Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Demonstrators voice their opposition to the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 17 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: John Lamparski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

'Prove Him Wrong': Progressives Demand Democrats Accept McConnell's Challenge, Expand Supreme Court If They Win Elections

"Mitch McConnell doesn't think we can fight back to save our courts. He's wrong. The first step is winning in November." 

Julia Conley

Progressive advocates on Monday demanded that the Democratic Party prove Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wrong about their commitment to ensuring the public's interests are represented by the judicial branch, after the Republican leader all but dared his colleagues to reshape the U.S. Supreme Court should the Democrats win the White House and Senate on Nov. 3. 

"McConnell is setting up decades of minority rule by white conservatives and betting that Democrats won't take the bold steps necessary to counter him. It's up to Democrats not just to win, but use their power to prove him wrong."
—Adam Jentleson, Democracy Forward

McConnell said on the Senate floor Sunday that he is pushing through Judge Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation because, regardless of the outcome of the elections, a 6-3 right-wing majority on the court could shape the U.S. in Republicans' favor for generations to come.

"McConnell is clearly betting against the Democrats mustering the resolve to ever alter the structure of the court," Demand Justice co-founder Brian Fallon told NBC News Monday. "Given how far the movement to add seats has already come in just two years, and how likely it is for this 6-3 court to produce rulings threatening progressive priorities, I think it's an unwise bet."

On the Senate floor, McConnell said that while Democrats will be able to undo many of the GOP's so-called "important contributions" from the last four years—including the party's prioritization of corporate interests over struggling families and small businesses during the coronavirus pandemic; its passage of President Donald Trump's tax cuts, which disproportionately benefited the rich; and its refusal to take up legislation passed by the House such as a bill to lower prescription drug prices last year—"they won't be able to do much about [Barrett's confirmation] for a long time to come."

"Challenge accepted," tweeted Fallon's organization in response to McConnell.

McConnell's confidence that Democrats will not consider packing the courts—increasing the number of justices from nine, which was originally proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who wanted to push older judges to step down by adding a new justice to the high court for every sitting justice who refused to retire after age 70—may stem from Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's refusal to seriously consider the measure should he win the election. 

Biden said last week after facing numerous questions about the issue that he would "put together a national...bipartisan commission of scholars, constitutional scholars, Democrats, Republicans, liberal, conservative" to study the issue of court reform. 

"I will ask them to over 180 days come back to me with recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it's getting out of whack," Biden told Norah O'Donnell on "60 Minutes." 

Biden's comments were met with disdain and frustration by Fallon, who called the former vice president's proposal "a punt."

Demand Justice and other proponents argue that adding justices to the Supreme Court is far from a radical proposal.

"Adding seats is straight-forward and easy," the group's website reads. "The number of justices is not set in the Constitution, so Congress can change it at any time. It has done so seven times throughout American history."

Adam Jentleson of Democracy Forward told NBC that the Republican Party's aim of stacking the high court with right-wing judges like Barrett and Trump-nominated Justice Brett Kavanaugh—who are at odds with the majority of Americans on issues like reproductive rights and the climate crisis—is far more radical than court restructuring. 

"McConnell is setting up decades of minority rule by white conservatives and betting that Democrats won't take the bold steps necessary to counter him," Jentleson told NBC. "It's up to Democrats not just to win, but use their power to prove him wrong."

In the House, progressive Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) have said in recent days that their Senate colleagues must not shy away from court expansion, particularly after Republicans in recent years have taken control of so much of the judiciary. 

Some centrist Democratic senators have indicated in recent days that they are open to the possibility of court packing, giving some hope to groups including Demand Justice. 

"I don't want to pack the court. I don't want to change that number," said Sen. Angus King (I-Maine). "I don't want to have to do that. But if all of this rule breaking is taking place, what does the majority expect? What do they expect?"

The senator elaborated on CNN Monday.

"The Republicans who are clutching their pearls now about, 'Oh no, don't talk about packing the courts'—in three states...over the last three or four years, the Republicans have packed their courts," King told Alyson Camerota. 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told the press last week that "everything is on the table" should the Democrats take the White House and the Senate next month, while Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) told CNN earlier this month that he is "open" to expanding the Supreme Court.  

Progressive Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) was more definitive on Monday, tweeting, "We must expand the Supreme Court."

"Mitch McConnell doesn't think we can fight back to save our courts," tweeted progressive advocacy group Indivisible. "He's wrong. The first step is winning in November." 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

As Other States Try to Copy Texas, SCOTUS Asked to Find Abortion Ban Unconstitutional

The request from healthcare providers comes after a Florida Republican filed a copycat bill and advocacy groups called on Congress to affirm the right to abortion nationwide.

Jessica Corbett ·

As Bids to Slash Pentagon Budget Fail, US Military Spending Slammed as 'Height of Absurdity'

"Spending $780 billion on weapons and war while our communities starve, while the climate crisis worsens, while a pandemic that has killed millions and affected countless more rages on, is a national shame."

Brett Wilkins ·

'This Is Big': House Passes Amendment to Cut US Complicity in Saudi Bombing of Yemen

The vote, said Rep. Ro Khanna, "sent a clear message to the Saudis: end the bombing in Yemen and lift the blockade."

Andrea Germanos ·

Praised for 'Braving the Smears,' Tlaib Votes Against $1 Billion in Military Aid to Israel

One rights group thanked Tlaib "for speaking truth to power" while being attacked "for simply insisting that Palestinians are human beings who deserve safety, security, and freedom from Israeli apartheid."

Brett Wilkins ·

'A Choice Point for Humanity': Women Demand Visionary Shift at UN Climate Talks

"This is the time to unite together to build the healthy and just future we know is possible for each other and the Earth."

Julia Conley ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo