U.S. Federal Reserve vice chair of supervision nominee Sarah Bloom Raskin testifies before the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee on February 3, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
'Disgraceful': Oil-Soaked Senators Force Out Bloom Raskin Over Climate Stance
"By blocking a Fed nominee for not being pro-fossil fuel enough, Joe Manchin is loudly saying to America two simple words: Drop dead. Good to know he's fine with the coming environmental apocalypse."
Sarah Bloom Raskin withdrew her nomination as Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision on Tuesday, prompting progressive condemnation of the fossil fuel-funded U.S. senators--especially right-wing West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin--who fiercely opposed her prospective appointment.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund."
The Washington Post reports that the White House confirmed Bloom Raskin--a former deputy secretary at the U.S. Treasury Department and member of the Federal Reserve's governing board during the Obama administration--would decline her nomination amid what she has described as "relentless attacks by special interests" spooked by her candid admissions that the climate emergency threatens economic stability.
"It was--and is--my considered view that the perils of climate change must be added to the list of serious risks that the Federal Reserve considers as it works to ensure the stability and resiliency of our economy and financial system," Bloom Raskin wrote in a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden explaining her decision.
"This is not a novel or radical position," she continued. "Any vice chair for supervision who ignored these realities--which are manifesting every day across this country--would be guilty of gross dereliction of duty."
Bloom Raskin's stance is in line with official policy statements from various U.S. government agencies including the Department of Defense, as well as central banks around the world and a growing number of corporations.
In a statement addressing accusations that Bloom Raskin is too "radical" for the job, Biden said that "unfortunately, Senate Republicans are more focused on amplifying these false claims and protecting special interests than taking important steps toward addressing inflation and lowering costs for the American people."
However, it was opposition from Manchin--who has taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in fossil fuel industry campaign contributions and made at least hundreds of thousands more from his family's coal business--in an evenly divided Senate that proved fatal to Bloom Raskin's confirmation prospects.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund," The New Republic's Kate Aronoff tweeted. "Guess they listened!"
The progressive group Indivisible lamented, "It's absurd that a qualified nominee who had been unanimously confirmed by the Senate to a similar role can't get confirmed now simply for acknowledging climate change."
David Arkush, climate program managing director at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement that "as climate harms push into an ever-larger proportion of our social and economic lives, so too does climate denial."
"At the behest of the oil and gas industry, Senate Republicans and Sen. Manchin smeared and killed the nomination of the most qualified person in the country to lead the U.S. through our present economic and financial stability challenges as vice chair for supervision because she had the temerity to voice aloud simple realities around climate change that most regulators agree with," he asserted. "Their behavior is disgraceful."
Arkush continued:
A mainstream nominee if there ever was one, Bloom Raskin has the support of consumers, civil rights groups, unions, businesses, and banks. She was confirmed twice by the Senate unanimously and has widespread, bipartisan support in the real world. But not in today's U.S. Senate, where the fossil fuel industry gives new meaning to the phrase scorched earth.
"It is no surprise that people who are destroying humanity's livable habitat are also willing to imperil financial stability and the broader economy by depriving the country of outstanding leadership in a time of multiple overlapping crises just to make a point," Arkush added. "But it is a new low."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Sarah Bloom Raskin withdrew her nomination as Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision on Tuesday, prompting progressive condemnation of the fossil fuel-funded U.S. senators--especially right-wing West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin--who fiercely opposed her prospective appointment.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund."
The Washington Post reports that the White House confirmed Bloom Raskin--a former deputy secretary at the U.S. Treasury Department and member of the Federal Reserve's governing board during the Obama administration--would decline her nomination amid what she has described as "relentless attacks by special interests" spooked by her candid admissions that the climate emergency threatens economic stability.
"It was--and is--my considered view that the perils of climate change must be added to the list of serious risks that the Federal Reserve considers as it works to ensure the stability and resiliency of our economy and financial system," Bloom Raskin wrote in a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden explaining her decision.
"This is not a novel or radical position," she continued. "Any vice chair for supervision who ignored these realities--which are manifesting every day across this country--would be guilty of gross dereliction of duty."
Bloom Raskin's stance is in line with official policy statements from various U.S. government agencies including the Department of Defense, as well as central banks around the world and a growing number of corporations.
In a statement addressing accusations that Bloom Raskin is too "radical" for the job, Biden said that "unfortunately, Senate Republicans are more focused on amplifying these false claims and protecting special interests than taking important steps toward addressing inflation and lowering costs for the American people."
However, it was opposition from Manchin--who has taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in fossil fuel industry campaign contributions and made at least hundreds of thousands more from his family's coal business--in an evenly divided Senate that proved fatal to Bloom Raskin's confirmation prospects.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund," The New Republic's Kate Aronoff tweeted. "Guess they listened!"
The progressive group Indivisible lamented, "It's absurd that a qualified nominee who had been unanimously confirmed by the Senate to a similar role can't get confirmed now simply for acknowledging climate change."
David Arkush, climate program managing director at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement that "as climate harms push into an ever-larger proportion of our social and economic lives, so too does climate denial."
"At the behest of the oil and gas industry, Senate Republicans and Sen. Manchin smeared and killed the nomination of the most qualified person in the country to lead the U.S. through our present economic and financial stability challenges as vice chair for supervision because she had the temerity to voice aloud simple realities around climate change that most regulators agree with," he asserted. "Their behavior is disgraceful."
Arkush continued:
A mainstream nominee if there ever was one, Bloom Raskin has the support of consumers, civil rights groups, unions, businesses, and banks. She was confirmed twice by the Senate unanimously and has widespread, bipartisan support in the real world. But not in today's U.S. Senate, where the fossil fuel industry gives new meaning to the phrase scorched earth.
"It is no surprise that people who are destroying humanity's livable habitat are also willing to imperil financial stability and the broader economy by depriving the country of outstanding leadership in a time of multiple overlapping crises just to make a point," Arkush added. "But it is a new low."
Sarah Bloom Raskin withdrew her nomination as Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision on Tuesday, prompting progressive condemnation of the fossil fuel-funded U.S. senators--especially right-wing West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin--who fiercely opposed her prospective appointment.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund."
The Washington Post reports that the White House confirmed Bloom Raskin--a former deputy secretary at the U.S. Treasury Department and member of the Federal Reserve's governing board during the Obama administration--would decline her nomination amid what she has described as "relentless attacks by special interests" spooked by her candid admissions that the climate emergency threatens economic stability.
"It was--and is--my considered view that the perils of climate change must be added to the list of serious risks that the Federal Reserve considers as it works to ensure the stability and resiliency of our economy and financial system," Bloom Raskin wrote in a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden explaining her decision.
"This is not a novel or radical position," she continued. "Any vice chair for supervision who ignored these realities--which are manifesting every day across this country--would be guilty of gross dereliction of duty."
Bloom Raskin's stance is in line with official policy statements from various U.S. government agencies including the Department of Defense, as well as central banks around the world and a growing number of corporations.
In a statement addressing accusations that Bloom Raskin is too "radical" for the job, Biden said that "unfortunately, Senate Republicans are more focused on amplifying these false claims and protecting special interests than taking important steps toward addressing inflation and lowering costs for the American people."
However, it was opposition from Manchin--who has taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in fossil fuel industry campaign contributions and made at least hundreds of thousands more from his family's coal business--in an evenly divided Senate that proved fatal to Bloom Raskin's confirmation prospects.
"Days before helping Republicans sink Sarah Bloom Raskin's Fed nomination, Joe Manchin told fossil fuel executives that they should seek a 'return on investment' from the politicians they fund," The New Republic's Kate Aronoff tweeted. "Guess they listened!"
The progressive group Indivisible lamented, "It's absurd that a qualified nominee who had been unanimously confirmed by the Senate to a similar role can't get confirmed now simply for acknowledging climate change."
David Arkush, climate program managing director at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement that "as climate harms push into an ever-larger proportion of our social and economic lives, so too does climate denial."
"At the behest of the oil and gas industry, Senate Republicans and Sen. Manchin smeared and killed the nomination of the most qualified person in the country to lead the U.S. through our present economic and financial stability challenges as vice chair for supervision because she had the temerity to voice aloud simple realities around climate change that most regulators agree with," he asserted. "Their behavior is disgraceful."
Arkush continued:
A mainstream nominee if there ever was one, Bloom Raskin has the support of consumers, civil rights groups, unions, businesses, and banks. She was confirmed twice by the Senate unanimously and has widespread, bipartisan support in the real world. But not in today's U.S. Senate, where the fossil fuel industry gives new meaning to the phrase scorched earth.
"It is no surprise that people who are destroying humanity's livable habitat are also willing to imperil financial stability and the broader economy by depriving the country of outstanding leadership in a time of multiple overlapping crises just to make a point," Arkush added. "But it is a new low."