

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Protesters await the arrival of New York City Mayor Eric Adams to a court hearing at Thurgood Marshall Courthouse on February 19, 2025 in New York City.
U.S. District Judge Dale Ho has done "the right thing," said one legal observer.
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.