SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
September, 11 2008, 12:26pm EDT
Contact:
Michael T. McPhearson 314-303-8874
Elliott Adams 518-441-2697
VFP Calls for U.S. Withdrawal From Afghanistan and the Prosecution of Dick Cheney and George Bush for Crimes Against Humanity
Nationwide
Veterans For Peace held its
Annual National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota days before the start
of the Republican Convention. Over 400 veterans, military family
members and friends ranging from World War II to the current conflict
in Iraq gathered for workshops, discussions, inspirational speakers and
entertainment. Topics covered included Agent Orange, Depleted Uranium,
outreach to military personnel, PTSD and healing from war, military
sexual assault and others. Keynote speakers for the four day conference
were Father Roy Bourgeois, a Catholic priest and founder of the School
of Americas Watch; former Marine and chief United Nations Special
Commission (UNSCOM) Inspector in Iraq 1991-1998, Scott Ritter; Iraq War
Gold Star parent and former Minnesota State Senator Becky Lourey; the
author of the best seller "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most
Powerful Mercenary Army," Jeremy Scahill; and West Point graduate James
Yee, former Muslim Chaplin for the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay.
Veterans For Peace also passed sixteen resolutions taking stands on
topics ranging from increasing VFP commitment to greening the annual
convention, working to authorizing the creation of Veterans For Peace
Incarcerated Chapters to assisting disabled military personnel and
veterans. Three resolutions in particular stand out.
Veterans For Peace is calling for changes in military law and other
appropriate regulations so that military personnel can declare
themselves Conscientious Objectors to specific wars based on a
religious, moral, or legal basis. Current law calls for the objection
to all wars to qualify for CO status.
The group is calling for the government of the United States to
immediately withdraw all military and intelligence forces from
Afghanistan and Pakistan. This same resolution calls for the U.S.
government to provide humanitarian aid to the people of Afghanistan, in
non-coercive forms, to help them rebuild their own nation and their
lives in cooperation with other nations in the region; and to allow the
people of Afghanistan to freely determine their own government without
interference by the U.S.
Continuing with their efforts to impeach President Bush Jr. and Vice
President Cheney, VFP has pledged to take every appropriate measure to
insure that George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and responsible members of
their administration are prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against
peace and crimes against humanity before any court claiming
jurisdiction in this country or abroad, for as long as they shall live.
Commenting on these resolutions, VFP Executive Director Michael
McPhearson said, "These three statements from our membership represent
many of the core values of our organization. We believe that service
members have the right to re-evaluate their decision to kill and change
their mind. We know that after all the killing is done the individual
soldiers must live with themselves and make sense of what they have
done. We believe that our political leaders must be held accountable
for their actions. This is a critical to a healthy and functional
democracy. We realize that to survive the challenges we face today,
like global warming, we must find ways to work together and war is not
viable."
To read full text of the resolutions please visit https://www.veteransforpeace.org/Convention_Resolutions_2008.vp.html
Veterans For Peace is a global organization of Military Veterans and allies whose collective efforts are to build a culture of peace by using our experiences and lifting our voices. We inform the public of the true causes of war and the enormous costs of wars, with an obligation to heal the wounds of wars. Our network is comprised of over 140 chapters worldwide whose work includes: educating the public, advocating for a dismantling of the war economy, providing services that assist veterans and victims of war, and most significantly, working to end all wars.
(314) 725-6005LATEST NEWS
'Unprecedented Mass Deployment' of Warplanes Across Atlantic Fuels Fears of US War on Iran
"You don't spin up this kind of skyward muscle just to flex," said one observer.
Jun 16, 2025
Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.
Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an "unprecedented mass deployment" to Europe.
According toThe Aviationist:
Most of these aircraft landed this morning at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and at Morón Air Base and [Naval Air Station] Rota in Spain, while two landed at Aviano Air Base in Italy and at least one landed at Prestwick International Airport in the U.K. At the time of writing, some tankers are in flight over the Balkans, headed south, possibly towards Souda Bay in Greece or Incirlik in Turkey.
