

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) board an elevator after a meeting on Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
As conservative U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin on Thursday joined his right-wing Democratic colleague Kyrsten Sinema in announcing his opposition to abolishing the Senate filibuster, progressive observers excoriated the pair--who recently supported a filibuster carve-out to raise the debt ceiling--for obstructing their party's landmark voting rights legislation.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights."
Manchin (W.Va.) followed his Arizona colleague in voicing support for protecting the filibuster, which racial justice campaigners call a "Jim Crow relic" because it has been used so many times to block voting and civil rights legislation.
Mother Jones senior reporter Ari Berman noted that Republican-led states "have passed new voter suppression laws, gerrymandered maps, and election subversion bills through simple majority, party-line votes, yet Sinema and Manchin demand [a] bipartisan supermajority to protect voting rights."
Berman said the pair "are like spineless Republican senators during end of Reconstruction who supported filibuster of voting rights bill that would've blocked poll taxes and literacy tests," actions that "ushered in 75 years of Jim Crow."
In a lengthy statement in which he declared that he "will not vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster," Manchin cited former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va), an erstwhile Ku Klux Klan member and ardent segregationist who infamously filibustered the landmark 1964 Voting Rights Act for 14 hours. Byrd would renounce racism later in his congressional career.
"Senator Byrd's insight helped explain why at no time in the history of the United States has the Senate been able to end debate on legislation with a simple majority," Manchin falsely asserted, as the rules of the first U.S. Senate in 1789 allowed debate to end after a simple majority vote.
Some progressives also noted that just over a month ago, both Manchin and Sinema approved a carve-out to the filibuster in order to raise the federal debt limit.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights," tweeted human rights attorney Qasim Rashid, who said that's because "raising the debt ceiling keeps them employed--but expanding voting rights makes them irrelevant."
Manchin's statement came after President Joe Biden met with the Senate Democratic caucus and urged members to take the necessary steps--including abolishing or modifying the filibuster--to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
Related Content

Republican senators have blocked the bills by invoking the 60-vote filibuster rule.
Multiple outlets reported that Biden would meet with Manchin and Sinema Thursday evening in a last-ditch attempt to salvage the two voting rights bills.
When asked earlier in the day whether the president has accepted that he "cannot sway" the pair when it comes to the filibuster, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that "we're going to keep fighting until the votes are had."
Vox senior correspondent Jamil Smith tweeted that Sinema "thought it would be a good idea today to spit on John Lewis' legacy," and that she and Manchin know that their "own party is the only one trying to repair a Voting Rights Act that requires repair."
"They just do not care," he said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As conservative U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin on Thursday joined his right-wing Democratic colleague Kyrsten Sinema in announcing his opposition to abolishing the Senate filibuster, progressive observers excoriated the pair--who recently supported a filibuster carve-out to raise the debt ceiling--for obstructing their party's landmark voting rights legislation.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights."
Manchin (W.Va.) followed his Arizona colleague in voicing support for protecting the filibuster, which racial justice campaigners call a "Jim Crow relic" because it has been used so many times to block voting and civil rights legislation.
Mother Jones senior reporter Ari Berman noted that Republican-led states "have passed new voter suppression laws, gerrymandered maps, and election subversion bills through simple majority, party-line votes, yet Sinema and Manchin demand [a] bipartisan supermajority to protect voting rights."
Berman said the pair "are like spineless Republican senators during end of Reconstruction who supported filibuster of voting rights bill that would've blocked poll taxes and literacy tests," actions that "ushered in 75 years of Jim Crow."
In a lengthy statement in which he declared that he "will not vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster," Manchin cited former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va), an erstwhile Ku Klux Klan member and ardent segregationist who infamously filibustered the landmark 1964 Voting Rights Act for 14 hours. Byrd would renounce racism later in his congressional career.
"Senator Byrd's insight helped explain why at no time in the history of the United States has the Senate been able to end debate on legislation with a simple majority," Manchin falsely asserted, as the rules of the first U.S. Senate in 1789 allowed debate to end after a simple majority vote.
Some progressives also noted that just over a month ago, both Manchin and Sinema approved a carve-out to the filibuster in order to raise the federal debt limit.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights," tweeted human rights attorney Qasim Rashid, who said that's because "raising the debt ceiling keeps them employed--but expanding voting rights makes them irrelevant."
Manchin's statement came after President Joe Biden met with the Senate Democratic caucus and urged members to take the necessary steps--including abolishing or modifying the filibuster--to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
Related Content

Republican senators have blocked the bills by invoking the 60-vote filibuster rule.
Multiple outlets reported that Biden would meet with Manchin and Sinema Thursday evening in a last-ditch attempt to salvage the two voting rights bills.
When asked earlier in the day whether the president has accepted that he "cannot sway" the pair when it comes to the filibuster, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that "we're going to keep fighting until the votes are had."
Vox senior correspondent Jamil Smith tweeted that Sinema "thought it would be a good idea today to spit on John Lewis' legacy," and that she and Manchin know that their "own party is the only one trying to repair a Voting Rights Act that requires repair."
"They just do not care," he said.
As conservative U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin on Thursday joined his right-wing Democratic colleague Kyrsten Sinema in announcing his opposition to abolishing the Senate filibuster, progressive observers excoriated the pair--who recently supported a filibuster carve-out to raise the debt ceiling--for obstructing their party's landmark voting rights legislation.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights."
Manchin (W.Va.) followed his Arizona colleague in voicing support for protecting the filibuster, which racial justice campaigners call a "Jim Crow relic" because it has been used so many times to block voting and civil rights legislation.
Mother Jones senior reporter Ari Berman noted that Republican-led states "have passed new voter suppression laws, gerrymandered maps, and election subversion bills through simple majority, party-line votes, yet Sinema and Manchin demand [a] bipartisan supermajority to protect voting rights."
Berman said the pair "are like spineless Republican senators during end of Reconstruction who supported filibuster of voting rights bill that would've blocked poll taxes and literacy tests," actions that "ushered in 75 years of Jim Crow."
In a lengthy statement in which he declared that he "will not vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster," Manchin cited former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va), an erstwhile Ku Klux Klan member and ardent segregationist who infamously filibustered the landmark 1964 Voting Rights Act for 14 hours. Byrd would renounce racism later in his congressional career.
"Senator Byrd's insight helped explain why at no time in the history of the United States has the Senate been able to end debate on legislation with a simple majority," Manchin falsely asserted, as the rules of the first U.S. Senate in 1789 allowed debate to end after a simple majority vote.
Some progressives also noted that just over a month ago, both Manchin and Sinema approved a carve-out to the filibuster in order to raise the federal debt limit.
"Sinema and Manchin voted last month to abolish the filibuster for the debt ceiling--but won't vote to abolish the filibuster for voting rights," tweeted human rights attorney Qasim Rashid, who said that's because "raising the debt ceiling keeps them employed--but expanding voting rights makes them irrelevant."
Manchin's statement came after President Joe Biden met with the Senate Democratic caucus and urged members to take the necessary steps--including abolishing or modifying the filibuster--to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
Related Content

Republican senators have blocked the bills by invoking the 60-vote filibuster rule.
Multiple outlets reported that Biden would meet with Manchin and Sinema Thursday evening in a last-ditch attempt to salvage the two voting rights bills.
When asked earlier in the day whether the president has accepted that he "cannot sway" the pair when it comes to the filibuster, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that "we're going to keep fighting until the votes are had."
Vox senior correspondent Jamil Smith tweeted that Sinema "thought it would be a good idea today to spit on John Lewis' legacy," and that she and Manchin know that their "own party is the only one trying to repair a Voting Rights Act that requires repair."
"They just do not care," he said.