September, 15 2008, 02:17pm EDT
![Human Rights Watch (HRW)](https://assets.rbl.ms/50602809/origin.jpg)
Zimbabwe: Rights Reform Vital to Lasting Stability
Power-Sharing Deal Should End Abuses, Bring Justice
JOHANNESBURG
Any transition to democracy following the power-sharing agreement in
Zimbabwe will remain fragile unless the political leadership takes
steps to address human rights abuses, Human Rights Watch said today.
Any deal should immediately end ongoing violations and hold to account
those responsible for past abuses.
"Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF must show their commitment to the
power-sharing agreement by bringing about an immediate end to abuses,"
said Georgette Gagnon, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "They
should release political prisoners, dismantle torture camps set up
around the elections and disarm ZANU-PF party members and its allies."
Negotiations between Zimbabwe's main political parties -
the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF)
and the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) - have not
brought an end to abuses. In August 2008, police arrested six MDC
parliamentarians on what Human Rights Watch believes are politically
motivated charges. Bednock Nyaude, Shua Mudiwa, Mathias Mlambo, Pearson
Mungofa, Eliah Jembere, and Trevor Saruwaka were arrested in Harare
during the opening of parliament. The parliamentarians were recently
released on bail.
ZANU-PF supporters, government-backed "war veterans" and
"youth militia" continue to terrorize Zimbabweans in rural areas. The
government has failed to dismantle the torture camps that it
established in the immediate aftermath of the March 29, 2008 general
elections. Despite lifting a three-month ban on operations by local and
international humanitarian agencies, the government has tightened its
control over their operations. If they wish to operate in a specific
area, they must first get permission and a memorandum of understanding
from the relevant government ministry. The restrictive government
controls have left the delivery of humanitarian assistance open to
manipulation by government agents and local ZANU-PF officials.
Zimbabwe's long history of impunity for politically
motivated crimes has contributed to the current crisis. Those who
committed past abuses have remained free to carry out further acts of
violence and intimidation. Supporters and officials of ZANU-PF, army
officials, "war veterans," and "youth militia" have been implicated in
the killing of at least 163 people and the beating and torture of more
than 5,000 others over the past four months. Tens of thousands of
Zimbabweans have fled the violence that has plagued the country since
the March 29 elections.
Human Rights Watch called for the establishment of an
independent commission of inquiry to investigate past and present
abuses and for the government to bring the perpetrators to justice.
Government and party officials implicated in abuses should not be
included in any future government, Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch called on Zimbabwe's political
leadership to take urgent measures over the next 60 days to address
endemic impunity and strengthen institutional reform to demonstrate
their commitment to real change, including:
- Review and repeal repressive laws;
- Restore the justice system;
- End arbitrary arrest and detention; and
- Address problems with the electoral process.
Repressive laws
In
the past few years, the government of Zimbabwe has instituted a raft of
repressive laws that violate the rights of Zimbabweans to freedom of
expression, association, and assembly. These include the Access to
Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the Public Order and
Security Act, the Criminal Law (Codification) Act, and the
Miscellaneous Offences Act. Human Rights Watch said that Zimbabwe's
political leadership should take immediate steps to repeal these laws,
and together with nongovernmental human rights organizations institute
a comprehensive process of review of all laws in force, with a view to
the repeal or amendment of those that do not comply with international
human rights standards.
The justice system
Zimbabwe's judiciary and
police force have been severely compromised under the current
government. The police are responsible for widespread violations,
including harassment, threats and violence against opposition
supporters and human rights activists, and torture and other
mistreatment. In the past four months, police have routinely refused to
take action against ZANU-PF supporters and militia implicated in
political violence. Human Rights Watch research over the past eight
years found that public confidence in the judiciary and police -
especially with respect to independence and impartiality - has been
progressively eroded.
Starting in 2000, the government of Zimbabwe began an
onslaught on the judiciary that included physical and verbal attacks
against judges, and bribes to compromise the impartiality, and
undermine the work of, the judiciary. A new government needs to focus
on these and other issues relating to the administration of justice to
help restore respect for human rights and the rule of law - respect
that is essential not only for the rights of Zimbabweans, but also to
promote the external investment that is necessary to bring Zimbabwe out
of its current economic crisis.
Arbitrary arrest and detention
The arrest of six MDC parliamentarians in August reflects a wider problem of arbitrary arrest and detention in Zimbabwe.
Police often arrest opposition activists, journalists and human rights
defenders without evidence, detain them without charge beyond the
48-hour limit, and deny them bail or access to their lawyers or
relatives. These arrests are an ongoing attempt by the current government to intimidate and harass its opponents and critics.
These and other politically motivated cases need to be reviewed
immediately. Those held without charge or who have been charged with
offenses that violate their basic rights should be promptly released.
Persons who have been charged with legally cognizable offenses should
be promptly brought to trial before courts that meet international fair
trial standards.
Problems with the electoral process
Human
Rights Watch documented serious flaws with Zimbabwe's electoral process
during the March 29 elections and the presidential runoff on June 27.These included government-instigated
violence, intimidation and threats against opposition candidates and
party members, lack of judicial independence, restrictions on the
media, lack of independence of the electoral commission and related
personnel, manipulation of government-subsidized food, and concerns
about pre-poll rigging. The political leadership should work with
national and international organizations to address these issues to
ensure that the next elections in Zimbabwe represent a genuinely free
and fair electoral process, Human Rights Watch said.
"The power-sharing agreement should ensure justice for
past and present human rights abuses and correct the systemic failures
of governance in Zimbabwe," Gagnon said. "A political agreement built
on impunity is unlikely to last - and may well serve as an invitation
to more atrocities in the future."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular