To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Climate activists protest from the side of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce headquarters on October 14, 2021 in Washington, D.C.
"Chamber litigation appears to be an advocacy tool to shield America's largest corporations from accountability, to the detriment of consumers and small businesses," said Public Citizen's Lisa Gilbert.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce bills itself as a champion of small businesses, but a report published Tuesday shows that the powerful lobbying group primarily uses its vast resources to support large corporations in court as they combat antitrust regulations, environmental protections, efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and consumer access to the legal system.
The new report from the watchdog group Public Citizen examines 400 recent cases from the Chamber's Litigation Center, an online resource that tracks the organization's legal work.
Public Citizen's analysis found that the Chamber backed businesses with revenue of more than a billion dollars a year 55% of the time—and 35% of the time, the litigants were Fortune 500 companies.
"In comparison, the Chamber filed in support of at least one small business only 6% of the time," the new report says. "Accordingly, only 23 of the roughly 28 million small businesses in the U.S. (0.0001%) directly benefited from the Chamber's litigation."
Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of Public Citizen, said in a statement that "Chamber litigation appears to be an advocacy tool to shield America's largest corporations from accountability, to the detriment of consumers and small businesses."
"The Chamber is helping big companies to protect their profits by stopping or stalling reforms that would bring down healthcare costs or reduce the student loan debt of small business owners, for example," said Gilbert.
"Its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow."
Of the 400 cases Public Citizen considered, a plurality involved access to the U.S. courts. The watchdog defined court access cases as "legal disputes relating to whether or not forced arbitration clauses would be enforced and whether or not a class action lawsuit would be allowed to proceed."
"While the Chamber actively works to shut the door on everyday Americans seeking relief from the judicial system, the Chamber certainly had no issue availing itself of the court," Public Citizen's report states. "Recently, Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne Clark utilized the yearly State of American Business Address to boast about the organization's many misguided accusations of overregulation, stating: 'And that's why the chamber sued the [Federal Trade Commission], the [Securities and Exchange Commission], and the [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau] last year.'"
The Chamber, which is funded mostly by large donations, has recently intervened in high-profile cases with vast implications for the U.S. public, siding with Big Pharma in its attack on Medicare drug price negotiations and opposing the Biden administration's effort to cancel student loan debt for tens of millions of borrowers.
After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration's debt cancellation policy last summer, the Chamber issued a statement applauding the ruling.
The Chamber also weighed in on the side of Microsoft last year as the world's most valuable public company fought an antitrust suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission.
"The Chamber repeatedly 'talks the talk' on fighting for the interests and empowerment of small businesses and everyday people trying to make a living. But its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow," Public Citizen's report reads. "In fact, many of the arguments and declarations the Chamber makes on behalf of large businesses come at the direct detriment of the interests of small businesses across the country."
"If the Chamber really wanted to help small businesses," the report adds, "there's no lack of opportunity to begin advocating for the policies and legal rulings that most aid them."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce bills itself as a champion of small businesses, but a report published Tuesday shows that the powerful lobbying group primarily uses its vast resources to support large corporations in court as they combat antitrust regulations, environmental protections, efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and consumer access to the legal system.
The new report from the watchdog group Public Citizen examines 400 recent cases from the Chamber's Litigation Center, an online resource that tracks the organization's legal work.
Public Citizen's analysis found that the Chamber backed businesses with revenue of more than a billion dollars a year 55% of the time—and 35% of the time, the litigants were Fortune 500 companies.
"In comparison, the Chamber filed in support of at least one small business only 6% of the time," the new report says. "Accordingly, only 23 of the roughly 28 million small businesses in the U.S. (0.0001%) directly benefited from the Chamber's litigation."
Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of Public Citizen, said in a statement that "Chamber litigation appears to be an advocacy tool to shield America's largest corporations from accountability, to the detriment of consumers and small businesses."
"The Chamber is helping big companies to protect their profits by stopping or stalling reforms that would bring down healthcare costs or reduce the student loan debt of small business owners, for example," said Gilbert.
"Its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow."
Of the 400 cases Public Citizen considered, a plurality involved access to the U.S. courts. The watchdog defined court access cases as "legal disputes relating to whether or not forced arbitration clauses would be enforced and whether or not a class action lawsuit would be allowed to proceed."
"While the Chamber actively works to shut the door on everyday Americans seeking relief from the judicial system, the Chamber certainly had no issue availing itself of the court," Public Citizen's report states. "Recently, Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne Clark utilized the yearly State of American Business Address to boast about the organization's many misguided accusations of overregulation, stating: 'And that's why the chamber sued the [Federal Trade Commission], the [Securities and Exchange Commission], and the [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau] last year.'"
The Chamber, which is funded mostly by large donations, has recently intervened in high-profile cases with vast implications for the U.S. public, siding with Big Pharma in its attack on Medicare drug price negotiations and opposing the Biden administration's effort to cancel student loan debt for tens of millions of borrowers.
After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration's debt cancellation policy last summer, the Chamber issued a statement applauding the ruling.
The Chamber also weighed in on the side of Microsoft last year as the world's most valuable public company fought an antitrust suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission.
"The Chamber repeatedly 'talks the talk' on fighting for the interests and empowerment of small businesses and everyday people trying to make a living. But its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow," Public Citizen's report reads. "In fact, many of the arguments and declarations the Chamber makes on behalf of large businesses come at the direct detriment of the interests of small businesses across the country."
"If the Chamber really wanted to help small businesses," the report adds, "there's no lack of opportunity to begin advocating for the policies and legal rulings that most aid them."
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce bills itself as a champion of small businesses, but a report published Tuesday shows that the powerful lobbying group primarily uses its vast resources to support large corporations in court as they combat antitrust regulations, environmental protections, efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and consumer access to the legal system.
The new report from the watchdog group Public Citizen examines 400 recent cases from the Chamber's Litigation Center, an online resource that tracks the organization's legal work.
Public Citizen's analysis found that the Chamber backed businesses with revenue of more than a billion dollars a year 55% of the time—and 35% of the time, the litigants were Fortune 500 companies.
"In comparison, the Chamber filed in support of at least one small business only 6% of the time," the new report says. "Accordingly, only 23 of the roughly 28 million small businesses in the U.S. (0.0001%) directly benefited from the Chamber's litigation."
Lisa Gilbert, executive vice president of Public Citizen, said in a statement that "Chamber litigation appears to be an advocacy tool to shield America's largest corporations from accountability, to the detriment of consumers and small businesses."
"The Chamber is helping big companies to protect their profits by stopping or stalling reforms that would bring down healthcare costs or reduce the student loan debt of small business owners, for example," said Gilbert.
"Its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow."
Of the 400 cases Public Citizen considered, a plurality involved access to the U.S. courts. The watchdog defined court access cases as "legal disputes relating to whether or not forced arbitration clauses would be enforced and whether or not a class action lawsuit would be allowed to proceed."
"While the Chamber actively works to shut the door on everyday Americans seeking relief from the judicial system, the Chamber certainly had no issue availing itself of the court," Public Citizen's report states. "Recently, Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne Clark utilized the yearly State of American Business Address to boast about the organization's many misguided accusations of overregulation, stating: 'And that's why the chamber sued the [Federal Trade Commission], the [Securities and Exchange Commission], and the [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau] last year.'"
The Chamber, which is funded mostly by large donations, has recently intervened in high-profile cases with vast implications for the U.S. public, siding with Big Pharma in its attack on Medicare drug price negotiations and opposing the Biden administration's effort to cancel student loan debt for tens of millions of borrowers.
After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration's debt cancellation policy last summer, the Chamber issued a statement applauding the ruling.
The Chamber also weighed in on the side of Microsoft last year as the world's most valuable public company fought an antitrust suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission.
"The Chamber repeatedly 'talks the talk' on fighting for the interests and empowerment of small businesses and everyday people trying to make a living. But its legal interventions on behalf of the largest corporations in America show the Chamber's words ring hollow," Public Citizen's report reads. "In fact, many of the arguments and declarations the Chamber makes on behalf of large businesses come at the direct detriment of the interests of small businesses across the country."
"If the Chamber really wanted to help small businesses," the report adds, "there's no lack of opportunity to begin advocating for the policies and legal rulings that most aid them."
