Jul 26, 2022
Reproductive healthcare advocates on Tuesday recoiled at a harrowing report describing how one Texas woman's wanted pregnancy became a "dystopian nightmare" after she suffered potentially deadly complications but was still initially denied lifesaving care under the state's extreme abortion ban.
"The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable."
"Anti-abortion zealots should be forced to read this," tweeted journalist Emily Singer in response to a Tuesday NPRarticle on the traumatic experience of 26-year-old Houston resident Elizabeth Weller. "The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable.They are responsible for her suffering."
Weller and her husband James wanted to have a baby. Although she believes in the right to choose abortion, the graduate student insisted that she "personally never would get one."
"We skipped over the genetic testing offered in the first trimester," she explained. "I was born with a physical disability. If she had any physical ailments, I would never abort her for that issue."
At 18 weeks of gestation, Weller suffered a premature membrane rupture, a condition affecting roughly 3% of pregnancies. With almost all of her amniotic fluid lost, there was very little chance that Weller's fetus would survive.
\u201cone thing to takeaway from this story is that in addition to being a total assault on bodily autonomy, these anti-abortion laws are based on a fantasy vision of pregnancy where there are no complications or challenges or problems. https://t.co/GYaXHM1sMz\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1658836232
According to NPR:
For the women, expectant management after premature rupture of membranes comes with its own health risks. One study showed they were four times as likely to develop an infection and 2.4 times as likely to experience a postpartum hemorrhage, compared with women who terminated the pregnancy.
In some cases, the infection can become severe or life-threatening, leading to sepsis, hysterectomy, or even death. In 2012, a woman died in Ireland after her waters broke at 17 weeks and doctors refused to give her an abortion. The case spurred a movement that led to the overturning of Ireland's abortion ban in 2018.
However, in Weller's case she was informed that under Texas law, she would have to wait for the fetus' heartbeat to stop before a medical abortion could be performed. Meanwhile, her own health deteriorated dangerously. She was cramping and passing clots of blood and foul discharge. But she was told none of that was severe enough to warrant an abortion. After her condition worsened to the point where she was instructed to rush to the emergency room, a hospital ethics committee determined she could finally terminate her pregnancy.
\u201cAbortion bans force women with failing pregnancies to undergo horrific pain and anguish, waiting in agony as they develop an infection severe enough to justify termination. They place life-and-death decisions in the hands of "ethics panels" instead of patients. They are barbaric.\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1658845496
Although Weller first blamed hospital staff--"to them, my life was not in danger enough," she said sardonically--she eventually came to attribute her "dystopian nightmare" of "physical, emotional, and mental anguish" on the Republican state legislators who passed Texas' six-week abortion ban and GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, who signed the measure into law in May 2021.
"We live in a culture that advocates small government and yet... we are allowing our Texas state government to dictate what women do with their own bodies and to dictate what they think is best, what medical procedures they think [are] best for them to get," Weller lamented.
Abbott came under fire Monday in a new political advertisement attacking his crusade to strip more than half the people in his state of their bodily autonomy.
In the ad--which was released by Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC--an actor playing a doctor tells a distraught couple their child will suffer agonizing seizures before dying within hours of birth from a catastrophic brain anomaly. The doctor informs her that "only one person" can make the choice for her before phoning Abbott to ask if abortion is an option.
\u201cWhose choice?\nTexas women no longer have a choice to make their most personal decision. This is wrong! Texans need to fight back and vote for Democrats this November and vote against TxGOP. Vote them out!\n#WhoseChoice #MAGAtheGood #WomensRights #TxLege\u201d— Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC (@Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC) 1658746801
"Yeah," the doctor tells the couple after hanging up the phone, "that's gonna be a no. Best of luck to you."
Healthcare providers and patients already have numerous real-life horror stories to share in the nascent post-Roe era.
Dr. Jessian Munoz, a San Antonio OB-GYN who treats high-risk pregnancies, told the Associated Press earlier this month that with the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, "the art of medicine is lost and actually has been replaced by fear" as doctors struggle to determine whether patients are "sick enough" to justify an abortion under Texas' six-week ban.
Munoz told of a pregnant patient who had begun to miscarry and developed a potentially life-threatening womb infection. But because the fetus still had a detectable heartbeat, abortion was illegal under the new law.
"We physically watched her get sicker and sicker and sicker" until the fetal heartbeat stopped the next day, "and then we could intervene," Munoz said. As a result of the delay in critical care, the patient developed complications, lost multiple liters of blood, required surgery, and had to be connected to a breathing machine.
\u201c\u201cDoctors whose patients develop pregnancy complications are struggling to determine whether a woman is \u2018sick enough\u2019 to justify an abortion,\u201d said @JayMunozMD for @AP. https://t.co/mtjNX5C9ZP\u201d— SMFM (@SMFM) 1658054731
Marlena Stell, a popular YouTuber, found out 9.5 weeks into her pregnancy that she had suffered a miscarriage. She was even more horrified to learn that due to Texas law, she would be forced to carry the dead fetus inside her for two weeks.
"I felt like a walking coffin," Stell toldThe Washington Post last week. "You're just walking around knowing that you have something that you hoped was going to be a baby for you, and it's gone. And you're just walking around carrying it."
"I get so angry that I was treated this way because of laws that were passed by men who have never been pregnant and never will be," Stell told her nearly 1.5 million YouTube subscribers. "I'm frustrated, I'm angry, and I feel like the women here deserve better than that."
Because the Texas law contains no exceptions in cases of rape or incest, some women have gone to extreme measures to protect against pregnancies resulting from crimes perpetrated against them.
Sexual assault survivor Julie Ann Nitsch told the AP that she "saw the writing on the wall" and chose to have herself sterilized at age 36 rather than risk being impregnated by another rapist.
"I ripped my organs out" to avoid that, she said, adding that "it's sad to think that I can't have kids, but it's better than being forced to have children."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Reproductive healthcare advocates on Tuesday recoiled at a harrowing report describing how one Texas woman's wanted pregnancy became a "dystopian nightmare" after she suffered potentially deadly complications but was still initially denied lifesaving care under the state's extreme abortion ban.
"The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable."
"Anti-abortion zealots should be forced to read this," tweeted journalist Emily Singer in response to a Tuesday NPRarticle on the traumatic experience of 26-year-old Houston resident Elizabeth Weller. "The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable.They are responsible for her suffering."
Weller and her husband James wanted to have a baby. Although she believes in the right to choose abortion, the graduate student insisted that she "personally never would get one."
"We skipped over the genetic testing offered in the first trimester," she explained. "I was born with a physical disability. If she had any physical ailments, I would never abort her for that issue."
At 18 weeks of gestation, Weller suffered a premature membrane rupture, a condition affecting roughly 3% of pregnancies. With almost all of her amniotic fluid lost, there was very little chance that Weller's fetus would survive.
\u201cone thing to takeaway from this story is that in addition to being a total assault on bodily autonomy, these anti-abortion laws are based on a fantasy vision of pregnancy where there are no complications or challenges or problems. https://t.co/GYaXHM1sMz\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1658836232
According to NPR:
For the women, expectant management after premature rupture of membranes comes with its own health risks. One study showed they were four times as likely to develop an infection and 2.4 times as likely to experience a postpartum hemorrhage, compared with women who terminated the pregnancy.
In some cases, the infection can become severe or life-threatening, leading to sepsis, hysterectomy, or even death. In 2012, a woman died in Ireland after her waters broke at 17 weeks and doctors refused to give her an abortion. The case spurred a movement that led to the overturning of Ireland's abortion ban in 2018.
However, in Weller's case she was informed that under Texas law, she would have to wait for the fetus' heartbeat to stop before a medical abortion could be performed. Meanwhile, her own health deteriorated dangerously. She was cramping and passing clots of blood and foul discharge. But she was told none of that was severe enough to warrant an abortion. After her condition worsened to the point where she was instructed to rush to the emergency room, a hospital ethics committee determined she could finally terminate her pregnancy.
\u201cAbortion bans force women with failing pregnancies to undergo horrific pain and anguish, waiting in agony as they develop an infection severe enough to justify termination. They place life-and-death decisions in the hands of "ethics panels" instead of patients. They are barbaric.\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1658845496
Although Weller first blamed hospital staff--"to them, my life was not in danger enough," she said sardonically--she eventually came to attribute her "dystopian nightmare" of "physical, emotional, and mental anguish" on the Republican state legislators who passed Texas' six-week abortion ban and GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, who signed the measure into law in May 2021.
"We live in a culture that advocates small government and yet... we are allowing our Texas state government to dictate what women do with their own bodies and to dictate what they think is best, what medical procedures they think [are] best for them to get," Weller lamented.
Abbott came under fire Monday in a new political advertisement attacking his crusade to strip more than half the people in his state of their bodily autonomy.
In the ad--which was released by Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC--an actor playing a doctor tells a distraught couple their child will suffer agonizing seizures before dying within hours of birth from a catastrophic brain anomaly. The doctor informs her that "only one person" can make the choice for her before phoning Abbott to ask if abortion is an option.
\u201cWhose choice?\nTexas women no longer have a choice to make their most personal decision. This is wrong! Texans need to fight back and vote for Democrats this November and vote against TxGOP. Vote them out!\n#WhoseChoice #MAGAtheGood #WomensRights #TxLege\u201d— Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC (@Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC) 1658746801
"Yeah," the doctor tells the couple after hanging up the phone, "that's gonna be a no. Best of luck to you."
Healthcare providers and patients already have numerous real-life horror stories to share in the nascent post-Roe era.
Dr. Jessian Munoz, a San Antonio OB-GYN who treats high-risk pregnancies, told the Associated Press earlier this month that with the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, "the art of medicine is lost and actually has been replaced by fear" as doctors struggle to determine whether patients are "sick enough" to justify an abortion under Texas' six-week ban.
Munoz told of a pregnant patient who had begun to miscarry and developed a potentially life-threatening womb infection. But because the fetus still had a detectable heartbeat, abortion was illegal under the new law.
"We physically watched her get sicker and sicker and sicker" until the fetal heartbeat stopped the next day, "and then we could intervene," Munoz said. As a result of the delay in critical care, the patient developed complications, lost multiple liters of blood, required surgery, and had to be connected to a breathing machine.
\u201c\u201cDoctors whose patients develop pregnancy complications are struggling to determine whether a woman is \u2018sick enough\u2019 to justify an abortion,\u201d said @JayMunozMD for @AP. https://t.co/mtjNX5C9ZP\u201d— SMFM (@SMFM) 1658054731
Marlena Stell, a popular YouTuber, found out 9.5 weeks into her pregnancy that she had suffered a miscarriage. She was even more horrified to learn that due to Texas law, she would be forced to carry the dead fetus inside her for two weeks.
"I felt like a walking coffin," Stell toldThe Washington Post last week. "You're just walking around knowing that you have something that you hoped was going to be a baby for you, and it's gone. And you're just walking around carrying it."
"I get so angry that I was treated this way because of laws that were passed by men who have never been pregnant and never will be," Stell told her nearly 1.5 million YouTube subscribers. "I'm frustrated, I'm angry, and I feel like the women here deserve better than that."
Because the Texas law contains no exceptions in cases of rape or incest, some women have gone to extreme measures to protect against pregnancies resulting from crimes perpetrated against them.
Sexual assault survivor Julie Ann Nitsch told the AP that she "saw the writing on the wall" and chose to have herself sterilized at age 36 rather than risk being impregnated by another rapist.
"I ripped my organs out" to avoid that, she said, adding that "it's sad to think that I can't have kids, but it's better than being forced to have children."
From Your Site Articles
- In First-of-Its Kind Legal Challenge, Texas Women Say State Abortion Ban Endangered Their Lives ›
- Critics Say Texas GOP's New Exception to Abortion Ban Is Meant to 'Deceive Voters' ›
- All-Male Commission Passes Abortion Travel Ban in Lubbock County, Texas ›
- Texas Approves Abortion Only After Woman Sues to Prove Medical Emergency ›
- Under Texas GOP's Abortion Ban, Infant Deaths From Fetal Abnormalities Jumped 23% | Common Dreams ›
- 'Direct Result of Trump': Texas Woman Died Because Doctors Feared Abortion Ban | Common Dreams ›
- Third Death Tied to Texas Abortion Ban as 'Stigma and Fear' Disrupt Miscarriage Care | Common Dreams ›
Reproductive healthcare advocates on Tuesday recoiled at a harrowing report describing how one Texas woman's wanted pregnancy became a "dystopian nightmare" after she suffered potentially deadly complications but was still initially denied lifesaving care under the state's extreme abortion ban.
"The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable."
"Anti-abortion zealots should be forced to read this," tweeted journalist Emily Singer in response to a Tuesday NPRarticle on the traumatic experience of 26-year-old Houston resident Elizabeth Weller. "The horror this woman endured because of the abortion bans they've pushed for for decades is unimaginable.They are responsible for her suffering."
Weller and her husband James wanted to have a baby. Although she believes in the right to choose abortion, the graduate student insisted that she "personally never would get one."
"We skipped over the genetic testing offered in the first trimester," she explained. "I was born with a physical disability. If she had any physical ailments, I would never abort her for that issue."
At 18 weeks of gestation, Weller suffered a premature membrane rupture, a condition affecting roughly 3% of pregnancies. With almost all of her amniotic fluid lost, there was very little chance that Weller's fetus would survive.
\u201cone thing to takeaway from this story is that in addition to being a total assault on bodily autonomy, these anti-abortion laws are based on a fantasy vision of pregnancy where there are no complications or challenges or problems. https://t.co/GYaXHM1sMz\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1658836232
According to NPR:
For the women, expectant management after premature rupture of membranes comes with its own health risks. One study showed they were four times as likely to develop an infection and 2.4 times as likely to experience a postpartum hemorrhage, compared with women who terminated the pregnancy.
In some cases, the infection can become severe or life-threatening, leading to sepsis, hysterectomy, or even death. In 2012, a woman died in Ireland after her waters broke at 17 weeks and doctors refused to give her an abortion. The case spurred a movement that led to the overturning of Ireland's abortion ban in 2018.
However, in Weller's case she was informed that under Texas law, she would have to wait for the fetus' heartbeat to stop before a medical abortion could be performed. Meanwhile, her own health deteriorated dangerously. She was cramping and passing clots of blood and foul discharge. But she was told none of that was severe enough to warrant an abortion. After her condition worsened to the point where she was instructed to rush to the emergency room, a hospital ethics committee determined she could finally terminate her pregnancy.
\u201cAbortion bans force women with failing pregnancies to undergo horrific pain and anguish, waiting in agony as they develop an infection severe enough to justify termination. They place life-and-death decisions in the hands of "ethics panels" instead of patients. They are barbaric.\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1658845496
Although Weller first blamed hospital staff--"to them, my life was not in danger enough," she said sardonically--she eventually came to attribute her "dystopian nightmare" of "physical, emotional, and mental anguish" on the Republican state legislators who passed Texas' six-week abortion ban and GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, who signed the measure into law in May 2021.
"We live in a culture that advocates small government and yet... we are allowing our Texas state government to dictate what women do with their own bodies and to dictate what they think is best, what medical procedures they think [are] best for them to get," Weller lamented.
