SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protect Our Care activists take part in a Lite-Brite demonstration outside of pharmaceutical industry lobby group PhRMA's headquarters calling for an end to drug company greed on September 28, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Protect Our Care)
Progressives Cautiously Welcome Drug Pricing Agreement as 'Something to Build On'
"This deal is an important starting point, and we're only beginning to fight."
Nov 03, 2021
Progressive U.S. lawmakers and healthcare reform campaigners on Wednesday cautiously welcomed Senate Democrats' unanimous compromise agreement to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of certain pharmaceutical drugs as a "positive step forward," while stressing that much more must be done to protect Americans from Big Pharma price gouging.
"This is real progress, and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Politico reports that under Tuesday's agreement, the Build Back Better Act will include a provision allowing Medicare Part D to leverage the federal government's prodigious purchasing power to directly negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical corporations.
"Prescription drug pricing reform is overwhelmingly popular and desperately needed across the country, which is why the Progressive Caucus included it as one of our priorities for this legislation," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement. "Americans pay more than any other country in the world for prescription drugs, and this agreement allows us to begin tackling that outrage with policy."
The agreement marks an interruption of a trend in which Democrats methodically gutted key progressive policies and provisions of what was once a sweeping $3.5 trillion social and climate investment package in an uncertain bid to win over right-wing Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).
Progressive Caucus members, grassroots activists, and Democratic lawmakers in vulnerable districts have been fighting to keep drug pricing reform in the bill, a policy favored by nearly 90% of Americans but strongly opposed by Big Pharma.
As Jayapal explained, the new agreement "will cap insulin at $35 for a month's supply, a lifesaving measure for those with diabetes who are currently forced to pay upwards of $200 per vial. It ensures seniors will not pay more than $2,000 out of pocket for their drugs annually, and it will impose a tax penalty on drug companies that increase their prices faster than inflation."
"This is real progress," she asserted, "and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Meanwhile, progressives kept pushing for the inclusion of expanded Medicare benefits and other popular provisions like paid leave in the reconciliation package.
While progressive advocacy groups cheered the agreement as a victory, activists stressed that Americans need and deserve far more than it delivers.
Alex Lawson, executive director of the advocacy group Social Security Works, said in a statement that "while the pharmaceutical corporations were able to use their money to limit the number of drugs Medicare can negotiate on, this is still an important victory for seniors, who will now get to keep more of their earned Social Security checks."
"It's also the biggest defeat Big Pharma has ever suffered, and it won't be the last," he added. "This deal is an important starting point, and we're only beginning to fight... And we will win."
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, argued that the agreement "falls short of what Americans deserve to stop Big Pharma price gouging, but it is a positive step forward nonetheless."
"The agreed-upon proposal will meaningfully improve access to affordable medications for millions of Americans," he continued. "Seniors will see their out-of-pocket costs go down due to a new cap on how much seniors must pay on their own. And the agreement promises very meaningful relief for insulin users."
"As important as these measures are, a much stronger agreement should have been reached," Weissman said. "There is only one reason that Americans are not getting the agreement they should: the political power of Big Pharma and its influence with a handful of Democrats who were willing to prioritize drug company profits over the well-being of the American people."
"At the same time," he added, "any relief from Big Pharma price gouging is welcome news."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
healthcarecongressional progressive caucusmedicarepublic citizenpramila jayapalsocial security workssocial securitybig pharmaus senate
Progressive U.S. lawmakers and healthcare reform campaigners on Wednesday cautiously welcomed Senate Democrats' unanimous compromise agreement to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of certain pharmaceutical drugs as a "positive step forward," while stressing that much more must be done to protect Americans from Big Pharma price gouging.
"This is real progress, and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Politico reports that under Tuesday's agreement, the Build Back Better Act will include a provision allowing Medicare Part D to leverage the federal government's prodigious purchasing power to directly negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical corporations.
"Prescription drug pricing reform is overwhelmingly popular and desperately needed across the country, which is why the Progressive Caucus included it as one of our priorities for this legislation," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement. "Americans pay more than any other country in the world for prescription drugs, and this agreement allows us to begin tackling that outrage with policy."
The agreement marks an interruption of a trend in which Democrats methodically gutted key progressive policies and provisions of what was once a sweeping $3.5 trillion social and climate investment package in an uncertain bid to win over right-wing Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).
Progressive Caucus members, grassroots activists, and Democratic lawmakers in vulnerable districts have been fighting to keep drug pricing reform in the bill, a policy favored by nearly 90% of Americans but strongly opposed by Big Pharma.
