Lyft driver Al Aloudi speaks to demonstrators during a March 25, 2019 San Francisco protest against the company's pay cuts and its announcement that it is going public on Friday. (Photo: Gabrielle Lurie/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)
Mar 08, 2022
An app-based worker advocacy group on Tuesday decried companies including Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash for launching a new lobby group to fight federal and state-level efforts to protect workers and reclassify them as employees instead of independent contractors.
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
The Hill reports the new lobby group, called Flex, will push back against Democrats' Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, a sweeping bill that, if passed, would expand collective bargaining rights, improve access to union elections, and impose penalties on businesses that exploit their workers.
The group will also fight state-level legislation to classify app-based drivers and other workers as employees--a status that would confer minimum pay, healthcare, and other benefits denied to independent contractors.
"Imagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly," the advocacy group Gig Workers Rising tweeted about app-based companies in response to Flex's formation.
\u201cImagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly. \n\nhttps://t.co/fIhzlmmxva\u201d— Gig Workers Rising (@Gig Workers Rising) 1646772471
The Wall Street Journalnotes that some of Flex's members were previously members of the Internet Association, a lobby group representing tech titans including Facebook and Google.
Critics accuse app-based companies of seeking to extract maximum profits from their workers without providing them with the basic benefits and protections due to employees.
At the state level, Lyft in December made the largest one-time political donation in Massachusetts history--$13 million--to a coalition launched to fund a ballot measure that, if passed, would deny drivers employee status.
Meanwhile, tech companies including Uber and Lyft are backing a bill seeking to prevent app-based drivers from being classified as employees in Washington state. The measure, H.B. 2076, passed the state House in February and is expected to face a Senate vote as soon as next week.
\u201cHB 2076 would deny TNC drivers basic employee rights, create no pathway to collective bargaining rights, and set damaging precedents. WA legislators should oppose this effort. https://t.co/qcSCl0kHnQ\u201d— Economic Policy Institute (@Economic Policy Institute) 1646234608
The Massachusetts and Washington battles closely mirror California's fight over Proposition 22, a measure approved by voters in November 2020 that exempts app-based driver companies from classifying their workers as employees.
In what was the costliest ballot initiative in California history, Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash collectively spent $160 million supporting Prop 22. The app-based companies also pushed drivers to vote "yes" on the measure, while some high-profile opponents of the bill endured intense harassment.
Computer security researcher and app-based worker advocate Katie Moussouris on Monday said people should not believe the "propaganda" of app-based companies "trying to classify drivers as anything less than full-time employees."
\u201cFoul play.\nDon\u2019t believe propaganda of gig econ companies trying to classify drivers as anything less than full time employees.\n\u201cThere\u2019s nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule, that means people need to forfeit basic workers\u2019 rights.\u201d\u201d— Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her) (@Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her)) 1646624165
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule," she tweeted, "that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An app-based worker advocacy group on Tuesday decried companies including Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash for launching a new lobby group to fight federal and state-level efforts to protect workers and reclassify them as employees instead of independent contractors.
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
The Hill reports the new lobby group, called Flex, will push back against Democrats' Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, a sweeping bill that, if passed, would expand collective bargaining rights, improve access to union elections, and impose penalties on businesses that exploit their workers.
The group will also fight state-level legislation to classify app-based drivers and other workers as employees--a status that would confer minimum pay, healthcare, and other benefits denied to independent contractors.
"Imagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly," the advocacy group Gig Workers Rising tweeted about app-based companies in response to Flex's formation.
\u201cImagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly. \n\nhttps://t.co/fIhzlmmxva\u201d— Gig Workers Rising (@Gig Workers Rising) 1646772471
The Wall Street Journalnotes that some of Flex's members were previously members of the Internet Association, a lobby group representing tech titans including Facebook and Google.
Critics accuse app-based companies of seeking to extract maximum profits from their workers without providing them with the basic benefits and protections due to employees.
At the state level, Lyft in December made the largest one-time political donation in Massachusetts history--$13 million--to a coalition launched to fund a ballot measure that, if passed, would deny drivers employee status.
Meanwhile, tech companies including Uber and Lyft are backing a bill seeking to prevent app-based drivers from being classified as employees in Washington state. The measure, H.B. 2076, passed the state House in February and is expected to face a Senate vote as soon as next week.
\u201cHB 2076 would deny TNC drivers basic employee rights, create no pathway to collective bargaining rights, and set damaging precedents. WA legislators should oppose this effort. https://t.co/qcSCl0kHnQ\u201d— Economic Policy Institute (@Economic Policy Institute) 1646234608
The Massachusetts and Washington battles closely mirror California's fight over Proposition 22, a measure approved by voters in November 2020 that exempts app-based driver companies from classifying their workers as employees.
In what was the costliest ballot initiative in California history, Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash collectively spent $160 million supporting Prop 22. The app-based companies also pushed drivers to vote "yes" on the measure, while some high-profile opponents of the bill endured intense harassment.
Computer security researcher and app-based worker advocate Katie Moussouris on Monday said people should not believe the "propaganda" of app-based companies "trying to classify drivers as anything less than full-time employees."
\u201cFoul play.\nDon\u2019t believe propaganda of gig econ companies trying to classify drivers as anything less than full time employees.\n\u201cThere\u2019s nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule, that means people need to forfeit basic workers\u2019 rights.\u201d\u201d— Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her) (@Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her)) 1646624165
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule," she tweeted, "that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
From Your Site Articles
- 'Our System Is Broken,' Say Labor Leaders as California Court Upholds Prop 22 ›
- Coalition Representing 24 Million Workers Blasts 'Dangerous' Cuellar Bill ›
- Opinion | Seattle’s City Council Must Stay the Course on Protections for App Workers | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Wall Street Greed, Not Worker Pay, Is Making Your Uber Ride More Expensive | Common Dreams ›
An app-based worker advocacy group on Tuesday decried companies including Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash for launching a new lobby group to fight federal and state-level efforts to protect workers and reclassify them as employees instead of independent contractors.
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
The Hill reports the new lobby group, called Flex, will push back against Democrats' Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, a sweeping bill that, if passed, would expand collective bargaining rights, improve access to union elections, and impose penalties on businesses that exploit their workers.
The group will also fight state-level legislation to classify app-based drivers and other workers as employees--a status that would confer minimum pay, healthcare, and other benefits denied to independent contractors.
"Imagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly," the advocacy group Gig Workers Rising tweeted about app-based companies in response to Flex's formation.
\u201cImagine if they spent all this money paying workers fairly instead of on propaganda to prevent them from having to pay workers fairly. \n\nhttps://t.co/fIhzlmmxva\u201d— Gig Workers Rising (@Gig Workers Rising) 1646772471
The Wall Street Journalnotes that some of Flex's members were previously members of the Internet Association, a lobby group representing tech titans including Facebook and Google.
Critics accuse app-based companies of seeking to extract maximum profits from their workers without providing them with the basic benefits and protections due to employees.
At the state level, Lyft in December made the largest one-time political donation in Massachusetts history--$13 million--to a coalition launched to fund a ballot measure that, if passed, would deny drivers employee status.
Meanwhile, tech companies including Uber and Lyft are backing a bill seeking to prevent app-based drivers from being classified as employees in Washington state. The measure, H.B. 2076, passed the state House in February and is expected to face a Senate vote as soon as next week.
\u201cHB 2076 would deny TNC drivers basic employee rights, create no pathway to collective bargaining rights, and set damaging precedents. WA legislators should oppose this effort. https://t.co/qcSCl0kHnQ\u201d— Economic Policy Institute (@Economic Policy Institute) 1646234608
The Massachusetts and Washington battles closely mirror California's fight over Proposition 22, a measure approved by voters in November 2020 that exempts app-based driver companies from classifying their workers as employees.
In what was the costliest ballot initiative in California history, Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash collectively spent $160 million supporting Prop 22. The app-based companies also pushed drivers to vote "yes" on the measure, while some high-profile opponents of the bill endured intense harassment.
Computer security researcher and app-based worker advocate Katie Moussouris on Monday said people should not believe the "propaganda" of app-based companies "trying to classify drivers as anything less than full-time employees."
\u201cFoul play.\nDon\u2019t believe propaganda of gig econ companies trying to classify drivers as anything less than full time employees.\n\u201cThere\u2019s nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule, that means people need to forfeit basic workers\u2019 rights.\u201d\u201d— Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her) (@Katie\ud83c\udf3bMoussouris \ud83e\udd83 (she/her)) 1646624165
"There's nothing about working on an app, or having some flexibility in your work schedule," she tweeted, "that means people need to forfeit basic workers' rights."
From Your Site Articles
- 'Our System Is Broken,' Say Labor Leaders as California Court Upholds Prop 22 ›
- Coalition Representing 24 Million Workers Blasts 'Dangerous' Cuellar Bill ›
- Opinion | Seattle’s City Council Must Stay the Course on Protections for App Workers | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Wall Street Greed, Not Worker Pay, Is Making Your Uber Ride More Expensive | Common Dreams ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.