SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
About six million people signed up for the SNAP program in the first three months of the coronavirus pandemic, an unprecedented expansion of the program. (Photo: Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
Despite Surging Need Amid Pandemic, GOP Moves to Roll Back SNAP When Food Assistance 'Matters Now More Than Ever'
"SNAP delivered. Like it always does."
Jul 20, 2020
Pointing to the success of the SNAP food assistance program during the coronavirus pandemic, economists on Monday said Republicans' plan to end the expansion of the aid would be "unconscionable."
As the New York Times reported, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program saw an unprecedented growth in demand as the coronavirus outbreak began, with 17% more Americans, or six million people, relying on the program in the first three months of the pandemic.
At least 41 states saw an increase in the use of SNAP, which was expanded to allow people to use the benefits with fewer restrictions. Thirty states experienced double-digit growth, with more people relying on food aid across suburbs, urban areas, and rural towns.
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help."
--Stacy Dean, CBPP
The expansion came after Congress passed legislation in March allowing all recipients to use the maximum aid allowed for their household size--permitting a household of three people to use $509 per month to buy groceries.
States were also temporarily able to enroll people without conducting interviews and to suspend reviews of existing applicants, but the suspension of those reviews has since ended.
People who have relied on the program in recent months told the Times that it had immensely helped their family's physical and psychological well-being during a time of uncertainty and rising food insecurity. Unlike the $600 per week boost in unemployment benefits that passed as part of the CARES Act in March, SNAP recipients did not face lengthy delays in accessing the benefits.
"It was the first safety net, because that's what I could count on," MaKayela Johnson, who was furloughed from her job at a medical office in Kentucky, told the Times.
"SNAP delivered," tweeted TalkPoverty.org, an anti-poverty project of the Center for American Progress. "Like it always does."
The Times report comes a month after two studies separately concluded that the $600 unemployment benefits combined with the $1,200 direct payment sent to some Americans significantly reduced poverty levels in the U.S. in the first months of the pandemic.
Despite the success of both programs, Republicans want to end their expansion at the end of this month. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said this week that the SNAP program should be expanded further, with the maximum benefit increased. Democrats in Congress have called for a 15% increase due to skyrocketing food prices.
"SNAP goes a long way towards alleviating hunger but doesn't eliminate it because the benefits aren't high enough," Dottie Rosenbaum of the CBPP told the Times. "Omitting a boost in SNAP benefits would be an unconscionable failure."
President Donald Trump has spent considerable time during his term pushing to impose work requirements and narrow eligibility criteria for the program, and Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue planned to implement the work rules on April 1, two weeks after the pandemic was declared a national emergency, before a federal judge blocked him from doing so.
Last week, the CBPP explained a number of reasons, beyond elevated food prices, that SNAP must be expanded as the pandemic and its effects on the economy persist.
Many of the poorest households didn't receive any benefit from the SNAP expansion, as they were already receiving the maximum benefit, explained Brynne Keith-Jennings, senior research analyst for the think tank.
"Low-income households generally experience the harshest impacts of economic downturns, and it often takes longer for the benefits of the recovery to reach them," Keith-Jennings wrote. "Extending SNAP relief as long as the economy remains weak will help families put food on the table while their income remains low."
On Twitter Monday, CBPP's vice president for food assistance policy, Stacy Dean, wrote that "SNAP matters now more than ever."
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help," Dean added. "An increase would help continue to reduce poverty and lessen the rise in food insecurity."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Pointing to the success of the SNAP food assistance program during the coronavirus pandemic, economists on Monday said Republicans' plan to end the expansion of the aid would be "unconscionable."
As the New York Times reported, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program saw an unprecedented growth in demand as the coronavirus outbreak began, with 17% more Americans, or six million people, relying on the program in the first three months of the pandemic.
At least 41 states saw an increase in the use of SNAP, which was expanded to allow people to use the benefits with fewer restrictions. Thirty states experienced double-digit growth, with more people relying on food aid across suburbs, urban areas, and rural towns.
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help."
--Stacy Dean, CBPP
The expansion came after Congress passed legislation in March allowing all recipients to use the maximum aid allowed for their household size--permitting a household of three people to use $509 per month to buy groceries.
States were also temporarily able to enroll people without conducting interviews and to suspend reviews of existing applicants, but the suspension of those reviews has since ended.
People who have relied on the program in recent months told the Times that it had immensely helped their family's physical and psychological well-being during a time of uncertainty and rising food insecurity. Unlike the $600 per week boost in unemployment benefits that passed as part of the CARES Act in March, SNAP recipients did not face lengthy delays in accessing the benefits.
"It was the first safety net, because that's what I could count on," MaKayela Johnson, who was furloughed from her job at a medical office in Kentucky, told the Times.
"SNAP delivered," tweeted TalkPoverty.org, an anti-poverty project of the Center for American Progress. "Like it always does."
The Times report comes a month after two studies separately concluded that the $600 unemployment benefits combined with the $1,200 direct payment sent to some Americans significantly reduced poverty levels in the U.S. in the first months of the pandemic.
Despite the success of both programs, Republicans want to end their expansion at the end of this month. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said this week that the SNAP program should be expanded further, with the maximum benefit increased. Democrats in Congress have called for a 15% increase due to skyrocketing food prices.
"SNAP goes a long way towards alleviating hunger but doesn't eliminate it because the benefits aren't high enough," Dottie Rosenbaum of the CBPP told the Times. "Omitting a boost in SNAP benefits would be an unconscionable failure."
President Donald Trump has spent considerable time during his term pushing to impose work requirements and narrow eligibility criteria for the program, and Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue planned to implement the work rules on April 1, two weeks after the pandemic was declared a national emergency, before a federal judge blocked him from doing so.
Last week, the CBPP explained a number of reasons, beyond elevated food prices, that SNAP must be expanded as the pandemic and its effects on the economy persist.
Many of the poorest households didn't receive any benefit from the SNAP expansion, as they were already receiving the maximum benefit, explained Brynne Keith-Jennings, senior research analyst for the think tank.
"Low-income households generally experience the harshest impacts of economic downturns, and it often takes longer for the benefits of the recovery to reach them," Keith-Jennings wrote. "Extending SNAP relief as long as the economy remains weak will help families put food on the table while their income remains low."
On Twitter Monday, CBPP's vice president for food assistance policy, Stacy Dean, wrote that "SNAP matters now more than ever."
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help," Dean added. "An increase would help continue to reduce poverty and lessen the rise in food insecurity."
Pointing to the success of the SNAP food assistance program during the coronavirus pandemic, economists on Monday said Republicans' plan to end the expansion of the aid would be "unconscionable."
As the New York Times reported, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program saw an unprecedented growth in demand as the coronavirus outbreak began, with 17% more Americans, or six million people, relying on the program in the first three months of the pandemic.
At least 41 states saw an increase in the use of SNAP, which was expanded to allow people to use the benefits with fewer restrictions. Thirty states experienced double-digit growth, with more people relying on food aid across suburbs, urban areas, and rural towns.
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help."
--Stacy Dean, CBPP
The expansion came after Congress passed legislation in March allowing all recipients to use the maximum aid allowed for their household size--permitting a household of three people to use $509 per month to buy groceries.
States were also temporarily able to enroll people without conducting interviews and to suspend reviews of existing applicants, but the suspension of those reviews has since ended.
People who have relied on the program in recent months told the Times that it had immensely helped their family's physical and psychological well-being during a time of uncertainty and rising food insecurity. Unlike the $600 per week boost in unemployment benefits that passed as part of the CARES Act in March, SNAP recipients did not face lengthy delays in accessing the benefits.
"It was the first safety net, because that's what I could count on," MaKayela Johnson, who was furloughed from her job at a medical office in Kentucky, told the Times.
"SNAP delivered," tweeted TalkPoverty.org, an anti-poverty project of the Center for American Progress. "Like it always does."
The Times report comes a month after two studies separately concluded that the $600 unemployment benefits combined with the $1,200 direct payment sent to some Americans significantly reduced poverty levels in the U.S. in the first months of the pandemic.
Despite the success of both programs, Republicans want to end their expansion at the end of this month. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said this week that the SNAP program should be expanded further, with the maximum benefit increased. Democrats in Congress have called for a 15% increase due to skyrocketing food prices.
"SNAP goes a long way towards alleviating hunger but doesn't eliminate it because the benefits aren't high enough," Dottie Rosenbaum of the CBPP told the Times. "Omitting a boost in SNAP benefits would be an unconscionable failure."
President Donald Trump has spent considerable time during his term pushing to impose work requirements and narrow eligibility criteria for the program, and Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue planned to implement the work rules on April 1, two weeks after the pandemic was declared a national emergency, before a federal judge blocked him from doing so.
Last week, the CBPP explained a number of reasons, beyond elevated food prices, that SNAP must be expanded as the pandemic and its effects on the economy persist.
Many of the poorest households didn't receive any benefit from the SNAP expansion, as they were already receiving the maximum benefit, explained Brynne Keith-Jennings, senior research analyst for the think tank.
"Low-income households generally experience the harshest impacts of economic downturns, and it often takes longer for the benefits of the recovery to reach them," Keith-Jennings wrote. "Extending SNAP relief as long as the economy remains weak will help families put food on the table while their income remains low."
On Twitter Monday, CBPP's vice president for food assistance policy, Stacy Dean, wrote that "SNAP matters now more than ever."
"We can do more to address hardship. SNAP is a powerful platform that can help," Dean added. "An increase would help continue to reduce poverty and lessen the rise in food insecurity."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy