Hundreds of unemployed Kentucky residents wait in long lines outside the Kentucky Career Center for help with their unemployment claims on June 19, 2020 in Frankfort. (Photo: John Sommers II/Getty Images)
Bolstering Case for Extending Unemployment Relief--and Higher Wages Overall--Study Shows Recipients Spent More During Pandemic
"Shocker: Working people spend money when they have it."
A new study published Thursday reveals that the federal government's unemployment boost of $600 a week for Americans who lost their jobs due to the coronavirus pandemic helped reduce the nation's economic crash, making the case for extending the benefit as mass joblessness persists.
According to the study, the extra boost in benefits allowed households to spend 10% more on average compared to pre-crisis levels, a stinging condemnation of persistent low wages in the country and proof that the benefit is having it intended stimulative effect.
As Reuters reported, Thursday's study from the JPMorgan Chase Institute tracked spending from the onset of the pandemic in March through May:
Researchers analyzed transactions for 61,000 households that received unemployment benefits between March and May. Spending dropped for all households as the virus spread and led to business shutdowns, but then rose when households began receiving jobless benefits, the study found.
That contrasts with a typical recession, when households receiving unemployment benefits usually cut spending by 7% because regular jobless benefits amount to only a fraction of a person's prior earnings, the research found.
The increase in spending likely kept the economy afloat, researchers concluded, making the impending loss of the supplement at the end of July a ticking time bomb of financial disaster.
"Our estimates suggest that expiration will result in large spending cuts, with potentially negative effects on both households and macroeconomic activity," the researchers wrote.
The effects of the unemployment stimulus are being felt in retail as well, Bloomberg reported Thursday, which exceeded expectations.
According to Bloomberg:
The value of retail purchases increased 7.5% from the prior month after an upwardly revised record 18.2% surge in May, according to Commerce Department data out Thursday. The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 5% gain for June.
But those gains are in danger if the unemployment benefit supplement runs out, Lydia Boussour and Gregory Daco, financial analysts with Oxford Economics, told Bloomberg.
"While today's report gives the illusion of a fearless consumer spending lavishly, the reality is more sobering: consumers are increasingly fearful amid new spikes in Covid-19 cases and a looming fiscal cliff," said Boussour and Daco.
Economic justice advocates also argued in favor of extending the benefit Thursday as unemployment numbers were released (pdf) showing the economic crisis is continuing with what the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) reported as another 2.4 million newly jobless people applying for aid when adjusted for both seasonal employment and the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.
EPI senior economist and director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday that the nature of the employment crisis means aid is essential for keeping the economy from total disaster.
"There are 14 million more unemployed workers than job openings, meaning millions will remain jobless no matter what they do," Shierholz wrote. "Cutting off the $600 cannot incentivize people to get jobs that aren't there."
"The millions who will remain jobless after the extra $600 is cut off will have no choice but to drastically cut their spending, causing a sharp decline in their living standards, an increase in poverty, and completely unnecessary suffering," she added.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A new study published Thursday reveals that the federal government's unemployment boost of $600 a week for Americans who lost their jobs due to the coronavirus pandemic helped reduce the nation's economic crash, making the case for extending the benefit as mass joblessness persists.
According to the study, the extra boost in benefits allowed households to spend 10% more on average compared to pre-crisis levels, a stinging condemnation of persistent low wages in the country and proof that the benefit is having it intended stimulative effect.
As Reuters reported, Thursday's study from the JPMorgan Chase Institute tracked spending from the onset of the pandemic in March through May:
Researchers analyzed transactions for 61,000 households that received unemployment benefits between March and May. Spending dropped for all households as the virus spread and led to business shutdowns, but then rose when households began receiving jobless benefits, the study found.
That contrasts with a typical recession, when households receiving unemployment benefits usually cut spending by 7% because regular jobless benefits amount to only a fraction of a person's prior earnings, the research found.
The increase in spending likely kept the economy afloat, researchers concluded, making the impending loss of the supplement at the end of July a ticking time bomb of financial disaster.
