Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos last week released new rules for how schools should handle sexual harassment and assault allegations.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos last week released new rules for how schools should handle sexual harassment and assault allegations. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)

DeVos Sued Over New Title IX Rules That Make It 'Easier for Schools to Sweep Sexual Violence Under the Rug'

"Betsy DeVos and the Trump administration have shown, once again, that they have no interest in supporting student survivors and their rights."

Jessica Corbett

The ACLU on Thursday filed suit to block provisions of the Department of Education's controversial new rules set to take effect in August governing how all U.S. schools, including higher education institutions, must handle sexual harassment and assault allegations involving students.

"In a reprehensible move that puts students at risk, the new rule gives schools more leeway to ignore their Title IX responsibilities."
—Joel Levin, Stop Sexual Assault in Schools

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos unveiled the rules last week to replace an Obama-era guidance she suspended in September 2017. The ACLU's complaint, filed with the U.S. District Court in Maryland, names the Education Department, DeVos, and Kenneth Marcus, assistant secretary for civil rights at the federal agency, as defendants.

Critics have warned that the new policy for Title IX—the U.S. law that bars sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding—will silence student survivors and limit their educational opportunities, and have vowed to fight against it.

In this federal lawsuit, the ACLU and the firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP are representing four organizations that help student survivors of sexual misconduct continue their education: Know Your IX, the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Girls for Gender Equity, and Stop Sexual Assault in Schools.

"Betsy DeVos has created a double standard that is devastating for survivors of sexual harassment and assault, who are overwhelmingly women and girls," Ria Tabacco Mar, director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, said in a statement. "We are suing to make sure this double standard never takes effect."

"Betsy DeVos and the Trump administration have shown, once again, that they have no interest in supporting student survivors and their rights," declared Sage Carson, manager of Know Your IX, a project of Advocates for Youth. The new Title IX policy, Carson warned, "makes it harder for survivors to report sexual violence and easier for schools to sweep sexual violence under the rug."

Stop Sexual Assault in Schools co-founder Joel Levin echoed Carson's criticism. "In a reprehensible move that puts students at risk, the new rule gives schools more leeway to ignore their Title IX responsibilities," he said.

The complaint raises alarm about five "unlawful" provisions from the department's policy, which is detailed in over 2,000 pages:

  • Redefining sexual harassment to exclude many instances of misconduct that currently fall within the agency's definition, and that continue to fall under the agency's definition of harassment based on race, national origin, and disability;
  • Directing schools to ignore many Title IX reports of sexual assault that occur off campus/school grounds, including in off-campus housing or during study abroad, regardless of the effect they have on-campus and on survivors' educations;
  • Relieving colleges and universities of the obligation to address sexual harassment unless reports of sexual harassment are made to a limited number of school officials, while requiring those same officials to respond to all harassment on the basis of race, national origin, or disability of which they knew or should have known;
  • Permitting, and in some cases requiring, schools to apply a higher standard of proof in sexual harassment hearings than has been required in hearings involving other forms of harassment committed by students; and
  • Holding schools accountable for their failed responses to sexual harassment only when they are "deliberately indifferent," while requiring schools to "take prompt and effective steps reasonably calculated to end harassment, eliminate the hostile environment, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects" in cases of harassment based on race, national origin, or disability.

"The regulations absolutely fail to consider the experiences, challenges, and needs of students with disabilities, who already face additional barriers to education," said Selene Almazan, legal director at Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates.

While the Education Department has framed its policy as "historic action to strengthen Title IX protections for all students" based on "years of wide-ranging research, careful deliberation, and critical input" from experts and survivors, Almazan accused the administration of choosing to "ignore research and best practices that fully support the rights of students with disabilities."

Ashley Sawyer, policy director at Girls for Gender Equity, warned that "the new Title IX regulations are a blatant threat to the years of work to create safe, supportive academic environments for students across the gender spectrum."

"We want to do everything we can to ensure that the true spirit and original intent of Title IX remains," Sawyer said, "to ensure that everyone has meaningful access to education, without being hindered by sexual violence."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo