

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Protesters await the arrival of New York City Mayor Eric Adams to a court hearing at Thurgood Marshall Courthouse on February 19, 2025 in New York City.
U.S. District Judge Dale Ho has done "the right thing," said one legal observer.
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.
A federal judge on Friday did not immediately sign off on the U.S. Department of Justice's bid to abandon federal corruption charges brought against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and instead appointed an outside attorney to present independent arguments on the government's motion to dismiss.
U.S. District Court Judge Dale Ho wrote that "to assist with its decision-making via an adversarial process" he is appointing Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George Bush who has argued dozens of cases before the Supreme Court, to weigh in on the case.
Clement's appointment to assist the court's decision-making is appropriate "particularly... in light of the public importance of this case, which calls for careful deliberation," wrote Ho.
Ryan Goodman, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote on Bluesky that Ho had done "the right thing," and a Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School, expressed the same.
The move poses a hurdle to the Trump administration's plan to cease prosecuting the Democratic mayor, which it rationalized by saying that the case could hurt Adams' ability to support Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. The move has been called a quid pro quo to ensure Adams' compliance with the administration's immigration crackdown.
The move to drop charges against Adams sparked a crisis within the Department of Justice and within Adams own administration when, last week, top Justice Department official Emil Bove ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment against Adams—prompting the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, to depart rather than carry out the directive.
Earlier this week, four deputy mayors working under Adams also announced their exit.
Bove himself submitted court papers seeking the dismissal. But in a sign that it might not be so easy to get rid of the charges against Adams, Ho ordered the Department of Justice to appear in court and explain its rationale for no longer pursuing its prosecution of Adams.
According to the local outlet Hell Gate, Bove told Ho that even if the Justice Department's move constitutes a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter. "I don't concede, and I don't think it's correct, that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be any issue with this motion," Bove said.
Separately, in addition to a chorus calling for Adams' resignation, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has also faced calls to remove Adams, which she has the power to do under state and city law. On Thursday, Hochul announced that instead of taking that step, she would increase oversight of the mayor's office.