

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The role of religion in the presidential campaign tops the 2008 "Top
Ten" list of top church-state stories, according to the editors of Church & State.
The monthly magazine, published by Americans United for Separation
of Church and State, is the nation's only news periodical devoted
exclusively to the intersection of religion and government.
Said Church & State publisher Barry W. Lynn, "It was a
wild and crazy year. To tell you the truth, I'm glad it's coming to a
close. I'm hopeful 2009 will be a lot better."
After studying the past 12 months of news, the editors selected the
following 10 stories as the most important and most interesting
church-state developments for the year.
1. The Role of Religion in the Presidential Campaign:
Not since 1960 when John F. Kennedy the first Roman Catholic president
was elected, has religion played such a large role in a presidential
campaign. News media representatives grilled candidates on what sins
they had committed and what their favorite Bible verses were. Barack
Obama fought false rumors that he is secretly a Muslim, and Mitt
Romney's Mormonism became a controversial topic. Candidates were held
accountable for the incendiary comments of their pastors and their
clergy supporters, such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and TV preacher
John Hagee. Many observers thought the whole thing was an unholy mess,
especially in a nation that separates religion and government.
2. The Resurgence of the Religious Right: While
pundits and progressives have proclaimed the demise of the Religious
Right, the fundamentalist political movement remained extraordinarily
powerful. Republican John McCain found it necessary to name evangelical
Sarah Palin as his running mate to mollify the GOP's restive religious
base, and Religious Right forces rammed through bans on same-sex
marriage in California, Florida and Arizona. Moderate evangelical
Richard Cizik was forced out as government affairs representative at
the National Association of Evangelicals after coming under fire from
Religious Right forces.
3. The Battle Over Gay Marriage: Bans on same-sex
marriage were approved in California, Florida and Arizona with
conservative religious forces leading the drive. California's approval
of Proposition 8, with massive funding from members of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was particularly contentious. The
Mormons, joined by the Roman Catholic hierarchy and evangelical
Protestant congregations, were successful in passing a constitutional
amendment that takes away the right of same-sex couples to marry and
reflects church doctrine in civil law. The issue now moves back to the
state Supreme Court.
4. The Ascendancy of Rick Warren: Once known
primarily as a mega-church pastor and best-selling author (The Purpose
Driven Life), the Rev. Rick Warren has rapidly moved into position as
the nation's most prominent preacher, despite right-wing views on
reproductive freedom, gay rights and church-state separation. Warren, a
Southern Baptist who heads Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., is
viewed by progressives as Jerry Falwell in a Hawaiian shirt with an ace
PR team. After hosting a presidential debate stacked toward John McCain
and being asked to give the invocation at Barack Obama's inauguration,
many think Warren seems destined to be the new Billy Graham.
5. Religious Right Influence at Justice Department:
Religious Right influence at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was
exposed this year. According to an internal DOJ investigation reported
in the media in July, senior aides in the department used religious and
political criteria to hire staff members for non-political positions.
Monica Goodling, a top adviser to the attorney general, checked to see
if job applicants were "pro-God in public life" and held right-wing
views on abortion, homosexuality and other issues. (Goodling is a
graduate of TV preacher Pat Robertson's Regent University.) DOJ also
posted a legally dubious memorandum this year insisting that the
federal government may give grants to "faith-based" social service
agencies that discriminate in hiring, even if Congress has explicitly
banned such bias.
6. Battles Over Creationism in Public Schools: New
battles have erupted over the teaching of evolution in public schools.
Blocked by the courts from teaching fundamentalist religious concepts
directly in biology classes, Religious Right forces are trying a
backdoor strategy. They are demanding that schools teach the "strengths
and weaknesses" of evolution, a euphemism for creationist ideas. Over
the heated objections of educators, scientists and civil liberties
activists, the Louisiana legislature approved an "academic freedom" law
encouraging such instruction in the state's schools. Now the Texas
State Board of Education is debating a similar proposal as part of its
10-year review of science standards.
7. Church Politicking Plot: The Religious Right's
dream of building a fundamentalist church-based political machine took
a big step forward in 2008 when more than 30 pastors used their pulpits
to endorse Republican political candidates. They acted at the behest of
the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a wealthy Religious Right legal outfit
that wants to challenge the federal tax law ban on partisan politicking
by tax-exempt groups. The ADF, which was founded by TV preachers and
other religious broadcasters, hopes the Internal Revenue Service will
revoke participating churches' tax exemptions leading to a court
showdown.
8. Defeat of Jeb Bush Referenda: Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush saw his school voucher subsidies for religious and other private
schools overturned by the state Supreme Court in 2006. Undeterred, the
now former governor's allies on an obscure tax commission engineered
two measures onto the November 2008 ballot that would have repealed the
state constitution's ban on public funding of religion as well as
diluted its provision for a strong system of public schools. To Bush's
dismay, the state Supreme Court on Sept. 3 struck the referenda from
the ballot, derailing the scheme.
9. Blocking of 'Christian' License Plate: The South
Carolina legislature unanimously approved a special "Christian" license
plate featuring a bright yellow cross, a stained-glass church window
and the words "I Believe." Backed by Americans United for Separation of
Church and State, four local clergy and two minority faith groups
challenged the government favoritism toward one faith. On Dec. 11, a
federal district court blocked issuance of the plates. The judge's
action may forestall similar sectarian plates under consideration in
other states.
10. The Christmas Wars: It has become an annual
holiday tradition Religious Right groups and their allies in the
right-wing media launch a yearly crusade to stop the alleged
secularization of Christmas and to pressure government to include
Christian symbols in the holiday mix. They rail against stores' use of
the term "Happy Holidays" and insist that advertisements say "Merry
Christmas" instead. This year, much of the attention focused on a
Washington State battle where an atheist Winter Solstice sign was
positioned near a Christian Nativity scene in the state capital. Fox
News pundit Bill O'Reilly and an array of Religious Right scolds
lambasted Gov. Christine Gregoire for allowing the anti-religious
sentiment. Ironically, credit for the atheist display actually should
go to the Alliance Defense Fund, a Religious Right legal group that
sued Gregoire last year, insisting that the Capitol is an open forum
where a Nativity scene (and all other forms of speech) must be allowed.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Despite denials of being involved in the Texas state senate special election, Trump endorsed the losing candidate on three separate occasions over the last three days.
Hours after the Republican Party suffered an upset defeat in a special election in a deep-red district in Texas, President Donald Trump falsely claimed he had nothing to do with the race.
While speaking to reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Sunday, Trump was asked what he made of the GOP losing a Texas state senate election in a district that he carried by 17 percentage points in 2024.
"I'm not involved in that, that's a local Texas race," Trump replied.
Reporter: A Democrat won a special election in Texas in an area that you won by 17 points
Trump: I’m not involved in that. That’s a local race. I don’t know anything about it. I had nothing to do with it. pic.twitter.com/MfWU1DZkar
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 1, 2026
In fact, Trump endorsed losing Republican candidate Leigh Wambsganss on three separate occasions in just the last three days, including a Saturday post on Truth Social where he called her "a phenomenal Candidate" and "an incredible supporter of our Movement to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN."
Trump's attempt to distance himself from someone whom he enthusiastically endorsed just one day ago elicited instant ridicule from many of his critics on social media.
"Two days ago, the president used his social media platform to endorse this 'phenomenal candidate' and to urge 'all America First Patriots' in the district to get out and vote for her," remarked Princeton historian Kevin Kruse. "Today, he says he doesn't know anything about it and had nothing to do with it. He's lying or demented or both."
Zak Williams, a political consultant at Zenith Strategies and a native Texan, wrote that Trump was "intimately involved" in the campaign, noting that Republicans outspent Democrats in the race by a margin of 10 to 1.
Joe Walsh, a former Republican congressman who left the GOP over his disgust with Trump, expressed astonishment at the president's blatant dishonesty.
"He’s such a horrible person," wrote Walsh. "And such a dishonest person. Yes, he was involved in that race. He endorsed the losing candidate, and she lost 100% because of him. She lost 100% because of this past year of his chaos, his cruelty, and his incompetence. Her loss was a total rejection of him."
Journalist James Barragán of TX Capital Tonight, argued that the Wambsganss loss calls into question just how effective Trump's endorsements will be in moving voters in the 2026 midterm elections.
"President Trump says he’s 'not involved' in SD 9 race where his endorsed candidate (who he boosted multiple times in the runup) lost a +17 Trump district," wrote Barragán. "He’s either not being truthful or it makes you question how much stock people should put into his social media endorsements."
"This was a bribe," said one critic.
A bombshell Saturday report from the Wall Street Journal revealed that a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family secretly backed a massive $500 million investment into the Trump family's cryptocurrency venture months before the Trump administration gave the United Arab Emirates access to highly sensitive artificial intelligence chip technology.
According to the Journal's sources, lieutenants of Abu Dhabi royal Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan signed a deal in early 2025 to buy a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial, the startup founded by members of the Trump family and the family of Trump Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
Documents reviewed by the Journal showed that the buyers in the deal agreed to "pay half up front, steering $187 million to Trump family entities," while "at least $31 million was also slated to flow to entities affiliated with" the Witkoff family.
Weeks after green lighting the investment into the Trump crypto venture, Tahnoon met directly with President Donald Trump and Witkoff in the White House, where he reportedly expressed interest in working with the US on AI-related technology.
Two months after this, the Journal noted, "the administration committed to give the tiny Gulf monarchy access to around 500,000 of the most advanced AI chips a year—enough to build one of the world’s biggest AI data center clusters."
Tahnoon in the past had tried to get US officials to give the UAE access to the chips, but was rebuffed on concerns that the cutting-edge technology could be passed along to top US geopolitical rival China, wrote the Journal.
Many observers expressed shock at the Journal's report, with some critics saying that it showed Trump and his associates were engaging in a criminal bribery scheme.
"This was a bribe," wrote Melanie D’Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, in a social media post. "UAE royals gave the Trump family $500 million, and Trump, in his presidential capacity, gave them access to tightly guarded American AI chips. The most powerful person on the planet, also happens to be the most shamelessly corrupt."
Jesse Eisinger, reporter and editor at ProPublica, argued that the Abu Dhabi investment into the Trump cypto firm "should rank among the greatest US scandals ever."
Democratic strategist David Axelrod also said that the scope of the Trump crypto investment scandal was historic in nature.
"In any other time or presidency, this story... would be an earthquake of a scandal," he wrote. "The size, scope and implications of it are unprecedented and mind-boggling."
Tommy Vietor, co-host of "Pod Save America," struggled to wrap his head around the scale of corruption on display.
"How do you add up the cost of corruption this massive?" he wondered. "It's not just that Trump is selling advanced AI tech to the highest bidder, national security be damned. Its that he's tapped that doofus Steve Witkoff as an international emissary so his son Zach Witkoff can mop up bribes."
Former Rep. Tom Malinkowski (D-NJ) warned the Trump and his associates that they could wind up paying a severe price for their deal with the UAE.
"If a future administration finds that such payments to the Trump family were acts of corruption," he wrote, "these people could be sanctioned under the Global Magnitsky Act, and the assets in the US could potentially be frozen."
In a speech before cheering supporters, Democrat Taylor Rehmet dedicated his victory "to everyday working people."
Democrats scored a major upset on Saturday, as machinist union leader Taylor Rehmet easily defeated Republican opponent Leigh Wambsganss in a state senate special election held in a deep-red district that President Donald Trump carried by 17 percentage points in 2024.
With nearly all votes counted, Rehmet holds a 14-point lead in Texas' Senate District 9, which covers a large portion of Tarrant County.
In a speech before cheering supporters, Rehmet dedicated his victory "to everyday working people" whom he credited with putting his campaign over the top.
This win goes to everyday, working people.
I’ll see you out there! pic.twitter.com/kPWzjn2LhW
— Taylor Rehmet (@TaylorRehmetTX) February 1, 2026
Republican opponent Wambsganss conceded defeat in the race but vowed to win an upcoming rematch in November.
“The dynamics of a special election are fundamentally different from a November general election,” Wambsganss said. “I believe the voters of Senate District 9 and Tarrant County Republicans will answer the call in November.”
Republican Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick reacted somberly to the news of Rehmet's victory, warning in a social media post that the result was "a wake-up call for Republicans across Texas."
"Our voters cannot take anything for granted," Patrick emphasized.
Democratic US Senate candidate James Talarico, on the other hand, cheered Rehmet's victory, which he hinted was a sign of things to come in the Lone Star State in the 2026 midterm elections.
"Trump won this district by 17 points," he wrote. "Democrat Taylor Rehmet just flipped it—despite Big Money outspending him 10:1. Something is happening in Texas."
Steven Monacelli, special correspondent for the Texas Observer, described Rehmet's victory as "an earthquake of Biblical proportions."
"Tarrant County is the largest red county in the nation," Monacelli explained. "I cannot emphasize enough how big this is."
Adam Carlson, founding partner of polling firm Zenith Research, noted that Rehmet's victory was truly remarkable given the district's past voting record.
"The recent high water mark for Dems in the district was 43.6% (Beto 2018)," he wrote, referring to Democrat Beto O'Rourke's failed 2018 US Senate campaign. "Rehmet’s likely to exceed 55%. The heavily Latino parts of the district shifted sharply to the left from 2024."
Polling analyst Lakshya Jain said that the big upset in Texas makes more sense when considering recent polling data on voter enthusiasm.
"Our last poll's generic ballot was D+4," he explained. "Among the most enthusiastic voters (a.k.a., those who said they would 'definitely' vote in 2026)? D+12. Foreseeable and horrible for the GOP."
Bud Kennedy, a columnist for the Forth Worth Star-Telegram, argued that Rehmet's victory shows that "Democrats can win almost anywhere in Texas" in 2026.
Kennedy also credited Rehmet with having "the perfect résumé for a District 9 Democrat" as "a Lockheed Martin leader running against a Republican who had lost suburban public school voters, particularly in staunch-red Republican north Fort Worth."