

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Anglers fish for sockeye salmon along the rapids of the Newwhalen River near Iliamna, Alaska on July 23, 2019. (Photo: Luis Sinco/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
More than half a million people--including local conservation, fishing, and tribal leaders--voiced their opposition to mining in Alaska's Bristol Bay during a public comment period for the Biden administration's proposed regional protections that concluded Tuesday.
"We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
After the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last year reinitiated the process of considering protections for certain waters in Bristol Bay under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Region 10 Office announced a revised proposed determination in May.
Activists and residents who have spent the past several years fighting to safeguard the region responded by again highlighting the dangers of the proposed Pebble Mine project and any other efforts to extract copper and gold deposits at the expense of the local ecosystem.
As a letter that 122 groups sent last month to EPA Administrator Michael Regan and Casey Sixkiller, the agency's regional administrator, explains:
Bristol Bay is home to the world's largest wild sockeye salmon fishery, generating $2.2 billion annually, supporting 15,000 American jobs, supplying 57% of the world's wild sockeye salmon, and sustaining Indigenous communities since time immemorial. As they have for millennia, the wild salmon returning each year to Bristol Bay ensure a way of life for Alaska Native communities, providing subsistence food, subsistence-based livelihoods, and the lifeblood of culture.
Yet the Pebble Mine would risk it all. If fully developed, the Pebble Mine would generate up to 10 billion tons of toxic mining waste. As proposed in the Pebble Limited Partnership's (PLP) 2020 mine plan, the 20-year mine would destroy approximately 100 miles of streams and 2,100 acres of wetlands, completely decimating areas critical to Bristol Bay's salmon fishery.
"The indisputable facts, clear science, and extensive administrative record overwhelmingly support a final 404(c) determination that protects Bristol Bay's headwaters from not only the mine plan proposed by PLP in 2020, but any future large-scale porphyry ore mining proposed for the Pebble deposit," the letter concludes.
Representatives from the Bristol Bay Defense Fund--a coalition of advocacy, business, and tribal groups battling Pebble Mine--echoed the letter's points in a statement Tuesday.
"EPA has a wealth of compelling reasons to veto the Pebble Mine," said Joel Reynolds, Western director and senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "This summer an all-time record of 78.4 million wild salmon returned to Bristol Bay, and over half a million people submitted comments demanding EPA action now."
Katherine Carscallen, executive director of Commercial Fishermen for Bristol Bay, pointed out that locals made time to submit comments "while thousands of fishermen and processing workers were working hard to deliver a record-breaking 59.5 million wild sockeye salmon to the market."
"We cannot allow one more fishing season to pass with the Pebble Mine looming over our heads," she said, calling on the EPA to finalize CWA protections "by the end of this year."
United Tribes of Bristol Bay executive director Alannah Hurley similarly stressed that "during the busiest season of the year, amidst a record-breaking salmon run, the people of Bristol Bay once again made it clear that EPA must finalize strong protections for our watershed and end the threat of Pebble Mine for good."
Both Hurley and Tim Bristol, executive director of SalmonState, emphasized that Pebble Mine opponents have repeatedly detailed their arguments against the project to regulators.
As Bristol put it: "Tribes, fishermen, and communities worldwide have shown up and supported durable protections for Bristol Bay every single time the EPA has asked us to. We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
EPA leaders, for their part, have signaled that they are determined to safeguard the area.
Regan in May called the watershed "a shining example of how our nation's waters are essential to healthy communities, vibrant ecosystems, and a thriving economy," while Sixkiller said that "clearly, Bristol Bay and the thousands of people who rely on it deserve protection."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
More than half a million people--including local conservation, fishing, and tribal leaders--voiced their opposition to mining in Alaska's Bristol Bay during a public comment period for the Biden administration's proposed regional protections that concluded Tuesday.
"We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
After the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last year reinitiated the process of considering protections for certain waters in Bristol Bay under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Region 10 Office announced a revised proposed determination in May.
Activists and residents who have spent the past several years fighting to safeguard the region responded by again highlighting the dangers of the proposed Pebble Mine project and any other efforts to extract copper and gold deposits at the expense of the local ecosystem.
As a letter that 122 groups sent last month to EPA Administrator Michael Regan and Casey Sixkiller, the agency's regional administrator, explains:
Bristol Bay is home to the world's largest wild sockeye salmon fishery, generating $2.2 billion annually, supporting 15,000 American jobs, supplying 57% of the world's wild sockeye salmon, and sustaining Indigenous communities since time immemorial. As they have for millennia, the wild salmon returning each year to Bristol Bay ensure a way of life for Alaska Native communities, providing subsistence food, subsistence-based livelihoods, and the lifeblood of culture.
Yet the Pebble Mine would risk it all. If fully developed, the Pebble Mine would generate up to 10 billion tons of toxic mining waste. As proposed in the Pebble Limited Partnership's (PLP) 2020 mine plan, the 20-year mine would destroy approximately 100 miles of streams and 2,100 acres of wetlands, completely decimating areas critical to Bristol Bay's salmon fishery.
"The indisputable facts, clear science, and extensive administrative record overwhelmingly support a final 404(c) determination that protects Bristol Bay's headwaters from not only the mine plan proposed by PLP in 2020, but any future large-scale porphyry ore mining proposed for the Pebble deposit," the letter concludes.
Representatives from the Bristol Bay Defense Fund--a coalition of advocacy, business, and tribal groups battling Pebble Mine--echoed the letter's points in a statement Tuesday.
"EPA has a wealth of compelling reasons to veto the Pebble Mine," said Joel Reynolds, Western director and senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "This summer an all-time record of 78.4 million wild salmon returned to Bristol Bay, and over half a million people submitted comments demanding EPA action now."
Katherine Carscallen, executive director of Commercial Fishermen for Bristol Bay, pointed out that locals made time to submit comments "while thousands of fishermen and processing workers were working hard to deliver a record-breaking 59.5 million wild sockeye salmon to the market."
"We cannot allow one more fishing season to pass with the Pebble Mine looming over our heads," she said, calling on the EPA to finalize CWA protections "by the end of this year."
United Tribes of Bristol Bay executive director Alannah Hurley similarly stressed that "during the busiest season of the year, amidst a record-breaking salmon run, the people of Bristol Bay once again made it clear that EPA must finalize strong protections for our watershed and end the threat of Pebble Mine for good."
Both Hurley and Tim Bristol, executive director of SalmonState, emphasized that Pebble Mine opponents have repeatedly detailed their arguments against the project to regulators.
As Bristol put it: "Tribes, fishermen, and communities worldwide have shown up and supported durable protections for Bristol Bay every single time the EPA has asked us to. We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
EPA leaders, for their part, have signaled that they are determined to safeguard the area.
Regan in May called the watershed "a shining example of how our nation's waters are essential to healthy communities, vibrant ecosystems, and a thriving economy," while Sixkiller said that "clearly, Bristol Bay and the thousands of people who rely on it deserve protection."
More than half a million people--including local conservation, fishing, and tribal leaders--voiced their opposition to mining in Alaska's Bristol Bay during a public comment period for the Biden administration's proposed regional protections that concluded Tuesday.
"We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
After the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last year reinitiated the process of considering protections for certain waters in Bristol Bay under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Region 10 Office announced a revised proposed determination in May.
Activists and residents who have spent the past several years fighting to safeguard the region responded by again highlighting the dangers of the proposed Pebble Mine project and any other efforts to extract copper and gold deposits at the expense of the local ecosystem.
As a letter that 122 groups sent last month to EPA Administrator Michael Regan and Casey Sixkiller, the agency's regional administrator, explains:
Bristol Bay is home to the world's largest wild sockeye salmon fishery, generating $2.2 billion annually, supporting 15,000 American jobs, supplying 57% of the world's wild sockeye salmon, and sustaining Indigenous communities since time immemorial. As they have for millennia, the wild salmon returning each year to Bristol Bay ensure a way of life for Alaska Native communities, providing subsistence food, subsistence-based livelihoods, and the lifeblood of culture.
Yet the Pebble Mine would risk it all. If fully developed, the Pebble Mine would generate up to 10 billion tons of toxic mining waste. As proposed in the Pebble Limited Partnership's (PLP) 2020 mine plan, the 20-year mine would destroy approximately 100 miles of streams and 2,100 acres of wetlands, completely decimating areas critical to Bristol Bay's salmon fishery.
"The indisputable facts, clear science, and extensive administrative record overwhelmingly support a final 404(c) determination that protects Bristol Bay's headwaters from not only the mine plan proposed by PLP in 2020, but any future large-scale porphyry ore mining proposed for the Pebble deposit," the letter concludes.
Representatives from the Bristol Bay Defense Fund--a coalition of advocacy, business, and tribal groups battling Pebble Mine--echoed the letter's points in a statement Tuesday.
"EPA has a wealth of compelling reasons to veto the Pebble Mine," said Joel Reynolds, Western director and senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "This summer an all-time record of 78.4 million wild salmon returned to Bristol Bay, and over half a million people submitted comments demanding EPA action now."
Katherine Carscallen, executive director of Commercial Fishermen for Bristol Bay, pointed out that locals made time to submit comments "while thousands of fishermen and processing workers were working hard to deliver a record-breaking 59.5 million wild sockeye salmon to the market."
"We cannot allow one more fishing season to pass with the Pebble Mine looming over our heads," she said, calling on the EPA to finalize CWA protections "by the end of this year."
United Tribes of Bristol Bay executive director Alannah Hurley similarly stressed that "during the busiest season of the year, amidst a record-breaking salmon run, the people of Bristol Bay once again made it clear that EPA must finalize strong protections for our watershed and end the threat of Pebble Mine for good."
Both Hurley and Tim Bristol, executive director of SalmonState, emphasized that Pebble Mine opponents have repeatedly detailed their arguments against the project to regulators.
As Bristol put it: "Tribes, fishermen, and communities worldwide have shown up and supported durable protections for Bristol Bay every single time the EPA has asked us to. We've done our part; it's now up to the EPA to finally finish the job and defend Bristol Bay from the threat of Pebble Mine."
EPA leaders, for their part, have signaled that they are determined to safeguard the area.
Regan in May called the watershed "a shining example of how our nation's waters are essential to healthy communities, vibrant ecosystems, and a thriving economy," while Sixkiller said that "clearly, Bristol Bay and the thousands of people who rely on it deserve protection."