October, 20 2009, 10:04am EDT
Off Target - Major Retailer Accused of Organic Improprieties
State and Federal Complaints Allege Mislabeling
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn
A public interest group that focuses on food and agriculture, The
Cornucopia Institute, announced this week that it had filed formal complaints
with the USDA's organic program, and Wisconsin
and Minnesota
officials, alleging that Target Corporation has misled consumers into thinking
some conventional food items it sells are organic.
The complaints are the latest salvo into a growing controversy whereas
corporate agribusiness and major retailers have been accused of blurring the
line between "natural" products and food that has been grown,
processed and properly certified organic under tight federal standards.
"Major food processors have recognized the meteoric rise of the
organic industry, and profit potential, and want to create what is in essence
'organic light,' taking advantage of the market cachet but not
being willing to do the heavy lifting required to earn the valuable USDA
organic seal," said Mark A. Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst at
Cornucopia.
The Wisconsin-based farm policy research group discovered Target
nationally advertised Silk soymilk in newspapers with the term
"organic" pictured on the carton's label, when in fact the
manufacturer, Dean Foods, had quietly shifted their products away from
organics.
Dean Foods, and its WhiteWave division, received media scrutiny, and
industry condemnation, this past spring for not notifying retailers or changing
the UPC codes, when they quietly switched to conventional soybeans in their
core-products.
Dean/WhiteWave also received heat in the organic food and agriculture
community when they decided to convert some of their Horizon products, the
leading organic label in terms of sales volume, to cheaper "natural"
(conventional) ingredients. "This really hit a nerve because one of
these new Horizon products, Little Blends
yogurt, is aimed specifically at toddlers, at an early stage of development,
where the nutritional superiority of organic food, and its utility in avoiding
chemical residues in our food, is so critically important," Kastel added.
A front-page story in the Chicago
Tribune in July outlined a consumer survey that showed the public
was unclear about the difference between natural and organic labels and that
some corporations, particularly Dean Foods, were taking advantage of the
confusion in the marketplace.
The story quoted Suzanne Shelton, president and CEO of the Shelton
Group which conducted the survey, as saying, "They [consumers] think
'natural' is regulated by the government but that organic
isn't, and of course it's just the opposite."
In fact, a strict set of farm and food handling standards have been
developed and implemented by the federal government to regulate food that
qualifies for the USDA's organic seal. For the most part, food
products containing "natural' ingredients represent little more
than soothing marketing puffery aimed at consumers.
This is not the first tangle involving Cornucopia and Target. The
giant Minneapolis-based retailer's own upscale private label food line,
Archer Farms, which blurs the line selling both natural and organically labeled
food, came under scrutiny when Cornucopia discovered that it's organic milk
supplier, Colorado-based Aurora Dairy, was flagrantly violating federal
organic livestock standards and filed a complaint with the USDA.
USDA investigators determined that Aurora had willfully violated 14 federal
organic regulations. In what was condemned as a "sweetheart
deal" by some in the organic industry, the Bush administration allowed Aurora to stay in
business. Unlike some other retailers, Target stuck with Aurora as their milk
supplier for their Archer Farms label.
"In an industry where educational achievement and passion are the
common denominators in describing its clientele, Target could certainly be
viewed as arrogant to think they can take advantage of consumers by ignoring
both the spirit and letter of the laws governing organic commerce," Kastel
affirmed.
SuperTarget stores have gained significant market share around the
country and are, according to a recent Nielsen/Shelby report, now the number
two grocer in Minnesota's
Twin Cities market.
"We feel very
strongly about taking seriously the use of the regulated term: Organic," said Lindy Bannister, general
manager of The Wedge, the nation's largest member-owned cooperative
store. "Although we welcome all the players that bring organic food
to people, we must insist that, for the unregulated (the non-certified
retailers), they at the very least should proof their ads as they are subject
to a federal fine for misusing that regulated term."
This is not the first time The Cornucopia Institute has found that
specialty retailers, like the nation's approximately 275 co-op grocers, have faced unethical competition
from big-box chains. After the group filed complaints with federal and
state regulators against Wal-Mart in 2006, also alleging misrepresention of
conventional food as organic with improper signage in their stores, the
nation's largest retailer signed consent agreements with the USDA and the state
of Wisconsin
committing to change their practices.
"Wal-Mart did indeed clean up its act, as we expect Target to do,
but it should not take the judicious oversight of an industry watchdog to cause
these giant corporations to comply with the law, said Will
Fantle, research director for the Wisconsin-based
Cornucopia. "One of the reasons these companies can undercut other
retailers is they do not invest in the kind of management expertise necessary
to prevent problems of this nature from occurring."
"It's bad enough Target steals real
farmers' identities with that fake 'Archer Farms' label," said Barth Anderson, a consumer long involved in the
organic movement and chief blogger at Fair Food Fight. "But blurring
the lines between natural and organic is just plain wrong. Target is
trying to profiteer at the expense of consumers like me."
Anderson was adamant that, "There's nothing wrong with larger
corporations being involved in organics but if they squeeze out ethical
companies by cutting corners, or play fast and loose by the rules, everyone
loses - real farmers, organic consumers and retailers alike.
Blurring the lines between natural and organic is just plain trying to
profiteer at the expense of consumers like me."
-30-
MORE:
The complaint filed with the USDA's National Organic Program can
be viewed here:
https://www.cornucopia.org/USDA/TargetComplaint_10-09.pdf
Photos of Mr. Kastel and Mr. Fantle, along with a graphic file of the
Cornucopia logo, are available upon request.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular