December, 29 2008, 01:07pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
(202) 466-3234,Joe Conn,Rob Boston,Sandhya Bathija
Role Of Religion In Presidential Campaign Heads 2008 'Top Ten' List Of Church-State Stories
From Radioactive Clergy To Media Inquisitions, Religion Was A Hot Topic In This Year's Race For The White House, Say Editors Of Church & State Magazine
WASHINGTON
The role of religion in the presidential campaign tops the 2008 "Top
Ten" list of top church-state stories, according to the editors of Church & State.
The monthly magazine, published by Americans United for Separation
of Church and State, is the nation's only news periodical devoted
exclusively to the intersection of religion and government.
Said Church & State publisher Barry W. Lynn, "It was a
wild and crazy year. To tell you the truth, I'm glad it's coming to a
close. I'm hopeful 2009 will be a lot better."
After studying the past 12 months of news, the editors selected the
following 10 stories as the most important and most interesting
church-state developments for the year.
1. The Role of Religion in the Presidential Campaign:
Not since 1960 when John F. Kennedy the first Roman Catholic president
was elected, has religion played such a large role in a presidential
campaign. News media representatives grilled candidates on what sins
they had committed and what their favorite Bible verses were. Barack
Obama fought false rumors that he is secretly a Muslim, and Mitt
Romney's Mormonism became a controversial topic. Candidates were held
accountable for the incendiary comments of their pastors and their
clergy supporters, such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and TV preacher
John Hagee. Many observers thought the whole thing was an unholy mess,
especially in a nation that separates religion and government.
2. The Resurgence of the Religious Right: While
pundits and progressives have proclaimed the demise of the Religious
Right, the fundamentalist political movement remained extraordinarily
powerful. Republican John McCain found it necessary to name evangelical
Sarah Palin as his running mate to mollify the GOP's restive religious
base, and Religious Right forces rammed through bans on same-sex
marriage in California, Florida and Arizona. Moderate evangelical
Richard Cizik was forced out as government affairs representative at
the National Association of Evangelicals after coming under fire from
Religious Right forces.
3. The Battle Over Gay Marriage: Bans on same-sex
marriage were approved in California, Florida and Arizona with
conservative religious forces leading the drive. California's approval
of Proposition 8, with massive funding from members of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was particularly contentious. The
Mormons, joined by the Roman Catholic hierarchy and evangelical
Protestant congregations, were successful in passing a constitutional
amendment that takes away the right of same-sex couples to marry and
reflects church doctrine in civil law. The issue now moves back to the
state Supreme Court.
4. The Ascendancy of Rick Warren: Once known
primarily as a mega-church pastor and best-selling author (The Purpose
Driven Life), the Rev. Rick Warren has rapidly moved into position as
the nation's most prominent preacher, despite right-wing views on
reproductive freedom, gay rights and church-state separation. Warren, a
Southern Baptist who heads Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., is
viewed by progressives as Jerry Falwell in a Hawaiian shirt with an ace
PR team. After hosting a presidential debate stacked toward John McCain
and being asked to give the invocation at Barack Obama's inauguration,
many think Warren seems destined to be the new Billy Graham.
5. Religious Right Influence at Justice Department:
Religious Right influence at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was
exposed this year. According to an internal DOJ investigation reported
in the media in July, senior aides in the department used religious and
political criteria to hire staff members for non-political positions.
Monica Goodling, a top adviser to the attorney general, checked to see
if job applicants were "pro-God in public life" and held right-wing
views on abortion, homosexuality and other issues. (Goodling is a
graduate of TV preacher Pat Robertson's Regent University.) DOJ also
posted a legally dubious memorandum this year insisting that the
federal government may give grants to "faith-based" social service
agencies that discriminate in hiring, even if Congress has explicitly
banned such bias.
6. Battles Over Creationism in Public Schools: New
battles have erupted over the teaching of evolution in public schools.
Blocked by the courts from teaching fundamentalist religious concepts
directly in biology classes, Religious Right forces are trying a
backdoor strategy. They are demanding that schools teach the "strengths
and weaknesses" of evolution, a euphemism for creationist ideas. Over
the heated objections of educators, scientists and civil liberties
activists, the Louisiana legislature approved an "academic freedom" law
encouraging such instruction in the state's schools. Now the Texas
State Board of Education is debating a similar proposal as part of its
10-year review of science standards.
7. Church Politicking Plot: The Religious Right's
dream of building a fundamentalist church-based political machine took
a big step forward in 2008 when more than 30 pastors used their pulpits
to endorse Republican political candidates. They acted at the behest of
the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a wealthy Religious Right legal outfit
that wants to challenge the federal tax law ban on partisan politicking
by tax-exempt groups. The ADF, which was founded by TV preachers and
other religious broadcasters, hopes the Internal Revenue Service will
revoke participating churches' tax exemptions leading to a court
showdown.
8. Defeat of Jeb Bush Referenda: Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush saw his school voucher subsidies for religious and other private
schools overturned by the state Supreme Court in 2006. Undeterred, the
now former governor's allies on an obscure tax commission engineered
two measures onto the November 2008 ballot that would have repealed the
state constitution's ban on public funding of religion as well as
diluted its provision for a strong system of public schools. To Bush's
dismay, the state Supreme Court on Sept. 3 struck the referenda from
the ballot, derailing the scheme.
9. Blocking of 'Christian' License Plate: The South
Carolina legislature unanimously approved a special "Christian" license
plate featuring a bright yellow cross, a stained-glass church window
and the words "I Believe." Backed by Americans United for Separation of
Church and State, four local clergy and two minority faith groups
challenged the government favoritism toward one faith. On Dec. 11, a
federal district court blocked issuance of the plates. The judge's
action may forestall similar sectarian plates under consideration in
other states.
10. The Christmas Wars: It has become an annual
holiday tradition Religious Right groups and their allies in the
right-wing media launch a yearly crusade to stop the alleged
secularization of Christmas and to pressure government to include
Christian symbols in the holiday mix. They rail against stores' use of
the term "Happy Holidays" and insist that advertisements say "Merry
Christmas" instead. This year, much of the attention focused on a
Washington State battle where an atheist Winter Solstice sign was
positioned near a Christian Nativity scene in the state capital. Fox
News pundit Bill O'Reilly and an array of Religious Right scolds
lambasted Gov. Christine Gregoire for allowing the anti-religious
sentiment. Ironically, credit for the atheist display actually should
go to the Alliance Defense Fund, a Religious Right legal group that
sued Gregoire last year, insisting that the Capitol is an open forum
where a Nativity scene (and all other forms of speech) must be allowed.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
LATEST NEWS
Judge Blocks Trump From Requiring Proof of Citizenship on Federal Voting Form
"Trump’s attempt to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form is an unconstitutional power grab," said one plaintiff in the case.
Oct 31, 2025
A federal judge on Friday permanently blocked part of President Donald Trump's executive order requiring proof of US citizenship on federal voter registration forms, a ruling hailed by one plaintiff in the case as "a clear victory for our democracy."
Siding with Democratic and civil liberties groups that sued the administration over Trump's March edict mandating a US passport, REAL ID-compliant document, military identification, or similar proof in order to register to vote in federal elections, Senior US District Judge for the District of Columbia Colleen Kollar-Kotelly found the directive to be an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers.
“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the states and to Congress, this court holds that the president lacks the authority to direct such changes," Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, wrote in her 81-page ruling.
"The Constitution addresses two types of power over federal elections: First, the power to determine who is qualified to vote, and second, the power to regulate federal election procedures," she continued. "In both spheres, the Constitution vests authority first in the states. In matters of election procedures, the Constitution assigns Congress the power to preempt State regulations."
"By contrast," Kollar-Kotelly added, "the Constitution assigns no direct role to the president in either domain."
This is the second time Kollar-Kotelly has ruled against Trump's proof-of-citizenship order. In April, she issued a temporary injunction blocking key portions of the directive.
"The president doesn't have the authority to change election procedures just because he wants to."
"The court upheld what we've long known: The president doesn't have the authority to change election procedures just because he wants to," the ACLU said on social media.
Sophia Lin Lakin of the ACLU, a plaintiff in the case, welcomed the decision as “a clear victory for our democracy."
