SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan waves to the crowd during a May 11, 2023 campaign rally in the capital city of Ankara.
"The vote will test whether voters in Turkey can rely on social media for independent news and to express their views on the election and its outcome, despite government efforts to put companies under its heel."
As Turks prepare to vote in Sunday's presidential and parliamentary elections, a pair of human rights groups warned Wednesday that the right-wing government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan "will exert considerable control over the digital ecosystem in an effort to undermine the outcome."
Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Article 19, an international group promoting freedom of expression, published a question-and-answer report examining "potential threats to Turkey's online environment in the parliamentary and presidential elections in which President Erdoğan—who has been in power for over 20 years—and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) face a significant electoral challenge."
\u201cSocial media and the internet are key sources of news and free debate in Turkey\u2019s May 14 elections.\n\nBut the Turkish government\u2019s practice of silencing online dissent could undermine the integrity of the election. https://t.co/oXY3LIqTZH\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683788432
As the BBC reports:
Six opposition parties have combined forces for presidential and parliamentary elections on 14 May, picking opposition leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu as their unity candidate.
Turkey has become increasingly authoritarian under President Erdoğan and the opposition is seeking to reverse that.
He appears vulnerable, with Turkey facing soaring inflation and reeling from twin earthquakes that have left more than 50,000 people dead.
Any candidate that can secure more than half the presidential vote on 14 May is the outright winner. Failing that, the race goes to a run-off two weeks later.
The new report details how the Turkish government—which has a history of quashing online dissent—"has amassed a vast arsenal of digital censorship tools," while listing steps social media and messaging platforms should take to safeguard human rights during the elections.
\u201cVoters in Turkey will soon head to the polls in a high-stakes election.\n\nAhead of this election, the Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites.\nhttps://t.co/3RZfKjQoQB\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683737718
"The Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites ahead of this election," HRW senior technology researcher Deborah Brown said in a statement. "The vote will test whether voters in Turkey can rely on social media for independent news and to express their views on the election and its outcome, despite government efforts to put companies under its heel."
According to the groups' report:
The Turkish government has equipped itself with multiple powers that it can use as a pretext to throttle any social media platform and render it unusable. Such steps could be taken during elections with the ulterior motive of limiting the right to information and independent news online. If election results are contested during election day or in its aftermath, the government may use its full array of censorship powers—and particularly its "spreading false information offense"—to prevent independent groups from challenging results that favor the ruling party. Social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably including assessments from independent monitors.
Turkish authorities have used the "fake news" law to target critical journalists; now critics say it is being applied to crack down on social media users.
"Turkey has long been hell for journalists," Sevgi Akarçeşme, formerly the editor-in-chief of Today's Zaman—the country's largest English-language daily—told CNBC last October. "With this new law… the goal is to control social media because conventional media is already under Erdoğan's control."
\u201c\ud83e\uddf5\ud83d\udd38Can #Turkey\u2019s elections be truly fair with internet censorship?\n\ud83d\udd38How may the govt\u2019s control over the Internet impact the fairness of vote? \n\ud83d\udd38What should big tech do? \n\n\ud83d\udc49Find answers in the Q&A by @article19org and @hrw \n\nhttps://t.co/d5aqwfuqrs 1/2\u201d— ARTICLE 19 ECA (@ARTICLE 19 ECA) 1683721230
Sarah Clarke, director of Article 19 Europe, said in a statement that "social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably, including assessments from independent monitors."
"It is crucial," she added, "for companies to resist these pressures and do everything in their power to push back against measures that would make them complicit in rights abuses during this critical election period."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As Turks prepare to vote in Sunday's presidential and parliamentary elections, a pair of human rights groups warned Wednesday that the right-wing government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan "will exert considerable control over the digital ecosystem in an effort to undermine the outcome."
Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Article 19, an international group promoting freedom of expression, published a question-and-answer report examining "potential threats to Turkey's online environment in the parliamentary and presidential elections in which President Erdoğan—who has been in power for over 20 years—and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) face a significant electoral challenge."
\u201cSocial media and the internet are key sources of news and free debate in Turkey\u2019s May 14 elections.\n\nBut the Turkish government\u2019s practice of silencing online dissent could undermine the integrity of the election. https://t.co/oXY3LIqTZH\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683788432
As the BBC reports:
Six opposition parties have combined forces for presidential and parliamentary elections on 14 May, picking opposition leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu as their unity candidate.
Turkey has become increasingly authoritarian under President Erdoğan and the opposition is seeking to reverse that.
He appears vulnerable, with Turkey facing soaring inflation and reeling from twin earthquakes that have left more than 50,000 people dead.
Any candidate that can secure more than half the presidential vote on 14 May is the outright winner. Failing that, the race goes to a run-off two weeks later.
The new report details how the Turkish government—which has a history of quashing online dissent—"has amassed a vast arsenal of digital censorship tools," while listing steps social media and messaging platforms should take to safeguard human rights during the elections.
\u201cVoters in Turkey will soon head to the polls in a high-stakes election.\n\nAhead of this election, the Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites.\nhttps://t.co/3RZfKjQoQB\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683737718
"The Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites ahead of this election," HRW senior technology researcher Deborah Brown said in a statement. "The vote will test whether voters in Turkey can rely on social media for independent news and to express their views on the election and its outcome, despite government efforts to put companies under its heel."