"Our estimates suggest that expiration will result in large spending cuts, with potentially negative effects on both households and macroeconomic activity," the researchers wrote.
The effects of the unemployment stimulus are being felt in retail as well, Bloomberg reported Thursday, which exceeded expectations.
According to Bloomberg:
The value of retail purchases increased 7.5% from the prior month after an upwardly revised record 18.2% surge in May, according to Commerce Department data out Thursday. The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 5% gain for June.
But those gains are in danger if the unemployment benefit supplement runs out, Lydia Boussour and Gregory Daco, financial analysts with Oxford Economics, told Bloomberg.
"While today's report gives the illusion of a fearless consumer spending lavishly, the reality is more sobering: consumers are increasingly fearful amid new spikes in Covid-19 cases and a looming fiscal cliff," said Boussour and Daco.
Economic justice advocates also argued in favor of extending the benefit Thursday as unemployment numbers were released (pdf) showing the economic crisis is continuing with what the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) reported as another 2.4 million newly jobless people applying for aid when adjusted for both seasonal employment and the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.
EPI senior economist and director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday that the nature of the employment crisis means aid is essential for keeping the economy from total disaster.
"There are 14 million more unemployed workers than job openings, meaning millions will remain jobless no matter what they do," Shierholz wrote. "Cutting off the $600 cannot incentivize people to get jobs that aren't there."
"The millions who will remain jobless after the extra $600 is cut off will have no choice but to drastically cut their spending, causing a sharp decline in their living standards, an increase in poverty, and completely unnecessary suffering," she added.
A new study published Thursday reveals that the federal government's unemployment boost of $600 a week for Americans who lost their jobs due to the coronavirus pandemic helped reduce the nation's economic crash, making the case for extending the benefit as mass joblessness persists.
According to the study, the extra boost in benefits allowed households to spend 10% more on average compared to pre-crisis levels, a stinging condemnation of persistent low wages in the country and proof that the benefit is having it intended stimulative effect.
As Reuters reported, Thursday's study from the JPMorgan Chase Institute tracked spending from the onset of the pandemic in March through May:
Researchers analyzed transactions for 61,000 households that received unemployment benefits between March and May. Spending dropped for all households as the virus spread and led to business shutdowns, but then rose when households began receiving jobless benefits, the study found.
That contrasts with a typical recession, when households receiving unemployment benefits usually cut spending by 7% because regular jobless benefits amount to only a fraction of a person's prior earnings, the research found.
The increase in spending likely kept the economy afloat, researchers concluded, making the impending loss of the supplement at the end of July a ticking time bomb of financial disaster.
"Our estimates suggest that expiration will result in large spending cuts, with potentially negative effects on both households and macroeconomic activity," the researchers wrote.
The effects of the unemployment stimulus are being felt in retail as well, Bloomberg reported Thursday, which exceeded expectations.
According to Bloomberg:
The value of retail purchases increased 7.5% from the prior month after an upwardly revised record 18.2% surge in May, according to Commerce Department data out Thursday. The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 5% gain for June.
But those gains are in danger if the unemployment benefit supplement runs out, Lydia Boussour and Gregory Daco, financial analysts with Oxford Economics, told Bloomberg.
"While today's report gives the illusion of a fearless consumer spending lavishly, the reality is more sobering: consumers are increasingly fearful amid new spikes in Covid-19 cases and a looming fiscal cliff," said Boussour and Daco.
Economic justice advocates also argued in favor of extending the benefit Thursday as unemployment numbers were released (pdf) showing the economic crisis is continuing with what the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) reported as another 2.4 million newly jobless people applying for aid when adjusted for both seasonal employment and the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.
EPI senior economist and director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday that the nature of the employment crisis means aid is essential for keeping the economy from total disaster.
"There are 14 million more unemployed workers than job openings, meaning millions will remain jobless no matter what they do," Shierholz wrote. "Cutting off the $600 cannot incentivize people to get jobs that aren't there."
"The millions who will remain jobless after the extra $600 is cut off will have no choice but to drastically cut their spending, causing a sharp decline in their living standards, an increase in poverty, and completely unnecessary suffering," she added.