SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In this screenshot taken from a Senate Television webcast, legal counsel for President Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, answers a question from a senator during impeachment proceedings in the Senate chamber at the U.S. Capitol on January 29, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Senate Television via Getty Images)
'Apologia for Authoritarianism': Trump Lawyer Argues President Can Do Whatever He Wants to Boost Reelection Chances
"They are saying that abuses of power in order to get reelected could be considered in the national interest and therefore not impeachable. If that doesn't worry you I just don't know what to say."
Jan 29, 2020
Lawmakers and legal analysts observing President Donald Trump's ongoing Senate trial voiced alarm at a brazen and sweeping line of defense offered Wednesday by Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz: "If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
Dershowitz's argument during a Senate question-and-answer session reverberated across Capitol Hill and social media, sparking warnings that--if accepted--Trump or any other president would be free to do whatever they please as long as they can claim they were acting to advance their chances of reelection.
"This of course would mean that a president could not be impeached for doing literally anything in the service of his own reelection," tweeted Cornell Law professor Josh Chafetz.
One observer described Dershowitz's claim as an "apologia for authoritarianism," and another remarked: "I'm not sure even kings had such powers."
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House impeachment manager and chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said Dershowitz's defense suggests presidents have free rein to cheat in elections to boost their hopes of victory.
"If you say you can't hold a president accountable in an election year where they're trying to cheat in that election," said Schiff, "then you are giving them carte blanche."
Dershowitz's assertion Wednesday represented the most extreme version of the shift among the president's defenders from "arguing Trump shouldn't be removed from office because he didn't do what witnesses and Democrats have accused him of" to "arguing that he shouldn't be removed because he has the right to do basically anything he likes, as long as it doesn't violate a specific criminal statute," noted HuffPost's Ryan Reilly and Arthur Delaney.
Democratic senators who witnessed Dershowitz's argument were startled by the implications of his latest defense of Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations into his Democratic political rivals.
"They are saying that abuses of power in order to get reelected could be considered in the national interest and therefore not impeachable," tweeted Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). "If that doesn't worry you I just don't know what to say."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called Dershowitz's defense "bananas."
"It's all out in the open now," said Murphy. "The president's counsel just argued that there is nothing wrong with any candidate for office soliciting dirt on their opponents from foreign countries. They're not even trying to fake it anymore."
As Dershowitz put forth his "extremist view of executive power" in the Senate chamber Wednesday, thousands of activists rallied at the U.S. Capitol building to demand that witnesses be called to testify in Trump's impeachment trial. A Senate vote on whether to allow witnesses is expected Friday.
According to consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, which helped organize Wednesday's demonstration, nearly 50 activists were arrested on the steps of the Capitol building as they demanded an end to the GOP's attempt to block witnesses and additional material evidence.
"By overwhelming margins, the American people support the commonsense notion that the U.S. Senate should hear from the fact witnesses who can shed light on President Trump's utterly implausible claim of innocent intent in withholding aid from Ukraine," Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, said in a statement. "Now it's on the Senate to refuse complicity in Trump's attempted cover-up."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lawmakers and legal analysts observing President Donald Trump's ongoing Senate trial voiced alarm at a brazen and sweeping line of defense offered Wednesday by Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz: "If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
Dershowitz's argument during a Senate question-and-answer session reverberated across Capitol Hill and social media, sparking warnings that--if accepted--Trump or any other president would be free to do whatever they please as long as they can claim they were acting to advance their chances of reelection.
"This of course would mean that a president could not be impeached for doing literally anything in the service of his own reelection," tweeted Cornell Law professor Josh Chafetz.
One observer described Dershowitz's claim as an "apologia for authoritarianism," and another remarked: "I'm not sure even kings had such powers."
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House impeachment manager and chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said Dershowitz's defense suggests presidents have free rein to cheat in elections to boost their hopes of victory.
"If you say you can't hold a president accountable in an election year where they're trying to cheat in that election," said Schiff, "then you are giving them carte blanche."
