SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo speaks during an interview with Fox News' Laura Ingraham on Thursday, January 9, 2020. (Photo: Fox News/Screengrab)
Pompeo Says 'No Doubt' Soleimani Was Planning Imminent Attacks But Admits He Doesn't Know When or Where
"That is not what 'imminent' means. It's this kind of obfuscation, lying to Congress, and unchecked provocation that dragged us into the Iraq War."
Jan 09, 2020
Secretary of Mike Pompeo said Thursday there is "no doubt" that assassinated Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani was planning imminent attacks on Americans but--in the very same sentence--admitted the U.S. doesn't know when or where such attacks would take place.
"There were a series of imminent attacks that were being plotted by Qasem Soleimani, and we don't know precisely when and we don't know precisely where, but it was real," Pompeo told Fox News' Laura Ingraham.
Watch:
Members of Congress critical of the Trump administration's decision to assassinate Soleimani immediately pounced on Pompeo's remarks, suggesting the secretary of state is either lying about the supposed attacks or doesn't know the definition of imminent.
"That is not what 'imminent' means," tweeted Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.). "It's this kind of obfuscation, lying to Congress, and unchecked provocation that dragged us into the Iraq War. We will not allow that to happen again. Yesterday's War Powers vote will ensure that."
Other Democratic lawmakers weighed in:
\u201c- not ordered, just "being plotted"\n- no idea where\n- no idea when\n\nSay it with me:\n\nTHAT'S NOT IMMINENT.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1578666239
\u201cI\u2019ve been a member of the Intel Committee for over a decade.\n\nBeen briefed hundreds of times on threats \u2014 some imminent, some not. When targeting a top gov\u2019t official for killing:\n\n\u201cWe don\u2019t know precisely when and we don\u2019t know precisely where,\u201d does not constitute \u201cimminent.\u201d\u201d— Adam Schiff (@Adam Schiff) 1578671013
Pompeo, a driving force behind the Trump administration's hawkish Iran policies, told Fox he believes White House officials did a "dynamite job" briefing lawmakers on the supposed intelligence that justified the assassination of Soleimani.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, lawmakers from both parties condemned the classified briefing as "insulting" and said White House officials did not provide a shred of evidence of an imminent attack.
In response to Pompeo's Fox interview, Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted, "This is about as much as they told Congress in a classified setting."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who attended the Senate briefing on Soleimani, said in an interview with NBC Friday that he didn't hear anything from Trump administration officials that amounted to evidence of an imminent attack.
"The difficulty that we have, and I don't mean to be rude here, is that we have a president who is a pathological liar," said Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. "So could it be true? I guess it could be. Is it likely to be true? Probably not."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Secretary of Mike Pompeo said Thursday there is "no doubt" that assassinated Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani was planning imminent attacks on Americans but--in the very same sentence--admitted the U.S. doesn't know when or where such attacks would take place.
"There were a series of imminent attacks that were being plotted by Qasem Soleimani, and we don't know precisely when and we don't know precisely where, but it was real," Pompeo told Fox News' Laura Ingraham.
Watch:
Members of Congress critical of the Trump administration's decision to assassinate Soleimani immediately pounced on Pompeo's remarks, suggesting the secretary of state is either lying about the supposed attacks or doesn't know the definition of imminent.
"That is not what 'imminent' means," tweeted Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.). "It's this kind of obfuscation, lying to Congress, and unchecked provocation that dragged us into the Iraq War. We will not allow that to happen again. Yesterday's War Powers vote will ensure that."
Other Democratic lawmakers weighed in:
\u201c- not ordered, just "being plotted"\n- no idea where\n- no idea when\n\nSay it with me:\n\nTHAT'S NOT IMMINENT.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1578666239
\u201cI\u2019ve been a member of the Intel Committee for over a decade.\n\nBeen briefed hundreds of times on threats \u2014 some imminent, some not. When targeting a top gov\u2019t official for killing:\n\n\u201cWe don\u2019t know precisely when and we don\u2019t know precisely where,\u201d does not constitute \u201cimminent.\u201d\u201d— Adam Schiff (@Adam Schiff) 1578671013
Pompeo, a driving force behind the Trump administration's hawkish Iran policies, told Fox he believes White House officials did a "dynamite job" briefing lawmakers on the supposed intelligence that justified the assassination of Soleimani.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, lawmakers from both parties condemned the classified briefing as "insulting" and said White House officials did not provide a shred of evidence of an imminent attack.
In response to Pompeo's Fox interview, Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted, "This is about as much as they told Congress in a classified setting."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who attended the Senate briefing on Soleimani, said in an interview with NBC Friday that he didn't hear anything from Trump administration officials that amounted to evidence of an imminent attack.
"The difficulty that we have, and I don't mean to be rude here, is that we have a president who is a pathological liar," said Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. "So could it be true? I guess it could be. Is it likely to be true? Probably not."
Secretary of Mike Pompeo said Thursday there is "no doubt" that assassinated Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani was planning imminent attacks on Americans but--in the very same sentence--admitted the U.S. doesn't know when or where such attacks would take place.
"There were a series of imminent attacks that were being plotted by Qasem Soleimani, and we don't know precisely when and we don't know precisely where, but it was real," Pompeo told Fox News' Laura Ingraham.
Watch:
Members of Congress critical of the Trump administration's decision to assassinate Soleimani immediately pounced on Pompeo's remarks, suggesting the secretary of state is either lying about the supposed attacks or doesn't know the definition of imminent.
"That is not what 'imminent' means," tweeted Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.). "It's this kind of obfuscation, lying to Congress, and unchecked provocation that dragged us into the Iraq War. We will not allow that to happen again. Yesterday's War Powers vote will ensure that."
Other Democratic lawmakers weighed in:
\u201c- not ordered, just "being plotted"\n- no idea where\n- no idea when\n\nSay it with me:\n\nTHAT'S NOT IMMINENT.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1578666239
\u201cI\u2019ve been a member of the Intel Committee for over a decade.\n\nBeen briefed hundreds of times on threats \u2014 some imminent, some not. When targeting a top gov\u2019t official for killing:\n\n\u201cWe don\u2019t know precisely when and we don\u2019t know precisely where,\u201d does not constitute \u201cimminent.\u201d\u201d— Adam Schiff (@Adam Schiff) 1578671013
Pompeo, a driving force behind the Trump administration's hawkish Iran policies, told Fox he believes White House officials did a "dynamite job" briefing lawmakers on the supposed intelligence that justified the assassination of Soleimani.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, lawmakers from both parties condemned the classified briefing as "insulting" and said White House officials did not provide a shred of evidence of an imminent attack.
In response to Pompeo's Fox interview, Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted, "This is about as much as they told Congress in a classified setting."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who attended the Senate briefing on Soleimani, said in an interview with NBC Friday that he didn't hear anything from Trump administration officials that amounted to evidence of an imminent attack.
"The difficulty that we have, and I don't mean to be rude here, is that we have a president who is a pathological liar," said Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. "So could it be true? I guess it could be. Is it likely to be true? Probably not."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.