April, 28 2009, 04:36pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brenda Bowser Soder
(202) 379-3323 – direct, (301) 906-4460 – cell
bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org
Report Examines Progress, Problems with U.S. Government's Efforts to Help Iraqi Refugees
Human Rights First Estimates Nearly 150,000 Iraqis Have U.S. Ties
WASHINGTON
Only 4,200 Iraqis with U.S. ties have made it to the United States
since 2003, though at least 20,000 have applied, and the number of
U.S.-affiliated Iraqis may be as high as 146,000, according to a new
report issued today by a leading human rights group.
The report, Promises to the Persecuted: The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2008,
issued by Human Rights First, examines implementation of this critical
legislation. It finds that, despite a Congressional mandate intended to
expedite Iraqi refugee processing times, only a small portion of
eligible Iraqis have been granted a safe haven in the United States.
Based on its findings, Human Rights First urged the Obama
administration to examine this issue and clear remaining bureaucratic
obstacles to fulfilling America's promise to persecuted Iraqis who
worked with the United States in Iraq, as well as to their families.
"Progress has been made since the enactment of the Refugee Crisis in
Iraq Act in January 2008, but it's not enough. Processing times are
unacceptably long, and Iraqis seeking safety in the United States can
wait a year or more for their applications to move through the system,"
says Human Rights First's Ruthie Epstein, who authored the report. "We
pin the delays on two problems - inadequate staffing and inefficient
security clearance procedures. The result is that thousands of
U.S.-affiliated Iraqis are stuck in Iraq and other countries in the
region, facing danger and destitution. The absence of direct access to
the U.S. refugee program in Syria and Turkey, where the need is
significant, exacerbates the problem."
According to the report, U.S. officials successfully established
processing for U.S.-affiliated Iraqis under an administration that was
reluctant to acknowledge the refugee crisis and in the face of
significant logistic and security challenges. But the multi-agency
programs are still plagued with procedural barriers.
"In February at Camp Lejeune, President Obama made a commitment to
Iraqi refugees. He declared, rightly so, that the United States has a
strategic interest and a moral responsibility to act," noted Amelia
Templeton, a refugee policy analyst at Human Rights First. "His
commitment should begin with a comprehensive evaluation and improvement
of the programs designed to provide escape to the very Iraqis who
helped the United States."
Human Rights First's recommendations to the U.S. government include:
- Reduce Processing Times: The State Department should increase
staffing at the Embassy in Baghdad and the International Organization
of Migration, and the Department of Homeland Security should increase
the frequency and staffing of circuit rides to the region, so that the
refugee applications of thousands of U.S.-affiliated Iraqis and their
families facing danger can be processed expeditiously; the Embassy
should allocate the space in the building that is necessary for these
increases; - Improve the Security Clearance Process: The White House
should review and improve the multi-agency security clearance process
required for Iraqi refugee applicants and other immigrants and refugees
so that Iraqis who meet all of the requirements for admission to the
United States do not wait indefinitely for final answers on their
applications; - Expand Access to Iraqis in Need: The State Department and
the White House should press the governments of Syria and Turkey at
senior levels to permit direct access to the U.S. refugee program to
vulnerable Iraqis in need; and - Ensure Post-Arrival Services: Congress should appropriate
the necessary funding to the Department of Health and Human Services to
adequately support post-arrival services for Iraqi refugees and other
new refugee populations to whom the United States has offered safety
from persecution, as well as to the State Department to increase
staffing on programs mandated by the legislation.
Today's report provides the most reliable public estimate to date of
the number of U.S.-affiliated Iraqis who might be eligible for the
programs mandated by the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act. Human Rights First
has estimated that there are approximately 146,000 U.S.-affiliated
Iraqis - Embassy direct hires, contractors, and employees of U.S.-based
media and NGOs. This figure does not include spouses and children. The
report says that no more than 4,200 U.S-affiliated Iraqis, including
some family members, have actually made it to the United States.
The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act was first proposed by Senator Edward
Kennedy (D-MA) and former Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR) in June 2007 to
address the plight of Iraq's refugees. Its mandate included special
immigration visas for Iraqis who worked with the U.S. government,
military, or contractors for at least a year; direct access to the U.S.
refugee resettlement programs for Iraqis who worked with the U.S.
government, military, contractors, or U.S.-based media or
nongovernmental organizations, and certain minority groups; and refugee
processing inside Iraq.
To read Human Rights First's report and its complete recommendations to the U.S. government, visit https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pdf/090428-RP-iraqi-progress.pdf.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Asked If He Must Uphold the US Constitution, Trump Says: 'I Don't Know'
"I'm not a lawyer," the president said in a newly aired interview.
May 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump refused in an interview released Sunday to affirm that the nation's Constitution affords due process to citizens and noncitizens alike and that he, as president, must uphold that fundamental right.
"I don't know, I'm not a lawyer," Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker, who asked if the president agrees with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that everyone on U.S. soil is entitled to due process.
When Welker pointed to the Fifth Amendment—which states that "no person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—Trump again replied that he's unsure and suggested granting due process to the undocumented immigrants he wants to deport would be too burdensome.
"We'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," Trump said, echoing a sentiment that his vice president expressed last month.
Asked whether he needs to "uphold the Constitution of the United States as president," Trump replied, "I don't know."
Watch:
WELKER: The 5th Amendment says everyone deserves due process
TRUMP: It might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or two million or three million trials pic.twitter.com/FMZQ7O9mTP
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 4, 2025
Trump, who similarly deferred to "the lawyers" when asked recently about his refusal to bring home wrongly deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, has unlawfully cited the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly remove undocumented immigrants from the U.S. without due process. Federal agents have also arrested and detained students, academics, and a current and former judge in recent weeks, heightening alarm over the administration's authoritarian tactics.
CNNreported Friday that the administration has "been examining whether it can label some suspected cartel and gang members inside the U.S. as 'enemy combatants' as a possible way to detain them more easily and limit their ability to challenge their imprisonment."
"Trump has expressed extreme frustration with federal courts halting many of those migrants' deportations, amid legal challenges questioning whether they were being afforded due process," the outlet added. "By labeling the migrants as enemy combatants, they would have fewer rights, the thinking goes."
Some top administration officials have publicly expressed disdain for the constitutional right to due process. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote in a social media post last month that "the judicial process is for Americans" and "immediate deportation" is for undocumented immigrants.
The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote in a column Saturday that "Miller appears to want Trump to have the power to declare undocumented immigrants to be terrorists and gang members by fiat; to have the power to absurdly decree them members of a hostile nation's invading army, again by fiat; and then to have quasi-unlimited power to remove them, unconstrained by any court."
"The more transparency we have gained into the rot of corruption and bad faith at the core of this whole saga, the worse it has come to look," Sargent continued. "Trump himself is exposing it all for what it truly is: the stuff of Mad Kings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Republicans Set to Give Self-Described 'DOGE Person' Keys to Social Security Agency
"A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security," warned one advocacy group.
May 04, 2025
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday is set to hold a confirmation vote for President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Social Security Administration—an ultra-rich former Wall Street executive who has aligned himself with the Elon Musk-led slash-and-burn effort at agencies across the federal government.
"I am fundamentally a DOGE person," Frank Bisignano told CNBC in March, amplifying concerns that he would take his experience in the financial technology industry—where he was notorious for inflicting mass layoffs while raking in a huge compensation package—to SSA, which is already facing large-scale staffing cuts that threaten the delivery of benefits for millions of Americans.
In an email on Saturday, the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works warned that Bisignano "is not the cure to the DOGE-manufactured chaos at the Social Security Administration."
"In fact, he is part of it, and, if confirmed, would make it even worse," the group added. "We're not going down without a fight. Republicans may have a majority in the Senate, but we're going to rally to send a message: A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security!"
