

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Michelle Chan, 415-544-0790 ext. 14
Erich Pica, 202-222-0739
Friends of the Earth announced its
opposition to the Bush administration's proposed trillion-dollar bailout
of the financial system today, and called on elected officials to ensure that
any government action related to the financial crisis fixes deep structural
flaws in the financial system that have spawned not only the current financial
crisis but are also jeopardizing our planet's future.
Friends of the Earth President Brent Blackwelder had the
following statement:
"This financial crisis has exposed
the right-wing's anti-regulation philosophy as an abject failure.
This hands-off approach to managing the economy has resulted in greedy
corporate titans getting rich on the backs of working people. This same
philosophy is causing irreparable harm to the planet. And now we face a
trillion-dollar taxpayer-funded bailout. Enough is enough.
"Friends of the
Earth opposes the Bush administration's proposed blank-check bailout for
these wealthy financiers. What is needed is truly fundamental reform, not
this no-strings-attached proposal.
The government must impose oversight and re-regulation on the financial
system. The days of the fox guarding the henhouse, with corporate
lobbyists writing the laws that regulate their industries, must end. And we must consider
environmental impacts to be economic impacts as we move forward. While
the risks posed to the economy by the current financial crisis are indeed dire,
we also face long-term risks posed by the climate crisis. These problems
are intertwined, and reforms of the financial system must take this into
account.
"Reform must be conducted in a
just way that helps people on Main
Street more than it helps corporate fat cats on
Wall Street. Taxpayer funds taken from the treasury to prop up Wall
Street must be replaced so they can be used to fund other
necessary initiatives.
"It's ironic that when many
countries run into financial trouble, the International Monetary Fund imposes
serious economic restructuring, but President Bush and Secretary
Paulson now see no need for restructuring at all. They're
wrong, and their proposal should be rejected."
This unprecedented bailout not only imposes a hefty
monetary cost on taxpayers and future generations, but it represents enormous
opportunity costs. In response, Friends of the Earth is calling on
Congress to consider the following specific reforms, which adhere to the
principles stated above:
Any bailout
package should be just.
-
Financial
institutions should bear the brunt of the losses from this crisis; taxpayer monies
should be used to only cover the bare minimum to keep our banking system
functional.
-
The
government should acquire an ownership stake in the institutions that are
bailed out.
-
Bailing out Wall Street banks
without making proportionate efforts to keep American families in their homes
is unfair. Friends of the Earth supports organizations such as the Center
for Responsible Lending, National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the
National Council on Civil Rights, who are advocating Chapter 13 judicial
modification relief to keep homeowners from losing their homes.
-
In
addition, failing to hold executives accountable for the disastrous
consequences of their actions is unconscionable; those who were responsible
should be persecuted to the full extent of the law. In the future, fines
and penalties for financial and corporate malfeasance must be increased, and
executive compensation must be reigned in at all companies that are being
bailed out.
Any bailout package must be tied to a restoration of regulation and supervision
of the financial services industry.
-
Decades of deregulation have
allowed this industry to "innovate" new financial products,
structures, and vehicles at an astonishing rate without monitoring and
supervision. Friends of the Earth supports the call from Center for
Economic and Policy Research to require tradable instruments, such as credit
default swaps, to be standardized and traded on exchanges, which would subject
them to regulation and transparency.
-
Now is the time to ensure proper
oversight over the financial services sector, and tighten up rules on
accounting and offshore tax havens which allow clever financial engineering to
hide real risks and liabilities. It is time to bring hedge funds under
supervision; and no hedge funds (which have refused to even register with the
SEC) should be bailed out.
-
Congress must also reinstate the
Glass-Stegall Act, which paved the way for massive overleveraging among
financial institutions, increased the risk of conflicts of interest, and put
consumers real savings at risk.
Any bailout package
should include measures to cool down
speculative hot money flows and asset bubbles.
-
The Fed should take on a new role
of proactively preventing asset bubbles, and take measures to cool down overheating
parts of the financial markets.
