June, 30 2009, 11:50am EDT
Israel: Misuse of Drones Killed Civilians in Gaza
Israel Should Release Camera Footage of Deadly Attacks
JERUSALEM
Israeli attacks with guided missiles fired from aerial drones killed
civilians during the recent Gaza fighting in violation of the laws of
war, Human Rights Watch said in a report
released today. The attacks with one of the most precise weapons in
Israel's arsenal killed civilians who were not taking part in
hostilities and were far from any fighting.
The 39-page report,
"Precisely Wrong: Gaza Civilians Killed by Israeli Drone-Launched
Missiles," details six incidents resulting in 29 civilian deaths, among
them eight children. Human Rights Watch found that Israeli forces
failed to take all feasible precautions to verify that these targets
were combatants, as required by the laws of war, or that they failed to
distinguish between combatants and civilians. Israeli and Palestinian
human rights groups have reported a total of 42 drone attacks that
killed civilians, 87 in all, during the fighting in December 2008 and
January 2009.
"Drone operators can clearly see their targets on the ground and
also divert their missiles after launch," said Marc Garlasco, senior
military analyst at Human Rights Watch and co-author of the report.
"Given these capabilities, Israel needs to explain why these civilian
deaths took place."
"Precisely Wrong" is based on field research in Gaza, where Human
Rights Watch researchers interviewed victims and witnesses, examined
attack sites, collected missile debris for testing, and reviewed
medical records. The Israel Defense Forces turned down repeated Human
Rights Watch requests for a meeting and did not respond to questions
submitted in writing.
Military experts have extolled armed drones, or Unmanned Combat
Aerial Vehicles, and their precision-guided missiles as weapons that
can minimize civilian casualties. Their use is rapidly expanding - for
example by the United States in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
"When used properly, drones and their precision missiles can help a
military minimize civilian casualties," Garlasco said. "But drones are
only as good at sparing civilians as the people who command and operate
them."
In the six cases documented in the report, Human Rights Watch found
no evidence that Palestinian fighters were present in the immediate
area of the attack at the time. None of the civilians who were killed
were moving quickly or fleeing the area, so the drone operators would
have had time to determine whether they were observing civilians or
combatants, and to hold fire if they were unable to tell the difference.
In three of the cases, drones fired missiles at children playing on
rooftops in residential neighborhoods, far from any ground fighting at
the time. Human Rights Watch found no evidence to suggest that the
children were acting as spotters, relaying Israeli troop locations, or
trying to launch a rocket from the roof.
On December 27, 2008, the first day of the Israeli offensive called
"Operation Cast Lead," a drone-launched missile hit a group of
university students as they waited for a bus on a crowded residential
street in central Gaza City, killing 12 civilians. The Israeli military
has failed to explain why it targeted the group on a crowded downtown
street with no known military activity in the area at the time.
On December 29, the Israeli military struck a truck that it said was
transporting Grad rockets, killing nine civilians. The military
released video footage
of the attack to support its case, but the video raises serious doubts
that the target constituted a military objective - doubts that should
have guided the drone operator to hold fire. The alleged rockets, the
military later admitted, proved to be oxygen canisters.
The technological capabilities of drones and drone-launched missiles
make these violations even more egregious, Human Rights Watch said.
Drones carry an array of advanced sensors, often combining radars,
electro-optical cameras, infrared cameras, and lasers. These sensors
can provide a clear image in real time of individuals on the ground
during day and night, with the ability to distinguish between children
and adults.
One Israeli drone operator who flew missions in Gaza during the
recent fighting told an Israeli military journal that he was able to
detect clothing colors, a large radio, and a weapon.
The missile launched from a drone carries its own cameras that allow
the operator to observe the target from the moment of firing to impact.
If doubts arise about a target, the drone operator can redirect the
weapon elsewhere.
The drones deployed by the Israeli military - the Israeli-produced
Hermes and Heron drones - have video-recording devices so that
everything viewed by the operator is recorded. Every Israeli drone
missile strike during Operation Cast Lead would therefore be registered
on video.