"If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
Bisignano, the CEO of payment processing giant Fiserv, has been accused during his confirmation process of lying under oath about his ties to DOGE, which has worked to seize control of Social Security data as part of a purported effort to root out "fraud" that advocates say is virtually nonexistent.
As The Washington Post reported in March, Bisignano testified to the Senate Finance Committee that "he has had no contact" with DOGE.
"But Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the claim is 'not true,' citing an account the senator said he received from a senior Social Security official who recently left the agency," the Post noted. "The former official... described 'numerous contacts Mr. Bisignano made with the agency since his nomination,' including 'frequent' conversations with senior executives."
Wyden pointed again to the former SSA official's statement in a floor speech Thursday in opposition to Bisignano, saying that "according to the whistleblower, Mr. Bisignano personally appointed his Wall Street buddy, Michael Russo, to be the leader of DOGE's team at Social Security."
The Oregon Democrat said Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee refused his request for a bipartisan meeting with the whistleblower to evaluate their accusations unless "we agreed to hand over any information received from the whistleblower directly to the nominee and the Trump administration."
"All Americans should be concerned that a nominee for a position of public trust like commissioner of Social Security is accused of lying about his actions at the agency and that efforts to bring this important information to light are being thwarted," Wyden said Thursday. "If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
"He could lie by denying any American who paid their Social Security taxes the benefits they've earned, claiming some phony pretense," the senator warned. "He could lie about how sensitive personal information is being mishandled—or worse, exploited for commercial use."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Chilling Attempt to Normalize Fascism': Groups Decry Trump Official's Arrest Threats
"We must not allow intimidation and authoritarian tactics to take root in our political system."
May 04, 2025
A coalition of advocacy organizations on Saturday expressed support for Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers and warned that the Trump border czar's threat against the Democratic leader marks a "dangerous escalation" of the administration's assault on the rule of law across the United States.
The groups—including All Voting Is Local and the ACLU of Wisconsin—said in a joint statement that Evers' guidance to state officials on how to handle being confronted by federal agents was "a prudent measure aimed at ensuring compliance with state and federal laws while protecting the rights of state employees."
The suggestion by Tom Homan, a leader of President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign, that Evers could be arrested for issuing such guidance undermines "the foundational principles of our democracy, including the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference," the groups said Saturday.
"To threaten our governor over his legal directive is gross overreach by our federal government, and it is not occurring in a vacuum," they continued, warning that the administration's rhetoric and actions represent a "chilling attempt to normalize fascism."
"Similar occurrences are happening across the nation, including within our academic systems," the groups added. "If we do not reject these actions now, states and other institutions will only lose more and more of their autonomy and power. This is exactly why we underscore Gov. Evers' claim that this event is 'chilling.'"
The threats against Gov. Evers in Wisconsin undermine the foundational principles of our democracy: the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference. We must reject this overreach. allvotingislocal.org/statements/w...
[image or embed]
— All Voting is Local (@allvotingislocal.bsky.social) May 3, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Trump administration officials and the president himself have repeatedly threatened state and local officials as the White House rushes ahead with its lawless mass deportation campaign, which has ensnared tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants and at least over a dozen U.S. citizens—including children.
In an executive order signed late last month, Trump accused "some state and local officials" of engaging in a "lawless insurrection" against the federal government by refusing to cooperate with the administration's deportation efforts.
But as Temple University law professor Jennifer Lee recently noted, localities "can legally decide not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement."
"Cities, like states, have constitutional protections against being forced to administer or enforce federal programs," Lee wrote. "The Trump administration cannot force any state or local official to assist in enforcing federal immigration law."
Administration officials have also leveled threats against members of Congress, with Homan suggesting earlier this year that he would refer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to the U.S. Justice Department for holding a webinar informing constituents of their rights.
During a town hall on Friday, Ocasio-Cortez dared Homan to do so.
"To that I say: Come for me," she said to cheers from the audience. "We need to challenge them. So don't let them intimidate you."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular