

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley speaks during an April 26, 2022 Senate hearing in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Bonnie Cash/Pool via Getty Images)
Government ethics watchdogs reacted angrily Thursday after U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley said a bill to ban members of Congress from trading stocks would be shelved until after November's midterm elections.
"This is a product of not having enough new blood at the top."
Merkley--an Oregon Democrat who spearheaded the proposed legislation and who just Wednesday said that "we need to get it done"--told Insider on Thursday that he is "looking forward to getting this across the finish line, but it's not going to happen before the election."
"I feel like we've made very large strides towards a consensus bill," he added. "But there are a whole lot of other bills and judicial nominations lined up for the balance of the few days we have left here."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a strong proponent of the ban, told Insider's Bryan Metzger Thursday that her colleagues' punt "further erodes the credibility of this body."
The advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) tweeted that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "promised to prioritize bringing a congressional stock trading ban to the floor before the election."
"Today's news that the Senate will not take up a bill until after the election is deeply disappointing," CREW added. "But it's not the end of the fight."
Danielle Brian, executive director at the Project on Government Oversight (POGO)--which called the delay "absolutely unacceptable"--tweeted, "Here's a perfect example of why it's important to focus on what elected officials do between elections."
"It's not good enough that they talk a good game," she added. "When in power, they also need to do the right thing."
Merkley is part of a working group launched by Schumer in February to draft a consensus bill that stood a chance of passing the evenly divided upper chamber.
Walter Shaub, POGO's senior ethics fellow, told Insider that "I'm not surprised to hear this is Sen. Merkley's position. He took control of the working group and slow-walked this thing for 223 days. It's a tragic lost opportunity and a shameful failure."
In a thread on Twitter, Shaub railed that he has "had it with legislators who either won't or can't pass the most obvious ethical reforms in a time of crisis, as our institutions crumble to dust, after we barely survived four years of the most corrupt president in history, and public trust in government disintegrates."
Progressives have long argued that the 2012 STOCK Act--the current law that allows members of Congress to buy and sell stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments as long as they refrain from insider trading and abide by disclosure rules--is fraught with loopholes and is frequently violated.
A running Insider investigation counts 72 members of Congress who have violated the STOCK Act in recent years. A New York Times investigation published earlier this week revealed that nearly 100 U.S. lawmakers reported trades in companies influenced by their committees.
Related Content

Merkley's announcement came the day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that lawmakers in the lower chamber may vote on a version of the trading ban later this month. Pelosi has come under fire after revelations her husband traded as much as $81 million worth of assets between 2019 and 2021, including in numerous companies subject to congressional scrutiny.
"Watch for the House version of the congressional stock ban to be riddled with loopholes," Shaub predicted on Twitter. "I pledge to walk you through each and every one of them once they FINALLY release the text of this mysterious bill."
Another bipartisan measure introduced in February by Warren and Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) along with Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) would, if passed, ban U.S. lawmakers and their spouses from owning or trading stocks.
"It is the toughest bill that has been proposed in Congress," Warren said on MSNBC Thursday. "No buying, no selling, no owning stocks, period... for members or members' spouses."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Government ethics watchdogs reacted angrily Thursday after U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley said a bill to ban members of Congress from trading stocks would be shelved until after November's midterm elections.
"This is a product of not having enough new blood at the top."
Merkley--an Oregon Democrat who spearheaded the proposed legislation and who just Wednesday said that "we need to get it done"--told Insider on Thursday that he is "looking forward to getting this across the finish line, but it's not going to happen before the election."
"I feel like we've made very large strides towards a consensus bill," he added. "But there are a whole lot of other bills and judicial nominations lined up for the balance of the few days we have left here."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a strong proponent of the ban, told Insider's Bryan Metzger Thursday that her colleagues' punt "further erodes the credibility of this body."
The advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) tweeted that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "promised to prioritize bringing a congressional stock trading ban to the floor before the election."
"Today's news that the Senate will not take up a bill until after the election is deeply disappointing," CREW added. "But it's not the end of the fight."
Danielle Brian, executive director at the Project on Government Oversight (POGO)--which called the delay "absolutely unacceptable"--tweeted, "Here's a perfect example of why it's important to focus on what elected officials do between elections."
"It's not good enough that they talk a good game," she added. "When in power, they also need to do the right thing."
Merkley is part of a working group launched by Schumer in February to draft a consensus bill that stood a chance of passing the evenly divided upper chamber.
Walter Shaub, POGO's senior ethics fellow, told Insider that "I'm not surprised to hear this is Sen. Merkley's position. He took control of the working group and slow-walked this thing for 223 days. It's a tragic lost opportunity and a shameful failure."
In a thread on Twitter, Shaub railed that he has "had it with legislators who either won't or can't pass the most obvious ethical reforms in a time of crisis, as our institutions crumble to dust, after we barely survived four years of the most corrupt president in history, and public trust in government disintegrates."
Progressives have long argued that the 2012 STOCK Act--the current law that allows members of Congress to buy and sell stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments as long as they refrain from insider trading and abide by disclosure rules--is fraught with loopholes and is frequently violated.
A running Insider investigation counts 72 members of Congress who have violated the STOCK Act in recent years. A New York Times investigation published earlier this week revealed that nearly 100 U.S. lawmakers reported trades in companies influenced by their committees.
Related Content

