May 06, 2021
The European Union's top court ruled Thursday in favor of the European Commission's partial ban on three pesticides hazardous to bees, much to the chagrin of Bayer--the German pharmaceutical and biotech company that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018.
Bayer attempted to overturn the ban and undermine the E.U.'s "precautionary principle" for the protection of environmental and human health, but the European Court of Justice dismissed the corporation's appeal and backed a lower court's 2018 decision to uphold restrictions on the use of some pesticides on certain crops. In 2013, the Commission banned the use of imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam--three bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides--on maize, rapseed, and some cereals.
"The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people's health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals and that the precautionary principle is a cornerstone of E.U. law," Greenpeace E.U. legal strategist Andrea Carta said in response to the top court's ratification of the ban.
"This means the E.U. has a responsibility and the power to ensure the safety of all pesticides, chemicals, GM crops, and other dangerous products and substances," said Carta.
\u201c\ud83d\udc1dGOOD NEWS\ud83d\udc1d\n\n@Bayer tried to overturn the EU's ban on three bee-killing neonicotinoid #pesticides \u2013 the EU's court said NO!\n\nBut more is needed to #SaveTheBees \u2013 governments can grant exemptions to the ban, and other dangerous pesticides are still in use\nhttps://t.co/upPwIsOjiR\u201d— Greenpeace EU (@Greenpeace EU) 1620291279
While hailing the "landmark decision," Greenpeace E.U. warned that it "does not mean an end to threats to bees and other pollinators in the E.U."
"E.U. courts have again ruled that bees and other essential insects should be protected from dangerous pesticides, but governments continue to dish out exemptions and hold up attempts to put in place effective safety testing," said Carta. "This ruling shows they must adopt rigorous testing rules without further delay."
According toReuters, 206 emergency authorizations were granted for the use of the neonicotinoids in the E.U. between 2013 and 2019, and the ban did not prevent the use of the toxic substances on other crops, such as sugar beet. "E.U. auditors last year said this pesticide use, while legal, was thought to be responsible for honeybee losses," the news outlet reported.
In addition, Greenpeace E.U. pointed out, "Research also indicates that several other pesticides currently used in the E.U. are a threat to bees and other pollinating insects, including four more neonicotinoids not covered by the 2013 ban."
Reuters noted that the Commission, in an effort to protect bees, has proposed targets to reduce the E.U.'s use of pesticides by 50% and to cut fertilizer use by 20% by 2030.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
The European Union's top court ruled Thursday in favor of the European Commission's partial ban on three pesticides hazardous to bees, much to the chagrin of Bayer--the German pharmaceutical and biotech company that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018.
Bayer attempted to overturn the ban and undermine the E.U.'s "precautionary principle" for the protection of environmental and human health, but the European Court of Justice dismissed the corporation's appeal and backed a lower court's 2018 decision to uphold restrictions on the use of some pesticides on certain crops. In 2013, the Commission banned the use of imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam--three bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides--on maize, rapseed, and some cereals.
"The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people's health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals and that the precautionary principle is a cornerstone of E.U. law," Greenpeace E.U. legal strategist Andrea Carta said in response to the top court's ratification of the ban.
"This means the E.U. has a responsibility and the power to ensure the safety of all pesticides, chemicals, GM crops, and other dangerous products and substances," said Carta.
\u201c\ud83d\udc1dGOOD NEWS\ud83d\udc1d\n\n@Bayer tried to overturn the EU's ban on three bee-killing neonicotinoid #pesticides \u2013 the EU's court said NO!\n\nBut more is needed to #SaveTheBees \u2013 governments can grant exemptions to the ban, and other dangerous pesticides are still in use\nhttps://t.co/upPwIsOjiR\u201d— Greenpeace EU (@Greenpeace EU) 1620291279
While hailing the "landmark decision," Greenpeace E.U. warned that it "does not mean an end to threats to bees and other pollinators in the E.U."
"E.U. courts have again ruled that bees and other essential insects should be protected from dangerous pesticides, but governments continue to dish out exemptions and hold up attempts to put in place effective safety testing," said Carta. "This ruling shows they must adopt rigorous testing rules without further delay."
According toReuters, 206 emergency authorizations were granted for the use of the neonicotinoids in the E.U. between 2013 and 2019, and the ban did not prevent the use of the toxic substances on other crops, such as sugar beet. "E.U. auditors last year said this pesticide use, while legal, was thought to be responsible for honeybee losses," the news outlet reported.
In addition, Greenpeace E.U. pointed out, "Research also indicates that several other pesticides currently used in the E.U. are a threat to bees and other pollinating insects, including four more neonicotinoids not covered by the 2013 ban."
Reuters noted that the Commission, in an effort to protect bees, has proposed targets to reduce the E.U.'s use of pesticides by 50% and to cut fertilizer use by 20% by 2030.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
The European Union's top court ruled Thursday in favor of the European Commission's partial ban on three pesticides hazardous to bees, much to the chagrin of Bayer--the German pharmaceutical and biotech company that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018.
Bayer attempted to overturn the ban and undermine the E.U.'s "precautionary principle" for the protection of environmental and human health, but the European Court of Justice dismissed the corporation's appeal and backed a lower court's 2018 decision to uphold restrictions on the use of some pesticides on certain crops. In 2013, the Commission banned the use of imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam--three bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides--on maize, rapseed, and some cereals.
"The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people's health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals and that the precautionary principle is a cornerstone of E.U. law," Greenpeace E.U. legal strategist Andrea Carta said in response to the top court's ratification of the ban.
"This means the E.U. has a responsibility and the power to ensure the safety of all pesticides, chemicals, GM crops, and other dangerous products and substances," said Carta.
\u201c\ud83d\udc1dGOOD NEWS\ud83d\udc1d\n\n@Bayer tried to overturn the EU's ban on three bee-killing neonicotinoid #pesticides \u2013 the EU's court said NO!\n\nBut more is needed to #SaveTheBees \u2013 governments can grant exemptions to the ban, and other dangerous pesticides are still in use\nhttps://t.co/upPwIsOjiR\u201d— Greenpeace EU (@Greenpeace EU) 1620291279
While hailing the "landmark decision," Greenpeace E.U. warned that it "does not mean an end to threats to bees and other pollinators in the E.U."
"E.U. courts have again ruled that bees and other essential insects should be protected from dangerous pesticides, but governments continue to dish out exemptions and hold up attempts to put in place effective safety testing," said Carta. "This ruling shows they must adopt rigorous testing rules without further delay."
According toReuters, 206 emergency authorizations were granted for the use of the neonicotinoids in the E.U. between 2013 and 2019, and the ban did not prevent the use of the toxic substances on other crops, such as sugar beet. "E.U. auditors last year said this pesticide use, while legal, was thought to be responsible for honeybee losses," the news outlet reported.
In addition, Greenpeace E.U. pointed out, "Research also indicates that several other pesticides currently used in the E.U. are a threat to bees and other pollinating insects, including four more neonicotinoids not covered by the 2013 ban."
Reuters noted that the Commission, in an effort to protect bees, has proposed targets to reduce the E.U.'s use of pesticides by 50% and to cut fertilizer use by 20% by 2030.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.