Former U.S. President Donald Trump leaves the courtroom for a lunch break during his civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme Court on November 6, 2023 in New York City.
Minnesotans Vow to Still 'Stand Up for Our Democracy' After Court Keeps Trump on Ballot
One attorney noted that the state court "explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage."
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
- Conservative Legal Scholars Argue Trump Is Disqualified for Office Under 14th Amendment ›
- 'Trump Is Disqualified': Activists Aim to Keep Insurrectionist Off Ballot in Key States ›
- Minnesota Voters File 14th Amendment Suit to Keep Trump Off Ballot ›
- Citing 14th Amendment, Michigan Voters File Suit to Bar Trump From 2024 Ballot ›
- Oregon Voters File Suit to Bar 'Ineligible' Trump From Ballot ›
- Opinion | The Constitutional Case for Keeping Trump off the Ballot | Common Dreams ›
- Voters Request Expedited SCOTUS Review of Colorado Trump Case ›
- 'He Is Not Qualified': Maine Bars Trump From Primary Ballot ›
Despite a setback in court on Wednesday, U.S. voters and lawyers working to keep former President Donald Trump—the GOP's 2024 front-runner—off the ballot on constitutional grounds remain resolute.
Free Speech for People (FSFP) in September filed a petition in the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of eight state residents, arguing that Trump is disqualified serving as president again after inciting the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The Minnesota case and others across the country rely on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars anyone who has taken an oath to the U.S. Constitution and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding any civil or military office.
In this case, FSFP sought a court order directing Minnesota's secretary of state to exclude Trump from the ballots for the March 5, 2024 presidential nomination primary and November 5, 2024 general election.
"We continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
Regarding the March contest, the high court found that "although the secretary of state and other election officials administer the mechanics of the election, this is an internal party election to serve internal party purposes, and winning the presidential nomination primary does not place the person on the general election ballot as a candidate for president of the United States."
"Because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary, and petitioners' other claims regarding the general election are not ripe, the petition must be dismissed, but without prejudice as to petitioners bringing a petition raising their claims as to the general election," the court added.
While Trump's 2024 campaign celebrated the ruling, FSFP legal director Ron Fein, who argued the case earlier this month, said Wednesday that "we are disappointed by the court's decision."
"However, the Minnesota Supreme Court explicitly recognized that the question of Donald Trump's disqualification for engaging in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution may be resolved at a later stage," he highlighted.
Charles Nauen of Lockridge Grindal Nauen in Minneapolis, another attorney for the petitioners, said that "we are grateful for the eight petitioners who bravely stepped forward to defend the Constitution."
The petitioners included a former Minnesota secretary of state, an ex-associate justice of the state Supreme Court, a retired labor union official, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, a previous St. Paul deputy mayor, and a 22-year veteran of the Minnesota National Guard who served in Iraq.
"Rest assured," Nauen declared, "Minnesotans will continue to stand up for our democracy."
Meanwhile, Fein declared that "the decision isn't binding on any court outside Minnesota and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump."
FSFP has a case in Michigan and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a similar challenge in Colorado.
In addition to those efforts to keep him off the ballot, Trump faces a total of 91 felony charges from two federal and two state-level criminal cases—two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. He is also in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York.
- Conservative Legal Scholars Argue Trump Is Disqualified for Office Under 14th Amendment ›
- 'Trump Is Disqualified': Activists Aim to Keep Insurrectionist Off Ballot in Key States ›
- Minnesota Voters File 14th Amendment Suit to Keep Trump Off Ballot ›
- Citing 14th Amendment, Michigan Voters File Suit to Bar Trump From 2024 Ballot ›
- Oregon Voters File Suit to Bar 'Ineligible' Trump From Ballot ›
- Opinion | The Constitutional Case for Keeping Trump off the Ballot | Common Dreams ›
- Voters Request Expedited SCOTUS Review of Colorado Trump Case ›
- 'He Is Not Qualified': Maine Bars Trump From Primary Ballot ›