February, 23 2009, 04:00pm EDT

CCR Releases Independent Report on Current Conditions at Guantanamo, Calls for Closure of Camps 5, 6, and Echo
Center for Constitutional Rights Experts Dispute Government Assertion That Guantánamo Complies With Geneva Conventions
NEW YORK
The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) released
a report on the current conditions in Camps 5, 6, and Echo following
the press conference today of Adm. Patrick M. Walsh, the vice chief of
naval operations, who delivered his own report on conditions to the
White House on Friday. Adm. Walsh determined in his report that
conditions at the base meet the standards of the Geneva Conventions, an
assertion the attorneys dispute.
CCR's report, "Conditions of Confinement at Guantanamo: Still in
Violation of the Law," covers conditions at Guantanamo in January and
February 2009 and includes new eyewitness accounts from attorneys and
detainees. The authors address continuing abusive conditions at the
prison camp, including conditions of confinement that violate U.S.
obligations under the Geneva Conventions, the U.S. Constitution and
international human rights law.
"The men at Guantanamo are deteriorating at a rapid rate due to the
harsh conditions that continue to this day, despite a few cosmetic
changes to their routines," said CCR Staff Attorney Pardiss Kebriaei.
"They are caught in a vicious cycle where their isolation causes
psychological damage, which causes them to act out, which brings more
abuse and keeps them in isolation. If they are going to be there
another year, or even another day, this has to end."
Despite President Obama's executive order of January 22, 2009,
requiring humane standards of confinement at Guantanamo and conformity
with "all applicable laws governing the conditions of such
confinement," including the Geneva Conventions, attorneys assert that
detainees at Guantanamo have continued to suffer from solitary
confinement, psychological abuse, abusive force-feeding of hunger
strikers, religious abuse, and physical abuse and threats of violence
from guards and Immediate Reaction Force (IRF) teams.
The majority of the men being detained are in isolation. They go weeks
without seeing the sun. Fluorescent lights, however, remain on 24 hours
a day in Camp 5. According to the report, "improvements" cited by the
military are, by and large, public relations activities rather than
meaningful improvements in detainees' conditions.
In a declaration made February 13, 2009, Col. Bruce Vargo, commander of
the Joint Detention Group at Guantanamo, stated that, "There are no
solitary confinement detention areas at JTF-GTMO...Detainees typically
are able to communicate with other detainees either face-to-face or by
spoken word from their cells throughout the day." By this, say
attorneys, he means that the men can yell through the metal food slot
in the solid steel doors of their cells when it is left open and
through the crack between the door and the floor.
The report details multiple cases of abuse occurring in the last month
and a half. For example, "On the afternoon of January 7, 2009, Yasin
Ismael was in one of the outdoor cages of Camp 6 for "recreation" time.
The cage was entirely in the shade. Mr. Ismael asked to be moved to
the adjoining empty cage because it had sunlight entering from the top.
The guards, who were outside the cages, refused. One guard told Mr.
Ismael that he was "not allowed to see the sun." Angered, Mr. Ismael
threw a shoe against the inner mesh side of the cage; which bounced
harmlessly back onto the cage floor. The guards, however, accused Mr.
Ismael of attacking them and left him in the cage as punishment. He
eventually fell asleep on the floor of the cage, but hours later he was
awakened by the sound of an IRF team entering the cage in the dark. The
team shackled him, and he put up no resistance. They then beat him.
They blocked his nose and mouth until he felt that he would suffocate,
and hit him repeatedly in the ribs and head. They then took him back to
his cell. As he was being taken back, a guard urinated on his head. Mr.
Ismael was badly injured and his ear started to bleed, leaving a large
stain on his pillow. The attack on Mr. Ismael was confirmed by at least
one other detainee."
One detainee in Camp 6 wrote to his attorney in January 2009, "As I
told you, we are in very bad condition, suffering from aggression,
beating and IRF teams, as well as the inability to sleep except for a
few hours. Soldiers here are on a high alert state and if one of us
dares to leave his cell and comes back without any harm, he is
considered as a man who survived an inevitable danger.
Hunger strikes continue among a large number of men at Guantanamo.
Hunger strikers are brutally force-fed using a restraint chair and
often unsanitary feeding tubes, and are beaten for refusing food, a
practice that continued within the last month and a half. Force-feeding
hunger strikers is considered by the World Medical Association to be a
violation of medical ethics and has continued unabated since President
Obama's Executive Order.
Detainees are still denied access to communal prayer: military
officials continue to classify hearing a call to prayer through a food
slot as communal prayer, which does not comport with the requirements
of Islam. There has been no Muslim chaplain at Guantanamo since 2003,
despite repeated requests. In addition, the report found that then men
are also subject to body search procedures that require the men to
subject themselves to a scanner that visually strips the men naked each
time they leave their cells for attorney meetings or recreation. This
humiliating and degrading experience, particularly given the men's
strong religious background, has led them to stay in their cells all
day, refusing attorney meetings and recreation entirely.
The Center for Constitutional Rights issued a series of recommendations
to ensure the conditions at Guantanamo satisfy legal standards for the
humane treatment of the detainees during the interim period while its
closure is being implemented. They are, in brief,
- Close Camps 5, 6 and Echo immediately, end solitary
confinement, and move the men there to facilities with lawful and
humane conditions of confinement. - End religious abuse of
detainees, including the violations of detainees' right to practice
their religion freely and the use of routine strip scanning and strip
searching. - Cease the use of IRF teams and all other
physical abuse of detainees immediately, including ending temperature
manipulation and sleep deprivation. - End the feeding of individuals against their will or under coercive circumstances.
- Allow
detainees immediate access to independent medical and psychological
professionals and cease the practice of forcible medication of
detainees.
"If President Obama is going to uphold the law and enforce his own
Executive Order, he must close Camps 5, 6, and Echo and improve
conditions immediately," said CCR Executive Director Vincent Warren.
"He should quickly remedy and end the Guantanamo created by his
predecessor, not embrace a whitewash of it. I hope Attorney General
Eric Holder has a freer hand to report the true conditions at the base
from his visit there today than did Adm. Walsh, whose boss has overseen
Guantanamo for the last two years."
To read the full report, click here.
CCR has led the legal battle over Guantanamo for the last six years
- sending the first ever habeas attorney to the base and sending the
first attorney to meet with a former CIA "ghost detainee" there. CCR
has been responsible for organizing and coordinating more than 500 pro
bono lawyers across the country in order to represent the men at
Guantanamo, ensuring that nearly all have the option of legal
representation. In addition, CCR has been working to resettle the
approximately 60 men who remain at Guantanamo because they cannot
return to their country of origin for fear of persecution and torture.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