According to the groups' report:
The Turkish government has equipped itself with multiple powers that it can use as a pretext to throttle any social media platform and render it unusable. Such steps could be taken during elections with the ulterior motive of limiting the right to information and independent news online. If election results are contested during election day or in its aftermath, the government may use its full array of censorship powers—and particularly its "spreading false information offense"—to prevent independent groups from challenging results that favor the ruling party. Social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably including assessments from independent monitors.
Turkish authorities have used the "fake news" law to target critical journalists; now critics say it is being applied to crack down on social media users.
"Turkey has long been hell for journalists," Sevgi Akarçeşme, formerly the editor-in-chief of Today's Zaman—the country's largest English-language daily—told CNBC last October. "With this new law… the goal is to control social media because conventional media is already under Erdoğan's control."
\u201c\ud83e\uddf5\ud83d\udd38Can #Turkey\u2019s elections be truly fair with internet censorship?\n\ud83d\udd38How may the govt\u2019s control over the Internet impact the fairness of vote? \n\ud83d\udd38What should big tech do? \n\n\ud83d\udc49Find answers in the Q&A by @article19org and @hrw \n\nhttps://t.co/d5aqwfuqrs 1/2\u201d— ARTICLE 19 ECA (@ARTICLE 19 ECA) 1683721230
Sarah Clarke, director of Article 19 Europe, said in a statement that "social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably, including assessments from independent monitors."
"It is crucial," she added, "for companies to resist these pressures and do everything in their power to push back against measures that would make them complicit in rights abuses during this critical election period."
As Turks prepare to vote in Sunday's presidential and parliamentary elections, a pair of human rights groups warned Wednesday that the right-wing government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan "will exert considerable control over the digital ecosystem in an effort to undermine the outcome."
Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Article 19, an international group promoting freedom of expression, published a question-and-answer report examining "potential threats to Turkey's online environment in the parliamentary and presidential elections in which President Erdoğan—who has been in power for over 20 years—and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) face a significant electoral challenge."
\u201cSocial media and the internet are key sources of news and free debate in Turkey\u2019s May 14 elections.\n\nBut the Turkish government\u2019s practice of silencing online dissent could undermine the integrity of the election. https://t.co/oXY3LIqTZH\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683788432
As the BBC reports:
Six opposition parties have combined forces for presidential and parliamentary elections on 14 May, picking opposition leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu as their unity candidate.
Turkey has become increasingly authoritarian under President Erdoğan and the opposition is seeking to reverse that.
He appears vulnerable, with Turkey facing soaring inflation and reeling from twin earthquakes that have left more than 50,000 people dead.
Any candidate that can secure more than half the presidential vote on 14 May is the outright winner. Failing that, the race goes to a run-off two weeks later.
The new report details how the Turkish government—which has a history of quashing online dissent—"has amassed a vast arsenal of digital censorship tools," while listing steps social media and messaging platforms should take to safeguard human rights during the elections.
\u201cVoters in Turkey will soon head to the polls in a high-stakes election.\n\nAhead of this election, the Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites.\nhttps://t.co/3RZfKjQoQB\u201d— Human Rights Watch (@Human Rights Watch) 1683737718
"The Turkish government has accelerated its efforts to enforce censorship and tighten control over social media and independent online news sites ahead of this election," HRW senior technology researcher Deborah Brown said in a statement. "The vote will test whether voters in Turkey can rely on social media for independent news and to express their views on the election and its outcome, despite government efforts to put companies under its heel."
According to the groups' report:
The Turkish government has equipped itself with multiple powers that it can use as a pretext to throttle any social media platform and render it unusable. Such steps could be taken during elections with the ulterior motive of limiting the right to information and independent news online. If election results are contested during election day or in its aftermath, the government may use its full array of censorship powers—and particularly its "spreading false information offense"—to prevent independent groups from challenging results that favor the ruling party. Social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably including assessments from independent monitors.
Turkish authorities have used the "fake news" law to target critical journalists; now critics say it is being applied to crack down on social media users.
"Turkey has long been hell for journalists," Sevgi Akarçeşme, formerly the editor-in-chief of Today's Zaman—the country's largest English-language daily—told CNBC last October. "With this new law… the goal is to control social media because conventional media is already under Erdoğan's control."
\u201c\ud83e\uddf5\ud83d\udd38Can #Turkey\u2019s elections be truly fair with internet censorship?\n\ud83d\udd38How may the govt\u2019s control over the Internet impact the fairness of vote? \n\ud83d\udd38What should big tech do? \n\n\ud83d\udc49Find answers in the Q&A by @article19org and @hrw \n\nhttps://t.co/d5aqwfuqrs 1/2\u201d— ARTICLE 19 ECA (@ARTICLE 19 ECA) 1683721230
Sarah Clarke, director of Article 19 Europe, said in a statement that "social media companies may face intense pressure to remove content the government views unfavorably, including assessments from independent monitors."
"It is crucial," she added, "for companies to resist these pressures and do everything in their power to push back against measures that would make them complicit in rights abuses during this critical election period."