October, 20 2009, 10:19am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
AIUSA media office,Email:,media@aiusa.org,Phone: 202-544-0200 x302
In New Report, Amnesty International Calls on South Korea to Cease Mistreatment of Migrant Workers
Many migrant workers in South
Korea are beaten, trafficked for sexual exploitation, and denied wages
for long periods of time, despite the introduction of rules to protect
their rights, said Amnesty International in a report issued today.
WASHINGTON
Many migrant workers in South
Korea are beaten, trafficked for sexual exploitation, and denied wages
for long periods of time, despite the introduction of rules to protect
their rights, said Amnesty International in a report issued today.
In the 98-page report, Disposable Labor:
Rights of Migrant Workers in South Korea, Amnesty International documents
the dangerous and unjust working conditions that many migrant workers are
forced into. According to the report, migrant workers often operate heavy
machinery and handle dangerous chemicals without receiving sufficient training
or protective equipment. As a result, they are at greater risk of industrial
accidents, including fatalities. To make matters worse, they often receive
less pay compared to native South Korean workers.
"Migrant workers are vulnerable to abuse
and exploitation largely because they cannot change jobs without their
employer's permission," said Roseann Rife, deputy director of Amnesty
International's Asia-Pacific program. "Work conditions are sometimes
so bad that they run away and, consequently, lose their regular status
and are then subject to arrest and deportation."
South Korea was one of the first Asian countries
to legally recognize the rights of migrant workers with the Employment
Permit System (EPS), which was meant to better protect the rights of migrant
workers. This granted them the same status as Korean workers, with equal
labor rights, pay, and benefits.
However, five years after its implementation,
many continue to face hardships and abuse.
In September 2008, there were an estimated
220,000 irregular migrant workers in the country.
The government of South Korea pledged to
halve this number by 2012, launching a massive and sometimes violent crackdown
on migrant workers. Immigration officers and the police are accused on
occasion of using excessive force against migrant workers and operating
outside the law.
Disposable Labor documents how the
South Korean government has not sufficiently monitored workplaces, with
high numbers of accidents, inadequate medical treatment and compensation,
and unfair dismissals.
Amnesty International interviewed migrant
workers who described how their employers forced them to work long hours
and night shifts, without overtime pay. The employers would often withhold
their wages as well.
"Despite the advances of the EPS, the cycle
of abuse and mistreatment continues as thousands of migrant workers
find themselves at the mercy of employers and the authorities who mistreat
them knowing their victims have few legal rights and are unable to access
justice or seek compensation for the abuse," said Rife.
Amnesty International's research shows that
women are at particular risk of abuse. Several female workers recruited
as singers in US military camp towns have been trafficked into sexual exploitation,
including the sex industry, by their employers and managers.
Amnesty International spoke to trafficked
women who said they had no choice but to remain in their jobs because they
were in debt to their employer and did not know where to turn for help.
If the women ran away, they risked losing their legal status and
being subject to deportation.
"These women are double victims," said
Rife. "First they are trafficked and then they become "illegal" migrants
under South Korean law when they attempt to escape from their exploitative
situation."
Amnesty International calls on the government
of South Korea:
* To
ensure that employers respect, protect and promote the rights of migrant
workers through rigorous labor inspections, so that the workplace is safe,
training is provided and migrant workers are paid fairly and on time.
- To
protect and promote the rights of all female migrant workers and stamp
out sexual harassment and sexual exploitation. - To
allow irregular migrant workers to remain in South Korea while accessing
justice and seeking compensation for abuses by employees. - To
ensure that during immigration raids, immigration authorities adhere to
South Korean law requiring them to identify themselves, present a warrant,
caution and inform migrant workers of their rights, and provide those under
their custody prompt medical treatment when needed or requested.
Background:
Disposable Labor contains the testimony
of 60 migrant workers along with staff from shelters, migrant centers,
NGOs, factory workers and managers, piecing together evidence of an exploitative
system that fails to uphold individual human rights. Interviews were carried
out in 11 cities throughout the country.
Case studies:
KN, a 34-year-old Sri Lankan male migrant
worker, worked at a factory making shipping parts in Jinae, South Gyeongsang
province. When a 150kg metal pipe fell on him, he broke five toes
and two fingers. Although he needed to be hospitalized for two months,
his employer came to the hospital after 12 days and threatened to fire
him if he did not return to work. He did not even give KN time to
change out of his hospital clothes. Living on the second floor, KN
had difficulty getting around because there were no lifts. His leg
hurt so much that he could barely stand. Infuriated with KN, his
employer dragged KN to the immigration office where he cancelled his work
visa.
FJ, a 37-year-old Filipino female migrant
worker, was recruited as a singer but was trafficked into sexual exploitation
at a nightclub in Dongducheon, Gyeonggi province. During her first
week, her employer brought his friends to the nightclub and locked her
and another woman in a room with them and left. His friends demanded
to have sex with the women but they refused. When FJ later complained
to her employer, he just yelled at her and threatened to send her back
to the Philippines.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
# # #
To receive the full report, Disposable
Labor: Rights of Migrant Workers in South Korea, please e-mail media@aiusa.org.
For more information, please visit: www.amnestyusa.org
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Jayapal, Sanders Offer Answer to Elon Musk's Healthcare Cost Question
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said National Nurses United, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Dec 05, 2024
Two of the United States' most outspoken critics of the for-profit health system welcomed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's criticism of the country's sky-high healthcare spending—and suggested that Musk, a potential Cabinet member in the incoming Trump administration, join the call for Medicare for All.
A social media post by Musk drew the attention of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who reintroduced legislation to expand Medicare coverage to every American last year and have long called for the for-profit healthcare system to be replaced by a government-run program, or single-payer system, like those in every other wealthy country in the world.
"Shouldn't the American people be getting getting their money's worth?" asked Musk, posting a graph from the nonpartisan Peter G. Peterson Foundation that showed how per capita administrative healthcare costs in the U.S. reached $1,055 in 2020—hundreds of dollars more than countries including Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
"Yes," said Sanders, repeating statistics he has frequently shared while condemning the country's $4.5 trillion health system in which private, for-profit health insurance companies increasingly refuse to pay for healthcare services and Americans pay an average of $1,142 in out-of-pocket expenses each year.
"We waste hundreds of billions a year on healthcare administrative expenses that make insurance CEOs and wealthy stockholders incredibly rich while 85 million Americans go uninsured or underinsured," the senator added. "Healthcare is a human right. We need Medicare for All."
Jayapal added that she has "a solution" to exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S.: "It's called Medicare for All."
Musk has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to lead a new federal agency that he wants to create called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Sanders has expressed support for some of the agency's mission, saying its plan to "cut wasteful expenditures" could be put to use at the Department of Defense, which has repeatedly failed audits of its annual spending.
But Sanders has sharply criticized the economic system and business practices that have helped make Musk the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $343.8 billion.
Another progressive, David Sirota of The Lever, suggested last month that DOGE could be used to eliminate the nation's vast health insurance bureaucracy and replace it with Medicare for All, pointing to a 2020 report from the Republican-controlled Congressional Budget Office that showed that a government-run healthcare program would save the country an estimated $650 billion each year.
"Such a system could achieve this in part because Medicare's 2% administrative costs are so much lower than the 17% administrative costs of the bureaucratic, profit-extracting private health insurance industry," wrote Sirota.
Musk drew the attention of Medicare for All advocates amid online discussion about the greed of for-profit insurance giants.
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on Wednesday prompted discussion about widespread anger over the U.S. healthcare system, and following public outcry, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield on Thursday backtracked on a decision to stop paying for surgical anesthesia if a procedure goes beyond a certain time limit. The American Society of Anesthesiologists said that if Anthem stopped fully paying doctors who provide pain management for complicated surgeries, patients would be left paying hundreds or thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs.
National Nurses United, which advocates for a government-run healthcare system, urged Musk and others who support the broadly popular proposal to "join the movement to win Medicare for All."
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said the group, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Disagree': US Dismisses Landmark Amnesty Report Accusing Israel of Genocide
"We have said previously and continue to find that the allegations of genocide are unfounded," said a State Department spokesperson.
Dec 05, 2024
A U.S. State Department spokesperson told reporters on Thursday that the United States disagrees with Amnesty International's new report accusing Israel of carrying out genocide in the Gaza Strip.
"We disagree with the conclusions of such a report," spokesperson Vedant Patel said a day after the human rights group released the document. "We have said previously and continue to find that the allegations of genocide are unfounded."
The Israeli government has vehemently rejected the findings in the report.
