SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife and conservative activist Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation on October 21, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
'Huge News' as Congress Tightens Ethics Rules for Federal Judges
It's "vital legislation that will boost public trust in the judiciary and codify judicial ethics," said one watchdog group.
Apr 27, 2022
Ethics watchdogs on Wednesday welcomed passage of legislation tightening financial disclosure requirements for federal judges as a step toward addressing a widespread crisis that still requires broader reforms.
"There is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary."
The legislation is the Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act, which takes on "the alarming lack of transparency in the personal financial holdings of federal judges, and the conflicts--or appearance of conflicts--those holdings can create in the cases those judges are asked to decide," as the House Judiciary Democrats put it.
Passed by a voice vote in the House on Wednesday after clearing the Senate in February, the bipartisan measure now heads to President Joe Biden's desk.
The bill's advancement comes months after a Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that, from 2010 to 2018, 131 judges heard nearly 700 cases in which they or their family had interests, violating federal law.
Adding to recent concerns about the impartiality of the federal judiciary is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' failure to recuse himself in cases related to the January 6, 2001 attack on the Capitol in light of his wife's texts to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows pushing for the 2020 election results to be overturned.
The measure would amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 in two ways. It would establish a searchable online database with judges' financial disclosure forms within 90 days of them being filed.
It would additionally extend the federal STOCK Act requirement to cover federal judges, forcing them to file periodic transaction reports for securities transactions over $1,000.
In a statement following the vote, Rep. Deborah Ross (D-N.C.), one of the lawmakers who introduced the measure, referenced the Journal's investigation and said the bill would "improve transparency, accountability, and public faith in the ability of our courts to carry out fair, impartial justice.
"This bill will hold federal judges to the same financial transaction disclosure requirements as members of the legislative and executive branches of government, eliminating an unwarranted double standard," she said.
The Project on Government Oversight called the measure's passage "huge news" and said it's "vital legislation that will boost public trust in the judiciary and codify judicial ethics."
Another government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), said the passage was "a great start for judicial ethics reform." However, the group added, "it's not enough on its own."
Speaking to a House panel Wednesday, CREW senior vice president and chief counsel Donald Sherman told lawmakers that "there is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary," one that "is the result of a number of overlapping failures, but chief among them is the judiciary's apparent inability to abide by the rules of ethical conduct their high office requires."
One step to address the ethics problem is "banning judges and their families from buying and owning individual stocks," said Sherman, calling it "the simplest way to address the financial conflicts that are undermining our judicial system."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Ethics watchdogs on Wednesday welcomed passage of legislation tightening financial disclosure requirements for federal judges as a step toward addressing a widespread crisis that still requires broader reforms.
"There is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary."
The legislation is the Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act, which takes on "the alarming lack of transparency in the personal financial holdings of federal judges, and the conflicts--or appearance of conflicts--those holdings can create in the cases those judges are asked to decide," as the House Judiciary Democrats put it.
Passed by a voice vote in the House on Wednesday after clearing the Senate in February, the bipartisan measure now heads to President Joe Biden's desk.
The bill's advancement comes months after a Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that, from 2010 to 2018, 131 judges heard nearly 700 cases in which they or their family had interests, violating federal law.
Adding to recent concerns about the impartiality of the federal judiciary is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' failure to recuse himself in cases related to the January 6, 2001 attack on the Capitol in light of his wife's texts to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows pushing for the 2020 election results to be overturned.
The measure would amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 in two ways. It would establish a searchable online database with judges' financial disclosure forms within 90 days of them being filed.
It would additionally extend the federal STOCK Act requirement to cover federal judges, forcing them to file periodic transaction reports for securities transactions over $1,000.
In a statement following the vote, Rep. Deborah Ross (D-N.C.), one of the lawmakers who introduced the measure, referenced the Journal's investigation and said the bill would "improve transparency, accountability, and public faith in the ability of our courts to carry out fair, impartial justice.
"This bill will hold federal judges to the same financial transaction disclosure requirements as members of the legislative and executive branches of government, eliminating an unwarranted double standard," she said.
The Project on Government Oversight called the measure's passage "huge news" and said it's "vital legislation that will boost public trust in the judiciary and codify judicial ethics."
Another government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), said the passage was "a great start for judicial ethics reform." However, the group added, "it's not enough on its own."
Speaking to a House panel Wednesday, CREW senior vice president and chief counsel Donald Sherman told lawmakers that "there is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary," one that "is the result of a number of overlapping failures, but chief among them is the judiciary's apparent inability to abide by the rules of ethical conduct their high office requires."
One step to address the ethics problem is "banning judges and their families from buying and owning individual stocks," said Sherman, calling it "the simplest way to address the financial conflicts that are undermining our judicial system."
Ethics watchdogs on Wednesday welcomed passage of legislation tightening financial disclosure requirements for federal judges as a step toward addressing a widespread crisis that still requires broader reforms.
"There is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary."
The legislation is the Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act, which takes on "the alarming lack of transparency in the personal financial holdings of federal judges, and the conflicts--or appearance of conflicts--those holdings can create in the cases those judges are asked to decide," as the House Judiciary Democrats put it.
Passed by a voice vote in the House on Wednesday after clearing the Senate in February, the bipartisan measure now heads to President Joe Biden's desk.
The bill's advancement comes months after a Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that, from 2010 to 2018, 131 judges heard nearly 700 cases in which they or their family had interests, violating federal law.
Adding to recent concerns about the impartiality of the federal judiciary is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' failure to recuse himself in cases related to the January 6, 2001 attack on the Capitol in light of his wife's texts to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows pushing for the 2020 election results to be overturned.
The measure would amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 in two ways. It would establish a searchable online database with judges' financial disclosure forms within 90 days of them being filed.
It would additionally extend the federal STOCK Act requirement to cover federal judges, forcing them to file periodic transaction reports for securities transactions over $1,000.
In a statement following the vote, Rep. Deborah Ross (D-N.C.), one of the lawmakers who introduced the measure, referenced the Journal's investigation and said the bill would "improve transparency, accountability, and public faith in the ability of our courts to carry out fair, impartial justice.
"This bill will hold federal judges to the same financial transaction disclosure requirements as members of the legislative and executive branches of government, eliminating an unwarranted double standard," she said.
The Project on Government Oversight called the measure's passage "huge news" and said it's "vital legislation that will boost public trust in the judiciary and codify judicial ethics."
Another government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), said the passage was "a great start for judicial ethics reform." However, the group added, "it's not enough on its own."
Speaking to a House panel Wednesday, CREW senior vice president and chief counsel Donald Sherman told lawmakers that "there is a crisis of confidence in our federal judiciary," one that "is the result of a number of overlapping failures, but chief among them is the judiciary's apparent inability to abide by the rules of ethical conduct their high office requires."
One step to address the ethics problem is "banning judges and their families from buying and owning individual stocks," said Sherman, calling it "the simplest way to address the financial conflicts that are undermining our judicial system."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.