"President Trump’s attempt to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form is an unconstitutional power grab," she added.
Campaign Legal Center president Trevor Potter said in a statement: "This federal court ruling reaffirms that no president has the authority to control our election systems and processes. The Constitution gives the states and Congress—not the president—the responsibility and authority to regulate our elections."
"We are glad that this core principle of separation of powers has been upheld and celebrate this decision, which will ensure that the president cannot singlehandedly impose barriers on voter registration that would prevent millions of Americans from making their voices heard in our elections," Potter added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘It Does Not Have to Be This Way’: Child Hunger Set to Surge as Trump Withholds SNAP Funds
Two federal courts ruled Friday that the White House must release contingency food assistance funds, but officials have suggested they will not comply with the orders.
Oct 31, 2025
Though two federal judges ruled on Friday that the Trump administration must use contingency funds to continue providing food assistance that 42 million Americans rely on, White House officials have signaled they won't comply with the court orders even as advocates warn the lapse in nutrition aid funding will cause an unprecedented child hunger crisis that families are unprepared to withstand.
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is planning to freeze payments to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program on Saturday as the government shutdown reaches the one-month mark, claiming it can no longer fund SNAP and cannot tap $5 billion in contingency funds that would allow recipients to collect at least partial benefits in November.
President Donald Trump said Thursday that his administration is "going to get it done," regarding the funding of SNAP, but offered no details on his plans to keep the nation's largest anti-hunger program funded, and his agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, would not commit on Friday to release the funds if ordered to do so.
"We're looking at all the options," Rollins told CNN before federal judges in Massachusetts and Rhode Island ordered the administration to fund the program.
The White House and Republicans in Congress have claimed the only way to fund SNAP is for Democratic lawmakers to vote for a continuing resolution proposed by the GOP to keep government funding at current levels; Democrats have refused to sign on to the resolution because it would allow healthcare subsidies under the Affordable Care Act to expire.
The administration previously said it would use the SNAP contingency funds before reversing course last week. A document detailing the contingency plan disappeared from the USDA's website this week. The White House's claims prompted two lawsuits filed by Democrat-led states and cities as well as nonprofit groups that demanded the funding be released.
On Thursday evening, US Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) addressed her followers on the social media platform X about the impending hunger emergency, emphasizing that the loss of SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans—39% of whom are children—is compounding a child poverty crisis that has grown since 2021 due to Republicans' refusal to extend pandemic-era programs like the enhanced child tax credit.
"One in eight kids in America lives in poverty in 2024," said Jayapal. "Sixty-one percent of these kids—that's about 6 million kids— have at least one parent who is employed. So it's not that people are not working, they're working, but they're not earning enough."
"I just want to be really clear that it is a policy choice to have people who are hungry, to have people who are poor," she said.
Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, an economist at Georgetown University, told The Washington Post that the loss of benefits for millions of children, elderly, and disabled people all at once is "unprecedented."
“We’ve never seen the elderly and children removed from the program in this sort of way,” Schanzenbach told the Post. “It really is hard to predict something of this magnitude."
A Thursday report by the economic justice group Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) emphasized that the impending child hunger crisis comes four months after Republicans passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which slashed food assistance by shifting some of the cost of SNAP to the states from the federal government, expanding work requirements, and ending adjustments to benefits to keep pace with food inflation.
Meanwhile, the law is projected to increase the incomes of the wealthiest 20% of US households by 3.7% while reducing the incomes of the poorest 20% of Americans by an average of 3.8%.
Now, said ATF, "they're gonna let hard-working Americans go hungry so billionaires can get richer."
At Time on Thursday, Stephanie Land, author of Class: A Memoir of Motherhood, Hunger, and Higher Education, wrote that "the cruelty is the point" of the Trump administration's refusal to ensure the 61-year-old program, established by Democratic former President Lyndon B. Johnson, doesn't lapse for the first time in its history.
"Once, when we lost most of our food stamp benefit, I mentally catalogued every can and box of food in the cupboards, and how long the milk we had would last," wrote Land. "They’d kicked me, the mother of a recently-turned 6-year-old, off of food stamps because I didn’t meet the work requirement of 20 hours a week. I hadn’t known that my daughter’s age had qualified me to not have to meet that requirement, and without warning, the funds I carefully budgeted for food were gone."