"While tanker movements in this direction are far from abnormal, such a large, near-simultaneous migration of the jets was very peculiar, especially at a time of extreme crisis in the Middle East," The War Zone's Tyler Rogoway wrote Monday. "The exact reason for the mass deployment is unclear, although many of the potential answers would indicate a change, or preparations for a potential change, in the current conflict between Israel and Iran."
Speaking on condition of anonymity, two U.S. officials toldReuters Monday that the tankers are being deployed to provide the administration of President Donald Trump with flexibility to act in the Middle East. Military experts said the deployment could portend expanded U.S. support for Israel's war on Iran or even American strikes against the country.
The Trump administration—which recently concluded that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons—insists that Israel is acting "unilaterally" against its enemy in an effort to prevent it from developing nukes.
However, Trump said Sunday that "it's possible" that U.S. forces could enter the fight. Iran has accused the United States of complicity in Israel's bombing—which Iran says has killed more than 200 people, 90% of whom are civilians—and warned Washington of potential dire consequences if it boosts involvement in the war.
Asked about possible U.S. intervention in the war, Trump told reporters during the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Alberta, Canada on Monday, "I don't want to talk about that."
"We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president added.
As Reuters noted:
The United States already has a sizable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region, including air defense systems, fighter aircraft, and warships that can help bring down missiles.
Last month, the Pentagon replaced B-2 bombers with another type of bomber at a base in the Indo-Pacific that is seen as being an ideal location to operate in the Middle East. The B-52 bombers can carry large bunker-busting munitions, which experts say can be used against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Iran has responded to Israel's bombardment with waves of apparently indiscriminate missile attacks against Israeli cites, killing at least 24 Israeli civilians including women and children and Palestinian citizens of Israel and wounding hundreds of others.
Iranian state media—which was bombed by Israeli forces Monday with reported fatalities—claimed late in the day that Tehran is "preparing for largest and most intense missile attack in history on Israeli soil," even as Iran's government reportedly signaled its willingness to negotiate an end to hostilities if the U.S. guarantees it will not attack.
However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu subsequently toldABC News that Israel would continue bombing Iran, dismissing Tehran's reported overture as a ruse meant to "lie, cheat, and string the U.S. along."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'War Crime': Iran Demands UN Action After Israeli Bombing of Media Building on Live TV
A regional director of the Committee to Protect Journalists said that "Israel's killing, with impunity, of almost 200 journalists in Gaza has emboldened it to target media elsewhere in the region."
Jun 16, 2025
The Israeli military deliberately bombed the studio of an Iranian state television network during a live broadcast on Monday, an attack that Iran swiftly condemned as a "war crime."
Video footage posted to social media shows the moment the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) complex was hit by Israeli forces, forcing the anchor to flee for safety as smoke and debris filled the broadcast room.
Watch:
This is the moment Iranian state TV was forced to stop its broadcast after it said it was attacked by an Israeli missile attack in Tehran. pic.twitter.com/7RoUtbCuYL
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) June 16, 2025
Shortly before the attack, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared that the "Iranian propaganda and incitement mouthpiece is on its way to disappearing."
Katz made clear in a subsequent social media post that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) intentionally targeted the media building.
"The Iranian regime's propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority was attacked by the IDF after a widespread evacuation of residents in the area," Katz wrote.
"Calling someone a mouthpiece doesn't give you permission to kill them."
The number of casualties from the attack was not immediately clear. Foad Izadi, professor of international relations at the University of Tehran, toldAl Jazeera that the number could be high.
"It's a huge building," said Izadi. "Iran's news channel is located on the first floor. It has four floors, and on every floor you have at least 200-300 people working."
“They were getting ready for the evening program. This is going to result in a lot of civilians—generally young people, young journalists—getting killed," he added. "Calling someone a mouthpiece doesn't give you permission to kill them."
Iran’s state broadcaster, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), is up in flames in Tehran.
The building was struck while airing footage of the war. Hours earlier, Israel’s defense minister declared that Iranian TV channels were “on their way to disappearing.” https://t.co/bfhwWWUr7e pic.twitter.com/dY6HPx7Qvq
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) June 16, 2025
Targeting journalists and media infrastructure is prohibited under international law—and the use of media facilities for propaganda purposes does not render them legitimate military targets.
