

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) makes his way to a meeting on Tuesday, December 15, 2020. (Photo: Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Congressional leaders are reportedly planning to include another round of direct payments to struggling Americans as part of a $900 billion coronavirus relief agreement that could be finalized Wednesday, a development that comes after progressives ramped up their demand for additional stimulus checks as a necessary component of any deal.
"The Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
Citing multiple unnamed sources involved in the rapidly moving talks, Politico reported Wednesday that "congressional negotiators are on the brink of a coronavirus rescue package that would include a second round of direct payments, but would likely leave out state and local funding and a liability shield."
The size of the direct payments under consideration is not yet fully clear, but Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that negotiators are considering checks amounting to between $600 and $700 per person.
According to the Washington Post, "the addition of the stimulus checks is expected to come in part by reducing the amount of unemployment aid."
"Congressional leadership has told other lawmakers that they are planning on reducing the number of unemployment benefits by one month from the bipartisan plan," the Post reported. The plan is expected to include a $300-per-week federal boost to unemployment benefits.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has demanded one-time payments of $1,200 per working-class adult and $500 per child, while members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) have called for payments of at least $2,000.
In an appearance on MSNBC Wednesday, the Vermont senator applauded news that direct payments will likely be included in the final relief package. If the deal includes $600 per adult and $600 per child, Sanders noted, "that would be 2,400 bucks" for a working-class family of four.
"But we have got to do more," Sanders said. "We have got to do more because the working class of this country, frankly, is in worse shape economically than at any time since the Great Depression."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the New York Times he is "glad that leadership listened to Sen. Sanders and progressive colleagues."
"We now have the benchmark that any future Covid deal has to have direct payments," said Khanna. "While we obviously need more, $600 a person is a step in the right direction."
A $908 billion bipartisan package that has served as a starting point for the ongoing negotiations did not include direct payments, a form of relief that is overwhelmingly popular with the U.S. public.
"I will not vote for a Covid package that doesn't include survival payments and unemployment relief for the American people," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a CPC member, tweeted late Tuesday. "It's a red line. It's also common sense."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the newly elected chair of the CPC, said Tuesday that "the Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
The apparent breakthrough in long-stagnant coronavirus relief negotiations followed a pair of meetings Tuesday between Democratic and Republican congressional leaders, talks that came days before the government is set to shut down without passage of a sprawling year-end funding bill. Lawmakers are seeking to attach a Covid-19 relief package to the legislation, which must pass by Friday night.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Congressional leaders are reportedly planning to include another round of direct payments to struggling Americans as part of a $900 billion coronavirus relief agreement that could be finalized Wednesday, a development that comes after progressives ramped up their demand for additional stimulus checks as a necessary component of any deal.
"The Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
Citing multiple unnamed sources involved in the rapidly moving talks, Politico reported Wednesday that "congressional negotiators are on the brink of a coronavirus rescue package that would include a second round of direct payments, but would likely leave out state and local funding and a liability shield."
The size of the direct payments under consideration is not yet fully clear, but Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that negotiators are considering checks amounting to between $600 and $700 per person.
According to the Washington Post, "the addition of the stimulus checks is expected to come in part by reducing the amount of unemployment aid."
"Congressional leadership has told other lawmakers that they are planning on reducing the number of unemployment benefits by one month from the bipartisan plan," the Post reported. The plan is expected to include a $300-per-week federal boost to unemployment benefits.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has demanded one-time payments of $1,200 per working-class adult and $500 per child, while members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) have called for payments of at least $2,000.
In an appearance on MSNBC Wednesday, the Vermont senator applauded news that direct payments will likely be included in the final relief package. If the deal includes $600 per adult and $600 per child, Sanders noted, "that would be 2,400 bucks" for a working-class family of four.
"But we have got to do more," Sanders said. "We have got to do more because the working class of this country, frankly, is in worse shape economically than at any time since the Great Depression."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the New York Times he is "glad that leadership listened to Sen. Sanders and progressive colleagues."
"We now have the benchmark that any future Covid deal has to have direct payments," said Khanna. "While we obviously need more, $600 a person is a step in the right direction."
A $908 billion bipartisan package that has served as a starting point for the ongoing negotiations did not include direct payments, a form of relief that is overwhelmingly popular with the U.S. public.
"I will not vote for a Covid package that doesn't include survival payments and unemployment relief for the American people," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a CPC member, tweeted late Tuesday. "It's a red line. It's also common sense."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the newly elected chair of the CPC, said Tuesday that "the Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
The apparent breakthrough in long-stagnant coronavirus relief negotiations followed a pair of meetings Tuesday between Democratic and Republican congressional leaders, talks that came days before the government is set to shut down without passage of a sprawling year-end funding bill. Lawmakers are seeking to attach a Covid-19 relief package to the legislation, which must pass by Friday night.
Congressional leaders are reportedly planning to include another round of direct payments to struggling Americans as part of a $900 billion coronavirus relief agreement that could be finalized Wednesday, a development that comes after progressives ramped up their demand for additional stimulus checks as a necessary component of any deal.
"The Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
--Rep. Pramila Jayapal
Citing multiple unnamed sources involved in the rapidly moving talks, Politico reported Wednesday that "congressional negotiators are on the brink of a coronavirus rescue package that would include a second round of direct payments, but would likely leave out state and local funding and a liability shield."
The size of the direct payments under consideration is not yet fully clear, but Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that negotiators are considering checks amounting to between $600 and $700 per person.
According to the Washington Post, "the addition of the stimulus checks is expected to come in part by reducing the amount of unemployment aid."
"Congressional leadership has told other lawmakers that they are planning on reducing the number of unemployment benefits by one month from the bipartisan plan," the Post reported. The plan is expected to include a $300-per-week federal boost to unemployment benefits.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has demanded one-time payments of $1,200 per working-class adult and $500 per child, while members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) have called for payments of at least $2,000.
In an appearance on MSNBC Wednesday, the Vermont senator applauded news that direct payments will likely be included in the final relief package. If the deal includes $600 per adult and $600 per child, Sanders noted, "that would be 2,400 bucks" for a working-class family of four.
"But we have got to do more," Sanders said. "We have got to do more because the working class of this country, frankly, is in worse shape economically than at any time since the Great Depression."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the New York Times he is "glad that leadership listened to Sen. Sanders and progressive colleagues."
"We now have the benchmark that any future Covid deal has to have direct payments," said Khanna. "While we obviously need more, $600 a person is a step in the right direction."
A $908 billion bipartisan package that has served as a starting point for the ongoing negotiations did not include direct payments, a form of relief that is overwhelmingly popular with the U.S. public.
"I will not vote for a Covid package that doesn't include survival payments and unemployment relief for the American people," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a CPC member, tweeted late Tuesday. "It's a red line. It's also common sense."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the newly elected chair of the CPC, said Tuesday that "the Progressive Caucus is united in our position: any Covid relief package must include survival checks and enhanced unemployment assistance--the two most effective ways to put money directly in people's pockets."
The apparent breakthrough in long-stagnant coronavirus relief negotiations followed a pair of meetings Tuesday between Democratic and Republican congressional leaders, talks that came days before the government is set to shut down without passage of a sprawling year-end funding bill. Lawmakers are seeking to attach a Covid-19 relief package to the legislation, which must pass by Friday night.