.You
replied: "No. I don't think we should be supporting the Tea Party or
any other party. But I'd like to investigate what you are saying before
condemning anyone."We appreciate your willingness to look into this matter. To aid in
your investigation, Media Matters has
compiled over 15 examples of your network's "support" of the Tea Party
movement. And, contrary to a Fox News spokesperson's suggestion
that only the "opinion commentators" are actively encouraging
participation in the protests, it is a problem that stretches across
the entire network.Tuesday
night, I was pleased to learn that you don't believe that Fox News
should be "supporting the Tea Party or any other party" and that you
were open to "condemning" anyone who had done so. For the past year, Media
Matters has
been vocal in criticizing the network's tea party coverage. I hope the
attached evidence is enough to convince you to take action. We look
forward to hearing the results of your investigation.Please don't hesitate to contact me if you would like any additional
information.Kind regards,
Ari Rabin-Havt
Vice President of Research & Communications
Media Matters for America
With the letter, Rabin-Havt included the following attachment:
"Join Your Local Tea Party": Fox News' history of promoting
the tea party movement
Anchor: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea parties.
Here we go!" During the April 13, 2009, edition of Your
World, Fox Business anchor and "business journalist" Stuart Varney plugged
Fox News' presence at the April 15, 2009, tea parties, saying: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea
parties. Here we go!"
Fox News aired more than 100 commercial promotions for tea
party protests in less than two weeks. From April
6 to April 15, Fox News aired at least 107 commercial promotions
for their coverage of the April 15, 2009, tea party protests.
Beck encouraged viewers to "please go" to "FNC Tax Day Tea
Parties." Fox News aired graphics on repeated occasions in
which they dubbed the April 15, 2009, Tax Day Tea Parties, "FNC Tax Day
Tea Parties." Host Glenn Beck told viewers
they could "[c]elebrate with Fox News" at any of four Fox
News-described "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties," saying: "If you can't make
the one in San Antonio" -- which Beck himself attended -- "please go to
the one with Neil or with Sean in Atlanta, that's supposed to be great,
Greta is in Washington, D.C. Just get out and let your face be seen."
"Can't get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea
party." On the April 11, 2009, edition of Fox News Watch,
Fox News host Bill Hemmer said:
HEMMER: While the mainstream media's ignored
the tea party movement, here at the Fox News Channel, we're gearing up
to bring you special coverage of the events all across the country.
Sean Hannity is in Atlanta; Glenn Beck's at the Alamo -- where else
would he be? -- San Antonio; Neil Cavuto is live in Sacramento; and
Greta is in Washington, D.C.Can't
get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea party. You can check
it out on the site for the location of a tea party in your area. Again,
that is Wednesday, the 15th of April.
On April 15, 2009, news anchor Megyn Kelly said,
"you can join the tea party action from your home if you go to the
FoxNation.com ... a virtual tax day tea party." On April 16, 2009, Fox
& Friends co-host Gretchen Carlson told viewers that
they "can still have a virtual tea party" at Fox Nation
Fox News host: "[H]opefully millions of people" will
participate. While reporting live at a protest on April 15,
2009, former Big Story host John Gibson, a Fox News Radio host,
remarked that
"hopefully millions of people" will participate in the protests.
Anchor to viewers: You "need to go" to tea party merchandise
site. On April 15, 2009, Fox Business anchor David Asman told viewers they
"need to go" to a tea party merchandise site "no matter what side of the
issue you're on."
News anchor on list of nationwide tea party events: "Check it
out online right now." On March 24, 2009, Hemmer noted
protests in Florida and Ohio and directed
viewers to the program's website to learn more about the protests:
HEMMER:
It's called the tea party. And check out the scene in Orlando, Florida.
More than 4,000 turned out over the weekend protesting government
spending and a big thumbs-down to the policies currently in Washington.
Radio host Bud Hedinger hosted that event. Protesters, well, they waved
flags and signs and with slogans like "Repeal the Pork" and "Our Bacon
is Cooked." I say, our bacon is cooked.They're
popping up literally all across the country now. They had about 5,000
in Cincinnati last weekend. If you go to our website, you will find a
growing list of these events, hundreds of photos, and a new tea-party
anthem that you will hear from the man who wrote it and recorded it
next hour. And there's a list of the nationwide Tax Day tea party
events coming up on the 15th of April, which will be a huge deal for
those organizations. So check it out online right now.
News anchor: To find "one happening near you, head to our
website." On April 6, 2009, Hemmer again directed
viewers to Fox News' website to find a tea party "happening near you"
HEMMER:
If you want to know more about the tea-party movement, if there is one
happening near you, head to our website FoxNews.com/americasnewsroom.
We have an entire section devoted to the growing tea-party movement.
That's our America's Newsroom website online. All the
information you need to know. Check it out right now.
Hannity: "We hope you'll join us." On April 3, 2009,
Fox News host Sean Hannity said:
"And also log on to our Web site to get all the details about our
special 'Tax Day Tea Party.' We're going to be live in Atlanta, April
15th. Governor [and Fox News host Mike] Huckabee, by the way, will be
on that show." Hannity also said during the program: "And then it's
April 15, it's our tea party tax day show. And I'll be hosting the show
from Atlanta, where one of dozens of tea party protests are going to be
going on that evening. So we hope you'll join us."
Reporter: "We want to let folks know" tea party schedule so
"they can be a part" of events. The August 23, 2009, edition of Fox
News' America's News HQ
hosted Tea Party Express organizer Mark Williams to promote the tour.
During the segment, anchor and reporter Shannon Bream said of the
tour's schedule:
BREAM: You do have a bit of a cohesive, at least organized schedule.
We want to let folks know you're going to be making --WILLIAMS: Yes.
BREAM:
-- 34, 35 stops, I believe it is, all across the country, so if they
want to come out and take part, they certainly can be a part of what
you're doing. And, you know, this has definitely struck a chord with
people.
Reporter: "[H]opefully Washington will listen to their
concerns." During the August 28, 2009, edition of Fox &
Friends, William La Jeunesse reported
live from Sacramento on the kickoff of the Tea Party Express. At the
conclusion of his report, La Jeunesse said of the tour's concerns:
"[T]hey believe, collectively, that they at least have a voice, and
hopefully Washington will listen to their concerns."
Host: "How you can join, next." On its August 19,
2009, broadcast, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade told
viewers "how you can join" the Tea Party Express:
KILMEADE:
Straight ahead, citizens take their concerns about health care on the
road to -- on the road. The organizer of a cross-country tea party
tour, and how you can join, next.[...]
KILMEADE:
The Tea Party Express will make 35 stops across the country, giving
Americans a constructive outlet in which to share their concerns on
health care, and I imagine more.
During
the segment, Fox News helped viewers find out "how you can join" the
Tea Party Express by displaying the dates and locations of 22 stops.
"To sign up for Tea Party 2.0 Go to ..." On May 13,
2009, On the Record host Greta Van Susteren did
a segment
on the "Tea Party 2.0," saying: "If you wanted to go to a tea party on
April 15 but could not make it or there was none in your hometown,
tomorrow's your big chance." She later asked Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC),
"What do they do, do they log on a particular place? And will they be
able to interact with you? I mean, how's this gonna work?" and later,
"[W]hen is this tea party? When does it begin? Is there a Web address
or a phone number?"
Cavuto on protestors: "God bless these folks."
On March 27, while showing footage of tea party protestors gathering
for a tea party rally "four and a half hours from now," Fox Business
senior vice president Neil Cavuto commented,
"I don't do that [gather to protest] for anything. ... God bless these
folks."
Reporter endorsed tea partier's call to "get these liberal
communists out of our government." While covering
a tea party protest for FoxNews.com on September 4, 2009, reporter
Griff Jenkins interviewed a tea partier who said he wanted to "get
these liberal communists out of our government." Jenkins replied: "How
about that. I couldn't have said anything better than that." On the
September 12, 2009, edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Dave
Briggs said of Tea Party Express-embedded Jenkins: "You might call him a
tea party groupie."
Fox News employee: Some members of Fox "cheerlead for rallies
and tea parties." Fox News contributor Bernard Goldberg stated
on September 29, 2009: "There are some programs on Fox that are not
only not 'Fair and Balanced' -- they're commentary shows, they don't
have to be -- but they brag about how 'Fair and Balanced' they are.
They don't cover rallies and tea parties; they cheerlead for rallies and
tea parties. And as a journalist, I am totally against that."
Tea party participants credited Fox promotions for bringing
them to the April 15, 2009, protests. For instance:
Tea party organizers used Fox News to increase attendance.
For instance:
Appendix: Fox News Tea Party promotional graphics
The following are examples of images that appeared on Fox News
properties, which promoted various Tea Party protests:
(Click here.)
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
"A case like this helps the government kind of see how far they can go in criminalizing constitutionally protected protest," one legal advocate said.
The government has largely won its first case bringing material-support-for-terrorism charges against protesters alleged to belong to "antifa," which President Donald Trump designated as a domestic terror group in 2025 despite the fact that no such organized group exists and the president has no legal authority to designate organizations as domestic terror groups.
A federal jury in Fort Worth, Texas agreed on Friday to convict eight people of domestic terrorism because they wore all black to a protest outside Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas on July 4, 2025, at which one of the protesters shot and wounded a police officer. Legal experts say the verdict could bolster attempts by the administration to stifle dissent.
"A case like this helps the government kind of see how far they can go in criminalizing constitutionally protected protests and also helps them kind of intimidate, increase the fear, hoping that folks in other cities then will think twice over protesting,” Suzanne Adely, interim president of the National Lawyers Guild, told The Associated Press.
The administration promised it would be the first such case of many.
"The US lost today with this verdict."
“Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization that has been allowed to flourish in Democrat-led cities—not under President Trump,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement Friday. “Today’s verdict on terrorism charges will not be the last as the Trump administration systematically dismantles Antifa and finally halts their violence on America’s streets.”
The trial revolved around a nighttime protest at which participants planned to set off fireworks in solidarity with the around 1,000 migrants detained inside the Prarieland ICE facility. Some participants brought guns, which is legal in Texas, as The Intercept reported.
Sam Levine explained in The Guardian what happened next:
Shortly after arriving at the facility, two or three of the protesters broke away from the larger group and began spray painting cars in the parking lot, a guard shack, slashed the tires on a government van, and broke a security camera. Two ICE detention guards came out and told the protesters to stop. A police officer arrived on the scene shortly after and drew his weapon at one of the people allegedly doing vandalism. One of the protesters was standing in the woods with an AR-15 and hit him in the shoulder. The officer would survive.
At first, the federal government charged those arrested after the event with "attempted murder of a police officer," according to NOTUS.
However, that changed after Trump's designation of antifa as a terror group in September and the release of National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), which directs federal law enforcement to target left-leaning groups and activities. The next month, the government's case expanded to include terrorism charges.
“This wouldn’t be a terrorism case if it weren’t for that memo,” one defense lawyer told NOTUS on background.
The prosecution argued that the fact that the protesters wore black clothes to the protest was enough to convict them of material support for terrorism.
“Providing your body as camouflage for others to do the enumerated acts is providing support,” Assistant US Attorney Shawn Smith said during closing arguments, as The Intercept reported on Thursday. “It’s impossible to tell who is doing what. That’s the point.”
The defense, meanwhile, warned the jury about the free speech implications of the charge.
“The government is asking you to put protesters in prison as terrorists. You are the only people who can stop that,” Blake Burns, an attorney for defendant Elizabeth Soto, said, according to The Guardian.
"When the villain is a made-up boogeyman then the target becomes 'anyone who disagrees with Trump'—and this is the result."
Ultimately, the jury decided to convict eight defendants of material support for terrorism as well as riot, conspiracy to use and carry an explosive, and use and carry of an explosive. However, they dismissed attempts by the state to argue that the protest constituted a pre-planned ambush and charge four people who had not shot at the police officer with attempted murder and discharging a firearm during a crime. Only Benjamin Song, the alleged shooter, was charged with one count of attempted murder and three counts of discharging a firearm.
The jury also convicted a ninth defendant, Daniel Rolando Sanchez Estrada, of conspiracy to conceal documents. Sanchez Estrada, who was not at the protest, had simply moved a box of zines out of his wife's home after she was arrested for the protest, according to The Intercept.
"The US lost today with this verdict,” Sanchez Estrada’s attorney, Christopher Weinbel, said, as AP reported.
Support the Prarieland Defendants said in a statement, "Everything about this trial from beginning to end has proven what we have said all along: This is a sham trial, built on political persecution and ideological attacks coming from the top."
However, the group commended the solidarity that had sprung up among the defendants and their allies and vowed to continue to support them.
"We have a long journey ahead of us to continue fighting these charges along with the state level charges," they said. "What happens here sets the tone for what’s to come. We are here and we won’t give up."
Outside observers warned about the implication for the right to protest under Trump.
"Remember all the people who dismissed the alarm over NSPM-7 because 'ANTIFA isn't even a real organization'? We told you that didn't matter. When the villain is a made-up boogeyman then the target becomes 'anyone who disagrees with Trump'—and this is the result," said Cory Archibald, the co-founder of Track AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee].
Content creator Austin MacNamara said: "The Prairieland trial was given almost zero media coverage because of the blatant lies by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] and Police. This verdict now sets a precedent for criminalization of dissent across the board. Noise demos, Black-Bloc, pamphlets/zines/red cards, all of this can be used to imprison you."
Academic Nathan Goodman wrote that convicting people of terrorism based on clothing was a "serious threat to the First Amendment."
The verdict gives new poignancy to what defendant Meagan Morris told NOTUS ahead of the jury's decision: “If we win, I think it shows that Trump’s mandate is not working, that the people understand that you can’t criminalize, you know, First and Second Amendment-protected activities. And I think if we lose, then… a lot of the country is OK with what’s going on. And it will be a much darker time, it’ll just signify a much increased crackdown on political opposition and free speech."
"Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official," one news network said.
In a move one administration critic described as "fragrantly unconstitutional," Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr wrote a post on social media on Saturday that appeared to threaten the broadcast license of any media outlet that reported information concerning President Donald Trump's war on Iran that the president did not like.
"Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions—also known as the fake news—have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not," Carr's message began.
Carr also shared a screenshot of a Trump post on Truth Social complaining about "Fake News Media" coverage of five US Air Force refueling planes that were reportedly hit and damaged in an Iranian missile strike on Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.
"The[is] is the federal government telling news stations to provide favorable coverage of the war or their licenses will be pulled," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media in response to the post. "A truly extraordinary moment. We aren't on the verge of a totalitarian takeover. WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. Act like it."
Several other media professionals, free speech advocates, and Democratic politicians understood Carr's post as a threat.
"The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that."
"The FCC is threatening the licenses of news stations that report on the effects of Iranian attacks on the American military," wrote journalist Séamus Malekafzali.
Bulwark economics editor Catherine Rampell wrote, "FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatens broadcast licenses over Iran War coverage."
Journalist Sam Stein posted, "The state doesn't like the war coverage, threatens the license of the broadcasters."
Independent news network MediasTouch wrote: "Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official."
"The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that," the group continued.
"This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered."
Several pointed out that such a threat would be in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press.
"Constitutional law 101: It’s illegal for the government to censor free speech it just doesn’t like about Trump’s Iran war," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted on social media. "This threat is straight out of the authoritarian playbook."
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who has faced scrutiny from the administration for advising service members to disobey illegal orders, wrote: "When our nation is at war it is critical that the press is free to report without government interference. It is literally in the Constitution. This is overreach by the FCC because this administration doesn’t like the microscope and doesn’t want to be held accountable."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote, "If Trump doesn't like your coverage of the war, his FCC will pull your broadcast license. That is flagrantly unconstitutional."
Aaron Terr, the director of public advocacy at the Foundation of Individual Rights and Expression, said: "The president's hand-picked misinformation czar is at it again, singling out 'fake news' that conflicts with his boss' political agenda. The First Amendment doesn't allow the government to censor information about the war it's waging."
Free Press senior director of strategy and communications Timothy Karr responded to Carr with a screenshot of the First Amendment and the words: "Here it is—as it seems you've forgotten what you swore an oath to 'support and defend.'"
This is not the first time that Carr has been accused of putting his loyalty to Trump over his duty to the Constitution. In September, he pressured ABC to take comedian Jimmy Kimmel off the air over remarks Kimmel had made following the murder of Charlie Kirk.
While ABC eventually reinstated Kimmel's show following public backlash, free speech advocates warned at the time that the Trump administration would not stop trying to censor opposing views.
“The Trump regime’s war on free speech is no joke—and it’s not over," Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron said at the time.
Indeed, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) wrote of Carr's Saturday statement: "This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered."
Carr's note comes at a particularly urgent time for independent media coverage in the US, as Paramount Skydance, which is run by the son of pro-Trump billionaire Larry Ellison, is set to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns CNN. The Trump administration has often criticized CNN's coverage, including of the war.
On Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters, “The sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better,” as he complained about a CNN report on how the Pentagon underestimated the risk that Iran would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US aggression.
Carr has already spoken out in favor of the merger, telling CNBC he thought it was a "good deal, and I think it should get through pretty quickly."
This piece has been updated with quotes from Sens. Chris Murphy, Elizabeth Warren, and Mark Kelly.
“Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill," one advocate said.
State leaders and environmental advocates responded with outrage after the Trump administration on Friday ordered the restarting of a California pipeline that caused one of the largest oil spills in the state's history, a move that comes as oil prices have skyrocketed following President Donald Trump's launching of an illegal war against Iran and Iran's subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
After Trump issued an executive order on Friday authorizing the Department of Energy (DOE) to ramp up oil and gas development under the Defense Production Act, Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered Sable Offshore Corp. to restart operations on the Santa Ynez Unit and Pipeline System, which include an offshore rig and a network of offshore and onshore pipelines along the Santa Barbara coast. Among them is a pipeline that ruptured in 2015, spilling around 450,000 gallons of oil into Refugio State Beach and killing hundreds of marine mammals and sea birds.
“Californians have repeatedly rejected dangerous drilling off our coast for decades," Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said in a statement on Saturday. "Now, after dragging the US into a war with Iran and driving up oil prices, the Trump administration is trying to exploit this crisis to further enrich the oil industry at the expense of our communities and our environment."
In his statement, Wright emphasized the defense benefits of resuming drilling, arguing that "today’s order will strengthen America’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system vital to our national security and defense, ensuring that West Coast military installations have the reliable energy critical to military readiness.”
“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal."
The DOE added that "Sable's facility can produce approximately 50,000 barrels of oil per day, a 15% increase to California’s in-state oil production, that can replace nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign crude each month."
Yet, far from a novel response to an unexpected emergency, the order is actually an escalation in a preexisting battle between California and the Trump administration over the future of the pipeline system. The state's Attorney General Rob Bonta sued to stop the administration from a federal takeover of two of the pipelines in January.
Sable also faces several lawsuits due to its attempts to restart the system after it purchased it from ExxonMobil in 2024, and has not yet cleared all of the state permitting requirements, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.
"In its latest brazen abuse of power, the Trump administration is attempting to seize exclusive federal control over two of California’s onshore pipelines," Bonta said on social media Friday evening. "We will not stand by as this administration continues their unlawful all-out assault on California and our coastlines, and we are reviewing all of our legal options."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom also spoke out against Wright's announcement.
"Trump knew his war with Iran would raise gas prices," he wrote on social media. "Now he wants to illegally resurrect a pipeline shut down by courts and facing criminal charges. And it won't even cut prices. I refuse to let Trump sacrifice Californians, our environment, or our $51 billion coastal economy."
The Center for Biological Diversity noted that this order would mark the first time that the Defense Production Act was used to force an oil company to restart out-of-use Infrastructure and to disregard the state permitting process.
“This is a revolting power grab by an extremist president. Trump is misusing this Cold War-era law just to help a Texas oil company skirt vital state laws that protect our coastline, and Californians will pay the price,” Talia Nimmer, an attorney for the center, said. “Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill. Overriding state law to let an oil company restart pipelines sets a radically dangerous precedent. It’s clear that no state is safe from Trump.”
The center also promised to push back against the order.
“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal,” Nimmer said. “We’re exploring all legal avenues. This dangerous action should be swiftly blocked by the courts.”