The IDF claimed, without providing any evidence, that the targeted building "was being used for military purposes by the Iranian Armed Forces."
Esmaeil Baqaei, a spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, called the Israeli attack "a wicked act" and a "war crime." He went on to urge the United Nations Security Council to "act now to stop the genocidal aggressor from committing further atrocities against our people."
"The world is watching," he wrote.
Sara Qudah, Middle East and North Africa regional director for the Committee to Protect Journalists, said Monday that the press freedom group is "appalled by Israel's bombing of Iran's state TV channel while live on air."
"Israel's killing, with impunity, of almost 200 journalists in Gaza has emboldened it to target media elsewhere in the region," said Qudah. "This bloodshed must end now."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Disgusting': VA Doctors Can Now Reportedly Refuse to Treat Unmarried People, Democrats
This is a "political purity tests for people who risked their lives for this country," wrote one veterans group.
Jun 16, 2025
In response to a January executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has implemented new guidelines that permit individual doctors and other health professionals to refuse to treat patients based on their marital status or political beliefs, according to Monday reporting from The Guardian.
With the changes in place, "individual workers are now free to decline to care for patients based on personal characteristics not explicitly prohibited by federal law."
According to The Guardian, previously VA hospitals' bylaws said that medical staff could not discriminate against patients based on "race, age, color, sex, religion, national origin, politics, marital status, or disability in any employment matter." Terms on that list including, including "national origin," "politics," and "marital status," are no longer there.
The changes "seem to open the door to discrimination on the basis of anything that is not legally protected," Dr. Kenneth Kizer, the VA's top healthcare official during the Clinton administration, told The Guardian.
The new guidelines, which also apply to psychologists and other occupations, are already in effect in at least some Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, according to the outlet.
The Veterans Health Administration, the largest integrated healthcare system in the country, provides care at over 1,300 healthcare facilities. According to the VA's website, over 9.1 million veterans are enrolled in the VA healthcare program.
What's more, the outlet reviewed documents that show that medical staff including doctors can now be barred "from working at VA hospitals based on their marital status, political party affiliation or union activity." Workers like certified nurse practitioners, chiropractors, and licensed clinical social workers, among others, are also impacted by the changes.
U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who is a senior member and former chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, issued a sharp statement in response to the news.
"Healthcare isn't just a special privilege Trump gets to dole out to veterans who agree with the president—it's a moral obligation our country owes to every single man and woman who serves in uniform. Anyone who doesn't understand that has no business leading our armed forces in any way," wrote Murray in a statement on Monday.
"It's disgusting that this policy was ever allowed to go into effect, and I will not let it fly under the radar," she added.
"This isn't healthcare. It's political purity tests for people who risked their lives for this country. It's unethical, authoritarian, and every one of us should be outraged," wrote VoteVets, a progressive veterans group, in a Bluesky post on Monday in response to The Guardian's reporting.
🚨🚨 Trump’s VA just allowed doctors to deny care to Democrats, unmarried Veterans, among other groups. This isn’t healthcare. It’s political purity tests for people who risked their lives for this country. It’s unethical, authoritarian, and every one of us should be outraged.
[image or embed]
— VoteVets (@votevets.org) June 16, 2025 at 11:11 AM
According to The Guardian, VA Press Secretary Peter Kasperowicz did not dispute these aspects of the new rules, but told the outlet that "all eligible veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they've earned under the law."
The rule change, according to The Guardian, stems from the January 30 executive order called "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
The outlet reported that the "primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. The VA has since ceased providing most gender-affirming care and forbidden a long list of words, including 'gender affirming' and 'transgender,' from clinical settings." The VA is currently led by former Republican congressman Doug Collins.
Kasperowicz confirmed that they were implemented to adhere to January executive order. He called the changes nothing more than a "formality." He added that the revisions were necessary to "ensure VA policy comports with federal law," but did not specify which laws made the changes necessary.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular