Oct 01, 2020
As millions of Americans receive publicly-funded food aid boxes during the Covid-19 pandemic, one particular item is leaving a bad taste in many mouths--a self-promoting letter from President Donald Trump.
Common Dreamsreported early last month that the Trump administration was set to include mandatory letters from the president in packages distributed as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Farmers to Families Food Box program, a $4 billion effort to send 100 million food boxes to needy U.S. families affected by the pandemic.
"It sure looks like political propaganda, and if its goal was to affect the presidential election, then it violates the Hatch Act."
--Kathleen Clark, Washington University
The move was slammed by Democrats as cynical election year self-aggrandizement--and hypocritical, given the administration's efforts to deprive millions of Americans of crucial food benefits.
More importantly, the letters seen by legal experts as a violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits executive branch employees from using their official capacities to influence elections.
In a letter (pdf) last month to Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, 49 House Democrats asserted that "a public health crisis is not an opportunity for the administration to promote its own political interests," and that "a federal food assistance program should not be used as a tool for the president to exploit taxpayer dollars for his reelection campaign."
Now those food aid boxes are shipping out across the country, as the Chicago Tribunereported Wednesday, and some food pantries are removing the Trump letter before distributing them to families in need.
\u201cBarf: Trump\u2019s Agriculture Department began mandating that millions of boxes of surplus food for needy families include a letter from President Trump claiming credit... \n\nMillions paid more than your puny $750 in taxes. Can we get our names on instead? \nhttps://t.co/PsQkUyEOOu\u201d— Eric Feigl-Ding (@Eric Feigl-Ding) 1601554125
"It is quite unethical and a misuse of government funds," Dr. Evelyn Figueroa, executive director of the Pilsen Food Pantry, told the Tribune. Figueroa said the pantry plans to remove the letter from the 200 boxes it was expecting to receive.
"I find it highly offensive that we have a letter in here that doesn't add any value and to me it seems very self-promoting," Figueroa added.
Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America, a nationwide nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, called the letter "absolutely outrageous."
"It essentially blackmails nonpartisan food charities into aiding Trump's reelection campaign by threatening more Americans to go hungry if these food boxes are not distributed," Berg said in a statement. "This move by the Trump administration is illegal and immoral."
Lisa Hamler-Fugitt, executive director of the Ohio Association of Food Banks, toldPolitico that in her 30 years of food aid work, she's "never seen something this egregious."
For its part, the USDA insists that "politics has played zero role" in the food box program.
In the letter, Trump claims that "safeguarding the health and well-being of our citizens is one of my highest priorities," and that he "prioritized sending nutritious food from our farmers to families in need throughout America."
\u201cDemocrats say the letter violates the law against using government resources to campaign. It\u2019s just the latest example of President Trump using his office to boost his reelection hopes. https://t.co/uPznEoTZ2C\u201d— ProPublica (@ProPublica) 1601116669
However, critics note that the administration has repeatedly moved to slash spending on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Affordable Care Act, and other critical social services desperately needed by the nation's most vulnerable people, especially during the ongoing pandemic--even as Trump and Republicans dramatically reduced taxes on corporations and the wealthy and boosted military spending to near-record levels.
Given the incongruity between this reality and Trump's letter claim about "safeguarding health and well-being," many observers have concluded the president is waging a taxpayer-funded public relations campaign just as the American people begin to render their verdict on his presidency via the ballot box.
"It sure looks like political propaganda, and if its goal was to affect the presidential election, then it violates the Hatch Act," Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, told the Tribune.
While many families are undoubtedly grateful for the much-needed assistance, some recipients of the letter-laden boxes are outraged--and even afraid to the point that they refused the food.
Olga Perez, a South Florida volunteer who delivers the boxes to families without transportation, told the Palm Beach Post that people are angry "because they felt the box and food were being politicized," and that "some were scared that the government was going to take repercussions or would find out where they live."
Perez, who said five families told her they would not accept delivery of the boxes, added that she was "so mad because [Trump] was using people he needs to win this election and win the Hispanic vote."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.