January, 26 2010, 01:28pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Diana Duarte, Media Coordinator,Phone: +1 212 627 0444,Email:,media@madre.org
Notes From Our Partner in Haiti
Ophelia Dahl, Executive Director of Partners in Health, arrived in
Haiti on Friday, January 22 to meet with staff and volunteers and to
assess Zanmi Lasante's needs for the coming weeks and months.
MADRE is providing emergency support to Zanmi Lasante, a Haitian healthcare initiative founded by Partners in Health.
These are some notes we received from Ophelia after her first two days in Haiti.
WASHINGTON
Ophelia Dahl, Executive Director of Partners in Health, arrived in
Haiti on Friday, January 22 to meet with staff and volunteers and to
assess Zanmi Lasante's needs for the coming weeks and months.
MADRE is providing emergency support to Zanmi Lasante, a Haitian healthcare initiative founded by Partners in Health.
These are some notes we received from Ophelia after her first two days in Haiti.
Haiti's catastrophe will forever divide its history into before earthquake and after.
Dust
has not settled. Flying towards pap you could see a thick layer of smog
lingering above the city. The air is acrid, stings the eyes and makes
you cough. The airport is its own world. A spread of tents large and
small, containers, supplies, boxes, vehicles, bicycles, and people
wandering about in and out of uniform.
We bumped into
Jens, the UN engineer who had worked with us on the bridge we helped
build in Boucan Carre, who was the last person to be pulled out alive
from the UN meeting building. He had been under rubble for 6-8 days.
Needless to say he looked like a walking skeleton and sounded very
jittery. He simply said, "I had a lot of luck".
We drove to
the University Hospital (HUEH). The scene there is truly impressive in
so many ways. Much progress has been made. Medical tents are lined up
in a row, and, inside, beds and stretchers lie close together, most
patients are post surgery, bandaged or in casts. They are now receiving
narcotics. Operating rooms up and running now 24 hours a day. Patients
are lying mostly with haunted eyes but always respond to a greeting,
often waving slow hand. I had to try to stop greeting them so they
wouldn't have to wave back in pain.
Last night, I sat
outside the main tent at HUEH on a bench talking to Evan [Dr. Evan
Lyon] and David [Dr. David Walton]. With the lights on inside the tent,
I could see the silhouettes of the relatives tending to the patients,
washing with a rag, feeding or massaging them. The sadness everywhere
is so palpable. Haitians are usually very expressive in their mourning.
Before quake, a wake would take place all night with women outside on
the ground wailing and shouting in agony. People often fainted during
funerals. I can't imagine that happening here now. The wailing would
never stop. There is no energy for weeping. Everything is marked by
the quiet. Nearly everyone, adults, and children have the same
expression of flat sadness.
Volunteers run about and some
nurses both Haitian and American are around though everywhere a lack of
nursing care. On the campus, the nursing school has collapsed,
pancaked in between two buildings that still stand. Its rubble holds
the remains of the entire second year nursing class. You can smell the
bodies when you walk past. Yet people do still walk past because there
is no choice but to get other places. It seems so feckless which
buildings crumbled which is why no one feels safe in a concrete
structure.
Outside in the courtyards at HUEH, the patients
who evacuated from the ward after the second wave of aftershocks have
constructed makeshift tents over their beds. It is starting to look
like people are staying - where else can they go? The main buildings
are mostly still standing on the HUEH campus, but several have major
cracks. Patients are afraid to be inside. Evan described the days that
have been lost to bringing 80 patients in and out of the wards. When
people felt the tremors, they pulled out their IVs and just scrambled
out the best, fastest way they could. Polo [Dr. Paul Farmer] described
a woman about 35 years old who had come to the hospital from the south.
She was also attached to oxygen and afraid. He asked her whether anyone
was with her. She said no one. She lost all her family and was brought
to the hospital by a neighbor.We also saw a woman who had been
brought back to the hospital with tetanus. She was fine and had been
discharged after the initial surgery on her foot. But now her neck was
stiff her head tilted back, she looked rigid and very sick. There will
be medical challenges for many months and years to come. Other
challenges remain too, including sanitation (there are no real
toilets). You can imagine.
So many people are doing such a
stellar job. Obviously I know it is many many folks, but Evan and David
are shining stars. Old news, I know, but Evan reinforced how
life-saving it has been to have Jim Ansara help get the electricity
going. No power was responsible for a lot of deaths in the first few
days.
The first night, after touring parts of the city, I
stayed with Evan, David, Jim Ansara, and Chris Strock with a family in
Port-au-Prince. We slept on the floor inside their house. The family
slept on the ground outside--still too unsure to go in.
Yesterday,
we had a leadership meeting with Loune [Loune Viaud], Fernet [Dr.
Fernet Leandre], Joia [Dr. Joia Mukherjee], Louise [Dr. Louise Ivers],
Lambert [Dr. Gregory Lambert] and Polo to talk about the mid- and
long-term response, particularly a community-based outreach movement--we
spoke of ten specific communities--with a massive training of Community
Health Workers for follow-up wound care and chronic care. We discussed
key partnerships with food and water organizations. Joia also returned
yesterday and has a plethora of details to be shared and refined.
Paul
and I headed to Cange following our meeting. Silence everywhere and a
sort of stoicism I had not seen here before. It is impossible to greet
colleagues and friends and not see that their hearts are broken.
We
went first to visit the church which has probably 70 patients lying on
mattresses in rows on the ground. All of them have casts on limbs or
white bandages over their stumps. Dressings are changed every day by
Haitian staff and volunteers and need to continue to be changed for
weeks to come. In the corner of the church is an overflow pharmacy, the
piano has become a work top and meds cover the altar. Docs round on the
patients. Lovely Dr. Jon Crocker was seeing patients with a team of
volunteers. And, as always, relatives help their loved ones with simple
tasks. There is mostly quiet, no one is talking much, but there is a
sense of community. Apparently, some patients moved to other wards have
asked to some back to the church. We will have mass today in the Clinic
Externe.
In the hospital all wards taken up with amputees,
fractures, some in need of spinal care. Probably 200 patients. The team
reported having done 1150 x-rays in Cange. The x-ray room is a
miserable place to be for those who have made the long trek, limbs must
be placed in best position to get a good film and it is painful. But
the films help ensure surgeries go smoothly.
There is a
long road ahead for plastics with skin grafts and wound care. We are
planning for all that. We'll need a big infusion of prosthetics in a
few months. Perhaps tens of thousands of amputees - hard to count. Koji
[Dr. Koji Nakashima] says there are some landmine NGOs with good
experience (Cambodia etc.) - we should reach out because it is clear it
can't be done cottage industry style, with donations here and there.
Also, there is loads of PT needed - it is so hilly, hard to imagine
life here without both legs.
I'm deeply moved by our staff
- many are suffering huge loss but are still here. One of our lab techs
lost her husband and her son suffered head trauma and kidney failure,
yet she keeps coming to work. Having volunteer teams working with our
staff is going well - team from CA here right now are lovely people.
The operating rooms are working hard - we're able to do roughly 16
surgeries per day. There are three rooms available, but one is kept for
emergencies and C-sections, which of course still go on.
I
am struck by many things, but the silence is deafening. The road from
Cange to Hinche used to be a busy thoroughfare with trucks hurtling
back and forth all day and blasting their horns. Yesterday, I counted
only a handful of trucks. The trucks used to be loaded with food and
things for market. Now there is just quiet - a sign that we are far
from any sort of economic normalcy.
Patients are still arriving in a steady stream from Port-au-Prince. I'm heading to Hinche and, hopefully, to St Marc tomorrow.
MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that partners with community-based women's groups to advance women's human rights, challenge injustice and create social change in contexts of war, conflict, disaster and their aftermath. MADRE advocates for a world in which all people enjoy individual and collective human rights; natural resources are shared equitably and sustainably; women participate effectively in all aspects of society; and all people have a meaningful say in policies that affect their lives. For more information about MADRE, visit www.madre.org.
LATEST NEWS
US Increases Dominance as World's Top Arms Exporter
"The impacts of the global arms trade aren't just about the volume of weapons delivered," said one expert, citing "a few examples of how U.S. arms deliveries can make the world a more dangerous place."
Mar 13, 2023
A Sweden-based research institute published a report Monday showing that the United States accounted for 40% of the world's weapons exports in the years 2018-22, selling armaments to more than 100 countries while increasing its dominance of the global arms trade.
The report—entitled Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2022—was published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and listed the United States, Russia, France, China, and Germany as the world's top five arms exporters from 2018-22. The five nations accounted for 76% of worldwide weapons exports during that period.
The five biggest arms importers over those five years were India, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Australia, and China.
"The United States has much room for improvement."
The United States saw a 14% increase in arms exports over the previous five-year period analyzed by SIPRI. U.S. arms were delivered to 103 nations from 2018-22, with 41% going to the Middle East.
"Even as arms transfers have declined globally, those to Europe have risen sharply due to the tensions between Russia and most other European states," Pieter Wezeman, senior researcher at the SIPRI Arms Transfers Program, said in a statement. "Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, European states want to import more arms, faster. Strategic competition also continues elsewhere: Arms imports to East Asia have increased and those to the Middle East remain at a high level."
According to the report, Russia's invasion of Ukraine early last year "had only a limited impact on the total volume of arms transfers in 2018–22, but Ukraine did become a major importer of arms in 2022."
Ukraine was the 14th-largest arms importer from 2018-22 and the third-biggest last year.
Wiliam Hartung, a senior research fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote Monday that "the impacts of the global arms trade aren't just about the volume of weapons delivered. The question is how those weapons are likely to be used, and the extent to which they promote stability versus fueling conflict or propping up repressive regimes with abysmal human rights records."
"On this score the United States has much room for improvement," he continued. "Transfers to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for use at the peak of their brutal war in Yemen, and sales to major human rights violators from the Philippines, Egypt, and Nigeria are a few examples of how U.S. arms deliveries can make the world a more dangerous place."
"There are a number of promising steps that Congress can take—as articulated by a new coalition, the Arms Sales Accountability Project—that would mandate closer scrutiny of U.S. sales," Hartung asserted.
"There is also some useful language in the Biden administration's new arms transfer policy directive, that, if implemented, would significantly rein in the most egregious sales," he added. "Only time will tell if U.S. policy can be moved towards one based on arms sales restraint rather than arms sales promotion."
Keep ReadingShow Less
100+ Groups Detail Demands for Dioxin Testing After Toxic Train Derailment
"It's important for the residents of East Palestine that accurate and transparent testing for dioxin be done at the lowest levels possible, so that the residents can begin to understand the risks they face and can make informed decisions to protect their health," said one expert.
Mar 13, 2023
While welcoming a federal order that Norfolk Southern test for dioxins near a derailed train that was carrying hazardous materials through East Palestine, Ohio, over 100 groups on Monday shared "recommendations on how this testing should be conducted to improve transparency, rebuild public trust, and comprehensively address possible releases."
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) told the rail company to develop a plan to test for dioxins—carcinogenic chemical compounds that persist in the environment and human body and are tied to developmental, reproductive, and immune system problems—only after nearly a month of pressure from residents across Ohio and Pennsylvania.
River Valley Organizing (RVO), Toxic-Free Future, and other organizations signed the letter sent on Monday to agency leaders including EPA Administrator Michael Regan—which states that "to date, Norfolk Southern has done an extremely poor job of building trust with the community of East Palestine and other communities impacted by the disaster."
"We strongly recommend the U.S. EPA itself conduct the dioxin sampling or hire its own consultants to conduct the testing."
"To ensure this testing is adequately conducted, and to rebuild public trust, we strongly recommend the U.S. EPA itself conduct the dioxin sampling or hire its own consultants to conduct the testing," the letter continues. "Norfolk Southern should not be in charge of the dioxin sampling. This testing must be paid for by the responsible parties, not taxpayers."
Along with laying out what the groups believe should be detailed in the dioxin sampling plan—including goals, locations, detection limits, procedures, and laboratories used—the letter calls for allowing residents to weigh in before testing begins.
"All sampling data and test results should be made available to the public for review in a transparent and easily accessible format," the organizations argued. "This information must be accessible for review, given the need for results to be meaningful to impacted communities as well as to build trust through transparent action."
While the EPA has said that its own "monitoring for indicator chemicals has suggested a low probability" that dioxins were released as a result of the February 3 derailment and subsequent "controlled burn" of vinyl chloride, as the letter says:
Responders reportedly punctured and burned more than 115,000 gallons of vinyl chloride in uncontrolled conditions for numerous days, making it likely that dioxins and related chlorinated substances were formed and released into the communities surrounding the disaster site. Four train cars of polyvinyl chloride plastic also burned, also likely forming dioxins. There have been elevated levels of dioxins released in other major accidents involving chlorinated chemicals—from the 2004 explosion at the PVC plant in Illiopolis, Illinois, to the 1997 Plastimet PVC recycling fire in Ontario, to the 2001 World Trade Center attacks.
The organizations also recommended that "the EPA work with other agencies to provide medical monitoring for impacted
communities, especially East Palestine and those in the combustion plume, that desire it."
"Communities surrounding and downwind of the derailment have a right to know whether the fire resulted in elevated concentrations of dioxins. The testing must be transparent and comprehensive," the letter asserts. "This would help demonstrate EPA's commitment to comprehensively responding to this disaster, rebuilding trust with East Palestine and other impacted communities, and advancing environmental justice."
Leaders and experts at groups that signed the letter echoed its key messages in a statement Monday—including RVO co-executive director Amanda Kiger, who declared that "this community deserves to know what potential toxic chemicals they will have to live with for years to come due to Norfolk Southern's greed."
Just like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called forever chemicals, "dioxins are toxic even at very low levels of exposure," noted Mike Schade, director of Mind the Store, a program of Toxic-Free Future.
Stephen Lester, science director of the Center for Health, Environment & Justice, highlighted that "exposure to dioxins can cause cancer, reproductive damage, developmental problems, immune effects, skin lesions, and other adverse effects."
"It's important for the residents of East Palestine that accurate and transparent testing for dioxin be done at the lowest levels possible, so that the residents can begin to understand the risks they face and can make informed decisions to protect their health," Lester said.
Others took aim at Norfolk Southern, which since the derailment has faced intense scrutiny for its safety culture and practices.
Given that "Norfolk Southern has obvious financial conflicts of interest in the outcomes of all environmental testing and public health evaluations," Dr. Ted Schettler, science director at the Science and Environmental Health Network, stressed the need for "rigorous oversight of the U.S. EPA, including strict quality control measures and split-sample testing."
Judith Enck, a former U.S. EPA regional administrator who is now president of Beyond Plastics, said that "it is unfortunate that the EPA took a month to decide to test for dioxins, and then rather than doing it itself, is having Norfolk Southern consultants to do the actual testing."
"The testing plan is too limited and should be revised to require some testing inside people's homes, at schools, and air filters in schools and buildings and cars should be tested, not just soil," she added. "Rain has likely driven contaminants toward groundwater and that water should be tested over a period of months and year[s]."
Enck's comments came after she wrote in a New York Times opinion piece last week that the EPA should have "ordered comprehensive testing the very day of the burn" and "told residents, especially pregnant women and families with young children, not to return home until it was safe to do so."
"Instead, it timidly stood back, leaving local authorities, corporate interests, and rumors to fill the void," she charged. "In lieu of a comprehensive plan, the EPA appears to be playing a game of crisis whack-a-mole, waiting and then responding to the news cycle. This is no way to safeguard our communities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Barney Frank Under Fire for Downplaying Deregulation While Being Paid by Signature Bank
After he had received more than $1 million as a Signature board member, the architect of the Dodd-Frank banking regulations minimized the risks of weakening rules he helped enact post-2008 financial crisis.
Mar 13, 2023
Barney Frank, a former House Democrat from Massachusetts, has been the subject of criticism since federal regulators took over Signature Bank on Sunday.
That's because Frank, architect of the Dodd-Frank banking regulations implemented in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, played a key role in whitewashing the bipartisan effort to weaken those rules in 2018—after he had received more than $1 million while serving on Signature's board following his departure from Congress.
Since federal regulators seized Signature's assets on Sunday—two days after they intervened to protect depositors amid the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB)—progressive critics have been quick to blame a deregulatory measure approved five years ago by the then-Republican-controlled Congress for engendering two of the three largest bank failures in U.S. history.
The GOP, however, wasn't alone in supporting Sen. Mike Crapo's (R-Idaho) Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a trenchant critic of the legislation, observed when it was moving through Congress, several Democrats—including Sens. Mark Warner (Va.), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), and Jon Tester (Mont.)—were integral to its passage.
To justify their decision, many of them pointed to Frank. The originator of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act used his cachet as a presumed banking expert to legitimize a rollback of the very framework he helped enact in 2010 as chair of the House Financial Services Committee. But the ex-lawmaker wasn't merely an uninterested bystander. In 2015, he joined the board of directors at Signature, a crypto-friendly bank that was poised to benefit from less stringent oversight.
Frank said Crapo's Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act "would not help the biggest Wall Street banks and denied it would increase the risks of another financial crisis," The Washington Post reported when then-President Donald Trump signed the bill into law in May 2018. "Some Democrats leaned heavily on those words as they pushed back against the plan's liberal critics."
However, the newspaper noted, "proponents of the law rarely, if ever, mentioned that Frank is not just the author of the 2010 law, but also sits on the board of New York-based Signature Bank."
In the wake of Signature's collapse on Sunday night, Frank's role in downplaying the risks of deregulation—while being paid by a bank that stood to gain from it—has received fresh light.
As the Post reported in May 2018: "Dodd-Frank imposed additional regulatory safeguards on banks with more than $50 billion in assets, but the rollback that passed this week, among other things, raises that threshold to $250 billion. Signature Bank has more than $40 billion in assets and can now grow significantly without automatically facing additional regulation."
But the bank's growth over the past half-decade came to a screeching halt over the weekend when its customers, alarmed by the failure of SVB, quickly withdrew $10 billion.
"Frank acknowledged that Signature stood to benefit, but he said his role on the bank's board did not influence his thinking," the Post reported five years ago. "Frank said his position on the threshold predates his compensation from the financial sector."
As Politicoreported on Monday, Frank disputes that Trump-era deregulation "had anything to do with" Signature's failure, even though it weakened oversight of "mid-size and regional banks like his own."
"I don't think that had any impact," Frank told the outlet. "They hadn't stopped examining banks."
Frank went so far as to tellCNBC that there was "no real objective reason" that Signature had to enter federal receivership.
"I think part of what happened was that regulators wanted to send a very strong anti-crypto message," Frank argued. "We became the poster boy because there was no insolvency based on the fundamentals."
Warren, by contrast, has focused her ire directly on the deregulatory moves minimized by Frank.
"Had Congress and the Federal Reserve not rolled back the stricter oversight, SVB and Signature would have been subject to stronger liquidity and capital requirements to withstand financial shocks," Warren wrote Monday in a New York Times opinion piece.
"They would have been required to conduct regular stress tests to expose their vulnerabilities and shore up their businesses," the lawmaker continued. "But because those requirements were repealed, when an old-fashioned bank run hit SVB, the bank couldn't withstand the pressure—and Signature's collapse was close behind."
"These bank failures were entirely avoidable if Congress and the Fed had done their jobs and kept strong banking regulations in place since 2018," she added. "SVB and Signature are gone, and now Washington must act quickly to prevent the next crisis."
Like Warren, Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont has called for fully repealing "the disastrous 2018 bank deregulation law."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.