Skip to main content

Why are the billionaires always laughing?

Because they know the corporate media will never call bullshit on their bullshit.

Why are the billionaires laughing?

It’s easy to laugh when the corporate press treats you as a glorious success instead of the epitome of a broken social order. Billionaires laugh because they know the corporate media prefers to fawn over them rather than hold them to account.

Today, we ask you to support our nonprofit, independent journalism because we are not impressed by billionaires flying into space, their corporations despoiling our health and planet, or their vast fortunes safely concealed in tax havens across the globe. We are not laughing.

We are hard at work producing journalism for the common good. With our Fall Campaign underway, please support this mission today. We cannot do it without you.

Support Our Work -- Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Every donation—large or small—helps us bring you the news that matters.

Protesters attend the hearing where Facebook co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testified before a combined Senate Judiciary and Commerce committee hearing on April 10, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Protesters attend the hearing where Facebook co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testified before a combined Senate Judiciary and Commerce committee hearing on April 10, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Coalition Forms to Challenge 'Predatory' Surveillance Advertising by Big Tech

"Big Tech's toxic business model is undermining democracy."

Kenny Stancil

A global coalition of more than three dozen groups on Monday launched a campaign to ban surveillance advertising, which the leaders of the effort described as "the extractive profit model underlying so many of Big Tech's worst behaviors."

"Big Tech platforms amplify hate, illegal activities, and conspiracism—and feed users increasingly extreme content—because that's what generates the most engagement and profit."
—Coalition to ban surveillance advertising

"Surveillance advertising—the core profit-driver for gatekeepers like Facebook and Google, as well as adtech middlemen—is the practice of extensively tracking and profiling individuals and groups, and then microtargeting ads at them based on their behavioral history, relationships, and identity," the coalition—co-organized by Accountable Tech and the American Economic Liberties Project—said in a joint statement.

"These dominant firms curate the content each person sees on their platforms using those dossiers—not just the ads, but newsfeeds, recommendations, trends, and so forth—to keep each user hooked, so they can be served more ads and mined for more data," added the coalition—which also includes Demand Progress, People's Action, and Public Citizen.

"Big Tech is making billions off surveillance advertising," the groups noted on their campaign website. "Society is paying the price."

The coalition of nearly 40 organizations—whose advocacy ranges from antitrust, corporate accountability, and consumer protection to privacy, civil rights, and counter-disinformation—argued that by "funding the misinformation machine," "aiding and abetting violent extremists," and more, "Big Tech's toxic business model is undermining democracy."

In their joint statement released ahead of Thursday's House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on "Social Media's Role in Promoting Extremism and Misinformation," the groups said that "Big Tech platforms amplify hate, illegal activities, and conspiracism—and feed users increasingly extreme content—because that's what generates the most engagement and profit."

"Their own algorithmic tools have boosted everything from white supremacist groups and Holocaust denialism to Covid-19 hoaxes, counterfeit opioids, and fake cancer cures," the coalition added. "Echo chambers, radicalization, and viral lies are features of these platforms, not bugs—central to the business model."

The coalition criticized social media giants for "eroding our consensus reality and threatening public safety in service of a toxic, extractive business model."

In addition, "surveillance advertising is further damaging the information ecosystem by starving the traditional news industry, especially local journalism," the groups said.

"Facebook and Google's monopoly power and data harvesting practices have given them an unfair advantage, allowing them to dominate the digital advertising market, siphoning up revenue that once kept local newspapers afloat," said the coalition. The result is that "while Big Tech CEOs get richer, journalists get laid off."

David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of Ruby on Rails and founder of Basecamp, lamented how "surveillance advertising has robbed newspapers, magazines, and independent writers of their livelihoods and commoditized their work—and all we got in return were a couple of abusive monopolists. That's not a good bargain for society."

"Big Tech will continue to stoke discrimination, division, and delusion—even if it fuels targeted violence or lays the groundwork for an insurrection—so long as it's in their financial interest."
—Coalition

"By banning this practice," he added, "we will return the unique value of writing, audio, and video to the people who make it rather than those who aggregate it."

According to recent polling, 73% of U.S. voters are opposed to companies tracking their online behavior and using personal data to target them with ads, but the coalition to ban surveillance advertising claimed that "Big Tech will continue to stoke discrimination, division, and delusion—even if it fuels targeted violence or lays the groundwork for an insurrection—so long as it's in their financial interest."

Removing "the financial incentives that drive so much online and offline harm," said Imran Ahmed—CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, part of the coalition—would require "ending invasive snooping on users and the sale of users' intimate thoughts and feelings to advertisers."

As Zephyr Teachout, associate professor of law at Fordham Law School, put it: "Facebook and Google possess enormous monopoly power, combined with the surveillance regimes of authoritarian states and the addiction business model of cigarettes. Congress has broad authority to regulate their business models and should use it to ban them from engaging in surveillance advertising."

Brandi Collins-Dexter, a visiting fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center, noted that "an industry built on monetizing human emotions online has come at the cost of eroding societal values of transparency, fairness, accountability, and safety offline."

"It is time," she added, "to demand regulators, legislators, and other corners of government band together to ensure our communities are safeguarded from predatory practices like surveillance advertising."

In their joint statement, the groups said that "there is no silver bullet to remedy this crisis—and the members of this coalition will continue to pursue a range of different policy approaches, from comprehensive privacy legislation to reforming our antitrust laws and liability standards."

"But," the coalition added, "here's one thing we all agree on: It's time to ban surveillance advertising."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

New Whistleblower Sparks Calls to 'Crack Down on Facebook and All Big Tech Companies'

Hours after another ex-employee filed a formal complaint, reporting broke on internal documents that show the tech giant's failure to address concerns about content related to the 2020 U.S. election.

Jessica Corbett ·


'Catastrophic and Irreparable Harm' to Wolves Averted as Wisconsin Judge Cancels Hunt

"We are heartened by this rare instance of reason and democracy prevailing in state wolf policy," said one conservation expert.

Brett Wilkins ·


West Virginia Constituents Decry 'Immorality' of Joe Manchin

"West Virginia has been locked into an economy that forces workers into low-wage jobs with no hope for advancement, and after decades of this our hope is dwindling," said one West Virginian. "The cuts that Sen. Manchin has negotiated into the agenda hurt our state."

Julia Conley ·


'Texans Deserved Better Than This': Supreme Court Leaves Abortion Ban in Place

The nation's high court set a date to hear a pair of legal challenges to the "horrific" restrictions.

Jessica Corbett ·


'Like It Never Happened': Federal Judge Tosses Trump Attack on Clean Water Rule

Denying a Biden administration request to temporarily retain the rule, the judge reestablished "the careful balance of state and federal power to protect clean water that Congress intended when it wrote the Clean Water Act."

Brett Wilkins ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo