Dec 29, 2021
A bill proposed by a Republican state senator in Oklahoma would empower parents to have books that discuss gender identity removed from public school libraries--a measure that rights advocates warned could have life-threatening consequences for LGBTQ+ children across the state.
Under Senate Bill 1142, introduced earlier this month by state Sen. Rob Standridge, just one parent would have to object to a book that includes discussion of "sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity" and other related themes in order to begin the process of removal.
Upon receiving a written request to remove a book, a school district would have 30 days to eliminate all copies of the material from circulation.
In a provision that appeared inspired by S.B. 8 in Texas--the law that deputizes any citizen and entitles them to a financial reward if they successfully sue someone for aiding a pregnant person in obtaining abortion care--parents will be able to collect $10,000 per day for as long as the book in question remains in library.
\u201cThe Supreme Court really opened Pandora\u2019s box by allowing these bounties to stand\u201d— Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1640792238
They could also be entitled to compensation for court and attorneys' fees, according toNewsweek, if the district refuses to remove the book and the case proceeds to court. School librarians could also be fired for keeping the book on shelves and barred from working in public schools for up to two years.
"These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone."
Democratic state Rep. Jacob Rosecrants called the proposal "asinine," but told the McAlester News-Capital he believes that bill has the potential to make it to the governor's desk in light of the Republican Party's pursuit of similar legislation in other states, including at least one proposal that's been passed into law limiting how teachers can discuss race and gender.
"I think it's just trying to feed into the fearmongering that it looks like the GOP really is going for here," Rosecrants told the local outlet. "It blows me away."
Standridge said books he has seen in school libraries that could be targeted by the bill include Trans Teen Survival Guide, A Quick and Easy Guide to Queer and Trans Identities, A Quick and Easy Guide to They/Them Pronouns, and The Art of Drag.
Even if the bill is voted down, Morgan Allen of Oklahomans for Equality told the News-Capital, the public condemnation of such material by a state legislator is "absolutely harmful" to young people in Oklahoma, where one in four LGBTQ+ youths report having attempted suicide, compared with 7% nationally.
"These books are there to give our kids the language that they need to express how they are already feeling, and that's it," Allen told the newspaper. "These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone. And if we take those books away from their libraries, then we're saying that their schools and the people who are in those schools don't see them for who they are, and that they are alone in those schools."
S.B. 1142 is one of several "education gag orders" that are moving through state legislatures, Dr. Jeffrey A. Sachs of Acadia University noted on social media. Such proposals, which Republicans have fashioned both as attacks on LGBTQ+ students and on classroom discussion of racial injustice and U.S. history, "increasingly include a private right of action," Sachs said.
New Hampshire's S.B. 2, which has been passed into law, allows "any person claiming to be aggrieved" by school discussions of race, sex, or gender to file a civil suit against the school in question.
Lawmakers in Missouri plan to take up a proposal next year which would allow private citizens to sue schools if they fail to promote "an overall positive... history and understanding of the United States."
"If found guilty, a school would be required to pay the plaintiff's legal fees and up to $1,000 in civil penalties," Sachs wrote at PEN America last week.
The slew of "education gag orders" represent "a madness that, at its core, is about putting the paralyzing fear of god into teachers, school districts, and local officials," tweeted Sachs.
The proposals "present themselves in the guise of so-called 'Parents' Bills of Rights'," Sachs added, using a term applied to a law pushed by Florida Republicans and signed last year by Gov. Ron DeSantis. "But don't be fooled. They are about fear."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A bill proposed by a Republican state senator in Oklahoma would empower parents to have books that discuss gender identity removed from public school libraries--a measure that rights advocates warned could have life-threatening consequences for LGBTQ+ children across the state.
Under Senate Bill 1142, introduced earlier this month by state Sen. Rob Standridge, just one parent would have to object to a book that includes discussion of "sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity" and other related themes in order to begin the process of removal.
Upon receiving a written request to remove a book, a school district would have 30 days to eliminate all copies of the material from circulation.
In a provision that appeared inspired by S.B. 8 in Texas--the law that deputizes any citizen and entitles them to a financial reward if they successfully sue someone for aiding a pregnant person in obtaining abortion care--parents will be able to collect $10,000 per day for as long as the book in question remains in library.
\u201cThe Supreme Court really opened Pandora\u2019s box by allowing these bounties to stand\u201d— Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1640792238
They could also be entitled to compensation for court and attorneys' fees, according toNewsweek, if the district refuses to remove the book and the case proceeds to court. School librarians could also be fired for keeping the book on shelves and barred from working in public schools for up to two years.
"These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone."
Democratic state Rep. Jacob Rosecrants called the proposal "asinine," but told the McAlester News-Capital he believes that bill has the potential to make it to the governor's desk in light of the Republican Party's pursuit of similar legislation in other states, including at least one proposal that's been passed into law limiting how teachers can discuss race and gender.
"I think it's just trying to feed into the fearmongering that it looks like the GOP really is going for here," Rosecrants told the local outlet. "It blows me away."
Standridge said books he has seen in school libraries that could be targeted by the bill include Trans Teen Survival Guide, A Quick and Easy Guide to Queer and Trans Identities, A Quick and Easy Guide to They/Them Pronouns, and The Art of Drag.
Even if the bill is voted down, Morgan Allen of Oklahomans for Equality told the News-Capital, the public condemnation of such material by a state legislator is "absolutely harmful" to young people in Oklahoma, where one in four LGBTQ+ youths report having attempted suicide, compared with 7% nationally.
"These books are there to give our kids the language that they need to express how they are already feeling, and that's it," Allen told the newspaper. "These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone. And if we take those books away from their libraries, then we're saying that their schools and the people who are in those schools don't see them for who they are, and that they are alone in those schools."
S.B. 1142 is one of several "education gag orders" that are moving through state legislatures, Dr. Jeffrey A. Sachs of Acadia University noted on social media. Such proposals, which Republicans have fashioned both as attacks on LGBTQ+ students and on classroom discussion of racial injustice and U.S. history, "increasingly include a private right of action," Sachs said.
New Hampshire's S.B. 2, which has been passed into law, allows "any person claiming to be aggrieved" by school discussions of race, sex, or gender to file a civil suit against the school in question.
Lawmakers in Missouri plan to take up a proposal next year which would allow private citizens to sue schools if they fail to promote "an overall positive... history and understanding of the United States."
"If found guilty, a school would be required to pay the plaintiff's legal fees and up to $1,000 in civil penalties," Sachs wrote at PEN America last week.
The slew of "education gag orders" represent "a madness that, at its core, is about putting the paralyzing fear of god into teachers, school districts, and local officials," tweeted Sachs.
The proposals "present themselves in the guise of so-called 'Parents' Bills of Rights'," Sachs added, using a term applied to a law pushed by Florida Republicans and signed last year by Gov. Ron DeSantis. "But don't be fooled. They are about fear."
From Your Site Articles
- 'Free the Books,' Say Opponents of New Florida Law as Teachers Remove or Cover Libraries ›
- Progressives Slam House Passage of GOP Book Banning Bill That Turns Children Into 'Pawns' ›
- 'Despicable and Dangerous': Missouri Republicans Vote to Defund State's Public Libraries ›
- Pulitzer-Winning Holocaust Novel Latest Victim of GOP Book-Banning Wave ›
- Far-Right Homophobic 'Libs of TikTok' Creator Appointed to Oklahoma Library Panel ›
A bill proposed by a Republican state senator in Oklahoma would empower parents to have books that discuss gender identity removed from public school libraries--a measure that rights advocates warned could have life-threatening consequences for LGBTQ+ children across the state.
Under Senate Bill 1142, introduced earlier this month by state Sen. Rob Standridge, just one parent would have to object to a book that includes discussion of "sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity" and other related themes in order to begin the process of removal.
Upon receiving a written request to remove a book, a school district would have 30 days to eliminate all copies of the material from circulation.
In a provision that appeared inspired by S.B. 8 in Texas--the law that deputizes any citizen and entitles them to a financial reward if they successfully sue someone for aiding a pregnant person in obtaining abortion care--parents will be able to collect $10,000 per day for as long as the book in question remains in library.
\u201cThe Supreme Court really opened Pandora\u2019s box by allowing these bounties to stand\u201d— Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1640792238
They could also be entitled to compensation for court and attorneys' fees, according toNewsweek, if the district refuses to remove the book and the case proceeds to court. School librarians could also be fired for keeping the book on shelves and barred from working in public schools for up to two years.
"These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone."
Democratic state Rep. Jacob Rosecrants called the proposal "asinine," but told the McAlester News-Capital he believes that bill has the potential to make it to the governor's desk in light of the Republican Party's pursuit of similar legislation in other states, including at least one proposal that's been passed into law limiting how teachers can discuss race and gender.
"I think it's just trying to feed into the fearmongering that it looks like the GOP really is going for here," Rosecrants told the local outlet. "It blows me away."
Standridge said books he has seen in school libraries that could be targeted by the bill include Trans Teen Survival Guide, A Quick and Easy Guide to Queer and Trans Identities, A Quick and Easy Guide to They/Them Pronouns, and The Art of Drag.
Even if the bill is voted down, Morgan Allen of Oklahomans for Equality told the News-Capital, the public condemnation of such material by a state legislator is "absolutely harmful" to young people in Oklahoma, where one in four LGBTQ+ youths report having attempted suicide, compared with 7% nationally.
"These books are there to give our kids the language that they need to express how they are already feeling, and that's it," Allen told the newspaper. "These books are not there for anything else other than to affirm and show the kids their love for who they are, and that there are other people out there like them, that they are not alone. And if we take those books away from their libraries, then we're saying that their schools and the people who are in those schools don't see them for who they are, and that they are alone in those schools."
S.B. 1142 is one of several "education gag orders" that are moving through state legislatures, Dr. Jeffrey A. Sachs of Acadia University noted on social media. Such proposals, which Republicans have fashioned both as attacks on LGBTQ+ students and on classroom discussion of racial injustice and U.S. history, "increasingly include a private right of action," Sachs said.
New Hampshire's S.B. 2, which has been passed into law, allows "any person claiming to be aggrieved" by school discussions of race, sex, or gender to file a civil suit against the school in question.
Lawmakers in Missouri plan to take up a proposal next year which would allow private citizens to sue schools if they fail to promote "an overall positive... history and understanding of the United States."
"If found guilty, a school would be required to pay the plaintiff's legal fees and up to $1,000 in civil penalties," Sachs wrote at PEN America last week.
The slew of "education gag orders" represent "a madness that, at its core, is about putting the paralyzing fear of god into teachers, school districts, and local officials," tweeted Sachs.
The proposals "present themselves in the guise of so-called 'Parents' Bills of Rights'," Sachs added, using a term applied to a law pushed by Florida Republicans and signed last year by Gov. Ron DeSantis. "But don't be fooled. They are about fear."
From Your Site Articles
- 'Free the Books,' Say Opponents of New Florida Law as Teachers Remove or Cover Libraries ›
- Progressives Slam House Passage of GOP Book Banning Bill That Turns Children Into 'Pawns' ›
- 'Despicable and Dangerous': Missouri Republicans Vote to Defund State's Public Libraries ›
- Pulitzer-Winning Holocaust Novel Latest Victim of GOP Book-Banning Wave ›
- Far-Right Homophobic 'Libs of TikTok' Creator Appointed to Oklahoma Library Panel ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.