Merkley's announcement came the day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that lawmakers in the lower chamber may vote on a version of the trading ban later this month. Pelosi has come under fire after revelations her husband traded as much as $81 million worth of assets between 2019 and 2021, including in numerous companies subject to congressional scrutiny.
"Watch for the House version of the congressional stock ban to be riddled with loopholes," Shaub predicted on Twitter. "I pledge to walk you through each and every one of them once they FINALLY release the text of this mysterious bill."
Another bipartisan measure introduced in February by Warren and Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) along with Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) would, if passed, ban U.S. lawmakers and their spouses from owning or trading stocks.
"It is the toughest bill that has been proposed in Congress," Warren said on MSNBC Thursday. "No buying, no selling, no owning stocks, period... for members or members' spouses."
Government ethics watchdogs reacted angrily Thursday after U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley said a bill to ban members of Congress from trading stocks would be shelved until after November's midterm elections.
"This is a product of not having enough new blood at the top."
Merkley--an Oregon Democrat who spearheaded the proposed legislation and who just Wednesday said that "we need to get it done"--told Insider on Thursday that he is "looking forward to getting this across the finish line, but it's not going to happen before the election."
"I feel like we've made very large strides towards a consensus bill," he added. "But there are a whole lot of other bills and judicial nominations lined up for the balance of the few days we have left here."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a strong proponent of the ban, told Insider's Bryan Metzger Thursday that her colleagues' punt "further erodes the credibility of this body."
The advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) tweeted that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "promised to prioritize bringing a congressional stock trading ban to the floor before the election."
"Today's news that the Senate will not take up a bill until after the election is deeply disappointing," CREW added. "But it's not the end of the fight."
Danielle Brian, executive director at the Project on Government Oversight (POGO)--which called the delay "absolutely unacceptable"--tweeted, "Here's a perfect example of why it's important to focus on what elected officials do between elections."
"It's not good enough that they talk a good game," she added. "When in power, they also need to do the right thing."
Merkley is part of a working group launched by Schumer in February to draft a consensus bill that stood a chance of passing the evenly divided upper chamber.
Walter Shaub, POGO's senior ethics fellow, told Insider that "I'm not surprised to hear this is Sen. Merkley's position. He took control of the working group and slow-walked this thing for 223 days. It's a tragic lost opportunity and a shameful failure."
In a thread on Twitter, Shaub railed that he has "had it with legislators who either won't or can't pass the most obvious ethical reforms in a time of crisis, as our institutions crumble to dust, after we barely survived four years of the most corrupt president in history, and public trust in government disintegrates."
Progressives have long argued that the 2012 STOCK Act--the current law that allows members of Congress to buy and sell stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments as long as they refrain from insider trading and abide by disclosure rules--is fraught with loopholes and is frequently violated.
A running Insider investigation counts 72 members of Congress who have violated the STOCK Act in recent years. A New York Times investigation published earlier this week revealed that nearly 100 U.S. lawmakers reported trades in companies influenced by their committees.
Related Content

Merkley's announcement came the day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that lawmakers in the lower chamber may vote on a version of the trading ban later this month. Pelosi has come under fire after revelations her husband traded as much as $81 million worth of assets between 2019 and 2021, including in numerous companies subject to congressional scrutiny.
"Watch for the House version of the congressional stock ban to be riddled with loopholes," Shaub predicted on Twitter. "I pledge to walk you through each and every one of them once they FINALLY release the text of this mysterious bill."
Another bipartisan measure introduced in February by Warren and Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) along with Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) would, if passed, ban U.S. lawmakers and their spouses from owning or trading stocks.
"It is the toughest bill that has been proposed in Congress," Warren said on MSNBC Thursday. "No buying, no selling, no owning stocks, period... for members or members' spouses."