November, 13 2009, 11:10am EDT
Constitution Project Welcomes Federal Prosecution of Some Detainees While Denouncing Use of Military Commissions for Others
Transfer of some detainees suspected of terrorism offenses into federal court consistent with policies called for in Beyond Guantanamo: A Bipartisan Declaration
WASHINGTON
Today, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will
face prosecution in a federal court in New York for the 9/11 terrorist
attacks. Also announced were plans for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a
suspect in the U.S.S. Cole bombing, along with four other detainees, to
be tried using military commissions. The Constitution Project welcomes
the decision to prosecute in federal courts some detainees suspected of
acts of terrorism, while expressing concern about the decision to
abandon that system for other detainees in favor of military
commissions.
"The Obama administration got this partially right,
but unfortunately, also partially wrong. Transferring detainees into
the federal justice system is the proper way to handle these cases,"
said Virginia Sloan, president of the Constitution Project. "But
military commissions risk circumventing our constitutional system of
justice in favor of a system rigged for convictions and where justice
cannot be a result."
Just last week, over 125 prominent
Americans called on the Obama administration and Congress to support a
policy for closing Guantanamo that is consistent with our
constitutional principles and our country's security. Beyond Guantanamo: A Bipartisan Declaration
was joined by former members of Congress, diplomats, military
officials, federal judges and prosecutors, national security and
foreign policy experts, bar leaders, and others.
"I congratulate
the Department of Justice for its decision to try high-level
individuals suspected of involvement in the 9/11 attacks in the U.S.
justice system," said William S. Sessions, former director of the FBI,
federal judge, and signatory to Beyond Guantanamo.
"The federal courts are the right place for these trials, with the
appropriate experience in balancing the needs of national security and
the protection of classified information with the rights of the
defendants to a fair trial."
An effort coordinated by the Constitution Project and Human Rights First, the Declaration
supports federal court prosecution of terrorism suspects and opposes
indefinite detention without charge. Days after its release, it was
cited on the Senate floor by Senator Patrick Leahy, during debate on an
amendment that would have barred the transfer of some detainees into
the federal justice system for trial. Senator Leahy had this to say:
"We
have also seen a strong public declaration in support of trying
terrorism offenses in Federal courts, signed by a bipartisan group of
former Members of Congress, high-ranking military officials and
judges...Experts and judges across the political spectrum have agreed
that our criminal justice system can handle this challenge and indeed
has handled it many times already."
have also seen a strong public declaration in support of trying
terrorism offenses in Federal courts, signed by a bipartisan group of
former Members of Congress, high-ranking military officials and
judges...Experts and judges across the political spectrum have agreed
that our criminal justice system can handle this challenge and indeed
has handled it many times already."
Responding
to John Cornyn (R-TX), who earlier today criticized the
administration's decision to bring the detainees to the United States
for trial, Declaration signatory Bob Barr, a former U.S. Attorney and Republican Member of Congress from Georgia, said:
"Trying
these individuals in federal courts for the heinous acts they allegedly
committed, is by no means treating them 'as common criminals,' as
Senator Cornyn inaccurately describes such process. Those federal
courts which Senator Cornyn impliedly disparages have in fact and
historically, tried, convicted and sentenced to appropriately lengthy
prison terms, individuals who have perpetrated serious terrorist acts
on our country and our citizens. It is mystifying why Senator Cornyn
today has so little faith in the ability of federal prosecutors,
federal agents, federal judges, and federal juries, to handle such
cases."
these individuals in federal courts for the heinous acts they allegedly
committed, is by no means treating them 'as common criminals,' as
Senator Cornyn inaccurately describes such process. Those federal
courts which Senator Cornyn impliedly disparages have in fact and
historically, tried, convicted and sentenced to appropriately lengthy
prison terms, individuals who have perpetrated serious terrorist acts
on our country and our citizens. It is mystifying why Senator Cornyn
today has so little faith in the ability of federal prosecutors,
federal agents, federal judges, and federal juries, to handle such
cases."
Daniel S. Seikaly, former federal prosecutor and CIA official, and another Declaration signer, said:
"I
am proud that the Obama administration has decided to try the cases of
high-level 9/11 suspects in federal court. However, I believe that the
decision to employ military commissions instead of the federal courts
for the USS Cole suspect and other detainees displays a surprising and
unwarranted lack of confidence in our constitutional principles. In my
view, the decision to circumvent a system that has served our country
well for over 200 years undercuts our assertion to other countries that
the rule of law is key to a stable and vibrant democracy."
am proud that the Obama administration has decided to try the cases of
high-level 9/11 suspects in federal court. However, I believe that the
decision to employ military commissions instead of the federal courts
for the USS Cole suspect and other detainees displays a surprising and
unwarranted lack of confidence in our constitutional principles. In my
view, the decision to circumvent a system that has served our country
well for over 200 years undercuts our assertion to other countries that
the rule of law is key to a stable and vibrant democracy."
To view the Declaration and a list of its signatories, go to:
www.constitutionproject.org
The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at https://constitutionproject.org/.
LATEST NEWS
Brutal Murder of Insurance CEO Sparks Wave of Dark Humor, Including Fictionalized Denial of Coverage Letter
"You don't have to sanction murder to see why so many Americans detest health insurance corporations who prioritize profit goals by routinely creating arbitrary reasons to deny patient needs," said one labor movement voice.
Dec 06, 2024
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside of a Manhattan hotel Wednesday has sparked a wave of dark humor and fresh fury at the for-profit U.S. healthcare system.
The barbs at UnitedHealthcare—the country's largest private insurer—included a mock denial of coverage letter posted to the subreddit r/nursing in a thread on Thompson’s murder.
"We regret to inform you that your request for coverage has been denied," the letter reads. "Our records indicate that you failed to obtain prior authorization before seeking care for the gunshot wound to your chest." The Daily Beastreported a spoof rejection letter was also posted to a since closed thread on r/medicine.
Police are in their third day searching for Thompson's killer, who shot the healthcare executive multiple times in front of a Hilton hotel in Midtown before fleeing the scene. The New York Police Department has released an image that shows a man authorities deem "a person of interest wanted for questioning" in connection to the Wednesday killing, perCNN. The image was captured at a hostel in Manhattan, according to CNN, citing law enforcement.
The words "deny," "defend," and "depose" were found written on the ammunition used by the gunman, three words that partially echo the title of the book "Delay, Deny, Defend," which details how the insurance industry avoids paying claims.
In addition to dark humor, reactions to Thompson's assassination have brought to the fore the public's downright rage at the health insurance industry.
In the comment section of Common Dreams' coverage of the murder, one commenter wrote: "I guess if you steal people's labor and deny them healthcare in order to line your own pockets, you might occasionally expect retaliation." Another wrote: "For profit health care is unethical and immoral."
"Thoughts and deductibles to the family," read one comment below a video of the shooting posted by CNN, according to The New York Times. "Unfortunately my condolences are out-of-network."
One woman whose mother with stage four breast cancer was forced to battle insurance to get new treatments approved toldNew York magazine that she experienced "a little surge of Schadenfreude," when she heard of Thompson's death.
"UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson was just 50 years old at the time of his murder, which is a lot more tragic when you know that his life expectancy as a member of the Top 1% was 88, or 15 years longer than the life expectancy of the average American male," wrote journalist and editor Moe Tkacik on X. Later, in a piece for The American Prospect, Tkacik framed the situation like this: "Only about 50 million customers of America’s reigning medical monopoly might have a motive to exact revenge upon the UnitedHealthcare CEO."
Others said that the reaction to the murder was an indication that the Democratic party ought to embrace economic populism and end their close association with corporate power.
"The mass reaction to the healthcare CEO’s murder is a reminder that there is a constant deadly class war being waged against working class Americans. If Dems ditched their billionaires and fully joined the side of the working class in that struggle they would easily win FDR style majorities," said the political commentator Krystal Ball.
Charles Idelson, former communications strategist for National Nurses United, said that "you don’t have to sanction murder to see why so many Americans detest health insurance corporations who prioritize profit goals by routinely creating arbitrary reasons to deny patient needs."
"It's not unique to UnitedHealth," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Agency Trump and Musk Want to 'Delete' Set to Deliver $1.8 Billion to Scammed US Consumers
"When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is allowed to fully do its job, Americans only stand to benefit."
Dec 06, 2024
In the coming weeks, as President-elect Donald Trump's second term approaches and his pledge to dismantle key agencies potentially comes closer to fruition, 4.3 million consumers are set to receive checks from one of the agencies the incoming administration wants to "delete."
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced Thursday that it will soon begin distributing a historic $1.8 billion to millions of people who were charged illegal junk fees or defrauded by credit repair companies including Lexington Law and CreditRepair.com.
The money will be distributed from the CFPB's victim relief fund, which was created by Congress and is financed entirely by civil penalties paid by companies and individuals who violate consumer financial protection laws.
The fund has distributed $3.3 billion to consumers since its inception, and the CFPB said the forthcoming payment will be its largest ever.
"Lexington Law and CreditRepair.com exploited vulnerable consumers who were trying to rebuild their credit, charging them illegal junk fees for results they hadn't delivered," said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. "This historic distribution of $1.8 billion demonstrates the CFPB's commitment to making consumers whole."
A district court ruled in August 2023 that the two companies had violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule's prohibition on advance fees, which bars credit repair firms from collecting fees from consumers until they prove they have achieved the results they promise to their customers.
If the CFPB payments are divided equally among those who were wrongly charged fees by the two companies, each consumer would receive about $419.
The payments are being sent days after the CFPB proposed a rule aimed at reining in data brokers who sell people's personal information.
As Common Dreamsreported, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has expressed concern about the practices of data brokers—but as Trump's nominee to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a yet-to-be-created commission that would cut regulations and government spending, Musk has pledged to "delete" the CFPB.
Filmmaker and media activist Danny Ledonne said Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, another businessman nominated to lead DOGE, likely want to do away with the CFPB because the agency acts "in the interest of regular people."
Liz Zelnick, director of the Economic Security and Corporate Power Program at government watchdog Accountable.US, said the upcoming $1.8 billion payout shows why the CFPB should remain in operation.
"When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is allowed to fully do its job, Americans only stand to benefit," said Zelnick. "Between surprise fees and misleading business practices, today's victory affirms the importance of the CFPB for defending people across the country from shady industry actors."
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said supporters of consumer protections in Congress will "fight any attempts to dismantle [CFPB], whether from Trump, Musk, or their billionaire buddies."
"The CFPB fights for everyday Americans against corporate greed, junk fees, and predatory lenders," he said. "This watchdog agency protects normal people like you and me."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Need to Tax the Rich So Much More': Musk Spent Quarter of a Billion Backing Trump
"If your income was $274 million per year, you'd make more than 99.9% of Americans," wrote one activist. "Elon Musk spent that buying the 2024 elections for Republicans."
Dec 06, 2024
Federal filings released Thursday revealed that Elon Musk spent significantly more than previously known to help secure a second White House term for Donald Trump and boost GOP congressional candidates, making the world's richest man the nation's largest political donor and perhaps the most influential figure involved with the incoming administration.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings showed that Musk, the CEO of Tesla and owner of the social media platform X, spent around $270 million this year in support of super PACs backing Trump's reelection bid.
The filings also exposed Musk as the mysterious funding source behind RBG PAC, a Republican organization named after the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Musk pumped more than $20.5 million into the super PAC, which aimed to paint Trump as more moderate on abortion than other Republicans and falsely claimed Trump shared Ginsburg's views on reproductive rights.
"In reality, RBG unequivocally supported abortion rights, believing it was a fundamental matter of equality," notedRolling Stone's Andrew Perez. "Trump, on the other hand, pledged to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade and allow states to ban abortion—and his justices did just that. When Ginsburg died late in Trump's first term, he replaced her with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, creating a 6-3 conservative supermajority on the court that overturned Roe and ended the federal right to an abortion."
Musk's ability to convert his extreme wealth into political influence underscored the need for far higher taxes on the nation's economic elites, progressives said in response to the FEC disclosures. In 2018, Musk paid nothing in federal income taxes even as his wealth soared, largely due to Tesla stock appreciation.
"We need to tax the rich so much more," activist Jonathan Cohn wrote on social media. "Not just so that we can fund programs to benefit everyone, but to prevent them from rigging the political system in their favor."
Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, noted that "if your income was $274 million per year, you'd make more than 99.9% of Americans."
"Elon Musk spent that buying the 2024 elections for Republicans," she wrote. "Tax the oligarchs."
Musk's spending on the 2024 elections outpaced that of Timothy Mellon, the secretive heir to a Gilded Age fortune who pumped $197 million into races in support of Republican candidates, Bloombergreported.
"The clear story from the final federal campaign filings of 2024 is of the damage concentrated money in politics does to our elections," said Public Citizen co-president Lisa Gilbert. "This includes being the sole backer of a super PAC that vandalized Ruth Bader Ginsburg's image to try and change Trump's public abortion position. Rich billionaires and corporate money simply ran the table in the 2024 election. They singlehandedly made the case for the aggressive campaign finance reforms we need to fix our system and get big money out of politics."
Musk, whose wealth jumped substantially following Trump's victory, is one of more than a dozen billionaires set to be either a member or close adviser to the incoming administration. The president-elect has tasked Musk and fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy with leading a commission whose goal is to gut federal regulations and slash spending.
"It's not hyperbole to call this a government of billionaires," Axiosreported Friday. "Trump's projected Cabinet alone is worth at least $10 billion... Trump's gilded Cabinet is the product of an election in which billionaires spent like never before in U.S. history—mostly on behalf of Republicans."
The billionaires in Trump's inner circle are set to play central roles in crafting policy over the next four years, including another tax-cut package that's expected to disproportionately benefit wealthy Americans. The 2017 Trump-GOP tax law that Republicans are looking to extend and expand helped boost the collective wealth of U.S. billionaires by over $2 trillion.
"The looters and polluters who are swarming around Trump bear careful watching," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said earlier this week. "Looks like no one's too rich to want to steal."
This story has been updated to include a statement from Public Citizen.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular