For Immediate Release
Constitution Project Disappointed by Justice Department Secrecy Stance
Justice Department Should Have Reversed Bush Administration Position and Allowed Torture Lawsuit To Go Forward
WASHINGTON - Constitution Project President Virginia Sloan expressed disappointment
with the Justice Department's failure to abandon the broad secrecy claims
originally made by the Bush administration in a case argued today before the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
"Regrettably, the Department of Justice missed its first
opportunity to confine its assertion of the state secrets privilege to actual
national security secrets," said Ms. Sloan. "The Justice Department should have
agreed to an independent review of the evidence by the trial judge and
repudiated the Bush administration's broad secrecy claims. By continuing the
Bush administration's overbroad assertion of the state secrets privilege, the
Obama administration places at risk its principled commitments to transparency,
accountability, and the rule of law."
Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard
argument concerning whether a federal trial court properly dismissed a lawsuit on
state secrets privilege grounds. The suit alleges that defense contractor
Jeppesen knowingly flew five people to a foreign country where they were
tortured as part of the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program. The case is Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
An existential threat to our democracy. A global pandemic. An unprecedented economic crisis. Our journalism has never been more needed.
Can you pitch in today and help us make our Fall Campaign goal of $80,000 by November 2nd?
Please select a donation method:
The state secrets privilege is a legal doctrine whose
purpose is to prevent public disclosure of particular evidence when the
disclosure would threaten our national security. The Bush Justice Department persuaded
a district court judge that the very
subject of the lawsuit-the CIA rendition program-was itself a state secret,
and that merely litigating the case would threaten national security. The
program has been widely reported in the press.
According to Ms. Sloan, "The trial judge, not the executive
branch, should determine what evidence the government can legitimately withhold,
and whether enough non-privileged evidence exists to allow the case to proceed."
On Friday, the Constitution Project released a letter
calling on the Obama administration to allow the lawsuit to go forward. In 2007, the Constitution Project released a report
signed by a bipartisan coalition that endorsed reforming
the state secrets privilege. To speak with our policy expert, please
contact Daniel Schuman at dschuman@constitutionproject.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at http://constitutionproject.org/.