October, 09 2008, 01:40pm EDT
Since Assault Weapons Ban Lifted, At Least 163 Dead, 185 Wounded, 15 Police Officers Dead, 23 Wounded
In the four years since the federal assault weapons ban expired on
September 15, 2004, at least 163 people have been killed and 185
wounded with military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, including at
least 38 police officers killed or wounded, according to a report being
issued today by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
WASHINGTON
In the four years since the federal assault weapons ban expired on
September 15, 2004, at least 163 people have been killed and 185
wounded with military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, including at
least 38 police officers killed or wounded, according to a report being
issued today by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Restrictions on assault weapons, which drew support from Presidents
Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W.
Bush, have been addressed by both major candidates for President:
"Senator Barack Obama has stated as recently as his convention
acceptance speech that it is imperative that criminals be denied the
use of assault weapons," the report says. "Senator John McCain, who
has opposed the NRA on gun shows and other issues, has been firm in his
opposition to an assault weapon ban."
The report outlines how the availability of assault weapons has altered
the balance of power on urban streets between police and criminals,
endangering police officers and causing a growing number of police
departments to use assault weapons to match the firepower they face .
The report also explores the ties between terrorism and assault weapons.
"Our communities are less safe today than they were four years ago,
when devastating weapons like AK-47s were not as easily available to
thugs and other dangerous people," said Paul Helmke, President of the
Brady Center. "We urge policymakers to take action now to get these
weapons off the streets."
The Brady Center report is entitled Mass Produced Mayhem, a phrase used
by federal law enforcement officials to describe the guns back in 1994.
The report is available online at
https://www.bradycenter.org/xshare/pdf/reports/mass-produced-mayhem.pdf
Over the past four years, the Brady Center has tracked available news
coverage of hundreds of incidents to prepare the report. The incidents
on the list involved weapons banned under the expired federal act as
well as copycat and similar models that would be banned under proposed
stronger legislation. The analysis makes a compelling case that
federal policymakers should again ban military-style assault weapons.
"This is a very cautious estimate of the injuries and deaths inflicted
with assault weapons since the 1994 law expired," said Brian J. Siebel,
the author of the report. "It only includes incidents covered by the
news media. The danger that our communities face from these weapons
likely is far worse than this report indicates."
The victim list of those killed with assault weapons since the federal
ban expires runs the gamut from grandmothers to young children to
decorated police officers:
- Stephen Liczbinski, a 12-year veteran of the Philadelphia
Police Department, executed in May by bank robbery suspects just days
short of his 40th birthday. He left a wife, Michelle, and three
children, Matt, Stephen and Amber.
- Vicky Armel, 40, the Fairfax County, Virginia police
veteran who was the mother of two girls, five and seven, when she and
officer Michael Garbarino lost their lives on May 2006. She
volunteered at her church and decorated the local school gym at the
holidays. The shooter: Michael Kennedy, an 18-year-old mental patient
whose mother helped him practice firing his AK-47 assault rifle and
whose father supplied him with marijuana.
- Siretha White of Chicago died of stray assault weapon fire
that came through the windows of her aunt's house, where she was at her
own surprise birthday party on March 11, 2006 just days before her 11th
birthday. Siretha loved acting and excelled as a fifth grader at Vernon
Johns Community Academy. She also loved jumping rope, basketball and
boxing with her brother. "I have lost my precious 'Nugget' to a deadly
assault weapon that had no business being in my neighborhood," said
Siretha's mother, Siretha Woods. "She would be alive today but for the
deadliness of these weapons."
- Janet Jorgensen, 68, mother of three and grandmother of
eight, who had just celebrated her 50th wedding anniversary when she
was gunned down in the Westroads Mall in Omaha, Nebraska during the
Christmas shopping season in December 2007. At St. James Catholic
Church, the crowd for her funeral was standing room only. Robert
Hawkins, 19, killed eight before committing suicide.
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
As Wage Growth Slows and Unemployment Rises, Trump Tax Cuts Deliver Big for Mega-Rich Retail CEOs
"At the same time prices have soared for consumers and retail workers remain stuck in low-wage jobs, big-store CEOs and shareholders have reaped higher profits and lower taxes."
Dec 19, 2025
As workers face slowing wage growth, a worsening cost-of-living crisis, and rising unemployment, the chief executives of top corporate retailers in the United States are reaping huge gains from the tax cuts that US President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans extended over the summer.
An analysis released Friday by the progressive advocacy group Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) estimates that the CEOs of Amazon, Best Buy, Costco, Home Depot, Lowe's, Target, TJX, and Walmart have collectively saved close to $35 million on their individual tax returns in the seven years the Trump tax cuts have been in effect.
Thanks to the Trump-GOP tax law, which took effect in 2018, the companies examined in the analysis paid a tax rate of just 17.5% between 2018 and 2024—roughly half what they paid prior to the law's enactment.
"While at the same time prices have soared for consumers and retail workers remain stuck in low-wage jobs, big-store CEOs and shareholders have reaped higher profits and lower taxes," David Kass, ATF’s executive director, said in a statement. "If we want a system that alleviates economic stress on average Americans instead of exacerbating it during the holiday season, we need to raise taxes on corporations and the rich, invest in workers and families with expanded public services."
Workers at the major retailers haven't fared nearly as well. ATF noted that "the average worker at the eight stores was paid less than $32,000 in 2024."
"Amazon—the world’s largest retailer—refuses to even sit down with its employees who have formed a labor union for better pay, benefits, and working conditions," the group observed. "If Lowe’s had used the nearly $50 billion it spent on stock buybacks over the seven-year period to instead raise employee wages, its workers would have each been paid almost $200,000 more."
Across the US economy, workers are seeing wage growth stagnate amid elevated and still-rising prices, which are forcing many to skip meals and ration their medications to make ends meet.
The Labor Department said earlier this week that wage growth decelerated to 3.5% year over year—the slowest pace since before the Covid-19 pandemic. Unemployment, meanwhile, rose in November to the highest level in four years.
The ATF analysis came days after Trump delivered a lie-filled primetime speech defending his handling of the US economy as his approval ratings tanked, with American voters across party lines increasingly furious over the high costs of housing, groceries, healthcare, and other necessities.
During the speech, Trump vowed that Americans would soon "see the results of the largest tax cuts in American history."
But the richest people in the country are set to reap disproportionate benefits from the tax cuts. As Bloomberg reported earlier this week, "Many filers—particularly those who could most use the financial boost—may soon be disappointed."
"Wealthy taxpayers in high-tax states like California, New York, and New Jersey are the biggest winners," the outlet noted.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Dems Call to Investigate Commerce Secretary Boosting AI Data Centers That 'Enrich His Entire Family'
"Never in modern US history has the office intersected so broadly and deeply with the financial interests of the commerce secretary’s own family," according to the New York Times.
Dec 19, 2025
A group of Democratic lawmakers has called for the Commerce Department to investigate whether its billionaire secretary, Howard Lutnick, is improperly boosting artificial intelligence data centers that "stand to enrich his entire family."
The group of 25 House and Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), sent a letter on Thursday urging the department's acting inspector general, Duane Townsend, to review whether Lutnick violated any part of the ethics agreement he signed following his nomination.
That agreement required him to divest his stake in the financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald, which he had owned and led for decades. Cantor owns the Newmark Group, a real estate broker that facilitates leases for AI data centers.
Lutnick stepped down from his position as CEO in February, handing his financial stake in the company to his adult sons, Brandon and Kyle.
Though the transfer of his stake was supposed to happen in May, records show he did not do so until October, after receiving an ethics waiver from the Trump administration that allowed him to continue working on matters that could affect the company.
The lawmakers described some of these potential conflicts in the letter, many of which were revealed by a New York Times investigation last month:
Multiple press reports indicate that, in his capacity as head of the Commerce Department, Secretary Lutnick has helped boost AI data centers in ways that will likely enrich his own family. He has made public appearances promoting data center projects—including at least one that his family's company has worked on.
Furthermore, Secretary Lutnick has reportedly pressured foreign governments to invest in the US data center industry. For example, as part of a recent AI chips export deal with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Secretary Lutnick reportedly pushed the UAE to "build data centers in America,” in exchange for the United States loosening export control restrictions on certain advanced chips. The Trump administration ultimately approved this deal, under which the Lutnick-backed Newmark Group is primed to profit from that Emirati investment.
Similarly, as part of another trade deal, Secretary Lutnick reportedly pushed South Korea to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States. One startup vying for some of South Korea's investment has paid the Lutnick family's companies millions in fees to help it secure financing and land for its new data center.
Though businesspeople have often occupied the role of Commerce Secretary, the Times reported last month that "never in modern US history has the office intersected so broadly and deeply with the financial interests of the commerce secretary’s own family, according to interviews with ethics lawyers and historians."
According to the company's most recent quarterly earnings report, Newmark has completed more than $25 billion in data center deals over the past 12 months, resulting in its most lucrative year in the firm's history.
Citing evidence that the construction of AI data centers considerably spikes energy costs for consumers, the lawmakers said, "There is substantial public interest in ensuring that Secretary Lutnick is not violating federal ethics law to propel data centers that will be profitable for his family while making life more expensive for working Americans."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Tanking Economy and Higher Prices Put Trump on ‘Naughty List’ This Holiday Season, Group Says
"Families are heading into the holidays facing snowballing costs on everything from toys and groceries to health care and utilities, yet Trump continues to call affordability a hoax."
Dec 19, 2025
President Donald Trump delivered a speech on Wednesday in which he tried to convince US voters that the economy under his watch was the envy of the world.
However, newly released data shows that Americans are not buying it.
The latest data from the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers showed consumer sentiment of current economic conditions dropped yet again in December to a rating of 50.4, which represents a 33% drop from the 74.0 consumer sentiment rating one year ago.
The Groundwork Collaborative released a report on Friday that slammed the president's economic stewardship and said that "it is no surprise that a record number of Americans put Trump’s economic performance on the naughty list this holiday season."
The group then explained why Americans have good reason to be pessimistic.
One of the most glaring problems with Trump's economy at the moment, the group contended, is the labor market, which has reported net negative job growth over the last two months.
What's more, Groundwork Collaborative noted that "the number of people working part time for economic reasons rose to 5.5 million in November, an increase of about 909,000 since September, as Americans are unable to find full-time employment."
The group also hit Trump for his tariffs on imported goods, which have already cost the average American family an estimated $1,200 so far and are projected to cost them $2,100 next year, assuming the tariffs remain at their current levels.
Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, said that current economic conditions were the opposite of what Trump promised during the 2024 presidential campaign, when he vowed to lower prices starting on his first day in office.
"Families are heading into the holidays facing snowballing costs on everything from toys and groceries to health care and utilities, yet Trump continues to call affordability a hoax," said Jacquez. "As working families yearn for the ghost of economies past, let’s hope the Scrooge in the White House makes a resolution to stop gaslighting Americans and get serious about bringing costs down in the new year."
Groundwork Collaborative's analysis came one day after the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) released a report on Thursday that outlined how Trump and his Republican allies have worked to make life less affordable for US voters over the last year.
Beyond the aforementioned tariffs cited by Groundwork Collaborative, CBPP cited the major cuts that Trump and the GOP made to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that they passed into law earlier this year.
CBPP also flagged Trump and the GOP's cuts to renewable energy projects that the group argued are raising the cost of electricity at a time when electric grids are coming under heavy strain from the energy demands of artificial intelligence data centers. Making this crisis potentially even worse, the think tank noted that Trump has proposed entirely eliminating the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP).
Taken together, CBPP suggested that GOP policies have been taking a hatchet to the budgets of US households in the bottom half of the income distribution scale.
"Households with incomes in the bottom half of the distribution... spend almost 90% of their incomes on basic items: utilities, groceries, health care, transportation, and shelter," wrote CBPP. "And to help afford those basics, many need assistance, such as Medicaid, SNAP, or LIHEAP, that the Administration has put on the chopping block."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular



