SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A mother who is undocumented tends to her U.S.-born children on June 7, 2017 in Denver, Colorado.
(Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
'Blatantly Unconstitutional': Federal Judge Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Order
"I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration.
Jan 23, 2025
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
From Your Site Articles
- Opinion | We Must Defend the Sacred Promise of Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- Second Federal Judge Blocks Unlawful Trump Order to End Birthright Citizenship by Fiat | Common Dreams ›
- Third Judge Blocks Trump's 'Wildly Unconstitutional' Attack on Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- 'Blizzard' of Anti-Immigrant Trump Moves Aimed at Remaking US in 'MAGA'S Preferred Image' | Common Dreams ›
- Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Trump Birthright Citizenship Case | Common Dreams ›
- As Supreme Court Hears Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump Ripped for Attack on Core Constitutional Right | Common Dreams ›
- By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares 'Open Season on All Our Rights' | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Attacks on Citizenship Reveal a Deeper Problem with ‘Citizenship’ Itself | Common Dreams ›
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
From Your Site Articles
- Opinion | We Must Defend the Sacred Promise of Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- Second Federal Judge Blocks Unlawful Trump Order to End Birthright Citizenship by Fiat | Common Dreams ›
- Third Judge Blocks Trump's 'Wildly Unconstitutional' Attack on Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- 'Blizzard' of Anti-Immigrant Trump Moves Aimed at Remaking US in 'MAGA'S Preferred Image' | Common Dreams ›
- Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Trump Birthright Citizenship Case | Common Dreams ›
- As Supreme Court Hears Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump Ripped for Attack on Core Constitutional Right | Common Dreams ›
- By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares 'Open Season on All Our Rights' | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Attacks on Citizenship Reveal a Deeper Problem with ‘Citizenship’ Itself | Common Dreams ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.