Jan 13, 2020
Democrats onstage Tuesday night at the CNN/Des Moines Register debate in Iowa were challenged repeatedly by moderators on the cost of major plans like Sen. Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All--scrutiny that was missing in the first half hour when the questions focused on endless war and a potential attack on Iran.
"Wonder if CNN asked how much going to potential war with Iran cost?" asked artist Karla Ortiz.
"Amazing how the moderators didn't ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars."
--Sarah Lazare
Questions on costs and how the presidential candidates proposed to pay for their proposals appeared to use an analysis provided to CNN Tuesday by Larry Summers on the cost of the Sanders agenda. The majority of the questions on cost were directed to Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
But those questions only came in the second hour of the debate, and were absent during the discussion on foreign policy.
Progressives quickly noted the disconnect.
"None of the candidates who said they support keeping troops in Iraq were asked how they were going to pay for it," tweeted Sanders campaign national organizing director Claire Sandberg.
Policy analyst Dan Riffle was incredulous at the line of questioning.
"They just asked 27 questions about sending troops to the Middle East and preventing Iran from developing nukes and not once asked how they'd pay for it," said Riffle. "But not letting poor people die? Whoa, what's the price tag on that?!"
Social media lit up with commentators and observers from the left taking aim at the difference in approach from the moderators.
\u201cAmazing how the moderators didn\u2019t ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars\u201d— Sarah Lazare (@Sarah Lazare) 1579057574
\u201cWhy do Dems have to show how they will pay for it when Trump straight up says Mexico will pay for the wall? When Republicans haven't explained how they will pay for their disastrous tax cut? When this country spends trillions on useless wars? We can't find money for health care?\u201d— Wajahat Ali (@Wajahat Ali) 1579057574
\u201cAmazing how that works. No question about \u201chow we\u2019re gonna pay for it\u201d when Wolf spent 15 questions grilling candidates on whether or not they want to keep troops in the Middle East forever\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1579057292
"If you didn't ask 'how do you pay for it' when it comes to the disastrous war budget, bank bailouts, or oil company subsidies, you have little to stand on," said Sanders surrogate Nina Turner. "Show the receipts!"
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democrats onstage Tuesday night at the CNN/Des Moines Register debate in Iowa were challenged repeatedly by moderators on the cost of major plans like Sen. Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All--scrutiny that was missing in the first half hour when the questions focused on endless war and a potential attack on Iran.
"Wonder if CNN asked how much going to potential war with Iran cost?" asked artist Karla Ortiz.
"Amazing how the moderators didn't ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars."
--Sarah Lazare
Questions on costs and how the presidential candidates proposed to pay for their proposals appeared to use an analysis provided to CNN Tuesday by Larry Summers on the cost of the Sanders agenda. The majority of the questions on cost were directed to Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
But those questions only came in the second hour of the debate, and were absent during the discussion on foreign policy.
Progressives quickly noted the disconnect.
"None of the candidates who said they support keeping troops in Iraq were asked how they were going to pay for it," tweeted Sanders campaign national organizing director Claire Sandberg.
Policy analyst Dan Riffle was incredulous at the line of questioning.
"They just asked 27 questions about sending troops to the Middle East and preventing Iran from developing nukes and not once asked how they'd pay for it," said Riffle. "But not letting poor people die? Whoa, what's the price tag on that?!"
Social media lit up with commentators and observers from the left taking aim at the difference in approach from the moderators.
\u201cAmazing how the moderators didn\u2019t ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars\u201d— Sarah Lazare (@Sarah Lazare) 1579057574
\u201cWhy do Dems have to show how they will pay for it when Trump straight up says Mexico will pay for the wall? When Republicans haven't explained how they will pay for their disastrous tax cut? When this country spends trillions on useless wars? We can't find money for health care?\u201d— Wajahat Ali (@Wajahat Ali) 1579057574
\u201cAmazing how that works. No question about \u201chow we\u2019re gonna pay for it\u201d when Wolf spent 15 questions grilling candidates on whether or not they want to keep troops in the Middle East forever\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1579057292
"If you didn't ask 'how do you pay for it' when it comes to the disastrous war budget, bank bailouts, or oil company subsidies, you have little to stand on," said Sanders surrogate Nina Turner. "Show the receipts!"
Democrats onstage Tuesday night at the CNN/Des Moines Register debate in Iowa were challenged repeatedly by moderators on the cost of major plans like Sen. Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All--scrutiny that was missing in the first half hour when the questions focused on endless war and a potential attack on Iran.
"Wonder if CNN asked how much going to potential war with Iran cost?" asked artist Karla Ortiz.
"Amazing how the moderators didn't ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars."
--Sarah Lazare
Questions on costs and how the presidential candidates proposed to pay for their proposals appeared to use an analysis provided to CNN Tuesday by Larry Summers on the cost of the Sanders agenda. The majority of the questions on cost were directed to Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
But those questions only came in the second hour of the debate, and were absent during the discussion on foreign policy.
Progressives quickly noted the disconnect.
"None of the candidates who said they support keeping troops in Iraq were asked how they were going to pay for it," tweeted Sanders campaign national organizing director Claire Sandberg.
Policy analyst Dan Riffle was incredulous at the line of questioning.
"They just asked 27 questions about sending troops to the Middle East and preventing Iran from developing nukes and not once asked how they'd pay for it," said Riffle. "But not letting poor people die? Whoa, what's the price tag on that?!"
Social media lit up with commentators and observers from the left taking aim at the difference in approach from the moderators.
\u201cAmazing how the moderators didn\u2019t ask how the candidates plan to pay for wars\u201d— Sarah Lazare (@Sarah Lazare) 1579057574
\u201cWhy do Dems have to show how they will pay for it when Trump straight up says Mexico will pay for the wall? When Republicans haven't explained how they will pay for their disastrous tax cut? When this country spends trillions on useless wars? We can't find money for health care?\u201d— Wajahat Ali (@Wajahat Ali) 1579057574
\u201cAmazing how that works. No question about \u201chow we\u2019re gonna pay for it\u201d when Wolf spent 15 questions grilling candidates on whether or not they want to keep troops in the Middle East forever\u201d— Adam H. Johnson (@Adam H. Johnson) 1579057292
"If you didn't ask 'how do you pay for it' when it comes to the disastrous war budget, bank bailouts, or oil company subsidies, you have little to stand on," said Sanders surrogate Nina Turner. "Show the receipts!"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.