The Israeli government is obligated under international law to
investigate serious violations of the laws of war. Israeli military or
civilian personnel found responsible for committing or ordering
unlawful drone attacks should be disciplined or prosecuted as
appropriate, Human Rights Watch said. Individuals who have committed
serious violations of the laws of war with criminal intent - that is,
intentionally or recklessly - are responsible for war crimes.
Israel has failed to conduct credible investigations into its
actions during Operation Cast Lead. On April 22, the military released
the results of an internal investigation, which concluded that its
forces "operated in accordance with international law" throughout the
fighting and that "a very small number" of "unavoidable" incidents
occurred due to "intelligence or operational errors."
A fact-finding team from the United Nations Human Rights Council
headed by the respected international jurist Richard Goldstone is
currently investigating alleged violations of the laws of war by both
Israel and Hamas. Israel has said it will not cooperate with the
investigation because the Human Rights Council is biased against
Israel. Hamas has said it will cooperate.
Human Rights Watch called on Israel and Hamas to cooperate fully
with the Goldstone investigation. Regarding drone-launched missiles,
Israel should provide the recorded video footage and other
documentation of its attacks in which civilians were wounded or killed.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Judge Slaps Down RFK Jr's Likely 'Unlawful' Mass Layoffs at HHS
"We're not going to let Trump and RFK Jr. dismantle our nation's health systems to promote conspiracy theories and tax breaks for billionaires," said Connecticut Attorney General William Tong.
Jul 01, 2025
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked planned mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services while declaring that the firings were likely unlawful.
Judge Melissa DuBose of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island ruled that the Trump administration exceeded its legal authority when it moved to lay off thousands of HHS employees on the grounds that such large-scale firings would leave the agency unable to fulfill its legislatively mandated duties that can only be altered by an act of Congress.
"The executive branch is vested with the power and is imbued with the responsibility to faithfully execute the laws which govern the governance structure of our country," wrote DuBose. "The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress."
DuBose further noted that courts have the power to "set aside" actions taken by federal agencies that are "unlawful," and she argued that the actions taken by HHS under the leadership of Trump-appointed Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. likely flouted the law.
The judge granted a preliminary injunction against the agency and blocked it from carrying out its planned reduction in staffing that it first announced this past March 27. HHS has until July 11 to file a status report affirming compliance with the court's order.
The lawsuit was originally filed by the attorneys general of 19 states plus the District of Columbia, who alleged that the layoffs violated the United States Constitution's separation of powers doctrine, as well as the Constitution's appropriations clause and the Administrative Procedure Act that prohibits agencies from taking "arbitrary and capricious" actions.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong took a victory lap in the wake of the ruling but cautioned that there was still a long fight ahead to save HHS.
President Donald Trump and Kennedy "are playing dangerous games with the health and safety of American families, and we just stopped them," he said. "Today's order means vital programs and services—including those supporting Head Start, disease monitoring at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] and Medicaid eligibility, and others—will remain accessible. This is still the beginning of a long fight ahead, but we're not going to let Trump and RFK Jr. dismantle our nation's health systems to promote conspiracy theories and tax breaks for billionaires."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'You Know It's a Terrible Bill': Murkowski Helps GOP Gut Safety Net After 'Bribe' Shields Her State
Sen. Lisa Murkowski was the deciding vote to pass Republicans' massive social safety net cuts through the Senate. She said she didn't like the bill, but voted for it anyway after getting Alaska exempted from some of its worst harms.
Jul 01, 2025
By the thinnest possible margin, the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to pass a budget that includes the largest cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance in U.S. history while giving trillions of dollars of tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans.
The deciding vote was Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who admitted she didn't like the bill. However, she voted for it regardless after securing relief for her home state from some of its most draconian cuts.
But in an interview immediately afterward, she acknowledged that the rest of the country, where millions are on track to lose their healthcare coverage and food assistance, would not be so lucky.
"Do I like this bill? No," Murkowski told a reporter for MSNBC. "I try to take care of Alaska's interests. I know that in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don't like that."
The 887-page bill includes more than $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program over the next decade—cuts the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects will result in nearly 12 million people losing health coverage. The measure also takes an ax to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—imperiling food aid for millions.
In recent days, Murkowski—a self-described "Medicaid moderate"—expressed hesitation about signing onto a list of such devastating cuts, calling the vote "agonizing". To get her on board, her Republican colleagues were willing to give her state some shelter from the coming storm.
As David Dayen explained in The American Prospect, Murkowski was able to secure a waiver that exempts Alaska from the newly implemented cost-sharing requirement that will force states to spend more of their budgets on SNAP.
In The New Republic, Robert McCoy described it as a "bribe."
Initially, Republicans attempted to simply write in a carve-out for Alaska and Hawaii. But after this was shot down by the Senate parliamentarian, they tried again with a measure that exempted the 10 states with the highest error rates.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) called it "the most absurd example of the hypocrisy of the Republican bill."
"They have now proposed delaying SNAP cuts FOR TWO YEARS ONLY FOR STATES with the highest error rates just to bury their help for Alaska," she said.
Murkowski also got a tax break for Alaskan fishing villages inserted into the bill. She attempted to have Alaska exempted from some Medicaid cuts as well, but the parliamentarian killed the measure.
"Did I get everything that I wanted? Absolutely not," she told reporters outside the Senate chamber.
However, as Dayen wrote, "Murkowski decided that she could live with a bill that takes food and medicine from vulnerable people to fund tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy, as long as it didn't take quite as much food away from Alaskans."
Murkowski showed herself to be well aware of the harms the bill will cause. After voting to pass the bill, she said, "My hope is that the House is gonna look at this and recognize that we're not there yet."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) called Murkowski's bargain "selfish," "cruel," and "expensive."
"Voting for the bill because [of] a carve-out for your state is open acknowledgement that people will get kicked off healthcare and will have to go to much more expensive emergency rooms," Jayapal wrote. "Clear you know it's a terrible bill for everyone."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Let's Break It Down': Mamdani Gives His Perspective on Historic NYC Win
Zohran Mamdani solidified his win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor with the release of ranked choice voting results.
Jul 01, 2025
Last week, democratic socialist and state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani stunned in an upset victory over disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary—sparking broader conversations about the future of the party and sending shockwaves through the American political system.
One week later, on Tuesday, Mamdani both solidified his win thanks to the release of the election's ranked choice voting results and unveiled a new video highlighting factors that in his view were key to his campaign's success. Mamdani credits his relentless focus on affordability and a commitment to reaching all New York City voters, including those who have previously voted for U.S. President Donald Trump, are inconsistent primary voters, or who speak languages besides English.
The goal, in Mamdani's words, was nothing short of rebuilding "a coalition that had frayed over years of disappointment and neglect, to win people back to a Democratic Party that puts working people first."
On Tuesday, New York City's Board of Elections announced the ranked-choice voting results from the June 24 primary, underscoring Mamdani's decisive victory. Mamdani secured 56% of the vote compared to Cuomo's 44%. All other candidates' votes were reallocated to Mamdani and Cuomo in the third round of voting. All told, some 545,000 New Yorkers ranked Mamdani on their ballots.
In the video, Mamdani touted some of his impressive margins, including his ability to win over districts that had gone for Trump in the last election, noting the inroads that Trump made in New York City in 2024. According to an analysis from Gothamist, Mamdani won 30% of primary election districts Trump carried in the general election last year.
Mamdani said his campaign achieved this by visiting areas that went for Trump, "not to lecture, but to listen."
He also said that his campaign knew it could turn out less consistent primary voters if "they saw themselves in our policies."
"We ran a campaign that tried to talk to every New Yorker, whether I could speak their languages or just tried to... and the coalition that came out on Tuesday, reflected the mosaic of these five boroughs," Mamdani said.
As part of the focus on connecting with voters, Mamdani put out campaign videos with him speaking in languages like Hindi and Spanish.
On Election Day, Mamdani led in areas with majority Asian, white, and Hispanic voters, while Cuomo led in areas with majority Black voters. "We narrowed Andrew Cuomo once sizable lead with Black voters, outright winning young Black New Yorkers in neighborhoods like Harlem and Flatbush," he said.
Mamdani also highlighted that he trounced Cuomo despite the super political action committee money supporting the former governor.
"We rewrote the rule book by, get this, talking to New Yorkers," he said. "Politics in this city won't ever be the same, and it's all thanks to you. The next chapter begins today New York."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular