To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas poses for an official photo in Washington, D.C. on October 7, 2022.

(Photo: Oliver Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)

Emails Reveal Trump Legal Team Saw Clarence Thomas as 'Best Shot' to Stop Election Certification

One lawyer of the former president said getting the case before the right-wing justice was “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion.”

NewsPolitics

Email conversations published Wednesday by Politico reveal that former President Donald Trump’s legal team saw U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their most promising chance to prevent congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

A federal judge recently ordered former Trump lawyer John Eastman, the architect of the plot to overturn the election, to share emails with the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which briefly delayed the certification process.

RECOMMENDED...
President Trump Holds Press Conference At The White House

Trump’s ‘Psychotic’ NYT Defamation Lawsuit Elicits Ridicule From Legal Experts

Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk’s Toxic Legacy of Hatred and Division

Thomas--who has faced calls to leave the court or at least recuse himself from 2020 election-related cases due to efforts by his wife Ginni Thomas, a right-wing activist, to help keep Trump in power--handles emergency appeals out of the 11th Circuit, which includes Georgia.

“The point is to have the court say that probably the election was void, which ought to be enough to prevent the Senate from counting the Biden electoral votes from Georgia, right?” Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro wrote to various people including Eastman on December 31, 2020. “Merely having this case pending in the Supreme Court, not ruled on, might be enough to delay consideration of Georgia, particularly if [then-Vice President Mike] Pence has the legal ability and will to insert himself at least enough to win delay.”

“Possibly Thomas would end up being key here--circuit justice, right?” Chesebro continued. “We want to frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt. Realistically, our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by [January] 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress, is from Thomas--do you agree, Prof. Eastman?”

A couple of hours later, Eastman replied: “I think I agree with this. If the court were to give us a ‘likely,’ that may be enough to kick the Georgia Legislature into gear, because I’ve been getting a lot of calls from them indicating to me they’re leaning that way.”

Not long after that, Chesebro wrote that while pending election-related legislation was at the district court level, “if we can just get this case pending before the Supreme Court” by January 5, “ideally with something positive written by a judge or justice, hopefully Thomas, I think it’s our best shot at holding up the count of a state in Congress.”

While the new reporting provoked fresh criticism of Thomas, Politico noted that team Trump’s legal strategy “found virtually no traction at the high court. The only outward signs of dissension among the justices were mild, like a December 11 order where the court rejected a bid by Texas to challenge the vote counts in four other states. Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito issued a brief statement saying they’d have accepted jurisdiction over the case, but joined the other justices in denying Texas any relief.”

The kind of decision that Trump’s lawyers sought from Thomas often precedes the full court weighing in--as was illustrated over the past week with a pair of orders related to a subpoena for U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to testify before a special purpose grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia that is probing efforts to subvert the 2020 election in the state.

Thomas last week temporarily blocked the subpoena for Graham to testify about calls he made to Georgia election officials shortly after Trump lost in 2020, but the full court on Tuesday reversed course--with no dissent or recusals--leaving the Trump ally set to appear before jurors later this month.

Publication of the Eastman emails--which also indicate Trump signed a legal document containing voter fraud claims he knew were false, as a federal judge’s ruling revealed last month--comes less than a week before the midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress for the next two years as well as who holds state positions that could impact 2024 races, including the presidential contest.

Republican candidates who support Trump’s “Big Lie” that he won in 2020 have continued to sow doubt about the integrity of U.S. elections on the campaign trail and wage legal battles intended to limit the power of voters, particularly in key swing states like Pennsylvania.

An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder


Dear Common Dreams reader,

The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I’ve ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets.

That’s why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we’ve ever done.

Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good.

Now here’s the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support.

That’s not just some fundraising cliche. It’s the absolute and literal truth. We don’t accept corporate advertising and never will. We don’t have a paywall because we don’t think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you.

Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams?

Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most.

- Craig Brown, Co-founder

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
john eastmanpoliticsjanuary 6clarence thomaselection 2020trumpismus supreme courtlindsey grahamjan 6 insurrectiondonald trump

Email conversations published Wednesday by Politico reveal that former President Donald Trump’s legal team saw U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their most promising chance to prevent congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

A federal judge recently ordered former Trump lawyer John Eastman, the architect of the plot to overturn the election, to share emails with the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which briefly delayed the certification process.

Thomas--who has faced calls to leave the court or at least recuse himself from 2020 election-related cases due to efforts by his wife Ginni Thomas, a right-wing activist, to help keep Trump in power--handles emergency appeals out of the 11th Circuit, which includes Georgia.

“The point is to have the court say that probably the election was void, which ought to be enough to prevent the Senate from counting the Biden electoral votes from Georgia, right?” Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro wrote to various people including Eastman on December 31, 2020. “Merely having this case pending in the Supreme Court, not ruled on, might be enough to delay consideration of Georgia, particularly if [then-Vice President Mike] Pence has the legal ability and will to insert himself at least enough to win delay.”

“Possibly Thomas would end up being key here--circuit justice, right?” Chesebro continued. “We want to frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt. Realistically, our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by [January] 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress, is from Thomas--do you agree, Prof. Eastman?”

A couple of hours later, Eastman replied: “I think I agree with this. If the court were to give us a ‘likely,’ that may be enough to kick the Georgia Legislature into gear, because I’ve been getting a lot of calls from them indicating to me they’re leaning that way.”

Not long after that, Chesebro wrote that while pending election-related legislation was at the district court level, “if we can just get this case pending before the Supreme Court” by January 5, “ideally with something positive written by a judge or justice, hopefully Thomas, I think it’s our best shot at holding up the count of a state in Congress.”

While the new reporting provoked fresh criticism of Thomas, Politico noted that team Trump’s legal strategy “found virtually no traction at the high court. The only outward signs of dissension among the justices were mild, like a December 11 order where the court rejected a bid by Texas to challenge the vote counts in four other states. Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito issued a brief statement saying they’d have accepted jurisdiction over the case, but joined the other justices in denying Texas any relief.”

The kind of decision that Trump’s lawyers sought from Thomas often precedes the full court weighing in--as was illustrated over the past week with a pair of orders related to a subpoena for U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to testify before a special purpose grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia that is probing efforts to subvert the 2020 election in the state.

Thomas last week temporarily blocked the subpoena for Graham to testify about calls he made to Georgia election officials shortly after Trump lost in 2020, but the full court on Tuesday reversed course--with no dissent or recusals--leaving the Trump ally set to appear before jurors later this month.

Publication of the Eastman emails--which also indicate Trump signed a legal document containing voter fraud claims he knew were false, as a federal judge’s ruling revealed last month--comes less than a week before the midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress for the next two years as well as who holds state positions that could impact 2024 races, including the presidential contest.

Republican candidates who support Trump’s “Big Lie” that he won in 2020 have continued to sow doubt about the integrity of U.S. elections on the campaign trail and wage legal battles intended to limit the power of voters, particularly in key swing states like Pennsylvania.

From Your Site Articles

Email conversations published Wednesday by Politico reveal that former President Donald Trump’s legal team saw U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their most promising chance to prevent congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

A federal judge recently ordered former Trump lawyer John Eastman, the architect of the plot to overturn the election, to share emails with the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which briefly delayed the certification process.

Thomas--who has faced calls to leave the court or at least recuse himself from 2020 election-related cases due to efforts by his wife Ginni Thomas, a right-wing activist, to help keep Trump in power--handles emergency appeals out of the 11th Circuit, which includes Georgia.

“The point is to have the court say that probably the election was void, which ought to be enough to prevent the Senate from counting the Biden electoral votes from Georgia, right?” Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro wrote to various people including Eastman on December 31, 2020. “Merely having this case pending in the Supreme Court, not ruled on, might be enough to delay consideration of Georgia, particularly if [then-Vice President Mike] Pence has the legal ability and will to insert himself at least enough to win delay.”

“Possibly Thomas would end up being key here--circuit justice, right?” Chesebro continued. “We want to frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt. Realistically, our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by [January] 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress, is from Thomas--do you agree, Prof. Eastman?”

A couple of hours later, Eastman replied: “I think I agree with this. If the court were to give us a ‘likely,’ that may be enough to kick the Georgia Legislature into gear, because I’ve been getting a lot of calls from them indicating to me they’re leaning that way.”

Not long after that, Chesebro wrote that while pending election-related legislation was at the district court level, “if we can just get this case pending before the Supreme Court” by January 5, “ideally with something positive written by a judge or justice, hopefully Thomas, I think it’s our best shot at holding up the count of a state in Congress.”

While the new reporting provoked fresh criticism of Thomas, Politico noted that team Trump’s legal strategy “found virtually no traction at the high court. The only outward signs of dissension among the justices were mild, like a December 11 order where the court rejected a bid by Texas to challenge the vote counts in four other states. Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito issued a brief statement saying they’d have accepted jurisdiction over the case, but joined the other justices in denying Texas any relief.”

The kind of decision that Trump’s lawyers sought from Thomas often precedes the full court weighing in--as was illustrated over the past week with a pair of orders related to a subpoena for U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to testify before a special purpose grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia that is probing efforts to subvert the 2020 election in the state.

Thomas last week temporarily blocked the subpoena for Graham to testify about calls he made to Georgia election officials shortly after Trump lost in 2020, but the full court on Tuesday reversed course--with no dissent or recusals--leaving the Trump ally set to appear before jurors later this month.

Publication of the Eastman emails--which also indicate Trump signed a legal document containing voter fraud claims he knew were false, as a federal judge’s ruling revealed last month--comes less than a week before the midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress for the next two years as well as who holds state positions that could impact 2024 races, including the presidential contest.

Republican candidates who support Trump’s “Big Lie” that he won in 2020 have continued to sow doubt about the integrity of U.S. elections on the campaign trail and wage legal battles intended to limit the power of voters, particularly in key swing states like Pennsylvania.

From Your Site Articles
john eastmanpoliticsjanuary 6clarence thomaselection 2020trumpismus supreme courtlindsey grahamjan 6 insurrectiondonald trump
Join the Conversation