Democratic Sens. Chris Murphy (Conn.) (L) and Tim Kaine (Va.) talk at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on June 18, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Caroline Brehman-Pool/Getty Images)
Feb 25, 2021
Two Democratic senators said Friday that the Biden administration must provide Congress with its legal justification for the retaliatory airstrikes it carried out Thursday in Syria allegedly targeting a site used by two Iranian-backed militia groups.
"The American people deserve to hear the administration's rationale for these strikes and its legal justification for acting without coming to Congress," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)--who last year put forth an ultimately vetoed War Powers resolution last year to prevent conflict in Iran without congressional approval--said in a statement.
"Offensive military action without congressional approval is not constitutional absent extraordinary circumstances. Congress must be fully briefed on this matter expeditiously," said Kaine.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) also expressed concern about the legal rational for the airstrikes.
While calling "strikes by Iranian-backed militias on bases in Iraq hosting U.S. troops... unacceptable," Murphy said that "retaliatory strikes, not necessary to prevent an imminent threat, must fall within the definition of an existing congressional authorization of military force."
The Connecticut Democrat added that "Congress should hold this administration to the same standard it did prior administrations, and require clear legal justifications for military action, especially inside theaters like Syria, where Congress has not explicitly authorized any American military action."
In the House, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)--who previously introduced legislation to prevent the Trump administration from rushing to war with Iran without congressional approval--framed the airstrikes within the context of the Democratic Party's political messaging.
"We ran on ending wars, not escalating conflicts in the Middle East," Khanna tweeted Friday.
"Our foreign policy needs to be rooted in diplomacy and the rule of law," he continued, "not retaliatory air strikes without Congressional authorization."
In an earlier tweet on Friday, Khanna said, "We need to work to extricate from the Middle East, not escalate."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Two Democratic senators said Friday that the Biden administration must provide Congress with its legal justification for the retaliatory airstrikes it carried out Thursday in Syria allegedly targeting a site used by two Iranian-backed militia groups.
"The American people deserve to hear the administration's rationale for these strikes and its legal justification for acting without coming to Congress," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)--who last year put forth an ultimately vetoed War Powers resolution last year to prevent conflict in Iran without congressional approval--said in a statement.
"Offensive military action without congressional approval is not constitutional absent extraordinary circumstances. Congress must be fully briefed on this matter expeditiously," said Kaine.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) also expressed concern about the legal rational for the airstrikes.
While calling "strikes by Iranian-backed militias on bases in Iraq hosting U.S. troops... unacceptable," Murphy said that "retaliatory strikes, not necessary to prevent an imminent threat, must fall within the definition of an existing congressional authorization of military force."
The Connecticut Democrat added that "Congress should hold this administration to the same standard it did prior administrations, and require clear legal justifications for military action, especially inside theaters like Syria, where Congress has not explicitly authorized any American military action."
In the House, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)--who previously introduced legislation to prevent the Trump administration from rushing to war with Iran without congressional approval--framed the airstrikes within the context of the Democratic Party's political messaging.
"We ran on ending wars, not escalating conflicts in the Middle East," Khanna tweeted Friday.
"Our foreign policy needs to be rooted in diplomacy and the rule of law," he continued, "not retaliatory air strikes without Congressional authorization."
In an earlier tweet on Friday, Khanna said, "We need to work to extricate from the Middle East, not escalate."
Two Democratic senators said Friday that the Biden administration must provide Congress with its legal justification for the retaliatory airstrikes it carried out Thursday in Syria allegedly targeting a site used by two Iranian-backed militia groups.
"The American people deserve to hear the administration's rationale for these strikes and its legal justification for acting without coming to Congress," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)--who last year put forth an ultimately vetoed War Powers resolution last year to prevent conflict in Iran without congressional approval--said in a statement.
"Offensive military action without congressional approval is not constitutional absent extraordinary circumstances. Congress must be fully briefed on this matter expeditiously," said Kaine.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) also expressed concern about the legal rational for the airstrikes.
While calling "strikes by Iranian-backed militias on bases in Iraq hosting U.S. troops... unacceptable," Murphy said that "retaliatory strikes, not necessary to prevent an imminent threat, must fall within the definition of an existing congressional authorization of military force."
The Connecticut Democrat added that "Congress should hold this administration to the same standard it did prior administrations, and require clear legal justifications for military action, especially inside theaters like Syria, where Congress has not explicitly authorized any American military action."
In the House, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)--who previously introduced legislation to prevent the Trump administration from rushing to war with Iran without congressional approval--framed the airstrikes within the context of the Democratic Party's political messaging.
"We ran on ending wars, not escalating conflicts in the Middle East," Khanna tweeted Friday.
"Our foreign policy needs to be rooted in diplomacy and the rule of law," he continued, "not retaliatory air strikes without Congressional authorization."
In an earlier tweet on Friday, Khanna said, "We need to work to extricate from the Middle East, not escalate."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.