December, 30 2008, 11:27am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Luke Eshleman (202) 265-7337
Interior Department Needs New Brooms to Sweep it Clean
Whistleblowers and Reformers Required to Rejuvenate Ravaged Agencies
WASHINGTON
The Obama transition should reach out to reformers and
whistleblowers to transform the scandal-wracked U.S. Department of
Interior, according to Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER). Under President Bush, corporate penetration into
the top echelons at Interior resulted in a prison term for its
number-two official, losses of billions in oil royalty dollars and
scandals ranging from sex and drug parties to unprecedented political
manipulation of science.
President-elect Obama naming Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO) as
Interior Secretary-designate was greeted with a huge sigh of relief
from drilling, mining and livestock interests. In his short statement
at the December 17th press conference, Salazar stressed "As the Nominee
to be Secretary of the Interior, I will do all I can to help reduce
America's dangerous dependence on foreign oil." He made only passing
reference to protecting natural resources and no mention of the parade
of recent scandals.
"'The change we need' requires change agents," stated PEER Executive
Director Jeff Ruch, recalling an Obama campaign slogan. "Energy
production, the stated priority of Secretary-designate Salazar, is only
one of many issues confronting Interior; we desperately need leaders
passionately committed to public service, protecting public resources
and the plethora of other problems plaguing this gigantic agency which
controls one out of every five acres in the U.S."
To run the agencies within Interior, PEER is presenting the Obama
transition with a slate of agency veterans and experts who exhibit what
the President-elect calls "a new kind of leadership". Most have made
career sacrifices to advance the stewardship principles that are the
cornerstones of their agencies' missions. The PEER "nominees" include -
- Martha Hahn as Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
Martha has more than 25 years of experience in both the BLM and Park
Service. In 2002, at the behest of Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), she was
removed at the BLM Idaho State Director by Deputy Interior Secretary
Steven Griles in connection with grazing reforms she had instituted.
Today, she is Division Chief for Science and Resource Management at
Grand Canyon National Park;
- John Donahue as the Director of the National Park Service.
John has served at several national parks and received the Stephen T.
Mather Award for exemplary stewardship in addressing off-road vehicle
challenges as Superintendent of Big Cypress National Preserve. He is
regarded as one of the most forward-thinking park managers in the
nation and is currently Superintendent of the Delaware Water Gap
National Recreation Area; - Bobby Maxwell as Director of Minerals Management Service.
Formerly an audit manager at MMS, Bobby blew the whistle on vast
royalty underpayment by major oil companies but was ordered to drop his
issue and was later "re-organized" out of his position in 2005. As a
private citizen, Maxwell filed a suit to recover the billions of
dollars owed to taxpayers and has campaigned against what he calls the
"cult of corruption" at MMS;
- Phil Doe as Commissioner of Reclamation. In
his 20 years at the Bureau of Reclamation, Phil exposed and ended large
illegal water subsidies to agribusiness posing as family farms. He
pushed other cost recovery policies to protect the taxpayer interest in
huge water projects. Since leaving Reclamation, he has been a citizen
activist promoting protection of the public's water resources; - Patrick McGinley as Director of the Office of Surface Mining.
Patrick has 35 years of experience with the administration and
enforcement of laws relating to coal mine health and safety and coal
mining and reclamation. He is the grandson of a coal miner who suffered
from black lung disease and served as a Special Assistant Attorney
General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on the "Environmental Strike
Force" enforced mine safety and anti-pollution laws. Today he is a law
professor at West Virginia University College of Law;
- Robert McCarthy as Interior Solicitor. In
late 2007, as a Field Solicitor, McCarthy testified against his own
agency in the Indian trust class action lawsuit Cobell v. Kempthorne.
He contradicted Interior's central defense that it can accurately
account for income from leases of 300,000 Indian landowners and was
cited by the judge in his ruling for the plaintiffs. Currently he is
the Managing Attorney of the Oklahoma City Law Office for Legal Aid
Services and recently received the Fern Holland Courageous Lawyer Award
from the state bar association; and
- Teresa Chambers as Chief of the U.S. Park Police.
Just days after giving an interview with the Washington Post, revealing
low staffing levels, Chief Teresa Chambers was ordered to surrender her
badge, weapon and ID and was relieved of her duties. In what has become
the prime example of the Bush administration's suppression of
information, Chambers was ultimately removed from the Chief position.
She recently won an appeal of that action before the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Chambers is presently serving as Chief
of Police for Riverdale Park, a town in Prince George's County,
Maryland.
"Many of these agencies have been gutted, not just by
the Bush appointees but, in some cases, by the Clintonites before
them," Ruch added. "To repair the damage, we need a new direction, not
just placeholders."
###
Find out more about these individuals
Look at some of the recent scandals at Interior
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular