

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. soldiers collect land mines in Mosul, Iraq on January 8, 2005. (Photo: Mauricio Lima/AFP via Getty Images)
Campaigners on Tuesday welcomed an announcement that the United States military would end anti-personnel land mine use in most of the world, while pushing the Biden administration to go further and join the international treaty prohibiting the deployment of weapons that kill and maim thousands of people every year.
"Inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century."
Acknowledging that mines have a "disproportionate impact on civilians, including children, long after fighting has stopped," the White House said that "after conducting a comprehensive policy review, the United States is joining the vast majority of countries around the world in committing to limit the use of anti-personnel land mines."
The new policy reverses former President Donald Trump's 2020 rollback of restrictions on the use of weapons that U.S. officials say kill around 7,000 people a year, the vast majority of them civilians.
Notably, the shift does not apply to the Korean Peninsula due to what the administration calls the "unique circumstances" of the U.S. obligation to help defend South Korea from potential invasion by North Korea. Under the new policy, any of the approximately three million U.S. mines deemed not needed to defend South Korea will be destroyed.
Mary Wareham, arms advocacy director at Human Rights Watch and a joint recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for her work with the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)--which led to the landmark 1997 Mine Ban Treaty--called the new U.S. policy "a positive step forward," while warning that it "doesn't go far enough."
Wareham added that "the U.S. should get rid of the Korean exception to its policy banning land mines and accede now to the international Mine Ban Treaty."
The U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines-U.S. Cluster Munition Coalition said in a statement that "while this new anti-personnel land mine policy is an important step, the USCBL-USCMC reiterates our call for President Biden to ban the use of anti-personnel land mines without geographic exceptions, including the Korean Peninsula."
"The mines on the Korean peninsula continue to cause ongoing harm and serve as a barrier to peace," the coalition continued. "Additionally, the mines on the Korean peninsula are no longer under U.S. responsibility, having been turned over to the South Korean armed forces, meaning these mines should not and do not prevent the U.S. from joining the Mine Ban Treaty."
"Through this new policy, the United States is once again moving toward the global consensus against the use of anti-personnel land mines," USCBL-USCMC said. "Today, 164 countries are party to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, also known as the Ottawa Convention, representing over 80% of the world's states and all U.S. NATO allies."
U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) joined campaigners in welcoming the policy shift, asserting in a statement that "inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century, and those who use them--like Russia in Ukraine today--should be universally condemned."
"As welcome as this step is, the White House needs to put the U.S. on a definitive path to join the treaties banning anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions," Leahy added. "Neither of these indiscriminate weapons, the horrific consequences of which we are seeing in Ukraine today, belong in the arsenals of civilized nations."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Campaigners on Tuesday welcomed an announcement that the United States military would end anti-personnel land mine use in most of the world, while pushing the Biden administration to go further and join the international treaty prohibiting the deployment of weapons that kill and maim thousands of people every year.
"Inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century."
Acknowledging that mines have a "disproportionate impact on civilians, including children, long after fighting has stopped," the White House said that "after conducting a comprehensive policy review, the United States is joining the vast majority of countries around the world in committing to limit the use of anti-personnel land mines."
The new policy reverses former President Donald Trump's 2020 rollback of restrictions on the use of weapons that U.S. officials say kill around 7,000 people a year, the vast majority of them civilians.
Notably, the shift does not apply to the Korean Peninsula due to what the administration calls the "unique circumstances" of the U.S. obligation to help defend South Korea from potential invasion by North Korea. Under the new policy, any of the approximately three million U.S. mines deemed not needed to defend South Korea will be destroyed.
Mary Wareham, arms advocacy director at Human Rights Watch and a joint recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for her work with the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)--which led to the landmark 1997 Mine Ban Treaty--called the new U.S. policy "a positive step forward," while warning that it "doesn't go far enough."
Wareham added that "the U.S. should get rid of the Korean exception to its policy banning land mines and accede now to the international Mine Ban Treaty."
The U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines-U.S. Cluster Munition Coalition said in a statement that "while this new anti-personnel land mine policy is an important step, the USCBL-USCMC reiterates our call for President Biden to ban the use of anti-personnel land mines without geographic exceptions, including the Korean Peninsula."
"The mines on the Korean peninsula continue to cause ongoing harm and serve as a barrier to peace," the coalition continued. "Additionally, the mines on the Korean peninsula are no longer under U.S. responsibility, having been turned over to the South Korean armed forces, meaning these mines should not and do not prevent the U.S. from joining the Mine Ban Treaty."
"Through this new policy, the United States is once again moving toward the global consensus against the use of anti-personnel land mines," USCBL-USCMC said. "Today, 164 countries are party to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, also known as the Ottawa Convention, representing over 80% of the world's states and all U.S. NATO allies."
U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) joined campaigners in welcoming the policy shift, asserting in a statement that "inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century, and those who use them--like Russia in Ukraine today--should be universally condemned."
"As welcome as this step is, the White House needs to put the U.S. on a definitive path to join the treaties banning anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions," Leahy added. "Neither of these indiscriminate weapons, the horrific consequences of which we are seeing in Ukraine today, belong in the arsenals of civilized nations."
Campaigners on Tuesday welcomed an announcement that the United States military would end anti-personnel land mine use in most of the world, while pushing the Biden administration to go further and join the international treaty prohibiting the deployment of weapons that kill and maim thousands of people every year.
"Inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century."
Acknowledging that mines have a "disproportionate impact on civilians, including children, long after fighting has stopped," the White House said that "after conducting a comprehensive policy review, the United States is joining the vast majority of countries around the world in committing to limit the use of anti-personnel land mines."
The new policy reverses former President Donald Trump's 2020 rollback of restrictions on the use of weapons that U.S. officials say kill around 7,000 people a year, the vast majority of them civilians.
Notably, the shift does not apply to the Korean Peninsula due to what the administration calls the "unique circumstances" of the U.S. obligation to help defend South Korea from potential invasion by North Korea. Under the new policy, any of the approximately three million U.S. mines deemed not needed to defend South Korea will be destroyed.
Mary Wareham, arms advocacy director at Human Rights Watch and a joint recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for her work with the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)--which led to the landmark 1997 Mine Ban Treaty--called the new U.S. policy "a positive step forward," while warning that it "doesn't go far enough."
Wareham added that "the U.S. should get rid of the Korean exception to its policy banning land mines and accede now to the international Mine Ban Treaty."
The U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines-U.S. Cluster Munition Coalition said in a statement that "while this new anti-personnel land mine policy is an important step, the USCBL-USCMC reiterates our call for President Biden to ban the use of anti-personnel land mines without geographic exceptions, including the Korean Peninsula."
"The mines on the Korean peninsula continue to cause ongoing harm and serve as a barrier to peace," the coalition continued. "Additionally, the mines on the Korean peninsula are no longer under U.S. responsibility, having been turned over to the South Korean armed forces, meaning these mines should not and do not prevent the U.S. from joining the Mine Ban Treaty."
"Through this new policy, the United States is once again moving toward the global consensus against the use of anti-personnel land mines," USCBL-USCMC said. "Today, 164 countries are party to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, also known as the Ottawa Convention, representing over 80% of the world's states and all U.S. NATO allies."
U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) joined campaigners in welcoming the policy shift, asserting in a statement that "inherently indiscriminate weapons that disproportionately harm civilians have no place in the 21st century, and those who use them--like Russia in Ukraine today--should be universally condemned."
"As welcome as this step is, the White House needs to put the U.S. on a definitive path to join the treaties banning anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions," Leahy added. "Neither of these indiscriminate weapons, the horrific consequences of which we are seeing in Ukraine today, belong in the arsenals of civilized nations."