Julian Assange supporters demonstrate outside of the Westminster Magistrates Court on November 18, 2019 in London. (Photo: Hollie Adams/Getty Images)
Jan 21, 2020
As journalists and rights advocates around the world rallied to support The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald in the face of his charging of cybercrime by the government of Brazil's right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro, a number of observers noted the similarity to the U.S. prosecution of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and called for both men to receive solidarity from their peers and supporters.
"Those who looked the other way because they personally disliked Julian Assange when the DOJ indicted him under a legal theory that merely publishing clear, public-interest journalism could constitute multiple Espionage Act violations should reconsider where that road leads," tweeted NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden on Tuesday.
Greenwald was charged with hacking cellphones of government officials involved with "Operation Car Wash," a scheme by Justice Minister Sergio Moro to entrap members of the left-wing Workers Party, including former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The allegations charge that Greenwald's involvement in the hack went far beyond simply receiving the information--echoing U.S. charges against Assange.
"Prosecutors allege Greenwald working sources to find information and protect themselves went beyond normal reporting techniques and is a crime," VICE News reporter David Uberti tweeted. "That's similar in some ways to the DOJ indictment of Julian Assange."
As the Columbia Journalism Reviewexplained Wednesday:
The case against Greenwald happens to be almost a carbon copy of the Justice Department's argument in the affidavit it filed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year, which contains more than a dozen charges under the Espionage Act. Just like the Brazilian government, U.S. prosecutors try to make the case that Assange didn't just receive leaked diplomatic cables and other information from former Army staffer Chelsea Manning, but that he actively participated in the hack and leaks, and therefore doesn't deserve the protection of the First Amendment.
Assange has been held for months in U.K. custody in conditions that a group of doctors compared to torture, as Common Dreams reported in November.
"Everyone congratulating themselves for their liberal-minded support for Greenwald's right to not be jailed for speech in spite of their disagreements with him should apply the same thought to the USA vs. Assange," Defense Priorities policy director Ben Friedman said on Twitter. "The 1st amendment is for assholes, as J.S. Mill said, more or less."
In a statement Tuesday, Greenwald promised the prosecution would not stop him from reporting on the Bolsonaro government.
"We will not be intimidated by these tyrannical attempts to silence journalists," said Greenwald. "I am working right now on new reporting and will continue to do so."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As journalists and rights advocates around the world rallied to support The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald in the face of his charging of cybercrime by the government of Brazil's right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro, a number of observers noted the similarity to the U.S. prosecution of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and called for both men to receive solidarity from their peers and supporters.
"Those who looked the other way because they personally disliked Julian Assange when the DOJ indicted him under a legal theory that merely publishing clear, public-interest journalism could constitute multiple Espionage Act violations should reconsider where that road leads," tweeted NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden on Tuesday.
Greenwald was charged with hacking cellphones of government officials involved with "Operation Car Wash," a scheme by Justice Minister Sergio Moro to entrap members of the left-wing Workers Party, including former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The allegations charge that Greenwald's involvement in the hack went far beyond simply receiving the information--echoing U.S. charges against Assange.
"Prosecutors allege Greenwald working sources to find information and protect themselves went beyond normal reporting techniques and is a crime," VICE News reporter David Uberti tweeted. "That's similar in some ways to the DOJ indictment of Julian Assange."
As the Columbia Journalism Reviewexplained Wednesday:
The case against Greenwald happens to be almost a carbon copy of the Justice Department's argument in the affidavit it filed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year, which contains more than a dozen charges under the Espionage Act. Just like the Brazilian government, U.S. prosecutors try to make the case that Assange didn't just receive leaked diplomatic cables and other information from former Army staffer Chelsea Manning, but that he actively participated in the hack and leaks, and therefore doesn't deserve the protection of the First Amendment.
Assange has been held for months in U.K. custody in conditions that a group of doctors compared to torture, as Common Dreams reported in November.
"Everyone congratulating themselves for their liberal-minded support for Greenwald's right to not be jailed for speech in spite of their disagreements with him should apply the same thought to the USA vs. Assange," Defense Priorities policy director Ben Friedman said on Twitter. "The 1st amendment is for assholes, as J.S. Mill said, more or less."
In a statement Tuesday, Greenwald promised the prosecution would not stop him from reporting on the Bolsonaro government.
"We will not be intimidated by these tyrannical attempts to silence journalists," said Greenwald. "I am working right now on new reporting and will continue to do so."
As journalists and rights advocates around the world rallied to support The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald in the face of his charging of cybercrime by the government of Brazil's right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro, a number of observers noted the similarity to the U.S. prosecution of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and called for both men to receive solidarity from their peers and supporters.
"Those who looked the other way because they personally disliked Julian Assange when the DOJ indicted him under a legal theory that merely publishing clear, public-interest journalism could constitute multiple Espionage Act violations should reconsider where that road leads," tweeted NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden on Tuesday.
Greenwald was charged with hacking cellphones of government officials involved with "Operation Car Wash," a scheme by Justice Minister Sergio Moro to entrap members of the left-wing Workers Party, including former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The allegations charge that Greenwald's involvement in the hack went far beyond simply receiving the information--echoing U.S. charges against Assange.
"Prosecutors allege Greenwald working sources to find information and protect themselves went beyond normal reporting techniques and is a crime," VICE News reporter David Uberti tweeted. "That's similar in some ways to the DOJ indictment of Julian Assange."
As the Columbia Journalism Reviewexplained Wednesday:
The case against Greenwald happens to be almost a carbon copy of the Justice Department's argument in the affidavit it filed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year, which contains more than a dozen charges under the Espionage Act. Just like the Brazilian government, U.S. prosecutors try to make the case that Assange didn't just receive leaked diplomatic cables and other information from former Army staffer Chelsea Manning, but that he actively participated in the hack and leaks, and therefore doesn't deserve the protection of the First Amendment.
Assange has been held for months in U.K. custody in conditions that a group of doctors compared to torture, as Common Dreams reported in November.
"Everyone congratulating themselves for their liberal-minded support for Greenwald's right to not be jailed for speech in spite of their disagreements with him should apply the same thought to the USA vs. Assange," Defense Priorities policy director Ben Friedman said on Twitter. "The 1st amendment is for assholes, as J.S. Mill said, more or less."
In a statement Tuesday, Greenwald promised the prosecution would not stop him from reporting on the Bolsonaro government.
"We will not be intimidated by these tyrannical attempts to silence journalists," said Greenwald. "I am working right now on new reporting and will continue to do so."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.