-
As Friends of the Earth has
proposed since 1995, a Tobin-style tax (for example, 0.25 percent tax on stock
trading, and 0.02 percent tax on options, futures, swaps, and currency trading)
should be introduced to curb excessive speculation and promote longer-term
investing that serves the real economy. Tobin-style tax revenue could be
used to help pay for the bailout and address critical social and environmental
needs.
Government-owned financial institutions have
the ability and responsibility to foster an environmentally sound future.
-
AIG, as it becomes a federally
controlled entity, should cease underwriting fossil fuel energy projects
and focus on facilitating a clean energy transformation. The same principle
should apply to other new federal entities that are created via this bail
out. The National Environmental Policy Act should apply to such
entities.
-
In the future, Fannie and Freddie
Mac should institute a policy to require an increasing percentage of the
mortgages they purchase to be "green" (location efficient, energy
efficient, and/or sustainably designed). It should phase out purchasing
mortgages for development in flood plains and coastal hazard zones.
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400The president's decision means the US "will not illegally intercept and seize the entirely legal and legitimate sovereign trade in oil," said one observer.
President Donald Trump said Sunday that his administration would let a Russia-owned tanker carrying an estimated 730,000 barrels of oil to reach Cuba, loosening the illegal fuel blockade that has intensified the island's already-grave humanitarian crisis.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said that "if a country wants to send some oil into Cuba right now, I have no problem," backing off his previous threat to tariff any nation that supplied the besieged island with fuel. Cuba has not received any oil imports since January 9, sparking nationwide blackouts and food shortages and leaving hospitals without critical supplies—with deadly consequences for patients.
Trump insisted that the oil on the Russian tanker—which experts say is enough to buy Cuba at least several weeks of energy—is "not going to have an impact," declaring, "Cuba is finished."
"They have a bad regime, and they have very bad and corrupt leadership," added Trump, who presides over what analysts have deemed the most corrupt administration in US history. "Whether or not they get a boat of oil is not going to matter."
Reporter: There's a report that the US is going to let a Russian oil tanker go to Cuba?
Trump: If a country wants to send some oil into Cuba, I have no problem with that.
Reporter: Do you worry that that helps Putin?
Trump: It doesn’t help him. He loses one boatload of oil.… pic.twitter.com/8Vh6gHwaxs
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 30, 2026
Trump's comments came after The New York Times reported that, "barring orders instructing it otherwise," the US Coast Guard would not intercept the Russian tanker as it approached Cuba.
The Russian vessel, known as the Anatoly Kolodkin, is expected to reach the island by Monday night, providing some reprieve to a nation whose economy has been strangled by unlawful US economic warfare for decades. In recent days, an international convoy of activists has delivered tons of food, medicine, and other aid to the island, but the shipments are a Band-Aid on a gaping wound.
Michael Gallant, a member of the Progressive International Secretariat, welcomed news that the US is allowing the Russian tanker to reach Cuba as "very good news"—but said Trump's decision is hardly deserving of praise.
Very good news. “The US will allow,” of course, means “will not illegally intercept and seize the entirely legal and legitimate sovereign trade in oil” https://t.co/YF2RRIXC2S
— Michael Galant (@michael_galant) March 29, 2026
Trump imposed the fuel blockade in January, absurdly characterizing Cuba as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security.
Earlier this month, Trump threatened to "take" Cuba by force, calling it a "very weakened nation." Trump's remarks prompted Cuba's president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, to vow "impregnable resistance" to any US attempt to seize the island. The Trump administration is reportedly seeking Díaz-Canel's removal as a necessary condition in talks with the Cuban government.
Trump's threats led Reps. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) to introduce legislation last week that would prohibit the administration from using federal funds for any attack on Cuba without congressional authorization.
"Trump has started illegal regime change conflicts in Venezuela and Iran and is now threatening Cuba," Jayapal said in a statement. "These military attacks put our troops in danger, endanger innocent civilians, waste billions of taxpayer dollars, and are not what the American people want."
"Trump promised to end forever wars—he lied," Jayapal added. "Congress alone has the power to declare war, something Trump clearly does not respect. He has no plan to improve conditions for the Cuban people or promote democracy, and we must pass this legislation to block him from acting on a whim."
"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war."
Pope Leo XIV used his Palm Sunday sermon to take what appears to be a shot at US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
In his sermon, excerpts of which he published on social media, the pope emphasized Christian teachings against violence while criticizing anyone who would invoke Jesus Christ to justify a war.
"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war," Pope Leo said. "He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them."
The pope also encouraged followers to "raise our prayers to the Prince of Peace so that he may support people wounded by war and open concrete paths of reconciliation and peace."
While speaking at the Pentagon last week, Hegseth directly invoked Jesus when discussing the Trump administration's unprovoked and unconstitutional war with Iran.
Specifically, Hegseth offered up a prayer in which he asked God to give US soldiers "wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy," adding that "we ask these things with bold confidence in the mighty and powerful name of Jesus Christ."
Mother Jones contributing writer Alex Nguyen described the pope's sermon as a "rebuke" of Hegseth, whom he noted "has been open about his support for a Christian crusade" in the Middle East.
Pope Leo is not the only Catholic leader speaking against using Christian faith to justify wars of aggression. Two weeks ago, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin patriarch of Jerusalem, said "the abuse and manipulation of God’s name to justify this and any other war is the gravest sin we can commit at this time."
“War is first and foremost political and has very material interests, like most wars," Cardinal Pizzaballa added.
"Trump’s problem is that whatever the claims he might make about the damage to Iran’s nuclear and military capacity, which is substantial, the regime survives, the international economy has been severely disrupted, and the bills keep on coming in."
President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to launch some kind of ground assault on Iran in the coming weeks, but one prominent military strategy expert believes he's heading straight for defeat.
The Washington Post on Saturday reported that the Pentagon is preparing for "weeks" of ground operations in Iran, which for the last month has disrupted global energy markets by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz in response to aerial assaults by the US and Israel.
The Post's sources revealed that "any potential ground operation would fall short of a full-scale invasion and could instead involve raids by a mixture of Special Operations forces and conventional infantry troops" that could be used to seize Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil export hub, or to search out and destroy weapons systems that could be used by the Iranians to target ships along the strait.
Michael Eisenstadt, director of the Military and Security Studies Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told the Post that taking over Kharg Island would be a highly risky operation for American troops, even if initially successful.
“I just wouldn’t want to be in that small place with Iran’s ability to rain down drones and maybe artillery,” said Eisenstadt.
Eisenstadt's analysis was echoed by Ret. Gen. Joseph Votel, former head of US Central Command, who told ABC News that seizing and occupying Kharg Island would put US troops in a state of constant danger, warning they could be "very, very vulnerable" to drones and missiles launched from the shore.
Lawrence Freedman, professor emeritus of war studies at King's College London, believes that the president has already checkmated himself regardless of what shape any ground operation takes.
In an analysis published Sunday, Freedman declared Trump had run "out of options" for victory, as there have been no signs of the Iranian regime crumbling due to US-Israeli attacks.
Freedman wrote that Trump now "appears to inhabit an alternative reality," noting that "his utterances have become increasingly incoherent, with contradictory statements following quickly one after the other, and frankly delusional claims."
Trump's loan real option at this point, Freedman continued, would to simply declare that he had achieved an unprecedented victory and just walk away. But even in that case, wrote Freedman, "this would mean leaving behind a mess in the Gulf" with no guarantee that Iran would re-open the Strait of Hormuz.
"Success in war is judged not by damage caused but by political objectives realized," Freedman wrote in his conclusion. "Here the objective was regime change, or at least the emergence of a new compliant leader... Trump’s problem is that whatever the claims he might make about the damage to Iran’s nuclear and military capacity, which is substantial, the regime survives, the international economy has been severely disrupted, and the bills keep on coming in."