
A mother who is undocumented tends to her U.S.-born children on June 7, 2017 in Denver, Colorado.
'Blatantly Unconstitutional': Federal Judge Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Order
"I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration.
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
- Opinion | We Must Defend the Sacred Promise of Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- Second Federal Judge Blocks Unlawful Trump Order to End Birthright Citizenship by Fiat | Common Dreams ›
- Third Judge Blocks Trump's 'Wildly Unconstitutional' Attack on Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- 'Blizzard' of Anti-Immigrant Trump Moves Aimed at Remaking US in 'MAGA'S Preferred Image' | Common Dreams ›
- Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Trump Birthright Citizenship Case | Common Dreams ›
- As Supreme Court Hears Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump Ripped for Attack on Core Constitutional Right | Common Dreams ›
- By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares 'Open Season on All Our Rights' | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Attacks on Citizenship Reveal a Deeper Problem with ‘Citizenship’ Itself | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Newest Unconstitutional, Dangerous Birthright Ban Must Be Stopped | Common Dreams ›
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reuters reported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.
- Opinion | We Must Defend the Sacred Promise of Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- Second Federal Judge Blocks Unlawful Trump Order to End Birthright Citizenship by Fiat | Common Dreams ›
- Third Judge Blocks Trump's 'Wildly Unconstitutional' Attack on Birthright Citizenship | Common Dreams ›
- 'Blizzard' of Anti-Immigrant Trump Moves Aimed at Remaking US in 'MAGA'S Preferred Image' | Common Dreams ›
- Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Trump Birthright Citizenship Case | Common Dreams ›
- As Supreme Court Hears Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump Ripped for Attack on Core Constitutional Right | Common Dreams ›
- By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares 'Open Season on All Our Rights' | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Attacks on Citizenship Reveal a Deeper Problem with ‘Citizenship’ Itself | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Trump’s Newest Unconstitutional, Dangerous Birthright Ban Must Be Stopped | Common Dreams ›