"The deplorable and fanatical organization Amnesty International has once again produced a fabricated report that is entirely false and based on lies. The genocidal massacre on October 7, 2023, was carried out by the Hamas terrorist organization against Israeli citizens. Since then, Israeli citizens have been subjected to daily attacks from seven different fronts. Israel is defending itself against these attacks acting fully in accordance with international law," wrote the Israel Foreign Ministry in a post on X.
Amnesty Israel also does not accept the findings of Amnesty International's report, according to The Times of Israel.
In a statement, the Israeli branch of the organization—which reportedly did not take part in the funding, research, or writing of the report—said that "the scale of the killing and destruction carried out by Israel in Gaza has reached horrific proportions and must be stopped immediately," per The Times of Israel. However, the groups does not believe the events "meet the definition of genocide as strictly laid out in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide."
In the 296-page report released Wednesday—titled, "You Feel Like You Are Subhuman": Israel's Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza—Amnesty International found through its research and legal analysis "sufficient basis to conclude that Israel committed, during the nine-month period under review, prohibited acts under Articles II (a), (b), and (c) of the Genocide Convention, namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in whole or in part."
In order for a conflict to be considered genocide under international law, there must be both evidence of specific criminal acts—such as killing members of a given group—as well as "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such."
In its report, Amnesty International concluded that "these acts were committed with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza."
Intent also came up during the State Department press conference Thursday when journalist Said Arikat of the Palestinian paper Al-Quds asked Patel a follow-up question about the report.
"I know that genocide depends a great deal on intent... And [the report] bases its conclusions on the statements, time and time and time again, by Israeli commanders, by Israeli officials," he said. "What is it going to take for you, for the United States of America... to say what is happening is genocide?"
Patel responded, "That's an opinion, and you're certainly welcome and you are entitled to it, as are all the organizations."
Israel faces an ongoing genocide case, led by South Africa, at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Green Group Sounds Alarm Over Meta's Nuclear Power Plans
"In the blind sprint to win on AI, Meta and the other tech giants have lost their way," said a leader at Environment America.
Dec 05, 2024
Environmental advocates this week responded with concern to Meta looking for nuclear power developers to help the tech giant add 1-4 gigawatts of generation capacity in the United States starting in the early 2030s.
Meta—the parent company of Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and more—released a request for proposals to identify developers, citing its artificial intelligence (AI) innovation and sustainability objectives. It is "seeking developers with strong community engagement, development, ...permitting, and execution expertise that have development opportunities for new nuclear energy resources—either small modular reactors (SMR) or larger nuclear reactors."
The company isn't alone. As TechCrunchreported: "Microsoft is hoping to restart a reactor at Three Mile Island by 2028. Google is betting that SMR technology can help it deliver on its AI and sustainability goals, signing a deal with startup Kairos Power for 500 megawatts of electricity. Amazon has thrown its weight behind SMR startup X-Energy, investing in the company and inking two development agreements for around 300 megawatts of generating capacity."
In response to Meta's announcement, Johanna Neumann, Environment America Research & Policy Center's senior director of the Campaign for 100% Renewable Energy, said: "The long history of overhyped nuclear promises reveals that nuclear energy is expensive and slow to build all while still being inherently dangerous. America already has 90,000 metric tons of nuclear waste that we don’t have a storage solution for."
"Do we really want to create more radioactive waste to power the often dubious and questionable uses of AI?" Neumann asked. "In the blind sprint to win on AI, Meta and the other tech giants have lost their way. Big Tech should recommit to solutions that not only work but pose less risk to our environment and health."
"Data centers should be as energy and water efficient as possible and powered solely with new renewable energy," she added. "Without those guardrails, the tech industry's insatiable thirst for energy risks derailing America's efforts to get off polluting forms of power, including nuclear."
In a May study, the Electric Power Research Institute found that "data centers could consume up to 9% of U.S. electricity generation by 2030—more than double the amount currently used." The group noted that "AI queries require approximately 10 times the electricity of traditional internet searches and the generation of original music, photos, and videos requires much more."
Meta is aiming to get the process started quickly: The intake form is due by January 3 and initial proposals are due February 7. It comes after a rare bee species thwarted Meta's plans to build a data center powered by an existing nuclear plant.
Following the nuclear announcement, Meta and renewable energy firm Invenergy on Thursday announced a deal for 760 megawatts of solar power capacity. Operations for that four-state project are expected to begin no later than 2027.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular