

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Yesterday evening, the district court in Washington, D.C. ruled against
two men who died in Guantanamo in June 2006 and their families in a
case seeking to hold federal officials and the United States
responsible for the men's torture, arbitrary detention and ultimate
deaths at Guantanamo.
Yesterday evening, the district court in Washington, D.C. ruled against
two men who died in Guantanamo in June 2006 and their families in a
case seeking to hold federal officials and the United States
responsible for the men's torture, arbitrary detention and ultimate
deaths at Guantanamo.
Following a two-year investigation, the military concluded that the men
had committed suicide. Recent first-hand accounts by four soldiers
stationed at the base at the time of the deaths, however, raise serious
questions about the cause and circumstances of the deaths, including
the possibility that the men died as the result of torture.
In dismissing the case, the district court ruled that the deceased's
constitutional claims that it was a violation of due process and cruel
treatment to detain them for four years without charge while subjecting
them to inhumane and degrading conditions of confinement and violent
acts of torture and abuse, could not be heard in federal court. The men
were held on the basis of an "enemy combatant" finding by a Combatant
Status Review Tribunal later found by the Supreme Court itself to be
inadequate.
The district court held that the claims were barred by a
jurisdiction-stripping provision of the 2006 Military Commissions Act
that bars any challenge by a Guantanamo detainee to their treatment,
conditions, or any other aspect of their detention, while failing to
address the plaintiffs' arguments about the unconstitutionality of the
provision itself. The court also dismissed the deceased's claims under
the Alien Tort Claims Act, following a holding by the D.C. Circuit
Court in another detainee case that found that even torture or
seriously criminal conduct can fall within the proper "scope of
employment" of a government actor. Last, the court failed to consider
the merits of plaintiffs' claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
including for emotional distress by the families, by holding that the
U.S. military base at Guantanamo is still a "foreign country" for the
purposes of the Act.
"These men were tortured and detained for four years on the basis of an
arbitrary designation of 'enemy combatant' and died in the custody of
the United States military. They and their families should have the
right to have their claims heard at the very least," said Pardiss Kebriaei, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.
"The court's decision is all the more troubling in light of recent
information that seriously undermines the official account of how these
men died, and creates an even greater urgency for transparency and
accountability."
On January 18, 2010, Scott Horton reported in Harper's Magazine
the accounts of four soldiers assigned to guard the camp where the
deceased were detained at the time of their deaths. The soldiers'
eye-witness accounts, including that of a ranking Army officer who was
on senior guard duty the night of the deaths, strongly suggest that the
deceased were taken to a secret "black site" at Guantanamo on the night
of their deaths and died at that site or from events that occurred
there. The undisclosed facility was thought to have been used by the
CIA or the Joint Special Operations Command of the Defense Department
to hold and interrogate detainees at Guantanamo. The soldiers further
describe a high-level cover-up initiated by the authorities within
hours of the men's deaths, and say they were ordered by their superiors
not to speak out.
Additional reports by Seton Hall University School of Law
analyzing the military's investigation files reveal major unanswered
questions and information gaps in the official account of the deaths,
including failures to review relevant available information and
interview material witnesses.
In June, a sixth man died at the base, Muhammad Ahmad Abdallah Salih,
also known as Al Hanashi, a 31-year-old Yemeni who had been detained at
Guantanamo Bay since 2002.
CCR represents the families of Yasser Al-Zahrani of Saudi Arabia and
Salah Al-Salami of Yemen, two men who were reportedly found dead along
with a third detainee, Mani Al-Utaybi of Saudi Arabia, in their cells
at Guantanamo on June 10, 2006. At the time of their deaths, Al-Zahrani
and Al-Salami had been detained incommunicado for more than four years
without charge. In letters found following their deaths, the men
described their conditions and abuse, including being beaten by teams
of military police known as the "Extreme Reaction Force," deprived of
sleep for up to 30 days at a time, subjected to desecration of the
Qur'an and forced shaving, and denied necessary medical care.
Al-Zahrani, who was 17 at the time of his arrest, wrote of the
"continuous oppression" of being isolated in a small cell each day and
prohibited human contact.
For more information and case documents in Al Zahrani, click here.
CCR has led the legal battle over Guantanamo for over eight years and
has been responsible for organizing and coordinating more than 500 pro
bono lawyers across the country in order to represent the men detained
there. CCR also works with men who were formerly detained and their
families to seek justice and accountability for the abuses suffered
during their imprisonment.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464"If the monstrous political-economic system that is tearing our planet, the climate, and its people apart isn't brought to its knees—then humanity will be," warned one climate scientist.
Led by Big Tech billionaires including Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison, and Elon Musk, the world's 500 richest people added a record $2.2 trillion to their collective wealth in 2025, Bloomberg reported as the year ended on Wednesday.
"Obscene greed! While billions of people live in poverty," human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell responded on X—a social media platform now controlled by Musk, the richest person on Earth. "It's why we need a global wealth tax."
Musk—who could become the world's first trillionaire thanks to his new controversial pay package as CEO of Tesla—is one of just eight ultrawealthy individuals who got around a quarter of all the gains recorded by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The others are Amazon founder Bezos and Oracle chairman Ellison, as well as Michael Dell, Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg. The previous year, Bloomberg noted, "the same eight billionaires made up 43% of the total gains."
According to Bloomberg, the gains that brought the combined net worth of all 500 people to $11.9 trillion "were turbocharged" by the 2024 election victory of President Donald Trump. The Republican and his relatives were among the "biggest winners" of 2025, gaining at least $282 million, for a net worth of $6.8 billion.
The "winners" also include Musk, who gained $190.3 billion for a net worth of $622.7 billion; Ellison, who gained $57.7 billion for a net worth of $249.8 billion; and Australian mining magnate Gina Rinehart, who gained $12.6 billion for a net worth of $37.7 billion.
After Trump's electoral win, several Big Tech billionaires buddied up to him, with Bezos, Musk, Zuckerberg, Apple CEO Tim Cook, and Google CEO Sundar Pichai all attending his inauguration. Musk then spent several months spearheading the administration's attack on federal workforce as the de facto leader of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
The world’s 500 richest people have total wealth of $11.9tn.Their wealth up by $2.2tn in 2025. 8 billionaires accounting for a 25% of the gains.No one becomes this rich by working.They fund right-wing parties, oppose worker/human rights, cause more pollution than normal people.
[image or embed]
— Prem Sikka (@premnsikka.bsky.social) January 1, 2026 at 3:21 AM
Sharing the Guardian's coverage of the findings on the social media network Bluesky, British climate scientist Bill McGuire warned that "if the monstrous political-economic system that is tearing our planet, the climate, and its people apart isn't brought to its knees—then humanity will be."
The Guardian pointed to Oxfam International's November statement that $2.2 trillion "would have been more than enough to lift 3.8 billion people out of poverty," which the humanitarian group highlighted ahead of the Group of 20 Summit hosted by South Africa, whose government used its G20 presidency to push for solutions to global inequality.
"Inequality is a deliberate policy choice. Despite record wealth at the top, public wealth is stagnating, even declining, and debt distress is growing," Oxfam executive director Amitabh Behar said at the time. "Inequality rips away life opportunities and rights from the majority of citizens, sparking poverty, hunger, resentment, distrust, and instability."
A June 2024 report from French economist and EU Tax Observatory director Gabriel Zucman—prepared for the G20's Brazilian presidency—estimated that a global 2% minimum tax on the wealth of 3,000 billionaires could generate about $250 billion.
As seven Nobel laureates, including Joseph Stiglitz, noted in a July op-ed published by the French newspaper Le Monde, "By extending this minimum rate to individuals with wealth over $100 million, these sums would increase significantly."
"My team and I are exploring all our legal options to ensure that critical childcare services do not get abruptly slashed based on pretext and grandstanding," said Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.
The Trump administration on Wednesday froze federal childcare funding to every state in the US after initially suspending funds for Minnesota earlier this week, a move that the state's Democratic attorney general condemned as a "hasty, scorched-earth attack" on key social services.
Jim O'Neill, deputy secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said in a statement posted to social media that he has "activated our defend the spend system for all [Administration for Children and Families] payments" to states, alleging "fraud that appears to be rampant in Minnesota and across the country." As evidence, O'Neill cited a viral video by Nick Shirley, a right-wing influencer who recently visited Somali-owned Minnesota daycare sites at the direction of state Republicans.
In order to receive Administration for Children and Families (ACF) funding going forward, O'Neill said Thursday, states will have to provide "a justification and a receipt or photo evidence." States with childcare centers that the Trump administration suspects of fraud will have to jump through additional hoops, according to an HHS spokesperson.
The Trump administration's decision to cut off childcare funds to all states—not just Minnesota—on the dubious grounds of fighting fraud came after Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz accused President Donald Trump of politicizing the issue to advance a broader assault on the social safety net.
"While Minnesota has been combating fraud, the president has been letting fraudsters out of jail," Walz wrote in a social media post on Thursday, apparently referring to the president's commutation of the seven-year prison sentence of David Gentile, a former private equity executive convicted of defrauding more than 10,000 investors.
"Trump’s using an issue he doesn’t give a damn about as an excuse to hurt working Minnesotans," Walz added.
"If we allow this funding freeze to happen, all Minnesotans are going to suffer."
In a statement on Wednesday, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said that the Trump administration "is threatening funding for the essential childcare services that countless families across Minnesota rely on—apparently all on the basis of one video on social media."
"To say I am outraged is an understatement," he said. "We’ve seen this movie before. In mid-December, the Trump administration gave four counties in Minnesota one month to conduct in-person interviews with almost 100,000 households that receive [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] benefits to reverify their eligibility."
"My team and I are exploring all our legal options to ensure that critical childcare services do not get abruptly slashed based on pretext and grandstanding," Ellison added.
Minnesota state Rep. Carlie Kotyza-Witthuhn (D-49B), co-chair of the Legislature's committee on children and families, warned that "if we allow this funding freeze to happen, all Minnesotans are going to suffer."
“This is truly the honor and privilege of a lifetime," the new mayor said.
Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani was sworn in as New York City's mayor early Thursday inside an abandoned subway station, capping off the rise to power of a former state assembly member whose laser focus on affordability, willingness to challenge establishment corruption, and adept use of social media inspired the electorate—including many previous nonvoters.
Mamdani's choice of location for the swearing-in ceremony, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, symbolized his commitment to restoring a city "that dared to be both beautiful and build great things that would transform working people’s lives," the mayor said in a statement.
During his campaign, Mamdani pledged to pursue a number of ambitious changes that he and his team will now begin the work of trying to implement, from fast and free buses to a $30 minimum wage to universal childcare—an agenda that would be funded by higher taxes on large corporations and the wealthiest 1% of New Yorkers.
“Happy New Year to New Yorkers both inside this tunnel and above,” Mamdani said in brief remarks at the ceremony. “This is truly the honor and privilege of a lifetime.”
This is now the official account of Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Welcome to a new era for NYC. pic.twitter.com/sDyiGWUVeb
— Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@NYCMayor) January 1, 2026
Much of Mamdani's agenda would require action from the city legislature. But in the weeks leading up to his swearing-in, members of Mamdani's team scoured city statutes looking for ways Mamdani could use his mayoral authority to lower prices quickly.
In an interview with Vox earlier this week, Mamdani said that enacting his agenda is "not just critically important because you’re fulfilling what animated so many to engage with the campaign, to support the campaign, but also because of the impact it can have on New Yorkers’ lives."
"There’s a lot of politics where it feels like it’s a contest around narrative, that when you win something, it’s just for the story that you can tell of what you won, but so many working people can’t feel that victory in their lives," he said. "The point of a rent freeze is you feel it every first of the month. The point of a fast and free bus is you feel it every day when you’re waiting for a bus that sometimes never comes. The point of universal child care is so that you don’t have to pay $22,500 a year for a single toddler."
Prior to Thursday's ceremony, former Democratic Mayor Eric Adams spent his final hours on a veto spree, blocking 19 bills including worker-protection legislation.
City & State reported that "among the 19 pieces of legislation that received a last-minute veto was a bill that would expand a cap on street vending licenses, a bill that aims to protect ride-hailing drivers from unjust deactivations from their apps, a bill that would prohibit federal immigration authorities from keeping an office at Rikers Island, and a bill that would grant the Civilian Complaint Review Board direct access to police body-cam footage."
Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, said in a statement that "Mayor Adams' last stand to steal protections from workers can’t dampen our hope for a better New York City under the leadership of Zohran Mamdani... and his pro-worker appointees, including Julie Su."