As Jayapal explained, the new agreement "will cap insulin at $35 for a month's supply, a lifesaving measure for those with diabetes who are currently forced to pay upwards of $200 per vial. It ensures seniors will not pay more than $2,000 out of pocket for their drugs annually, and it will impose a tax penalty on drug companies that increase their prices faster than inflation."
"This is real progress," she asserted, "and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Meanwhile, progressives kept pushing for the inclusion of expanded Medicare benefits and other popular provisions like paid leave in the reconciliation package.
While progressive advocacy groups cheered the agreement as a victory, activists stressed that Americans need and deserve far more than it delivers.
Alex Lawson, executive director of the advocacy group Social Security Works, said in a statement that "while the pharmaceutical corporations were able to use their money to limit the number of drugs Medicare can negotiate on, this is still an important victory for seniors, who will now get to keep more of their earned Social Security checks."
"It's also the biggest defeat Big Pharma has ever suffered, and it won't be the last," he added. "This deal is an important starting point, and we're only beginning to fight... And we will win."
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, argued that the agreement "falls short of what Americans deserve to stop Big Pharma price gouging, but it is a positive step forward nonetheless."
"The agreed-upon proposal will meaningfully improve access to affordable medications for millions of Americans," he continued. "Seniors will see their out-of-pocket costs go down due to a new cap on how much seniors must pay on their own. And the agreement promises very meaningful relief for insulin users."
"As important as these measures are, a much stronger agreement should have been reached," Weissman said. "There is only one reason that Americans are not getting the agreement they should: the political power of Big Pharma and its influence with a handful of Democrats who were willing to prioritize drug company profits over the well-being of the American people."
"At the same time," he added, "any relief from Big Pharma price gouging is welcome news."
Progressive U.S. lawmakers and healthcare reform campaigners on Wednesday cautiously welcomed Senate Democrats' unanimous compromise agreement to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of certain pharmaceutical drugs as a "positive step forward," while stressing that much more must be done to protect Americans from Big Pharma price gouging.
"This is real progress, and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Politico reports that under Tuesday's agreement, the Build Back Better Act will include a provision allowing Medicare Part D to leverage the federal government's prodigious purchasing power to directly negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical corporations.
"Prescription drug pricing reform is overwhelmingly popular and desperately needed across the country, which is why the Progressive Caucus included it as one of our priorities for this legislation," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement. "Americans pay more than any other country in the world for prescription drugs, and this agreement allows us to begin tackling that outrage with policy."
The agreement marks an interruption of a trend in which Democrats methodically gutted key progressive policies and provisions of what was once a sweeping $3.5 trillion social and climate investment package in an uncertain bid to win over right-wing Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).
Progressive Caucus members, grassroots activists, and Democratic lawmakers in vulnerable districts have been fighting to keep drug pricing reform in the bill, a policy favored by nearly 90% of Americans but strongly opposed by Big Pharma.
As Jayapal explained, the new agreement "will cap insulin at $35 for a month's supply, a lifesaving measure for those with diabetes who are currently forced to pay upwards of $200 per vial. It ensures seniors will not pay more than $2,000 out of pocket for their drugs annually, and it will impose a tax penalty on drug companies that increase their prices faster than inflation."
"This is real progress," she asserted, "and it gives Congress something to build on, setting us up to continue to take action that curbs the pharmaceutical industry's greed and profiteering."
Meanwhile, progressives kept pushing for the inclusion of expanded Medicare benefits and other popular provisions like paid leave in the reconciliation package.
While progressive advocacy groups cheered the agreement as a victory, activists stressed that Americans need and deserve far more than it delivers.
Alex Lawson, executive director of the advocacy group Social Security Works, said in a statement that "while the pharmaceutical corporations were able to use their money to limit the number of drugs Medicare can negotiate on, this is still an important victory for seniors, who will now get to keep more of their earned Social Security checks."
"It's also the biggest defeat Big Pharma has ever suffered, and it won't be the last," he added. "This deal is an important starting point, and we're only beginning to fight... And we will win."
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, argued that the agreement "falls short of what Americans deserve to stop Big Pharma price gouging, but it is a positive step forward nonetheless."
"The agreed-upon proposal will meaningfully improve access to affordable medications for millions of Americans," he continued. "Seniors will see their out-of-pocket costs go down due to a new cap on how much seniors must pay on their own. And the agreement promises very meaningful relief for insulin users."
"As important as these measures are, a much stronger agreement should have been reached," Weissman said. "There is only one reason that Americans are not getting the agreement they should: the political power of Big Pharma and its influence with a handful of Democrats who were willing to prioritize drug company profits over the well-being of the American people."
"At the same time," he added, "any relief from Big Pharma price gouging is welcome news."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.