Former U.S. President Donald Trump leaves the courtroom for a lunch break during his civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme Court on November 6, 2023 in New York City.
Minnesotans Vow to Still 'Stand Up for Our Democracy' After Court Keeps Trump on Ballot
One attorney noted that the state court "explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage."
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
- Conservative Legal Scholars Argue Trump Is Disqualified for Office Under 14th Amendment ›
- 'Trump Is Disqualified': Activists Aim to Keep Insurrectionist Off Ballot in Key States ›
- Minnesota Voters File 14th Amendment Suit to Keep Trump Off Ballot ›
- Citing 14th Amendment, Michigan Voters File Suit to Bar Trump From 2024 Ballot ›
- Oregon Voters File Suit to Bar 'Ineligible' Trump From Ballot ›
- Opinion | The Constitutional Case for Keeping Trump off the Ballot | Common Dreams ›
- Voters Request Expedited SCOTUS Review of Colorado Trump Case ›
- 'He Is Not Qualified': Maine Bars Trump From Primary Ballot ›
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
- Conservative Legal Scholars Argue Trump Is Disqualified for Office Under 14th Amendment ›
- 'Trump Is Disqualified': Activists Aim to Keep Insurrectionist Off Ballot in Key States ›
- Minnesota Voters File 14th Amendment Suit to Keep Trump Off Ballot ›
- Citing 14th Amendment, Michigan Voters File Suit to Bar Trump From 2024 Ballot ›
- Oregon Voters File Suit to Bar 'Ineligible' Trump From Ballot ›
- Opinion | The Constitutional Case for Keeping Trump off the Ballot | Common Dreams ›
- Voters Request Expedited SCOTUS Review of Colorado Trump Case ›
- 'He Is Not Qualified': Maine Bars Trump From Primary Ballot ›