Abbott came under fire Monday in a new political advertisement attacking his crusade to strip more than half the people in his state of their bodily autonomy.
In the ad--which was released by Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC--an actor playing a doctor tells a distraught couple their child will suffer agonizing seizures before dying within hours of birth from a catastrophic brain anomaly. The doctor informs her that "only one person" can make the choice for her before phoning Abbott to ask if abortion is an option.
\u201cWhose choice?\nTexas women no longer have a choice to make their most personal decision. This is wrong! Texans need to fight back and vote for Democrats this November and vote against TxGOP. Vote them out!\n#WhoseChoice #MAGAtheGood #WomensRights #TxLege\u201d— Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC (@Mothers Against Greg Abbott PAC) 1658746801
"Yeah," the doctor tells the couple after hanging up the phone, "that's gonna be a no. Best of luck to you."
Healthcare providers and patients already have numerous real-life horror stories to share in the nascent post-Roe era.
Dr. Jessian Munoz, a San Antonio OB-GYN who treats high-risk pregnancies, told the Associated Press earlier this month that with the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, "the art of medicine is lost and actually has been replaced by fear" as doctors struggle to determine whether patients are "sick enough" to justify an abortion under Texas' six-week ban.
Munoz told of a pregnant patient who had begun to miscarry and developed a potentially life-threatening womb infection. But because the fetus still had a detectable heartbeat, abortion was illegal under the new law.
"We physically watched her get sicker and sicker and sicker" until the fetal heartbeat stopped the next day, "and then we could intervene," Munoz said. As a result of the delay in critical care, the patient developed complications, lost multiple liters of blood, required surgery, and had to be connected to a breathing machine.
\u201c\u201cDoctors whose patients develop pregnancy complications are struggling to determine whether a woman is \u2018sick enough\u2019 to justify an abortion,\u201d said @JayMunozMD for @AP. https://t.co/mtjNX5C9ZP\u201d— SMFM (@SMFM) 1658054731
Marlena Stell, a popular YouTuber, found out 9.5 weeks into her pregnancy that she had suffered a miscarriage. She was even more horrified to learn that due to Texas law, she would be forced to carry the dead fetus inside her for two weeks.
"I felt like a walking coffin," Stell toldThe Washington Post last week. "You're just walking around knowing that you have something that you hoped was going to be a baby for you, and it's gone. And you're just walking around carrying it."
"I get so angry that I was treated this way because of laws that were passed by men who have never been pregnant and never will be," Stell told her nearly 1.5 million YouTube subscribers. "I'm frustrated, I'm angry, and I feel like the women here deserve better than that."
Because the Texas law contains no exceptions in cases of rape or incest, some women have gone to extreme measures to protect against pregnancies resulting from crimes perpetrated against them.
Sexual assault survivor Julie Ann Nitsch told the AP that she "saw the writing on the wall" and chose to have herself sterilized at age 36 rather than risk being impregnated by another rapist.
"I ripped my organs out" to avoid that, she said, adding that "it's sad to think that I can't have kids, but it's better than being forced to have children."
From Your Site Articles
- In First-of-Its Kind Legal Challenge, Texas Women Say State Abortion Ban Endangered Their Lives ›
- Critics Say Texas GOP's New Exception to Abortion Ban Is Meant to 'Deceive Voters' ›
- All-Male Commission Passes Abortion Travel Ban in Lubbock County, Texas ›
- Texas Approves Abortion Only After Woman Sues to Prove Medical Emergency ›
- Under Texas GOP's Abortion Ban, Infant Deaths From Fetal Abnormalities Jumped 23% | Common Dreams ›
- 'Direct Result of Trump': Texas Woman Died Because Doctors Feared Abortion Ban | Common Dreams ›
- Third Death Tied to Texas Abortion Ban as 'Stigma and Fear' Disrupt Miscarriage Care | Common Dreams ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.