"It didn’t matter that I was a full-time student and worked 10-15 hours a week," she continued. "This letter from my local government office said it wasn’t sufficient to meet their stamp of approval. In their opinion, I wasn’t working enough to deserve to eat. My value, my dignity as a human being, was completely dependent on my ability to work, as if nothing else about me awarded me the ability to feel satiated by food."
"Whether the current administration decides to continue to fund SNAP in November or not, the intended damage has already been done. The fear of losing means for food, shelter, and healthcare is the point," Land added. "Programs referred to as a 'safety net' are anything but when they can be removed with a thoughtless, vague message, or scribble from a permanent marker. It’s about control to gain compliance, and our most vulnerable populations will struggle to keep up."
On Thursday, the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) expressed hope that the president's recent statement saying the White House will ensure people obtain their benefits will "trigger the administration to use its authority and precedent to prevent disruptions in food assistance."
"The issue at hand is not political. It is about ensuring that parents can put food on the table, older adults on fixed incomes can meet their nutritional needs, and children continue to receive the meals they rely on. SNAP is one of the most effective tools for reducing hunger and supporting local economies," said the group.
"Swift and transparent action is needed," FRAC added, "to restore stability, maintain public confidence, and ensure that our state partners, local economies and grocers, and the millions of children, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans who participate in SNAP are not left bearing the consequences of federal inaction."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Immigration Agents Cause Chaos In Chicago Suburb as New Report Documents 'Pattern of Extreme Brutality'
"Our message for ICE is simple: Get the hell out," said Evanston, Illinois Mayor Daniel Biss.
Oct 31, 2025
Officials in Evanston, Illinois are accusing federal immigration officials of "deliberately causing chaos" in their city during a Friday operation that led to angry protests from local residents.
As reported by Fox 32 Chicago, Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss and other local leaders held a news conference on Friday afternoon to denounce actions earlier in the day by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials.
"Our message for ICE is simple: Get the hell out of Evanston," Biss said during the conference.
In a social media post ahead of the press conference, Biss, who is currently a candidate for US Senate, described the agents' actions as "monstrous" and vowed that he would "continue to track the movement of federal agents in and around Evanston and ensure that the Evanston Police Department is responding in the appropriate fashion."
As of this writing, it is unclear how the incident involving the immigration officials in Evanston began, although witness Jose Marin told local publication Evanston Now that agents on Friday morning had deliberately caused a car crash in the area near the Chute Elementary School, and then proceeded to detain the vehicle's passengers.
Videos taken after the crash posted by Chicago Tribune investigative reporter Gregory Royal Pratt and by Evanston Now reporter Matthew Eadie show several people in the area angrily confronting law enforcement officials as they were in the process of detaining the passengers.
“You a criminal!” Evanston residents angrily confront immigration agents pic.twitter.com/t7jVaC4czq
— Gregory Royal Pratt (@royalpratt) October 31, 2025
Another video of ICE grabbing at least two people after a crash on Oakton/Asbury in Evanston
Witnesses say at least three were arrested by Feds pic.twitter.com/DStgCrKWTA
— Matthew Eadie (@mattheweadie22) October 31, 2025
The operation in Evanston came on the same day that Bellingcat published a report documenting what has been described as "a pattern of extreme brutality" being carried out by immigration enforcement officials in Illinois.
Specifically, the publication examined social media videos of immigration enforcement actions taken between October 9 to October 27, and found "multiple examples of force and riot control weapons being used" in apparent violation of a judge's temporary restraining order that banned such weapons except in cases where federal officers are in immediate danger.
"In total, we found seven [instances] that appeared to show the use of riot control weapons when there was seemingly no apparent immediate threat by protesters and no audible warnings given," Bellingcat reported. "Nineteen showed use of force, such as tackling people to the ground when they were not visibly resisting. Another seven showed agents ordering or threatening people to leave public places. Some of the events identified showed incidents that appeared to fall into more than one of these categories."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


