Cesar, 35, an asylum seeker from Nicaragua, waits with his wife, Carolina, 25, (Right) and his eight-year-old son Donovan as a U.S. Customs and Border agent looks on on April 6, 2020 at the Paso del Norte International Bridge in Ciudad Juarez in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. (Photo: Paul Ratje/Agence France-Presse/AFP via Getty Images)
Trump Proposes Changes to Asylum Rules That Stand to 'Practically Write the Refugee Definition Out of Existence'
"The Trump administration is doubling down on a xenophobic, anti-immigrant agenda while the president is fueling violence against Black and Brown people in our country with his racist, white supremacist rhetoric."
Human rights experts sharply criticized a new proposal from the Trump administration that would dramatically narrow qualifications for migrants filing for asylum.
"These proposed changes would represent the end of the asylum system as we know it," said the American Immigration Council.
The Justice Department unveiled the changes Wednesday, saying that the rule would be published in the Federal Register "in the near future."
"While a rash of recent policies has gutted the process of seeking asylum, this new rule is the Trump administration's most dramatic attempt yet to redefine who qualifies for this vital protection," Charanya Krishnaswami, advocacy director for the Americas at Amnesty International USA, said in a statement Wednesday. "Even after the current asylum ban implemented under the guise of fighting the COVID-19 pandemic is lifted, the dozens of new changes these regulations make to asylum laws, which practically write the refugee definition out of existence, will be profound and potentially long-lasting."
CNN reported on the new provisions, noting, "Under one proposed change, an individual's asylum claim could face greater scrutiny if the person traveled through at least one country while on the way to the U.S. but didn't seek refuge there." The new rule would also include living unlawfully in the U.S. for more than one year before filing for asylum a "significant adverse factor" and would change what constitutes membership of a "particular social group" that qualifies for a favorable asylum ruling, the outlet reported.
NBC News added, "The new rule would allow immigration judges to throw out an asylum seeker's case if they think there are flaws in the application."
Further, as Axios noted, "The proposal would enable lower-level asylum officers to rule if an application was 'frivolous,' therefore denying the applicant protections in the U.S., a power that currently only resides with the DOJ's Board of Immigration Appeals and immigration judges."
The Justice Department framed the changes as allowing for "more efficient procedures"--but Amnesty's Krishnaswami says the goal is something different.
"The Trump administration's intent is clear: it is designing a regime in which the vast majority of people seeking safety--from survivors of gender-based persecution and torture to people fleeing levels of violence seen only in war zones--will never be able to access it."
"The Trump administration is doubling down on a xenophobic, anti-immigrant agenda while the president is fueling violence against Black and Brown people in our country with his racist, white supremacist rhetoric," she continued. "It's time for policies that embrace the humanity and fundamental human rights of all."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Human rights experts sharply criticized a new proposal from the Trump administration that would dramatically narrow qualifications for migrants filing for asylum.
"These proposed changes would represent the end of the asylum system as we know it," said the American Immigration Council.
The Justice Department unveiled the changes Wednesday, saying that the rule would be published in the Federal Register "in the near future."
"While a rash of recent policies has gutted the process of seeking asylum, this new rule is the Trump administration's most dramatic attempt yet to redefine who qualifies for this vital protection," Charanya Krishnaswami, advocacy director for the Americas at Amnesty International USA, said in a statement Wednesday. "Even after the current asylum ban implemented under the guise of fighting the COVID-19 pandemic is lifted, the dozens of new changes these regulations make to asylum laws, which practically write the refugee definition out of existence, will be profound and potentially long-lasting."
CNN reported on the new provisions, noting, "Under one proposed change, an individual's asylum claim could face greater scrutiny if the person traveled through at least one country while on the way to the U.S. but didn't seek refuge there." The new rule would also include living unlawfully in the U.S. for more than one year before filing for asylum a "significant adverse factor" and would change what constitutes membership of a "particular social group" that qualifies for a favorable asylum ruling, the outlet reported.
NBC News added, "The new rule would allow immigration judges to throw out an asylum seeker's case if they think there are flaws in the application."
Further, as Axios noted, "The proposal would enable lower-level asylum officers to rule if an application was 'frivolous,' therefore denying the applicant protections in the U.S., a power that currently only resides with the DOJ's Board of Immigration Appeals and immigration judges."
The Justice Department framed the changes as allowing for "more efficient procedures"--but Amnesty's Krishnaswami says the goal is something different.
"The Trump administration's intent is clear: it is designing a regime in which the vast majority of people seeking safety--from survivors of gender-based persecution and torture to people fleeing levels of violence seen only in war zones--will never be able to access it."
"The Trump administration is doubling down on a xenophobic, anti-immigrant agenda while the president is fueling violence against Black and Brown people in our country with his racist, white supremacist rhetoric," she continued. "It's time for policies that embrace the humanity and fundamental human rights of all."
Human rights experts sharply criticized a new proposal from the Trump administration that would dramatically narrow qualifications for migrants filing for asylum.
"These proposed changes would represent the end of the asylum system as we know it," said the American Immigration Council.
The Justice Department unveiled the changes Wednesday, saying that the rule would be published in the Federal Register "in the near future."
"While a rash of recent policies has gutted the process of seeking asylum, this new rule is the Trump administration's most dramatic attempt yet to redefine who qualifies for this vital protection," Charanya Krishnaswami, advocacy director for the Americas at Amnesty International USA, said in a statement Wednesday. "Even after the current asylum ban implemented under the guise of fighting the COVID-19 pandemic is lifted, the dozens of new changes these regulations make to asylum laws, which practically write the refugee definition out of existence, will be profound and potentially long-lasting."
CNN reported on the new provisions, noting, "Under one proposed change, an individual's asylum claim could face greater scrutiny if the person traveled through at least one country while on the way to the U.S. but didn't seek refuge there." The new rule would also include living unlawfully in the U.S. for more than one year before filing for asylum a "significant adverse factor" and would change what constitutes membership of a "particular social group" that qualifies for a favorable asylum ruling, the outlet reported.
NBC News added, "The new rule would allow immigration judges to throw out an asylum seeker's case if they think there are flaws in the application."
Further, as Axios noted, "The proposal would enable lower-level asylum officers to rule if an application was 'frivolous,' therefore denying the applicant protections in the U.S., a power that currently only resides with the DOJ's Board of Immigration Appeals and immigration judges."
The Justice Department framed the changes as allowing for "more efficient procedures"--but Amnesty's Krishnaswami says the goal is something different.
"The Trump administration's intent is clear: it is designing a regime in which the vast majority of people seeking safety--from survivors of gender-based persecution and torture to people fleeing levels of violence seen only in war zones--will never be able to access it."
"The Trump administration is doubling down on a xenophobic, anti-immigrant agenda while the president is fueling violence against Black and Brown people in our country with his racist, white supremacist rhetoric," she continued. "It's time for policies that embrace the humanity and fundamental human rights of all."