Dershowitz's assertion Wednesday represented the most extreme version of the shift among the president's defenders from "arguing Trump shouldn't be removed from office because he didn't do what witnesses and Democrats have accused him of" to "arguing that he shouldn't be removed because he has the right to do basically anything he likes, as long as it doesn't violate a specific criminal statute," noted HuffPost's Ryan Reilly and Arthur Delaney.
Democratic senators who witnessed Dershowitz's argument were startled by the implications of his latest defense of Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations into his Democratic political rivals.
"They are saying that abuses of power in order to get reelected could be considered in the national interest and therefore not impeachable," tweeted Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). "If that doesn't worry you I just don't know what to say."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called Dershowitz's defense "bananas."
"It's all out in the open now," said Murphy. "The president's counsel just argued that there is nothing wrong with any candidate for office soliciting dirt on their opponents from foreign countries. They're not even trying to fake it anymore."
As Dershowitz put forth his "extremist view of executive power" in the Senate chamber Wednesday, thousands of activists rallied at the U.S. Capitol building to demand that witnesses be called to testify in Trump's impeachment trial. A Senate vote on whether to allow witnesses is expected Friday.
According to consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, which helped organize Wednesday's demonstration, nearly 50 activists were arrested on the steps of the Capitol building as they demanded an end to the GOP's attempt to block witnesses and additional material evidence.
"By overwhelming margins, the American people support the commonsense notion that the U.S. Senate should hear from the fact witnesses who can shed light on President Trump's utterly implausible claim of innocent intent in withholding aid from Ukraine," Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, said in a statement. "Now it's on the Senate to refuse complicity in Trump's attempted cover-up."
Lawmakers and legal analysts observing President Donald Trump's ongoing Senate trial voiced alarm at a brazen and sweeping line of defense offered Wednesday by Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz: "If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
Dershowitz's argument during a Senate question-and-answer session reverberated across Capitol Hill and social media, sparking warnings that--if accepted--Trump or any other president would be free to do whatever they please as long as they can claim they were acting to advance their chances of reelection.
"This of course would mean that a president could not be impeached for doing literally anything in the service of his own reelection," tweeted Cornell Law professor Josh Chafetz.
One observer described Dershowitz's claim as an "apologia for authoritarianism," and another remarked: "I'm not sure even kings had such powers."
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House impeachment manager and chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said Dershowitz's defense suggests presidents have free rein to cheat in elections to boost their hopes of victory.
"If you say you can't hold a president accountable in an election year where they're trying to cheat in that election," said Schiff, "then you are giving them carte blanche."
Dershowitz's assertion Wednesday represented the most extreme version of the shift among the president's defenders from "arguing Trump shouldn't be removed from office because he didn't do what witnesses and Democrats have accused him of" to "arguing that he shouldn't be removed because he has the right to do basically anything he likes, as long as it doesn't violate a specific criminal statute," noted HuffPost's Ryan Reilly and Arthur Delaney.
Democratic senators who witnessed Dershowitz's argument were startled by the implications of his latest defense of Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations into his Democratic political rivals.
"They are saying that abuses of power in order to get reelected could be considered in the national interest and therefore not impeachable," tweeted Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). "If that doesn't worry you I just don't know what to say."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called Dershowitz's defense "bananas."
"It's all out in the open now," said Murphy. "The president's counsel just argued that there is nothing wrong with any candidate for office soliciting dirt on their opponents from foreign countries. They're not even trying to fake it anymore."
As Dershowitz put forth his "extremist view of executive power" in the Senate chamber Wednesday, thousands of activists rallied at the U.S. Capitol building to demand that witnesses be called to testify in Trump's impeachment trial. A Senate vote on whether to allow witnesses is expected Friday.
According to consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, which helped organize Wednesday's demonstration, nearly 50 activists were arrested on the steps of the Capitol building as they demanded an end to the GOP's attempt to block witnesses and additional material evidence.
"By overwhelming margins, the American people support the commonsense notion that the U.S. Senate should hear from the fact witnesses who can shed light on President Trump's utterly implausible claim of innocent intent in withholding aid from Ukraine," Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, said in a statement. "Now it's on the Senate to refuse complicity in Trump's attempted cover-up."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.